User talk:Charmk

Hello sir? Why are you trying to delete Ahmed Ghanam page? it's just a "Seeds" and I'm working on it. Please Hold — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adham Hamam (talk • contribs) 14:11, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

• Wikipedia is not a place to write a profile for everyone, the article topic is about non-notable character. Charmk (talk) 14:13, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

It's a translation from another wiki arz! — Preceding unsigned comment added by AhmedGhanam (talk • contribs) 14:17, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

• The Arabic article must be deleted too. Charmk (talk) 14:19, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Raylib, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. StudiesWorld (talk) 13:51, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Thanks Charmk (talk) 14:36, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello. Help copy edit for article. Thanks you. Cheung2 (talk) 07:44, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Envision (software) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.pm.inf.ethz.ch/research/envision.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lopifalko (talk) 07:53, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Draft:Envision (software) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.pm.inf.ethz.ch/research/envision.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lopifalko (talk) 08:06, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Envision (software) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Envision (software) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lopifalko (talk) 08:27, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Raylib, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:29, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Raylib, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GeneralNotability (talk) 14:52, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I just wanted to stop by and let you know I have changed the article you created at Andrew Kelley to a redirect to the Zig article, because it was so short being one sentence and nothing more in that that wasn't already in the Zig article. If you would like to add more to it, it is still in the history. Please do remember we need to see more sources which talk about Andrew and have some more details on him besides he created Zig. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 05:30, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Thanks Charmk (talk) 06:18, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello Charmk. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Young Dumb Thrills, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: In my opinion - and please feel free to disagree - a two sentence unreferenced stub does not a amount to unambiguous promotional content. As a compromise, I have moved it into draftspace. . Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 09:20, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

• Hello Shirt58. Nice decision, Thanks Charmk (talk) 11:38, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello, why did you not inform me of your tagging for my article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sadegh imani (talk • contribs) 12:17, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks, I did this now Charmk (talk) 17:45, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

I've removed your tag of that article because it was erronous, the article is clearly not promotional. I would reccomend taking a break from tagging articles for deletion for a few weeks. – Thjarkur (talk) 18:41, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

The article is about non-notable football player, I started a deletion discussion about it Charmk (talk) 20:51, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

On 24 September 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Zofia Poznańska, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Zofia Poznańska, cipher clerk to the Red Orchestra espionage group, was captured in Belgium by the Abwehr in 1941 and hanged herself in prison in 1942? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Zofia Poznańska. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Zofia Poznańska), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—valereee (talk) 00:02, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello,

First of all thank you for your help.

I tried according to the guidelines and guide of wikepedia to include a picture of the artist "Claudine Loquen" and a picture of one of his works (idans mages are wikicommons), but I can't do it.

Could you please help me?

Thank you so much in advance. Have a nice day.

--Raouldefrance (talk) 09:59, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

• Raouldefrance I checked the Claudine Loquen article and discovered that you have already added the images. Charmk (talk) 13:17, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi there,

While I appreciate the help on the article Allen Phillips Griffiths, adding the {{STUB}} and {{Uncategorized}} templates is unproductive on a article which clearly has {{WIP}} (now {{in use}}) on the top of the page.

Thanks,

--Mychemicalromanceisrealemo (talk) 09:33, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Good Morning Sir, I hope you doing well Please let me introduce myself for you .. My name is "Ahmed AlNeaimy" i'm 32 years old from Iraq, Living in Turkey, Software and Web Developer.

I'm a simple man "like any developer" who love coding, build softwares and share a lot of useful thing with people, I developed a new tool using PanguTeam Tool for Jailbreaking Apple Devices without computer, my new tool works on Safari browser directly without need to connect Apple Devices to the computer to be able to Jailbreak

,This was impossible since about 2011-2012, until I developed my new tool in 2016, and it's helped the Jailbreak community to Jailbroke their Apple devices instantly, the Jailbreak community is too big, and there're a thousands and maybe million of Apple Devices are currently Jailbroken using my way, not even that the Jailbreak, there are too many services are using my new way to sign iOS Apps with Apple Developer Certificate and install the Apps outside AppStore, and anyone can use it easily.

A lot of sites shared the news about my tool, in English - Spanish - Turkish - French - Russian - Indian - Arabic .. etc,

kindly check here: 1- 2- 3- 4- 5- 6- 7- 8- 9- 10- 11- 12- 13- 14- 15- 16- 17- 18- 19- 20- 21- 22- 23- 24- 25- 26- 27-

and many more sites shared too. I'm really happy and proud to help people and create something useful for them, and also to be part of the Jailbreak community, I'm here to ask you to make a page for me on Wikipedia please, i'll be very happy and thankful to be part of Wikipedia.

Thanks in advance sir Best Regards Ahmed AlNeaimy Ahmed Neaimy (talk) 15:01, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

• Hello Ahmed Neaimy, Hesham Hussain
  I will try to help by explaining the process and suggesting the right thing to do according to my knowledge. At first, the article is created in 2018 in this page : Ahmed AlNeaimy then deleted after a deletion discussion : Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ahmed_AlNeaimy and the page is protected from creation.
  Trying to recreate an article which is deleted per deletion dicussion as in this page : Ahmed_AlNeaimy_(programmer) is not the right thing to do in Wikipedia.
  It's deleted again and the page is protected which is expected.
  To create an article in Wikipedia about a computer programmer we must prove that he is (Notable). At first don't take this personal. You may be very great programmer, but to have an article about you in Wikipedia, we need (3) things
  (1) Achievements - Read this section WP:CREATIVE - for example "The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of an independent and notable work (for example, a book, film, or television series, but usually not a single episode of a television series) or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews." - If that thing already have a Wikipedia article (This will be very helpful).
  (2) Significant-coverage in reliable secondary resources about the article topic itself. This means multiple resources about Ahmed himself that talk about him - something like many paragraphs written in books or newspapers for example. Not just a passing mention in a technical article.
  (3) No Conflict of Interest - To have fair content about the subject, the article is expected to be written by other people (not Ahmed, not anyone who have personal connection with him).
  Summary The article is deleted because the first and the second conditions are not satisfied. In the future when these secondary resources that talk about Ahmed in details exist, and when one of his projects becomes notable, it will be more easy to have a Wikipedia article. In this case someone else (not Ahmed) can start by writing a draft, then submitting it through (Articles for Creation) process. Charmk (talk) 21:06, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello Mr Charmk
Thank you so much about being a helper person , I understand you and I think Ahmed will understand too . So Mr Ahmed Neaimy The Requirements To be Notable as Mr Charmk said like the following part such work must have been the primary subject of an independent and notable work (for example, a book, film, or television series, but usually not a single episode of a television series) or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews. Hesham Hussain (talk) 06:27, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

You are welcome Charmk (talk) 11:27, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Charmk. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Citrine (programming language), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 05:11, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Bot0612 We already have the article in the main space, So this old draft could be deleted. Charmk (talk) 00:47, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Charmk. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Citrine".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:48, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Charmk. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nenad Rakocevic".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:51, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Charmk. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jai (programming language), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:02, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for your recent edit to Wicked Game (film), but please take care not to add {{stub}} to an article which already has a specific stub tag. Thanks. PamD 07:34, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

PamD Ok, Thank you very much. Charmk (talk) 03:18, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

... like {{uncategorised}} go at the bottom of the article, btw. Usedtobecool ☎️ 15:52, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Usedtobecool Thanks Charmk (talk) 19:56, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

The article DearImGui has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Far from notable, WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MarioGom (talk) 16:23, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

MarioGom Thanks for the review Charmk (talk) 20:17, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Charmk. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jai".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:08, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Charmk. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:DearImGui, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

thanks for your edits; can I remove the OneSource link yet? Martin Kealey (talk) 18:54, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Martin Kealey Yes, Thanks for updating the article. Charmk (talk) 07:49, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi,

We need a ref to support your addition that Carbon (programming language) was influenced by Rust. When this came up before, I checked the page, but as far as I can tell none of these articles directly support the claim that Rust influenced Carbon: https://www.phoneworld.com.pk/carbon-a-new-programming-language-from-google-as-a-c-successor/ https://mybroadband.co.za/news/software/453410-googles-carbon-programming-language-aims-to-replace-c.html https://thenewstack.io/google-launches-carbon-an-experimental-replacement-for-c/

The only page that mentions influenced by Rust is this GitHub text file. Which I'm not sure counts as a good enough source, especially because it only states that the governance/evolution process was influenced by Rust: https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/blob/trunk/docs/project/evolution.md

I've removed the edit again for now. But please don't hold it personally -- let me know if you have a better reference.

Thanks! Caleb Stanford (talk) 14:25, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Caleb Stanford I agree with you, Thank you very much. Charmk (talk) 08:49, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Charmk. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "DearImGui".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:37, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Since you're adding {{stub}} tags to articles, please be aware, per WP:TAGSTUB, that stub tags go after category tags and that stub tags should be preceded by two blank lines. Regards, Dan Bloch (talk) 05:20, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Danbloch Thanks for the useful information. Charmk (talk) 06:26, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Jueves (song). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 14:39, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Hi Charmk,

I noticed your edit on the Timeline of programming languages and your work on a previous draft of Jai (by Jonathan Blow). I find the situation about the Jai language quite curious, particularily in comparison to Mojo and its creator (Chris Lattner). Arguably, they are both in similar categories of notability, in terms of personally and the language(s) they have created. Yet, Mojo has an article and Jai does not.

Wikipedia lists the Jai (programming language) language to be found by search engines (which then redirects to Jonathan's page) and references the Jai programming language (at least here- Jai and here- Jonathan and Jai), so I can see how new editors or casual readers encountering the topic can get confused about the situation. Thus this could be the cause of them attempting to update programming related articles with Jai information.

There is an argument that the language is being treated strangely, because of how it's listed for search engines and then redirected, and it would seem to be more informative to have an article or at least a stub (and include the link to Jonathan's page). From conducting a casual search, there does seem possibly enough for you to give it another shot.Wukuendo (talk) 18:00, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Wukuendo Jai still under development and Jonathan provides Beta access to a small group of developers. We can't create a Wikipedia article about Jai if it's not released for public and covered by reliable and independent sources after release. These sources must provide significant coverage too. Once the Jai language is released and such coverage exist, we can go and write the Jai article. Charmk (talk) 04:15, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Dear sir, I have linked the article, plz have a look . Thank you for response. 🙏 CoolBoyMe (talk) 15:06, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

CoolBoyMe Nice update, Thanks.Charmk (talk) 15:08, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Ragia Islam. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 16:12, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to 2023 Football Tasmania season. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JoeNMLC (talk) 20:50, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:43, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Significa liberdade Thanks. Charmk (talk) 13:48, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Hey @Charmk. Your wiki edit anniversary is today, marking 8 years of dedicated contributions to English Wikipedia. Your passion for sharing knowledge and your remarkable contributions have not only enriched the project, but also inspired countless others to contribute. Thank you for your amazing contributions. Wishing you many more wonderful years ahead in the Wiki journey and a happy 2026 ahead. :) -❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ ✉ 15:02, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ Thank you very much. :) Charmk (talk) 03:17, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

- ❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ ✉ 15:26, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Charmk. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the Edit Request Wizard), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.

Specifically I noticed that the majority of your content contributions are related to Mahmoud Samir Fayed or projects created by him: PWCT, Ring (programming language), LASCNN algorithm. This is very suspicious, so please state whether you have a conflict of interest. SmartSE (talk) 11:48, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

SmartSE Thanks for your suggestion. I have no conflict of interest, but I am a native Arabic speaker and have access to Arabic resources on these topics. I have personally used the Ring language for some time and have watched several Arabic videos about it from Hassouna Academy (YouTube). When writing about such topics, I write from a neutral point of view and include criticism sections in each article using third‑party resources. Charmk (talk) 12:12, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

Oh look: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mahmoud Fayed/Archive. I guess you're lying then. SmartSE (talk) 12:14, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

SmartSE I am surprised that he does that. To clarify, My edits are based on my experience with the related technologies, not on any personal connection. I’m not involved in the case you mentioned, but I understand why the overlap in topics might raise concerns. If you notice any specific edits that need review, I’m happy to look at them. Charmk (talk) 12:31, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

You can lie all you like, but your contributions speak for themselves and this is one of the clearest WP:DUCK cases I can recall. You'll soon be blocked and the articles deleted per WP:CSD#G5. SmartSE (talk) 12:57, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

SmartSE As a native Arabic speaker from the Middle East, and because his projects are the only open‑source programming‑language projects developed in the region and used internationally, I used to see him as a hero. But after learning that he created an account to promote his own projects on Wikipedia, I found that to be a foolish decision. From the discussions, it was clear he was young at the time and unfamiliar with Wikipedia’s rules. He was trying to promote his free software through Wikipedia, which is not acceptable. Creating multiple accounts was also a poor choice, especially since it can easily be detected through IP checks. If he really did that, there are two possibilities: either he didn’t understand basic networking—which would be surprising for someone who created a programming language—or several fans happened to be using the same network. In any case, after discovering all of this, I decided to distance myself from anything related to him or his projects. Charmk (talk) 16:08, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Mahmoud Fayed per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mahmoud Fayed. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

asilvering (talk) 01:11, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Charmk (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I am an active Wikipedia editor, and I use only this account. Over the past eight years, I have contributed more than 6,000 edits. While I may be enthusiastic about certain topics, every article I have written follows a neutral point of view, includes references from multiple independent sources, and adheres to guidance from other Wikipedia editors. I have also included criticism sections where appropriate and submitted articles through Articles for Creation to ensure proper review. Being blocked and having four of my articles deleted (out of the seven I created, in addition to many I have improved) does not seem fair. I respectfully request that you lift the block on my account and review each deleted article to determine whether it meets Wikipedia’s standards. Each article satisfies the General Notability Guidelines. Thank you very much. Charmk (talk) 10:47, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I recommend taking the standard offer. You should be prepared to disclose any COI that you have as required by the COI guideline or agree to a topic ban. voorts (talk/contributions) 05:50, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is irrelevant - you are blocked and the articles deleted because you are very clearly a sockpuppet of User:Mahmoud Fayed. It's not "fair" to our readers and editors that you have been promoting Fayed here for the last 19 years. SmartSE (talk) 11:05, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

SmartSE Please, I am not responsible for his past actions. I discovered the Ring language and its related projects through Arabic YouTube videos, and I found them interesting. Like tens of thousands of others who follow his work and news, I followed him on Facebook. It is possible that reading many of his posts influenced some of my decisions when contributing to Wikipedia. I am sorry for that. However, I always tried to follow Wikipedia’s rules and relied on reliable references when writing.

I kindly request that you remove the block from my Wikipedia account. I will avoid editing topics related to him, and I will continue contributing to other subjects as I have done over the past eight years.

I also ask that you review the deleted articles and make the decision that best serves Wikipedia. Articles written from a neutral point of view and that meet the general notability guideline and passed (Articles for Creation) review process deserve a place on Wikipedia, and you are welcome to revise or improve any content that does not follow Wikipedia’s style.

Additionally, I will state on my user page that I previously followed him on social media and read messages in the Ring Group, which may have influenced my writing style. This will help other editors review my old contributions more carefully for the benefit of Wikipedia. Wikipedia has been a meaningful part of my life, and I want to remain part of it.

Thank you. Charmk (talk) 11:39, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

SmartSE When I first wrote the Ring article, it went through a deletion discussion. Other editors advised me that the topic was not considered notable at that time, but that PWCT was notable and would likely meet the GNG if the article focused on PWCT instead. I listened to their advice, found many reliable sources about PWCT, and the article ultimately passed the deletion discussion with a Keep result based on other editors’ evaluations.

Later, more sources became available for the Ring article, so I submitted it through Articles for Creation. Again, editors advised that the available sources were still insufficient, and I accepted their feedback. Years later, when additional independent sources appeared, I shared them with reviewers, and the article finally passed the AfC review.

Throughout this process, I believed I was helping Wikipedia, learning from experienced editors, and gaining editorial skills. Having articles about PWCT and Ring—both created by the same developer—encouraged me to write an article about him as well, using independent sources. Since I followed him on social media (without any direct contact), I occasionally discovered new sources when he shared books or news about his projects, which helped me update the articles.

I now understand the issue: I created multiple articles about closely related subjects and projects, and I recognize how this can raise concerns. I will not repeat this pattern.

I am requesting the following:

1. A second chance, with a clear commitment not to write about these topics again. I am willing to note on my user page that I was previously a strong fan of the Ring/PWCT projects.

2. Restoration of the PWCT/Ring articles that meet the GNG, with an appropriate tag indicating that they may require improvement due to my past close following of the author on social media. Charmk (talk) 17:21, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

You are still not addressing the reason for the block. Note also that it is a checkuser block and that your IP address was found to be consistent with this account being a sockpuppet. I don't have anything else to add. SmartSE (talk) 18:45, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

SmartSE Thank you so much, I use only one Wikipedia account. My goal has never been to promote any subject; I simply write about topics that interest me while following Wikipedia’s guidelines. I am a native Arabic speaker, so the topics I worked on were naturally interesting to me. I live in Saudi Arabia, and because of my job requirements I often use multiple public and private internet networks across the city.

I have explained everything in good faith regarding the COI concerns and the articles I created. I trust you and the experienced administrators to review the situation fairly. I always follow expert advice and try to learn from it. I am not asking for too much—just a second chance for someone who has contributed to the project for eight years. I am someone who is here to learn, improve, and contribute positively to the project. Charmk (talk) 19:10, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

@Charmk, I don't like blocking people who are contributing to wikipedia, and I'd much prefer that you are able to be unblocked and return to normal editing. Your G5'd articles could then even be restored on request, unless the responding admin has some reason to hesitate in any specific case. It's possible that the responding admin would accept an unblock, with a conditional topic ban from Mahmoud Fayed and projects worked on by Mahmoud Fayed. But I don't think that topic ban would be necessary - provided that you disclose the COI openly. -- asilvering (talk) 21:30, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

asilvering Thank you very much. I will state on my user page that I was previously a fan of the PWCT/Ring projects to a degree that I now consider a potential conflict of interest (after learning more about this issue on Wikipedia). I will no longer edit articles related to PWCT/Ring. With respect to restoring articles that already meet the GNG, such as the PWCT/Ring articles, I will leave that decision to other contributors who have more experience than I do and who do not have a COI. Thanks.Charmk (talk) 21:40, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

@Asilvering: This user is clearly WP:NOTHERE as they are only interested in promoting Fayed. This has been going on for 19 years now! If it weren't for the block, I would be proposing a ban and I am fairly sure how the community would feel about it. That they still have not admitted what's going on is not a good sign either. SmartSE (talk) 22:35, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

@asilvering, @SmartSE I have successfully created multiple Wikipedia articles, including raylib, Sourcetrail, and Robert Griesemer, and I have helped tag thousands of articles. I understand that my editing pattern created the appearance of coordinated promotion, and I recognize why this raised serious concerns even though that was never my intention; I also acknowledge that my strong interest in PWCT, Ring, and related topics amounted to a conflict of interest that I should have disclosed earlier. While I cannot independently verify the technical details behind the checkuser findings, I can explain that my work requires me to use several shared and public networks across my city, including workplace and institutional connections, which may produce overlapping IP characteristics. I accept responsibility for how my editing behavior was interpreted, and to ensure that this situation does not recur, I am prepared to avoid creating new articles for a period and focus on general maintenance and improvements so administrators can be confident that my future participation will remain fully aligned with Wikipedia’s policies. Charmk (talk) 07:58, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

@Asilvering: Could you please contact an administrator to review my request with your recommendation (unblock + optional topic ban), or could you handle this yourself since the block was based on your decision? I would like to continue contributing to Wikipedia. I’ve learned my lesson. If I become deeply involved in a topic, I will disclose any COI and stop editing in that area. I will also avoid creating closely related articles, as that can appear promotional. My focus will be on improving existing articles. Thank you very much. Charmk (talk) 00:15, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Charmk, you've already contacted an admin by creating this unblock request. I'm afraid you'll have to be patient as these are handled by volunteers. I will not be unblocking, since I think it is important that the case is reviewed by an uninvolved administrator. -- asilvering (talk) 04:23, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

@Asilvering: Thank you very much for your time and your continuous support. Charmk (talk) 04:25, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

I want to state clearly that I am not Mahmoud Fayed and have never edited Wikipedia as any other account. I have never had any contact with him in real life or online; my only exposure to his work was through public YouTube videos and social media posts. If the CheckUser data shows overlap, it must be due to my use of shared and public networks. I request review by an uninvolved CheckUser. Charmk (talk) 04:43, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

I actually think this block appeal would be best handled by a non-checkuser, up until the point where CU approval to lift is required. But please stop repeating yourself here. This is counterproductive. Every edit you make to this page makes your appeal look longer and more complicated, and additionally keeps bumping you down to the end of the chronological order if responding admins are sorting by last edit date. -- asilvering (talk) 04:48, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

@Asilvering: Thank you very much for your help and guidance. I completely agree with your suggestions and will follow them. Charmk (talk) 04:51, 11 February 2026 (UTC)