User talk:Mohammed Shahidullah-Bin-Anwar

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. MrOllie (talk) 15:40, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. MrOllie (talk) 16:48, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi Mohammed Shahidullah-Bin-Anwar! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. It’s not a big issue; just so you know. Schwede66 18:39, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for the clarification, Schwede66. I'll be more careful with marking edits as minor in the future. Mohammed Shahidullah-Bin-Anwar (talk) 04:19, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Mohammed Shahidullah-Bin-Anwar/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Remsense诉 15:42, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi. I am deleting your draft because the only place you are allowed to write about yourself is on your own user page. Note that you will NOT be allowed to link to your Youtube channel, blog, Instagram account or any other such content or to promote your skills, services, publications, recordings, etc. Please do not post your CV anywhere on Wikipedia. Deb (talk) 16:39, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Mohammed Shahidullah-Bin-Anwar,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Lordseriouspig, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Mohammad shahidullah bin ansar sandbox 1, for deletion, because it is a very short article that doesn't provide readers with enough context to determine who or what the subject is.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Lordseriouspig}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Lordseriouspig 07:46, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your feedback, Sir. I acknowledge the issue and will work on expanding the article to provide more context and relevant information. Mohammed Shahidullah-Bin-Anwar (talk) 07:59, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making edits generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Suleiman the Magnificent. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Altoids0 (talk) 17:56, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your feedback. I understand the guidelines regarding AI-generated content. However, the edits made to the Suleiman the Magnificent article were based on thorough research and consideration of reliable sources. It’s believed that these changes contribute valuable information to the article. Any specific feedback for improvement would be appreciated. Thank you! Mohammed Shahidullah-Bin-Anwar (talk) 18:22, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

It is believed by whom, yourself? Also, GPTZero flagged your response here as 100% likely to be LLM generated. If you did use an LLM to respond to me, please know that it is not permitted to use LLMs to generate talk messages.

Assuming good faith regardless, your changes ultimately amount to a rather tangential discussion of Ahmet III, who ruled several hundred years later. This is irrelevant to the article's topic. The image you included also does not represent specifically Suleiman's gardens and in wide renderings appears very far away from the text (as Suleiman's article has a lot of images as-is). The caption that the LLM generated was likewise too vague and unsourced.

Is there some reason why you are using LLMs? Are you using them as a translation tool? Altoids0 (talk) 19:59, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your detailed feedback. I appreciate your insights regarding the relevance of my edits and the image used. I will ensure to adhere to Wikipedia's guidelines in the future. If you have further suggestions for improving the article, I would be grateful to hear them. Mohammed Shahidullah-Bin-Anwar (talk) 15:08, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

Please stop using an LLM to respond to me. It is against guidelines and very rude. I would like to hear what your actual opinion is here instead of what ChatGPT thinks.

You (nor it) responded to my question, so I will draw out my hypothetical that you are trying to use an LLM as a translation tool. Please consider using an alternative one. Contributors to the English Wikipedia should ideally have a basic competence in the English language, or an appropriate, trustworthy translator. Consider checking out Wikipedia:Embassy, there's people there who can provide advice about translation sources and how to approach having disputes here. Altoids0 (talk) 10:32, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days, and you are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Note that this includes the war with Iran, as Iran aids Hamas/Hezbollah which Israel has cited as one reason for the war. 331dot (talk) 12:26, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Bangladesh-Zimbabwe Relations. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mekomo (talk) 18:02, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edits you made did not have an edit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on the talk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

or in the visual editor:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. If you use a registered account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Editor → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Amigao (talk) 00:15, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article English in South America is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/English in South America until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

~ A412 ^talk! 14:11, 4 June 2026 (UTC)