User talk:Last of The Time

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tej Pratap Tiwari has been accepted

Tej Pratap Tiwari, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Kovcszaln6 (talk) 09:11, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vivek Kumar Birla has been accepted

Vivek Kumar Birla, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

The AP (talk) 17:56, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arvind Singh Sangwan (December 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
RangersRus (talk) 17:04, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Arvind Singh Sangwan

Information icon Hello, Last of The Time. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Arvind Singh Sangwan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:07, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arvind Singh Sangwan (June 9)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Thilsebatti, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Arvind Singh Sangwan to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Thilsebatti (talk) 07:27, 9 June 2026 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Last of The Time! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Thilsebatti (talk) 07:27, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nagapudi Chandrasekhara Aiyar (June 9)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Thilsebatti, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Nagapudi Chandrasekhara Aiyar to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Thilsebatti (talk) 08:00, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Last of The Time. Thank you for your work on Nagapudi Chandrasekhara Aiyar. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice start!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamneireach out 🕊️ 11:40, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

Thank You Last of The Time (talk) 12:59, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Last of The Time. Thank you for your work on Arvind Singh Sangwan. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice start!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamneireach out 🕊️ 11:42, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

Thank You. Last of The Time (talk) 12:59, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

June 2026

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Arvind Singh Sangwan when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:34, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Abu Daoud al-Maghribi

A tag has been placed on Abu Daoud al-Maghribi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

John B123 (talk) 06:27, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

Tagging an article

Hi, could you please explain to me why you added {{Notability}} in Amr Adib? This person is a well-notable personality and well-known in the Arab world, especially Egypt. You can google it and you will find many reliable sources, proving his notability. كريم أحمد (talk) 11:54, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

The subject's notability has not been established. The sources provided by you, do not provide significant independent coverage and are insufficient to establish notability. Last of The Time (talk) 14:39, 13 June 2026 (UTC)
@Last of The Time I created it as a stub and anyone can extend it. The person himself already has significant independent coverage and is clearly notable. كريم أحمد (talk) 19:12, 13 June 2026 (UTC)
and please remember that Notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article. كريم أحمد (talk) 19:18, 13 June 2026 (UTC)
Also, Template:Notability itself mentions clearly:

Do not use this tag merely because the page requires significant work. Notability requires only that appropriate sources have been published about the subject. It does not require that any editor has already named these sources, followed the neutral, encyclopedic style, or otherwise written a good article.

so your reason for tagging is invalid. كريم أحمد (talk) 09:27, 14 June 2026 (UTC)
@Thepharoah17 please judge about the article's notability since Last of The Time didn't respond and I'm the creator of the article. كريم أحمد (talk) 21:22, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

June 2026

icon

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For an unblock to be considered, you must:

  • Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
  • State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
  • Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.
Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:43, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

Administrators: If this block includes a Volunteer Response Team ticket number, this block was placed as part of the conflict of interest VRT queue and the user must not be unblocked without the express consent of a user with access to the queue. Admins lifting or loosening such blocks without appropriate authorization may, at the discretion of the Arbitration Committee, be desysopped.

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI