User talk:HarryWurst

Hi HarryWurst. Thank you for your work on Panilla aroa. Another editor, Agent VII, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Passes WP:NSPECIES. Thank you.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Agent VII}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Agent 007 (talk) 15:06, 28 September 2025 (UTC)

Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia! I think your moth articles are too short to be encyclopedia articles. Perhaps it would be better to expand Panilla instead? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:32, 28 September 2025 (UTC)

Some editors don't like two-sentence articles, and would prefer that everyone Wikipedia:Beef up that first revision. WhatamIdoing (talk) 20:53, 28 September 2025 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Alexandre de Moraes. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ixocactus (talk) 00:15, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

Oh, no, it's highly interesting how Brazilian laws are broken, but the leftist want to hide it? Why do they do it, who is paying you, and what for? Very interesting question: why do you absolutely want to have it out of wikipedia, that is sensed to be an informative enzyclopadia ?

I am very worried about your censoreship.

HarryWurst (talk) 07:04, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

Your Panilla articles have the source https://ftp.funet.fi/index/Tree_of_life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/noctuoidea/erebidae/boletobiinae/panilla/ in it but it is shown as only "ftp.funet.fi". This makes WP:Link rot. I am fixing this for you. ~Rafael (He, him) • talk • guestbook • projects 03:46, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello, HarryWurst,

Thank you for creating Morosaphycita.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Nice start! The links are bare URLs, please use the {{cite web}}: Empty citation (help) template or similar templates. Also, there are not enough sources, and it would be helpful to explain better the connection between the lead and the list of species.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Mariamnei (talk) 08:29, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Carineta

added links pointing to Berg, Sanborn, Jacobi, Francis Walker, Walker, Torres, Davis and Goding

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello, HarryWurst,

Thank you for creating Meleonoma flavilineata.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please try to add more sources and to add more details to the citations. Have a great day!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Mariamnei (talk) 08:28, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

Which other sources do you want? The original description is the source' all other sources are void, because they are not reliable. So why hanging this over every species of moths? That's completely unlogical from the biological side.

Yes, every body needs other sources but only one source is taken into account in biology: the original description.

cheers

HarryWurst (talk) 01:59, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from pt:Eudócia Caldas to Eudócia Caldas. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. Sample wording for this is given here. If you forgot, or were not aware of this requirement, attribution must be given retroactively, for example:

NOTE: Content in the edit of 01:25, January 25, 2023 was translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.

Retroactive attribution may be added using a dummy edit; see Repairing insufficient attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you must add attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. C F A 23:48, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for creating Tiquadra inscitella. I noticed that you included {{Taxonbar|from=Q13484168}}, probably copied from the article on Tiquadra crocidura. The Q-number is a Wikidata identifier for the species, so it should be changed to the identifier for the species you're creating the article on (in this case, Q13484163). If you can't find the right Wikidata item, one option is to remove the template – someone will come along to add it eventually, and in the meantime, having no taxonbar is better than having an incorrect one. jlwoodwa (talk) 02:16, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

Yes, I copied it from another page of that taxon. Right

HarryWurst (talk) 02:30, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Members of the Chamber of Deputies (Brazil) from Espirito Santo indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:07, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics.

You have recently made edits related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them. This is a standard message to inform you that gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics.

I have not looked deeply into the specific issue you are referring to, as there does not appear to be a talk page discussion related to your concerns, but calling other editors of a page "transgender activists" or claiming references are "fake citations" generates more heat than light and are thus unlikely to be helpful. Please try to focus on specific issues with content, as that is likely to be the most effective way of explaining your position. Thanks. Alpha3031 (t • c) 10:08, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

You seem to have not seached deeply. Please revise you idiology but you are following an idiotlogy.

Revise it, the links are mentioned? Why are you too lazy to follow them up, because of your idiotilogy? Yes, I know, many wikipedians are submissed to this: I regret it deemply, I stay prefer to the facts. Please revise it.

Regards

HarryWurst (talk) 10:35, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

You are free to edit the article yourself, as you are not blocked at present, but again I must ask you to refrain from making personal attacks on editors. Alpha3031 (t • c) 03:06, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi HarryWurst. Thank you for your work on Tiquadra nubilella. Another editor, Lynch44, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Lynch44}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Lynch44 12:09, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Metapherna, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Australian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 22:16, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Topazio Neto, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Htanaungg (talk) 07:31, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Mayors of Florianópolis indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:11, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zekelita ravalis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kenia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 14 December 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Route nationale 9 (Madagascar), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Manja.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Companies based in Brusque indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:48, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi HarryWurst. Thank you for your work on Vitor Azevedo. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please add more sources. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 13:21, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Amaro Neto when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 04:01, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Category:People from Porto Walter has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 19:48, 16 March 2026 (UTC)