User talk:Soupsnake

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Nikolay Vasilyev and Ivan Melnikov. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi, thanks very much for your work on the Russian legislative constituencies! I'm curious, where do you get the information from for the results tables, specifically the representative's parties, and the percentage totals? These don't seem to be listed on the website. Do you just work the latter out yourself? There's a few I'd like to update, such as Anna constituency. Spokoyni (talk) 10:23, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi! It's so exited to see someone interested in such a specific theme. For by-elections to the State Duma since 2003 and federal elections since 2016 I use information from Central Electoral Commission website and calculate percentages myself. As for previous elections (1993-2003) I have a personal database of CEC official protocols sourced from printed materials and web archives. However, you can always request editing any page and I will provide electoral data Soupsnake (talk) 20:46, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Thanks very much for this! I've figured out how to get the material from the CEC - it isn't the easiest website to navigate - and I've updated the older constituency articles with the results and tables from the 2021 elections, so all should be up to date. Feel free to check and see if I've missed anything of course, or made any errors. Most of these still lack pre-2016 results, but there's no rush on that of course. When the Duma sits we'll be able to be sure on the final membership and I'll do what I can to update the deputy pages. The constituency articles and sources used are a big help in that! Keep up the good work! Spokoyni (talk) 10:46, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nizhny Novgorod constituency, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestine.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Magnitogorsk constituency, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs some prose content with citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Josey Wales ^Parley 08:48, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Moscow City Duma District 24 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moscow City Duma District 24 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Morpho achilles (talk) 09:10, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Soupsnake. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Magnitogorsk constituency, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:02, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Raydann (talk) 06:22, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Soupsnake. Thank you for creating 2022 Udmurtia State Council election. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:29, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Politics of the Nenets Autonomous Okrug indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:16, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Soupsnake. Thank you for your work on 2023 Luhansk People's Republic People's Council election. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

Hello! Hopefully you have a nice day today. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by creating an article.

As your article have adhered to the policies of Wikipedia, I have marked it as reviewed.

Have a good day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:31, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! Have a great day too! Soupsnake (talk) 14:59, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Rsk6400 (talk) 07:23, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on By-elections to the 8th Russian State Duma. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Rsk6400 (talk) 13:45, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rsk6400 (talk • contribs) 13:53, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Soupsnake. Thank you for your work on 2023 Buryatia People's Khural election. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 05:12, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Soupsnake and @SunDawn: Did you notice that that article, like other articles you (Soupsnake) created, doesn't contain a single reference to a reliable source ? It is also highly POV in its description of the Russian system of elections. There are hundreds of RS on the shortcomings of that election system, and you didn't use any of them. Rsk6400 (talk) 07:48, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Hello Rsk6400. I can't comment on the shortcomings of this particular election, but other editors can add them if they wanted. I didn't see any POV problem in the description of Russian system of election on this article. I personally believe Russia's election have many problems, but it's not my place to comment on that as Wikipedia is not for WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS. As for the WP:RS issue, I think tagging the article would suffice. What do you think? Thank you. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:41, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

A well-sourced sentence from the lead of Elections in Russia says, Elections in Russia have not been free and fair under Putin's rule. Political opponents are jailed and repressed, independent media are intimidated and suppressed, and electoral fraud is rampant. Creating dozens of articles on Russian elections without even mentioning that is a blatant violation of our NPOV. All the pages in Category:2023 elections in Russia that I checked seem to fail WP:GNG as well as WP:NPOV. I don't see any reason to thank Soupsnake for "expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia". Is there any way we can get rid of those articles without starting 41 individual AfDs ? Rsk6400 (talk) 07:07, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

No, this is not a blatant violation of our NPOV. As already mentioned, you can cite sources that mention that specific election and any potential shortcomings, but you are not doing this. No need to hound the guy either. Mellk (talk) 23:46, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Mellk, why do you think that I'm "hounding" Soupsnake ? I was originally replying to SunDawn's comment. Are you serious in suggesting that I add text to dozens of individual pages ? I think creating the impression that Russians really had a choice in their elections (and are therefore responsible for the actions of their government), is an extreme anti-Russian bias. Every editor (including Soupsnake, you, and myself, of course) should strife for neutrality in their editing. Soupsnake, the last sentence is also an answer to your comment of 15:53, 17 October. @SunDawn: I didn't ping you then, so maybe you didn't see my question of 07:07, 19 October 2023. Rsk6400 (talk) 06:08, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

I am not sure why you are asking to "get rid" of all of the articles which they created. The more significant elections are rigged, the insignificant regional ones in general not so much. The main elections with obvious rigging get international coverage. Did you check the sources for every single one of those articles? Because the sourcing is more than adequate enough, such as 2023 Khakassia head election. You claimed that "all" the pages in the category do not meet GNG and fail NPOV, but this is false. Even if they did not follow NPOV, this is not a reason for deletion. Mellk (talk) 06:19, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Rsk6400, You are free to cite reliable sources in the article and add proposed shortcomings. The article does not have a restricted access, so it should be quite easy. Soupsnake (talk) 15:53, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Viktoria Abramchenko, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vasily Golubev.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:08, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2015 Russian elections, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page UR.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

An article you recently created, 2026 Russian elections, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 06:20, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

Hey @Soupsnake. Your wiki edit anniversary is today, marking 5 years of dedicated contributions to English Wikipedia. Your passion for sharing knowledge and your remarkable contributions have not only enriched the project, but also inspired countless others to contribute. Thank you for your amazing contributions. Wishing you many more wonderful years ahead in the Wiki journey and a blessed New Year. :) -❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ ✉ 18:16, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Donetsk constituency, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donetsk constituency until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kherson constituency, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kherson constituency until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 24 March 2026 (UTC)