User talk:ChastityArgyle

Can you confirm that you're a member of the Australia Labor Party? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2026-44099-26 (talk) 05:09, 19 August 2026 (UTC)

Nope, not a member of a political party. Can you confirm you're a member of a political party? ChastityArgyle (talk) 05:12, 19 August 2026 (UTC)

Not a member of any party. Why is every page you've ever created connected to the Labor Party and unionism? ~2026-44099-26 (talk) 05:20, 19 August 2026 (UTC)

I'm a unionist and have an interest in political history, I think that's clear based on my profile. ChastityArgyle (talk) 05:21, 19 August 2026 (UTC)

OK, so you have a clear bias to hide information from the public about Labor Party. Why were you trying to trick me into thinking I wasn't allowed to make Wiki edits without an account? ~2026-44099-26 (talk) 05:22, 19 August 2026 (UTC)

I'm not sure what kind of delusion you're under, but "trying to trick you" is absolute nonsense.
You are attempting to make an obvious smear (a bad faith edit) by linking the subject to her partner re: a conviction given more than a decade before their marriage and has no place on her page - you should find consensus on the talk page before attempting it again. Otherwise, you will be referred to administrators. This was discussed and resolved 9 years ago. Nothing is being hidden, in fact it is prominently on Michael Coutts-Trotter's page, where you are also free to make edits. ChastityArgyle (talk) 05:35, 19 August 2026 (UTC)

If you weren't trying to dissuade me, why did you raise it in the first place? You keep reverting an edit which states that her husband "is a senior NSW public servant", which is far less relevant to the average reader than his conviction for heroin dealing. ~2026-44099-26 (talk) 05:48, 19 August 2026 (UTC)

I raised it because it's very conspicuous that the only edit you have ever made is on an IP account, and is an attempt to smear a senior politician. You just don't seem to get it. ChastityArgyle (talk) 05:54, 19 August 2026 (UTC)

Hi ChastityArgyle. Thank you for your work on Jack Schmella. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice start!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 06:51, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi ChastityArgyle. Thank you for your work on Reg Broadby. Another editor, Bastun, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work on your new article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 11:55, 1 September 2026 (UTC)

The page Ellen Imelda Cashman has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://adb.anu.edu.au/biography/cashman-ellen-imelda-mel-12298 ; not compatibly licensed. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 01:00, 2 September 2026 (UTC)

This was not an unambiguous copy. Were the sources even checked against the entries or is this just down to a bot? ChastityArgyle (talk) 01:20, 2 September 2026 (UTC)

I checked it against the source using Earwig's tool and manually. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 02:53, 2 September 2026 (UTC)

Good on you. I guess that settles it then. ChastityArgyle (talk) 04:11, 2 September 2026 (UTC)

Hello, ChastityArgyle, I'm Bearcat. Please note that pages in your personal sandbox, such as User:ChastityArgyle/sandbox, are not allowed to be categorized alongside finished articles in mainspace, per WP:USERNOCAT. The page must stay out of any categories so long as it is outside mainspace, and this is not an optional rule that you're free to disregard or ignore.

You can provisionally list categories in your draft without affecting content categories by using one of the methods described here.

As the page has had to be pulled out of categories twice in three days, do not readd it to categories again, because draft and sandbox pages are not allowed to be in content categories. Note as well that there can be consequences for disruption if it doesn't stop, such as page protection or deletion and/or the temporary or permanent suspension of your editing privileges. Bearcat (talk) 15:40, 7 September 2026 (UTC)

Okay. Thanks for letting me know. ChastityArgyle (talk) 19:19, 7 September 2026 (UTC)

Hello, ChastityArgyle. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Senate Standing Committees on Economics".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:53, 19 September 2026 (UTC)