User talk:Fidjeri

Hello Fidjeri! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's elegibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 14:52, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Peloneous. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Doha, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. I have also removed the identical statement added to 2024 Summer Olympics whose citation was to a non-existent page on the Qatar Tourism website. Thank you.

Hello, I partially reverted your edits to Salman of Saudi Arabia as you added links to things that should generally not be linked; countries, especially common ones such as the ones you linked (China, Japan, Pakistan, etc.) should generally not be linked to, as described in MOS:OL, as well as dates, including the link you added to 2015. There is a reason those pages were not linked to before, and please take a look at the MOS conventions on what generally should and should not be linked. Thanks. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 23:26, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Zamzam Well. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. See MOS:OVERLINK. Please do not link country names. You have been warned about this previously. CodeTalker (talk) 17:34, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Frost. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Qatari involvement in higher education in the United States have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Frost 11:53, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi Fidjeri! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Justjourney (talk | contribs) 16:48, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi Justjourney, thank you for your messege and kind approach. I am aware of the policy, however from what comes to my mind at the moment, reversions i did, were on article that information i wrote was wrongly deleted time and again. Sometime by a user that simply used an ip, not even explaining why he deleted information. My guess is, he didn't like what is written.

I do my best to follow the rules, each reversion i did, is explained, sourced and backed with facts. I understand the point you are making. Having said that, i hope you approached some of those who deleted information, and explained them the policy. Once again i thank you for your messege, i hope you understood my point too. I will do my best to follow policy in the future. Fidjeri (talk) 18:47, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 19:18, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Fidjeri,

Thank you for creating Sana Yousuf.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Good start, however the page is not fully meeting neutrality and other WP guidelines. To overpass one event notability issue you have to work more on this page and demonstrate a lasting general notability

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Old-AgedKid}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Old-AgedKid (talk) 12:47, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Folkezoft. An edit that you recently made to Strait of Hormuz seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Folkezoft (talk) 19:07, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Yelps. I noticed that you recently removed content from Project Endgame without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Yelps ᘛ⁠⁐̤⁠ᕐ⁠ᐷ critique me 14:30, 17 August 2025 (UTC)

Hi, thank you for you comment, my mistake. i am working on an article that is named Project Endgame, so i removed the content. I thank you for restoring it, as i it is not ready yet. Once i am done, i will do things the proper way. Fidjeri (talk) 15:03, 17 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Josh0108 (alt). I noticed that you have reverted my edit, which mainly involved removing this section below:

"The Qatar 2022 World Cup took place under serious claims of corruption. Qatar was accused it bribed FIFA officials to win the hosting rights of the event. According to amnesty and other sources, human rights problems were common, especially for migrant workers, that faced unfair working conditions, high recruitment fees, unpaid wages, and little help or compensation after the event ended. To this date Qatar's laws against homosexuality and its harsh treatment of LGBTQ people still draw strong criticism. Same-sex acts can lead to imprisonment, and LGBTQ symbols were banned at the World Cup venues. Even though Qatar promised tolerance, many human rights groups criticized the country for not protecting workers' and LGBTQ rights during and after the tournament."

I removed it because I don't believe it belonged in the section due to two reasons:

1. It deviates from the main topic (which is Qatar wanting to host the Olympics). It goes from talking about Qatar's bid to a section about corruption regarding the 2022 FIFA World Cup that was hosted in Qatar. I understand that if Qatar were to host the Games, there would be controversy, but it'll only materialise if Qatar is awarded the rights to host.
2. The text, to me, is seemingly taken from another page with little changes to fit within this page's context. Also, it was most assuredly written before Qatar had launched its bid, so there is nothing in the text that correlates with the Olympics.

I get your reasons for adding this section, but it is not appropriate at this time. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.

P.S. DO NOT call me a vandal ever again. Josh0108 (alt) (talk) 16:03, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello

1. I can see your point claiming it deviates from the main topic. However i believe in the bigger picture. You cannot ignore this sort of information appears on other pages regarding bids, or ignore Qatar's controversial history, when it comes to international sports and tournaments, that is even before we look into the human rights abuse and other aspects that were problematic, when they hosted the World Cup. Overlooking this, i believe is wrong.
2. I should have written that the text does come from another page and credited it.
3. I am sorry for calling you a vandal, however, removing information without reason is considered on Wikipedia disruptive.

Fidjeri (talk) 07:34, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2025 Ethiopia Egypt crisis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2025 Ethiopia Egypt crisis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mccapra (talk) 06:46, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Nasser bin Radan Al Rashid Al Wadaei, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~2026-23353-6 (talk) 23:59, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

The article Nasser bin Radan Al Rashid Al Wadaei has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lack of notability and his age is unverified. The article provides no encyclopedic value. I'd say this can go on a list but doesn't need its own article. In addition, all sources are unverified.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. BelowFlames (talk) 18:44, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page India–European Union relations, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:57, 27 January 2026 (UTC)