User talk:Raime
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
If you would like to leave me a message, please click on this link.
When posting comments, please try to be civil. If you leave me a message, I will respond on your talk page unless otherwise stated. If I leave you a message, please try and respond here.
Thank you!
Rai•me
Welcome back!
Hey! Missed having you around, I was just talking on IRC about the need of a New England editor, thought about you and saw you edited RI 4 today. :) (Still wanted to get that to FA). If you'd like to show up on IRC, I'd be highly appreciative. Mitch32(There is a destiny that makes us... family.) 22:24, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
- Just showup whenever, its active most of the time every day. Don't need to schedule. I got a lot of RI photos to finish uploading and MA photos I took on a trip to Boston recently. Mitch32(There is a destiny that makes us... family.) 03:01, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Las Vegas article titles
These changes are really the logical moves following the move of the Las Vegas page. All of the articles that were in that name space and covered more then the city, still cover more then the city. So naming them to match the city article further confuses a confusing situation. I don't see these as a problem since they are clearly correct moves. But I do agree that some who have a very narrow focus and fail to see or accept the usage of the term may not agree. But what was clear in the discussion is that NLV and Henderson at a minimum clearly can not be considered in any way as being Las Vegas, a point I don't agree with. So the reverse logic, that anything that covers those places should not be labeled Las Vegas, seems like a logical and clearly supported position. Vegaswikian (talk) 06:09, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited GiraSole (New York), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hell's Kitchen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:16, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
List of tallest buildings in Dubai
Hi Raime. I've just noticed this page has a few issues now which I think means it's no longer up to featured status. Would you be able to address them or should I just nominate it at WP:FLRC? The priorities would be:
- Fix the sorting on the rank column.
- Fix the dead links.
- Fix the bare URLs.
That's at a quick glance, if you're prepared to have a look into it, I could perform a much more detailed analysis. Hope you're well, The Rambling Man (talk) 09:44, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
I have nominated List of tallest buildings in Dubai for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:22, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
WikiProject Good articles (Participant Clean-Up)
Hello, you are receiving this message because you are currently a participant of WikiProject Good articles. Since the creation of the WikiProject, over 200 user's have joined to help review good article nominations and contribute to other sections of the WikiProject. Over the years, several of these users have stopped reviewing articles and/or have become inactive with the project but are still listed as participates. In order to improve communications with other participants and get newsletters sent out faster (newsletters will begin to be sent out monthly starting in October) all participants that are no longer active with the WikiProject will be removed from the participants list.
If you are still interested in being a participant for this WikiProject, please sign your user name here and please help review some articles so we can reduce the size of the backlog. If you are no longer interested, you do not need to sign your name anywhere and your name will be removed from the participants list after the deadline. Remember that even if you are not interested at this time, you can always re-add your name to the list whenever you want. The deadline to sign your name on the page above will be November 1, 2012. Thank-you. 13:32, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
Update for: WikiProject Good articles (Participant Clean-Up)
Sorry for having to send out a second message but a user has brought to my attention that a point mentioned in the first message should be clarified. If user's don't sign on this page, they will be moved to an "Inactive Participants" list rather then be being removed from the entire WikiProject. Sorry for any confusion.--Dom497 (talk)15:22, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
Beverly Hills, again
For reasons explained at Talk:Beverly_Hills,_California#Premature_close, I've opened a new RM request/discussion at Talk:Beverly Hills,_California#Requested move. You're receiving this notice because you participated in the last one. --Born2cycle (talk) 23:36, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
WP:TFL reboot
Hello Raime. I just wanted to thank you for selecting a submission for TFL. As you are aware, recently, at WT:TFL, there's been a lot of concern that the system has become stuck, that new nominations are being discouraged by the lengthy queues in place, and that my selections for TFL haven't been diverse enough. To that end, I've rebooted the system. In short, we will no longer have a submissions and prep page, just a submissions page. We'll limit the number of submissions to ten. The community can comment on, support, oppose etc the inclusion of any of the submissions. Directors will have final say on what goes on main page when. I've deleted all selections made from mid-October to Christmas to give others the opportunity to get involved. I'm sorry that your efforts now have been, well, delayed I guess, and hope that you'll continue to support our process, as we try to improve and ultimately get more main page exposure. Feel free to ping me about any of this. Thanks again. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:30, 27 September 2012 (UTC)














