User talk:Norden1990

The article Pirate Party of Hungary has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources on the page, nor is the party relevant enough to warrant an article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Category:Kačić has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 17:58, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

Hi, this can be interesting for you!

https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_Secretum_Secretorum_(The_Secret_of_Secrets)_-_Louis_the_Great_of_Hungary.jpg

https://sites.hertford.ox.ac.uk/library-archives/secretum/ OrionNimrod (talk) 23:43, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Thank you! --Norden1990 (talk) 07:57, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

Category:Geőcze family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ^SMason_Garrison 01:02, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Category:Rhédey family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ^SMason_Garrison 01:06, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Category:Lépes family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ^SMason_Garrison 01:06, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Category:Kisfaludy family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ^SMason_Garrison 01:07, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Category:Albeni family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ^SMason_Garrison 01:24, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi Norden!

I think it would be worth to check the strange edits of this user, some examples:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Religion_in_Hungary&diff=prev&oldid=1287217051

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_Hungary&diff=prev&oldid=1286880108 OrionNimrod (talk) 19:32, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

At first glance, I don't see the user's edits as problematic, but if there is a content edit that is questionable, it should be resolved on the talk page. --Norden1990 (talk) 20:46, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

Szia! Szerinted erdélyi vajda volt? https://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Szilágyi_Mihály_(kormányzó)

https://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erdélyi_vajda

Voivode of Transylvania#List of voivodes OrionNimrod (talk) 15:08, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

Az 1458–1526. közötti archontológiai adattár szerint erdélyi kormányzó volt 1460-ban. De mindeközben a vajdai tisztség is be volt töltve, tehát a válasz: nem. --Norden1990 (talk) 18:15, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

Mit jelent az hogy erdélyi kormányzó? Forrásod van erről? OrionNimrod (talk) 19:19, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

Szilágyi Mihályról máig az egyetlen monográfia: . Korai pályafutásával kapcsolatban nemrég felmerültek kételyek: . --Norden1990 (talk) 08:33, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

Köszi! OrionNimrod (talk) 08:53, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi Norden1990. Thank you for your work on Stephen II Gutkeled. Another editor, Scope creep, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Big wall of text needs subsections.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Scope creep}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

scope_creepTalk 16:09, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

@Scope creep:, done. --Norden1990 (talk) 19:30, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Nice one @Norden1990: You have been working like a beaver. That is great. Excellent wee article on a super obscure individual. Much better. scope_creep^Talk 19:34, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Thanks! --Norden1990 (talk) 20:27, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:KovacsBela1908.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi, as start, feedbacks and extension are welcome! Rerum Hungaricarum decades OrionNimrod (talk) 13:30, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

After Nov 2025, this most valuable academic work on Bonfini's chronicle will become public domain. Anyway, Péter Kulcsár's studies are the best summaries in the preface or afterword of each edition. --Norden1990 (talk) 17:56, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the info! OrionNimrod (talk) 19:25, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

They copied your article! Great! https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gesta_Hungarorum_vetera OrionNimrod (talk) 12:43, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

And that's not the only one fortunately. --Norden1990 (talk) 13:12, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

Yes, I experienced this even with my written articles OrionNimrod (talk) 13:37, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi, weird edits OrionNimrod (talk) 13:24, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi Norden, what is your opinion about this date? It is ok? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Matthias_Corvinus&curid=272105&diff=1301203253&oldid=1300154635 OrionNimrod (talk) 19:14, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

@OrionNimrod:, yes, he was crowned on 29 March 1464, based on the modern medieval chronology published in 2023. --Norden1990 (talk) 20:32, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It will be held from Monday June 16 - Sunday July 13. There is over $3300 going into it, with $500 the top prize. If you are interested in winning something to save you money in buying books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for subjects which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested. Even if you can only manage a few articles they would be very much appreciated and help towards making the content produced as diverse and broad as possible!♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:03, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Szia, hosszú hallgatás után készen állok, hogy a szabadságharc katonai történetét röviden megírjam a főcikkbe. Tehát úgy gondolom, hogy azt, aminek nincs helye ott, azt kitörlöm, és, áttekinthető módon, röviden, beteszem azt, amiről szólnia kell: hadseregszervezést, hadjáratokat, csatákat. Rendben van-e így? A nem publikált hosszú, részletes szabadságharc története cikket pedig időszak, régió szerint részekre bontva, külön-külön publikálom, hivatkozásokkal a főcikkbe. A kérdésem az, hogy ezeket nem lehetne-e, az avatatlan trollok számára ugyanúgy korlátozni, mint a főcikket? Sylvain1975 (talk) 16:30, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Szia, amíg nincs konfliktus, sajnos nem, mert a Wiki szabad lexikon. Örülök, hogy végül publikálod, mert ezek nagyon értékes szerkesztések (valamelyest elkezdtem átnézni nyelvtanilag stb., csak sajnos nekem is behatárolt az időm). --Norden1990 (talk) 21:03, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Szia, már három 48 szabadságharcos cikket készítettem.

1. A régebbi, leghosszabbat (99 A4 oldal), amelyet hadjáratonként (őszi, téli, tavaszi, nyári) és előzmények és következményekként (a hadsereg megszervezése, fegyverletétel, a szabadságharc utóélete) külön cikkekre fogok felbontani és közzétenni.

2. Egy, ennek a negyedénél kissé nagyobb összefogó cikket (27 A4 oldal), amelyet egy, csak a szabadságharc katonai történetét bemutató külön cikknek ('Hungarian War of Independence of 1848-1849') szánok.

3. A legújabb (9 A4 oldalas), amelyet a 'Hungarian Revolution of 1848' cikk katonai részének szánok. Ezt úgy gondolom, hogy az eredeti cikk 'Austrians' és 'Russians' alcímeit törlöm, mert azok, zagyván és falsul, próbálták a szabadságharc néhány mozzanatát bemutatni. Helyettük lenne ez a cikk, amely a magyar hadsereg megalakulását és a szabadságharcot mutatja be röviden, időrendi sorrendben.

Később a nemzetiségek rész valótlanságait is ki kellene szerkeszteni a cikkből.

Mit gondolsz erről? Sylvain1975 (talk) 16:29, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

Egyetértek. A nemzetiségi résznél azért nézd meg, mi az, ami tartható, a szlovák, román stb. álláspontnak is meg kell jelennie, különben állandó szerkesztési háború lesz a vége. --Norden1990 (talk) 20:01, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

Szia, a román, szlovák, szerb, horvát részt egyelőre meghagyjuk. Csak az orosz és osztrák részt szedem ki, és helyébe a szabadságharc részletes bemutatását teszem. Az előbbiekkel később majd meglátjuk. Sylvain1975 (talk) 14:45, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi Norden! I see you created this, I think it is redundant and we could delete it as we have own articles with date Battle of Isaszeg. Many battles, sieges happened in the same location, but I do not see a group article like that, battle Lechfeld 910+955, siege Belgrade 1440+1456+1521 etc. What do you think? OrionNimrod (talk) 13:36, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

This is a disambiguation page, similar to Siege of Belgrade, Sack of Rome etc. --Norden1990 (talk) 20:11, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

I added a proper description, those are not the Cumans https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cumans_in_Hungary.jpg OrionNimrod (talk) 13:50, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the comment, I removed the image. However, the image is also incorrectly listed in the List of wars involving Hungary article. --Norden1990 (talk) 14:12, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

It also listed incorrect in many other foreign articles. I will propose a file rename, in Chronicon Pictum that image is part of the clan pages in 10th century, page 32. From page 194 https://vilagbiztonsag.hu/keptar/albums/userpics/10009/kalti_mark_kepes_kronikaja.pdf OrionNimrod (talk) 14:14, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi! I noticed your recent creation Ladislaus (bishop of Vác). I was about to mark the article as reviewed but wanted to quickly verify everything. In doing so, I stumbled on Ladislaus Szalkai, who is claimed to have been a 16th-century bishop of Vác. At the minimum, I think we need to alter the disambiguation for your new article. However, I'm having trouble verifying that either man was a bishop of Vác. The classic stand-by of Catholic-Hierarchy (a useful albeit deprecated and problematic resource) mentions neither. If you have the ability to share quotes or any accessible links that support either man's episcopate, I think it would greatly improve either article. Thanks for your good work! Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 22:02, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

Hello! Both of them were bishops of Vác based on modern archontologies. However, these are offline works. For Ladislaus Szalkai: , for the 13th-century Ladislaus: ("László (†1293?)"). --Norden1990 (talk) 22:24, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

Excellent—that's all good to go there! The only issue remaining that we should probably move Ladislaus (bishop of Vác) to something that disambiguates him from the other Ladislaus who was bishop of Vác. Since his death date is uncertain, that sort of rules that out. Any thoughts? ~ Pbritti (talk) 23:29, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

I have placed a disambiguation template at the beginning of the article. --Norden1990 (talk) 08:11, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

The redirect Rogwa Wodrata has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 August 29 § Rogwa Wodrata until a consensus is reached. TNstingray (talk) 12:16, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Szia, a tegnap draftba helyezték a szóban forgó átfogó cikkemet, hogy úgymond elég lesz a Hungarian Revolution of 1848 cikkben levő rövidebb leírás. Én a cikk alatt megírtam a véleményemet, hogy ez nem helyes, és hogy valóban jó lenne egy kis átalakítás a Revolution cikkben, például kiszedni onnan a katonai részeket, mert az nem tartozik a forradalomhoz, visszatenni a draftból a szabadságharc cikket és ott is csak a hadjáratok (nyári, tavaszi, stb.) megalakítandó infoboxait tenni annak infoboxába, és mikor közlésre kerül aa többi hadjárat, azokban lebontva beletenni minden csatát ütközetet oda, ahova azok tartoznak. Kérlek, te is írd meg a véleményedet a Revolution cikk alá erről. Köszi.

Sylvain1975 (Sylvain1975 💬) 10:32, 02 September 2025 (UTC)

Hi Sylvain1975, the problem you talked a lot earlier about those things privat in many user talks, all of us should talk about this in the relevant talk page where everybody can see and can make a comment. Talk:Hungarian Revolution of 1848#Article split proposal: Hungarian Revolution 1848 (March 1848) + Hungarian War of Indepence 18484-49 (June 1848 - October 1849) OrionNimrod (talk) 09:01, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

Hi, I see you usually do people articles, maybe he can be a good candidate as there is no English page https://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thury_György OrionNimrod (talk) 13:12, 25 September 2025 (UTC)

Thanks! Unfortunately, I don't have much time to edit lately. --Norden1990 (talk) 20:38, 25 September 2025 (UTC)

Hi, just for your information, some people mentioned the article length and the too extensive battle list, because this would be just a list of wars and not list of battles Talk:List of wars involving Hungary#Redundant battles so we decided to make the list of wars more simple focusing on wars, and we can make separate split articles where we can add battle/siege details, and the article length is more optimized with subarticles: List of wars involving Hungary

Example:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_France

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_battles_involving_France_in_modern_history (sieges also here)

OrionNimrod (talk) 19:36, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Records of prime ministers of Hungary is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Records of prime ministers of Hungary until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Shredlordsupreme (talk) 09:32, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi, I would like ask advice

1 Battle of the Ialomița#Background in the top section I write about the "raid on Krusevac" as in Palosfalvi/Jefferson book, how should I call the article, "battle of Krusevac" or "raid on Krusevac"?

2 Matthias, "siege of Boroszlo", what would be the proper name? Boroszlo? Breslau? Wroclaw? https://histori.ewk.hu/_userfiles_/histori/Matyas-Boroszlo.pdf

3 Matthias, "siege of Szabacs", what would be the proper article name? https://epa.oszk.hu/00000/00018/00058/pdf/EPA00018_hadtortenelmi_2009_01_036-061.pdf

Do we use contemporary names for medieval sieges? Or English literature name like Pressburg/Belgrade/Breadfield is prefered than the contemporary Hungarian name if those names exist in English literature? For example in English Palosfalvi book I also see battle of Kenyermezo and Vaskapu words. OrionNimrod (talk) 09:54, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello!

1. 1, I support "raid".
2. 2, further research is needed to determine what variant is more common in English (Breslau or Wroclaw, but definitely not Boroszló).
3. 3, "Šabac", since the area was not part of Hungary by the time of the siege, in addition to the fact that is more common than the Hungarian name.
4. 4, There is no unified position, the most common version in English literature (if there is one) counts. I do not support naming battles according to current political borders, as it only causes confusion. Breadfield and Iron Gates are typically neutral names, shouldn't be messed with. --Norden1990 (talk) 10:33, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

   Thanks! OrionNimrod (talk) 11:52, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi, I see you did already many medieval civil war article, do you plan to do this? What would be the timeline? 1440-41 or 42? Until the death of Elizabeth?

https://mek.oszk.hu/09400/09477/html/0010/722.html

https://mek.oszk.hu/09400/09477/html/0010/726.html

https://mek.oszk.hu/09400/09477/html/0010/737.html

I dont see above the Bataszek/Cikador But here, Cikador or Bataszek? Probably the same place

https://honvedelem.hu/hatter/multidezo/csatak-az-ev-elso-napjan.html

https://lexikon.katolikus.hu/B/bátaszéki%20ütközet.html + https://lexikon.katolikus.hu/H/Hunyadi.html

probably need more sources OrionNimrod (talk) 10:16, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

Hungarian Civil War (1440–1442) Feel free to expand OrionNimrod (talk) 10:19, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:RadocsayLaszlo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:CzinegeLajos.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from Sebestyén Vágó to another page. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. Sample wording for this is given here. If you forgot, or were not aware of this requirement, attribution must be given retroactively, for example:

NOTE: Content in the edit of 01:25, January 25, 2023 was translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.

Retroactive attribution may be added using a dummy edit; see Repairing insufficient attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you must add attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Kovcszaln6 (talk) 15:35, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Kovcszaln6. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2026 Hungarian parliamentary election, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please address criticism addressed at you. You have ignored my warning above, asking you to retroactively give copyright attribution. Please be more careful going forward, and ensure your compliance with our policies and guidelines. Kovcszaln6 (talk) 16:37, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi, I see you are creating a lot of medieval people articles, I found this is quite minimal Bálint Török OrionNimrod (talk) 18:56, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

That will happen someday. For now, my horizons extend to the Árpád era, or at most to the Anjou era. --Norden1990 (talk) 06:45, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi, I see you are dealing with politicians, please check the recent edits in these article

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_prime_ministers_of_Hungary&action=history

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_heads_of_state_of_Hungary&action=history OrionNimrod (talk) 12:59, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Thank you. This new editor is not the first to completely trash these articles. --Norden1990 (talk) 13:16, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Philip III Kórógyi, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Balaton was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 22:59, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi, Kinizsi article is imperfect, it can be interesting for you. Images are updating gradually on the Illuminated Chronicle article, pick them if you need, cheers! OrionNimrod (talk) 16:43, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Thank you. I'll look into both. --Norden1990 (talk) 22:38, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

I found an old family for you, maybe you are interested, no article yet: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=L%C3%A1szl%C3%B3_Medny%C3%A1nszky&diff=prev&oldid=1362639302

https://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medny%C3%A1nszky_csal%C3%A1d

https://www.mek.oszk.hu/25000/25079/

https://www.arcanum.com/hu/online-kiadvanyok/Kempelen-kempelen-bela-magyar-nemes-csaladok-1/7-kotet-C47F/mednyanszky-aranyos-medgyesi-CE4A/ OrionNimrod (talk) 09:18, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

Another family idea: Irinyi family János Irinyi

The Irinyi family is an old Hungarian noble family of Szatmár County.^[1][2][3] It took its name from the village of Iriny in the county, which it owned, and at the beginning of the 19th century the family also held joint ownership of several other settlements in the county. The ancestors of the family fought under King Ladislaus IV of Hungary at the Battle of Marchfeld in 1278, where they killed the enemy king Ottokar II of Bohemia, and captured his son alive. For this service, King Ladislaus IV granted them the estate of Iriny in Szatmár County in 1278. The family's coat of arms also refers to this event.^[1][3] OrionNimrod (talk) 11:05, 24 August 2026 (UTC)

Hi, please feel free to expand it Szabolcs (chieftain) OrionNimrod (talk) 19:28, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi, I started this also, you can expand it: Siege of Pozsony (1052) OrionNimrod (talk) 11:16, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

Hi, can we fast expand Szabolcs? It was nominated for deletion OrionNimrod (talk) 08:14, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

Could you check the section before 1000? List of Hungarian monarchs OrionNimrod (talk) 14:04, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

No source mentions that Ügyek was the ruler of the Hungarians. He was "just" a chieftain, and of course he was the father of Álmos. Levedi is the earliest known leader ("voivode") of the Hungarians. --Norden1990 (talk) 20:16, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

Could you fix the article based on your knowledge? OrionNimrod (talk) 20:33, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:1173.KOMNENOS.png check this as well, old wrong claims... OrionNimrod (talk) 20:35, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

Could you clarify of the dates of the double excommunication? Page 134 Illuminated Chronicle OrionNimrod (talk) 11:54, 16 September 2026 (UTC)

Unfortunately, the dates for these have not survived; both likely took place in 1304. --Norden1990 (talk) 08:31, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Mary, Queen of Hungary when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 14:59, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

Quick facts Nine years! ...

Precious

Nine years!

Close

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:08, 21 August 2026 (UTC)