User talk:Phlogiston Enthusiast

Hi Phlogiston Enthusiast. Thank you for your work on Atascosa Lookout House. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice start!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 13:34, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

@Mariamnei: Thank you! Is there anything you would like me to do or assist with? Any issues with the article? pHLOGISTON eNTHUSIAST (tALK pAGE) 14:20, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for writing to me. It's certainly a good start and marked the article as reviewed. I would try to find more sources and expand it when you have time. Have a great day! Mariamnei (talk) 13:29, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2026).

Administrator changes

Vacant0

• Crisco 1492

• Deepfriedokra
• Hbdragon88
• Karl Dickman
• Worm That Turned

CheckUser changes

Daniel Quinlan

Vanamonde93

Mkdw

Oversight changes

Daniel Quinlan

Arbitration

• Due to the result of a recent motion, a rough consensus of administrators at the arbitration enforcement noticeboard may impose an expanded topic ban on Israel, Israelis, Jews, Judaism, Palestine, Palestinians, Islam, and/or Arabs, if an editor's Arab-Israeli conflict topic ban is determined to be insufficient to prevent disruption. At least one diff per area expanded into should be cited.

Miscellaneous

• Voting in the 2026 Steward elections started on 06 February 2026 at 14:00 (UTC) and will end on 27 February 2026 at 14:00 (UTC). The confirmation process for current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Bassnectar on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 11:30, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST (I am one chatty Cathy!) 23:34, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Ugh its really ugly in dark mode PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST (I am one chatty Cathy!) 23:35, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

TEST 2 (Talk)PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 14:52, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

@Phlogiston Enthusiast You can use WT:SB =) – LuniZunie_(talk) 23:38, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

TY! (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 00:47, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

At the ANI page about the Nazi, you mentioned having never seen that image (I'm assuming the lead one). It's actually not from the Munich Conference, as some might assume. It's from the page of Godesberg Memorandum, where H---er issued an ultimatum to Chamberlain over the Czech lands, which then led to the Munich Conference. Of course, appeasement totally worked. Cheers, ThatTrainGuy1945 (talk) 18:09, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Oh. That's good to know. Thanks for letting me know, becaausea that's very interesting. Cheers! (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 18:10, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello! I've reverted this, where I believe you accidentally restored personal attacks instead of removing them. lp0 on fire () 11:09, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

OMG! I'm so sorry, I think what happened is that I tried to revert right as someone else reverted it, and I ended up reverting their edit in error. Thanks for letting me know! (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 12:07, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, no problem! I don't think that's quite what happened (It was added before TAs were introduced); I think what happened is that someone used a misleading edit summary for a valid removal, and you got confused. I'll admit I was confused by it as well for a moment. lp0 on fire () 12:10, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Also, no need to apologise! Thanks for patrolling recent changes :) lp0 on fire () 12:11, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

No problem! I only said that because I remember seeing this specific vandalism at least once. It could be that I'm misremembering and honestly, I'm just going to drop the bone and move on! I know New Page Reviewers can be busy like cats on a tin roof, and I'm not trying to take time away from that. Thanks again! B) (<--- that is a man with sunglasses.) (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 12:23, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

No worries :)

I'm not actually doing NPP at the moment; I'm patrolling for vandalism and spam (which is why I saw your revert). lp0 on fire () 12:24, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Ah. I see! Thanks again. :K (I don't even know what face this is.) (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 12:32, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

I can't type :D at the start of a like without adding nowiki D: lp0 on fire () 12:33, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Omg Noooooooo D**: (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 12:42, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit
  

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 21:14, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Welcome, welcome, welcome Phlogiston Enthusiast! I'm glad that you are joining the March 2026 drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Cielquiparle (talk) 11:06, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2026).

Administrator changes

• Brendanconway
• Calmer Waters
• Hut 8.5
• Joe Roe
• VersedFenrir

CheckUser changes

Ks0stm

Oversight changes

Ks0stm

Guideline and policy news

• Following an RfC, the web archival service archive.today has been deprecated; links to the site should be removed.
• A request for comment is open to discuss retiring CSD criterion R3 in favour of handling such redirects through RfD.

Arbitration

• Following a motion, remedy 9.1 of the Conduct in deletion-related editing case has been amended to limit TenPoundHammer to one XfD nomination or PROD per 24-hour period.
• Following a motion, the Iskandar323 further POV pushing motion has been rescinded.
• The Arbitration Committee has passed a housekeeping motion rescinding a number of outdated remedies and enforcement provisions across multiple legacy cases. In most instances, existing sanctions remain in force and continue to be appealable through the usual processes, while some case-specific remedies were amended or clarified.

Miscellaneous

• Following the 2026 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: A09, AmandaNP, Barras, Count Count, M7, SHB2000, Teles and VIGNERON.
• An Unreferenced articles backlog drive is taking place in March 2026 to reduce the backlog of articles tagged with {{Unreferenced}}. You can help reduce the backlog by adding citations to these articles. Sign up to participate!

Hello. I see you're participating in the MAR26 event. I've recently reviewed edits of yours and I've noticed that in your MAR26 edits, some of them have been completed in February, before the event even started. Another time, you implemented a citation using the MAR26 edit description when there already were citations. Due to the rules, I also had to not accept this edit. Therefore, I encourage you to re-review the rules of the event. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 16:11, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Sorry, that's my bad. Thanks for letting me know! (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 16:11, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

It's all good. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 16:20, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Maddie Ziegler on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 12:31, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

...please see WP:OWNTALK. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 17:11, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Alright, sorry.Won't happen again. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 17:40, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

This one. Started with a complaint over (correct) reversions; an unrelated editor flew off the handle for some reason - a bit like our situation - but then apologized. After they did so OP continued to rant and cast aspersions at both that editor and the first they complained about (and attacked an admin), then mirrored the same behavior they were complaining about from the third party...Very messy and the boom rang hard. Nearly caught a CBAN. ChompyTheGogoat (talk) 21:22, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

I struggle to comprehend how these are real people every time I see something like this. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 13:43, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

This one has been going on for ten years. ChompyTheGogoat (talk) 21:00, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Christ. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 11:48, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

You and I had some rocky interactions near the beginning of your editing (and I was admittedly also being quite cranky at the time), so I feel that I should come back and commend you on your recent countervandalism efforts. I notice your name sometimes while I do RC patrol, so please know that your efforts haven't gone unnoticed. I see how hard you've been working to keep Wikipedia the best it can be, and I thank you for it.

ᴸᵃᶠᶠʸTaffer💬(they/she) 20:50, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you very much! I apologize for how irate I had acted, too. I was being impolite, and I shouldn't have been so hasty to get upset. I aprreciate all of your work as well! Thank you again. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 18:05, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

If it means anything, that irritation and impoliteness never came through over text, but thank you all the same, and I also apologize for how WP:BITEy I probably was to you. ᴸᵃᶠᶠʸTaffer💬(they/she) 18:31, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

No worries! It's good to know we can go forward without animosity. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 18:32, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

I was wondering what you meant by "thin and contained" just now but, now I've read your user page, I'm supposing that it's firefighting jargon, meaning a fire that is well under control, right?

And I find that we have something in common and that's a good billhook. I've been wanting one for a while and was able to get one from the Museum of Rural Life which has a great collection of vintage tools. They were selling off some of their spares last year and so I bought a billhook, brush hook and a sickle. Below is a picture of the billhook. It was made by William Hunt and Sons and the blade is 10 inches long. What I especially like is that the handle is quite long so the overall length is two feet and so it can be used two-handed, if needed.

I've cleaned it up and oiled it with linseed but haven't tried serious sharpening yet as I'm not quite sure of the technique and don't want to spoil the blade. Do you have any tips, please?

Andrew🐉(talk) 19:33, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

I'll try to dig up some advice! By thin and contained I just meant that the margins were getting very small on the textboxes, sorry. I have notes about it that I can get to you when I get home today. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 12:59, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Oh my god I'm so sorry! Seeing your image here it would appear we do not have the same kind. I have an English bill, and not an agriciultural bill. Yours is still really nice, though. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 13:03, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Ah, you have a bill (weapon). They are not really different as they are essentially the same tool but the military version was more of a polearm while the billhooks used for hedge-laying are more often made for one-handed use. I wanted something suitable for clearing brush and brambles. Andrew🐉(talk) 13:35, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

I have a billhook more so for my interest in HEMA and similar fencing sports. It's still interesting to see the differences and to share an appreciation for a beautiful tool. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 13:38, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Is the blade of yours bright or black? Mine has a dark patina as it would come from the forge which I gather is preferred by collectors. But military versions made for the nobles would be more likely to be polished bright. Andrew🐉(talk) 13:54, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Mine is not historical, unfortunately, but it does also have a nice black coloration much like the one in the image you provided. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 14:11, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

I know this is old discussion but while on the topic, I've bagged myself a Macuahuitl. They're pretty neat-o and I figured you would be interested. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 13:02, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Phlogiston Enthusiast. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Paulus Hector Mair at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, 🅑🅰🅖 ☿ 🅴🅻🅵🅵🅐🅱 06:19, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi Phlogiston Enthusiast, please note I have not added any extra content to the above article. I've also restored your most-recent request to the Requests page; please wait until one of those has been processed before adding any more requests. Thanks and good luck, 🅑🅰🅖 ☿ 🅴🅻🅵🅵🅐🅱 06:19, 14 March 2026 (UTC).

Hello!

I'd like to thank you for approving my first ever edit, even though I am sending this a bit late.

I really do appreciate it, even though it was a very minor edit.

Thank you, phlogiston!!

Regards, kaslmineer7999.

Kaslmineer7999 (talk) 00:03, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

No problem! I appreciate this. Here's to a great time for you. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 13:00, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

You forgot to sign your report. 🚂ThatTrainGuy1945 ^{Peep peep!} 13:39, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Got busy halfway through, just did it though. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 13:40, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

		The Barnstar of Diplomacy
		I saw you on WP:ANI, and I thank you very much for helping end the conflict with peace. Your contributions to make Wikipedia a better place have not gone unnoticed! ~~PolishHamsteryeah 22:39, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you! (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 00:18, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

I undid this edit that you accepted. It doesn't make any sense. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 19:28, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

My bad, then. Thanks for fixing that. Not sure why I accepted that one but it won't happen again. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 20:12, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks. We have some pages PC-protected that attract subtle vandals, so it's always good to slow down when looking at the changes. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 21:00, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

You posted this comment to the Clerk/Checkuser/Patrolling admin area. You might want to revert or place in the correct area. — Dædαlus^{+ Contribs} 22:46, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Is almost certainly LTA User:Andrew5. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:22, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Femke. I wanted to let you know that your signature does not meet the requirements for signature appearances. Your signature may have too little contrast. You can use a tool to check the contrast to determine if your signature meets the minimum contrast ratio of 4.5. If you have any questions, feel free to reply or ask for help at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 19:49, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

Alright, fixed. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 13:16, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

	A barnstar for you!
	Congratulations on being one of the top 5 pending changes reviewers during 25 February—25 March 2026! [source/credit] randomdude121    10:22, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you so much! (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 12:55, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Not a good use of that user script. voorts (talk/contributions) 17:47, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

I'll stop, then. Sorry. Promise it was in good faith. Also, why is everything stuck inside this green thing? (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 17:48, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

I'm assuming if it's bad and it just effected one hundred something admins I'm in huge trouble now. 0_0 (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 17:50, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

I would focus on editing rather than awarding barnstars. voorts (talk/contributions) 17:54, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep in mind many of us have several admin talk pages on our watchlist so when you do something like this, we get several watchlist updates. Not the worst thing in the world and I am sure you did it in AGF but looking at your stats, you seem to spend much more time at ANI (the worst place to spend time), Village Pump and other places rather than in article space so I have to agree with vroots. Focus on improving the encyclopedia rather than notice boards and the like. S0091 (talk) 19:32, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks! Most of the stuff I do in article space is anti-vandalism and pending changes, so it makes sense it would look scarce. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 19:34, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Think of it thus way. A personalised barnstar gives the recipient a buzz. A mass-generated one must be as meh! as a corporate Christmas card.

If you want to show off your medals - I can't remember where I got it from, but if you look into my user page you'll find the code for something called a barnometer. Best, Narky Blert (talk) 20:01, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Anti-vandalism is in article space so if that is your focus, you should have tons of edits in article space and AIV. You have little in article space and 7 edits to AIV, while you have 95 at ANI so, no, that does not explain it. S0091 (talk) 20:01, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Then most is pending changes, I'd presume. Either that or I'm too lazy. Either way, will return to editing articles more. There are very few fires in recent memory so I've probably missed some and will have to go back and edit those, for sure. Last one I remember was cranz-montana. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 20:06, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

-- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 20:48, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Was waiting for this one, I knew it was coming at some point. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 20:51, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

tis the proper response. you meant well, and that makes a HUGE difference. TBH, i probably spend too much of my time looking at wikidrama, too. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 23:43, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

• Discussion
• Thank you.

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		For your well-meant intent to brighten the day of active admins everywhere! - jc37 21:04, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

After finding that discussion in your user history, and reading it and your responses, and finding out your intent, I think you deserve one of these yourself. I think that was a nice thing to do. I hope everyone in that discussion who didn't receive one (including closer), subsequently received one as well. Thank you, and I hope you're having a great day. - jc37 21:04, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

• I +1 this – LuniZunie_(talk) 02:08, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you so much! You're very kind, I feel honestly so stupid but it's a learning moment. I'm not sure how everyone else would end up recieving one, but it is very, very kind of you to give me this. I promise next time I'll use better methods and be more conscious of the outcomes of my decisions. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 21:07, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

I understand why they asked you to stop, but I still think it was a nice idea, thoughtful, and a nice thing to do. As for the other admins, if you're so inclined, I don't think it would be an issue if you went ahead and shared one with each of those who commented, who didn't receive one. Adminship is a largely thankless task of responsibilities that all too often garners more negativity than positivity. And any chance to brighten their day should be embraced. Thank you again.- jc37 21:11, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Done, & thanks! (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 21:28, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Test to see what this looks like on my end. -- (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 15:27, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

No notification was issued. I do not know why it lets me put myself as my mentor but that's kind of hilarious. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 15:28, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Heh I think it works after all ...

"Your mentee, Phlogiston Enthusiast, was claimed by ‪Phlogiston Enthusiast‬.

"Reason: Test edit. Presumably this does not work and if it does that's kinda silly." CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 21:00, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Sorry to poach your golden goose but I really like this guy. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 21:44, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

probably doesn't run any checks... because it's not really a huge target for vandalism. it assumes the one using it knows what they're doing, i suppose. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 21:16, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

It could definitely be used for vandalism, the mentor dashboard I mean. For example, someone could set themselves as User: Jimmy Wales' mentor and set the reason as something derogatory, and have thousands of eyes on it. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 21:45, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for the Barnstar! 5 albert square (talk) 15:44, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 20:31, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2026).

Administrator changes

• ARandomName123

• Biblioworm
• Causa sui
• Djsasso
• Espresso Addict
• Fenix down
• Firefangledfeathers
• GeneralNotability
• NawlinWiki
• Northamerica1000
• Smalljim

Checkuser changes

Giraffer

Oversight changes

Kj cheetham

Giraffer

Guideline and policy news

• The content of Wikipedia:Writing articles with large language models has been updated following a request for comment. It now prohibits using LLMs to generate content, with exceptions for translation and copy-editing.

Arbitration

• Following a motion, the GSCASTE extended-confirmed restriction in the Indian military history case has been narrowed. It now applies to caste-related topics in South Asia, and the preemptive protection remedy has been amended accordingly.
• The arbitration case Pbsouthwood has been closed.
• The arbitration case Maghreb has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case will close on 7 April.

Commenting on permission requests by other users can be helpful, but this was not. It repeats exactly what the bot said and doesn't add anything. Toadspike [Talk] 21:03, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Alright, sorry. My mistake entirely. Redundancy is the worst. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 12:59, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Taylor Swift on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 03:30, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

Perhaps keep an alternative account for those types of tests? TheClocksAlwaysTurn (The Clockworks) (contribs) 20:49, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Good idea, but isn't that sockpuppetry? (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 20:56, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Wouldn't that fall under WP:TECHALT? Unstirredshading23 (talk) 21:00, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

I’m guessing it would. I doubt that the community would be mad over having such an account TheClocksAlwaysTurn (The Clockworks) (contribs) 21:04, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

There are legitimate uses of alt accounts: I have one. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry#Legitimate uses. However, for this purpose I wouldn't bother creating an alt account. Instead, do your experimenting on test.wikipedia.org. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 21:05, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

importScript('User:Ingenuity/quickNavigate.js'); // Backlink: User:Ingenuity/quickNavigate.js

importScript('User:Joeytje50/JWB.js/load.js'); // Backlink: User:Joeytje50/JWB.js/load.js

importScript('User:Ohconfucius/script/Common Terms.js'); // Backlink: User:Ohconfucius/script/Common Terms.js

importScript('User:Danski454/w2wFinder.js'); // Backlink: User:Danski454/w2wFinder.js

importScript('User:Polygnotus/Scripts/DetectPromo-v2.js'); // Backlink: User:Polygnotus/Scripts/DetectPromo-v2.js

importScript('User:Yair rand/UserBlind.js'); // Backlink: User:Yair rand/UserBlind.js

importScript('User:Anomie/useridentifier.js'); // Backlink: User:Anomie/useridentifier.js

importScript('User:Novem Linguae/Scripts/DetectSNG.js'); // Backlink: User:Novem Linguae/Scripts/DetectSNG.js

importScript('m:User:Awesome Aasim/SRGL.js'); // Backlink: m:User:Awesome Aasim/SRGL.js

importScript('User:Alexis Jazz/Kill-It-With-Fire.js'); // Backlink: User:Alexis Jazz/Kill-It-With-Fire.js

importScript('User:RedWarn/.js'); // Backlink: User:RedWarn/.js

importScript('User:BrandonXLF/Restorer.js'); // Backlink: User:BrandonXLF/Restorer.js

importScript('User:Awesome Aasim/editrequest.js'); // Backlink: User:Awesome Aasim/editrequest.js

importScript('User:Enterprisey/undo-last-edit.js'); // Backlink: User:Enterprisey/undo-last-edit.js

importScript('User:Evad37/OneClickArchiver.js'); // Backlink: User:Evad37/OneClickArchiver.js

importScript('User:Music1201/QuickLinks.js'); // Backlink: User:Music1201/QuickLinks.js

importScript('User:Epicgenius/pcreview.js'); // Backlink: User:Epicgenius/pcreview.js

importScript('User:DreamRimmer/massMessageLite.js'); // Backlink: User:DreamRimmer/massMessageLite.js — rsjaffe 🗣️ 23:19, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Some of these scripts seem pretty nice… might just steal a few TheClocksAlwaysTurn (The Clockworks) (contribs) 01:54, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Like the video I saw on the social media app that shall not be named (r), don't set your foot on fire. Unless you want to lose weight. Credit to @EEng for originally saying 🚂ThatTrainGuy1945 ^{Peep peep!} 02:12, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

What video? Why would I set my foot on fire? What's that got to do with weight loss? Please explain, I am so curious. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 03:32, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

(Checking in after the ANI thread) TrainGuy, I don't understand this either? MEN KISSING (she/they) Talk to me, I don't bite! - See my edits 09:54, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

I think it's one of the riddles the sphynx gives you before you are allowed to pass? (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 11:21, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

I am not a sphynx, but what I will say is that it was a Reddit video of a kid (in China) setting his foot on fire and then failing to put it out. Like how EEng said "Don't shoot yourself in the foot", I meant "set your foot on fire either", and since your name is "Phlogiston Enthusiast, well"...

I apologize for the awful humor though. I'll get better.

@MEN KISSING@Phlogiston Enthusiast 🚂ThatTrainGuy1945 ^{Peep peep!} 11:27, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

No worries! My username is actually that for a reason. I'm suffering from pyromania and more importantly I'm just interested in fires. Funny enough, I have a similar story to this! I accidentally tossed my shoe into a campfire as a kid, and I almost burned my leg going to get it. Thankfully, my mother prevented me from doing that. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 11:53, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

You know, I've always wanted to ask: your username is Phlogiston Enthusiast, do you have any particular thoughts on the actual historical theory of phlogiston? MEN KISSING (she/they) Talk to me, I don't bite! - See my edits 05:50, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

It's really interesting, I think. It was definitely somewhat more advanced than most theories of the time, and, despite being wrong, it most definitely influenced some correct theories down the line. I have a similar question about your username... XD. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 01:27, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Hehehe, I do have quite a positive opinion on men kissing, in large part because I'm an advocate for the acceptance of gay men in society. That, and I figured the name "MEN KISSING" would make a lot of folks laugh. And I was right! The reception has been overwhelmingly positive. MEN KISSING (she/they) Talk to me, I don't bite! - See my edits 10:10, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

What video? Why would I set my foot on fire? What's that got to do with weight loss? Please explain, I am so curious. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 02:49, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Can I also post on JFK matters, if legal and confidential? --Joscovit (talk) 17:55, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

What do you mean? If you mean you are trying to add information to the article John Fitzgerald Kennedy, we need a reliable source that can be accessed and verified. If the source has a restriction other than a paywall, it's unlikely to be acceptable. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 18:18, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

But I lived it, know it, know the confidential sides. Too bad, but I will defer. Do not want a RICO act assessed however. Bona fide data. IMO. Joscovit (talk) 18:24, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

If you cannot provide a verifiable source, don't add the information. Thanks. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 18:44, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

But you fail to see the question. You do not understand that I AM THE SOURCE. Period. Maybe two or three others, but many dead. You do not seem to understand. You cannot outsource my source base. I demand fair and equal treatment in these matters as a source. Sorry. Please rethink your thoughts. I can provide the data, and I am mostly the source, few if any collaborators. I can

testify under oath by affidavit. Some I lived through, some I discovered, some I researched, some I reported to others. Was also at DOD & NARA. I do not invent source data. You must double check any data I furnish on JFK matters. But do not ipso facto challenge me as a reliable or semi-reliable source. That is not fair or productive. I can only tell what I factually know. I would not furnish guesses or gossip or estimates or speculations. I assure you. (JS) Joscovit (talk) 19:00, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

You would need to provide a link to a source that can be proven true. If there is no link, or no way to prove it is true, it cannot be added. Sorry. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 20:23, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

I will be careful, wait and see. I can only tell what I know to be 99% true. Most of my items can be cross referenced with other data/page sources but not always by other humans. Most

are dead. Sorry. Joscovit (talk) 20:39, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi, Joscovit,

Wikipedia would consider that to be Original Research, which is not considered a usable source. all information presented in articles must be verifiable. unfortunately, you as a source directly, does not meet that requirement. it would have to be published, and preferably as a secondary source. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 20:37, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Not all meets that criteria. Sole source may need affidavit or may be in need of pardon, and must guard against any RICO act charges. Must be careful but factual. Facts ARE facts.

If a prime source cannot be adequately sourced as source, then what is the reason for WIKI? That means I would be censored and always discounted as a Cassandra from myth. NOT TRUE. Joscovit (talk) 20:44, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

the wiki is a tertiary source. unfortunately, if the information cannot be verified, it cannot be included. we do not profess to be a source of truth, only a source of verifiable information. perhaps there is another venue that might be more appropriate for such information? -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 21:01, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Yes, agreed. But that is in a private setting or agency setting before a hearing, deposition, affidavitizing, etc. As I said, I will be careful as to what I can/cannot contribute. Joscovit (talk) 21:06, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

realistically, I think Wikipedia is not the place for the kind of information you are trying to provide. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 21:26, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

But history and historical trivia annd historical review should be part of Wiki, at all costs, in all venues. Suppression and censorship is to be rejected. Free flow od data is always necessary. I will be careful and factual in any item I post on JFK matters. Thank you. Joscovit (talk) 01:07, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

I'm gonna level with you: I neither believe nor understand whatever it is that you're saying and you refuse to listen to the advice or the rules. I HEAVILY suggest that you stay away from that article and subject matter. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 12:41, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

If needed maybe. No censorship promises. We shall see. Amen. I AM AN ORIGINAL SOURCE, on that matter. (JS) Joscovit (talk) 16:55, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

That's not how that works. Please read WP:V. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 17:17, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Understood of course. As needed. But you (whomever anon critic) can also verify my fed govt employment with DOD/DOW and NARA and collateral knowledge and interface on the subject matter. Give it a try. Dare ya. Thanks much, anon. Someone should try to verify your status too, ANON. Bye. No more games on credentials, please. (JS) Joscovit (talk) 18:53, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Dude. That's not how ANY OF THIS WORKS. Also, legal threats are cause for a block. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 13:36, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

No threats. No comment, "DUDE." ~2026-26302-85 (talk) 22:40, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

I don't know why you're on a temp account now or why you're being rude about all this. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 15:27, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/Candidates/Phlogiston Enthusiast, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. HurricaneZeta alt (talk) 17:16, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for testing it! HurricaneZeta alt (talk) 17:16, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

No problem! I'm not in any trouble, yeah? (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 17:21, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

It works! Nice. What happens if you fill in the thing that says do not fill in though? Will check and report back to you. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 17:07, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

Tested. Nothing interesting. Just a spam filter. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 17:10, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

Test to see if you can edit wikipedia via w3m

I've deleted it. "I'm not in any trouble, yeah?" None at all. I also dropped by to say thanks. Test pages are just deleted after tests (a lot of templates have deleted subpages). Rjjⁱⁱⁱ (talk) 17:47, 29 April 2026 (UTC)