User talk:Thedarkknightli

Which parameter should I use instead (of nationality)? MOS:INFONAT doesn't suggest any. If we remove "nationality" without any option, that seems quite unfair? Huldra (talk) 22:14, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

@Huldra: Well, not sure what you were trying to say in that comment, but doesn't MOS:INFONAT state, "A |citizenship= field can be used ..."? Thedarkknightli (talk) 04:07, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

No, as you can see in Mohamed Hadid, his citizenship= United States, Jordan. There is no field stating his ethnicity/nationality, and what he self-defines as, namely Palestinian, after you removed it. Please suggest a solution to that problem, thanks, Huldra (talk) 20:18, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

How about changing the lead sentence to "... American real estate developer of Palestinian origin"? Thedarkknightli (talk) 21:04, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

Why can't we have that in the info-box? Some would argue that is more important that what country gives you a passport, after all, Huldra (talk) 22:10, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

Well, besides MOS:INFONAT, we have MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE, which states, "... an article should remain complete with its infobox ignored. The less information that an infobox contains, the more effectively it serves its purpose, allowing readers to identify key facts at a glance." Thedarkknightli (talk) 22:31, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

And you just removed a major point about him from the info-box. I'm undoing. If you want to remove it, please start a RfC, Huldra (talk) 23:21, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

I saw this discussion you referenced and I think it makes sense to include the republic (the infobox documentation does not discourage including subdivisions; it mentions this standard format: city, administrative region, country).

This discussion seems to be focused more on the USSR and Yugoslavia etc., but I did see you also mentioned the Russian Empire. I am not sure about this, though, at least for places that were always part of Russia (say Moscow and St. Petersburg).

For example, I do not think we would generally need to write "French Fourth Republic" or "Kingdom of France" etc. (maybe there will be some exceptions but that will depend on discussion). Algeria was considered to be part of Metropolitan France, at least administratively, but of course we would be fine if we just wrote "France" for places that are still part of France. Thoughts? Mellk (talk) 11:34, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Mellk, thanks for noting that! I personally find disambiguation necessary in Russian Empire's case. The empire was much bigger than present-day Russia. I mean, it included a lot of present-day countries. Thedarkknightli (talk) 12:48, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

I think it would make sense to write "Russian Empire" for places not located within present-day Russia, but I am not sure if it is necessary for places like Moscow. Mellk (talk) 12:50, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

No, it isn't unless for consistency within an infobox. Thedarkknightli (talk) 13:31, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Thedarkknightli. Thank you. —Absolutiva 01:50, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

I agree that "Swedish citizenship from 1905" (repeating the birth year) was not proper format; I have reworded the infobox accordingly. However, you are quite wrong about the rules of Swedish citizenship. While some countries do indeed forbid dual citizenship, Sweden is not one of them. Garbo never renounced her Swedish citizenship, and that citizenship did not cease when she became a naturalized U.S. citizen in 1951. It is erroneous to state, or even infer, that it ceased when it didn't. Mason.Jones (talk) 20:04, 18 August 2025 (UTC)

Well @Mason.Jones, do you have a source for that? Per the article Swedish nationality law, it was impossible for Swedish citizens to hold dual citizenship before 2001 unless they automatically acquired the other citizenship at birth. Also, I changed the descriptor to "Swedish and American" in this edit not because Garbo held dual citizenship, but because she had a career that spanned her emigration (see MOS:NATIONALITY). Thedarkknightli (talk) 01:41, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

Yes, I've googled many sources about this. If they mention Garbo's citizenship at all, they confirm that she did have to relinquish her Swedish citizenship in 1951. Although it was restored with Sweden's new 2001 law (which was retroactive), that certainly doesn't cover all the decades when she was not a Swedish citizen. Your edit seems to be the most logical resolution. Mason.Jones (talk) 15:52, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

You just changed designation of GG from Swedish American actress to Swedish and American Actress.... I've been following this page for over a decade since I wrote most of the current version back then, and I want to let you know that editors have been changing her national designation around for 10 years. Inevitably, it gets changed. "Swedish American" has lasted the longest. I don't care, but you should know it will eventually get changed, so beware.Classicfilmbuff (talk) 21:20, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 September 18 § Category:Entertainers from Aachen on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kaffet i halsen (talk) 12:33, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

Category:Swiss entertainers by canton has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ^SMason_Garrison 19:06, 28 September 2025 (UTC)

Categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 October 14 § Category:People from Taff's Well by occupation on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kaffet i halsen (talk) 11:26, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

This thread was split off from #Mohamed Hadid above by Thedarkknightli (talk) 06:44, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi there, you made some edit to Hany Abu-Assad that are problematic because they protect unsourced anon edits not based in the sources cited & which conflict with his self-identification. I have opened a talk page section there to rectify this. Please participate to explain your edits if you seek to preserve them. Tiamut (talk) 06:39, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Its just you & me on the talk page & no one is responding to the blp noticeboard request. If you had not objected, I would just be bold & change the infobox bc it is clearly out of line with several policies, including wp:blp. It currently implies Hany is an Israeli-Dutch filmmaker when that is not true & not what he is notable for. Can you please explain in the talk why you are okay with this misrepresentation? Based on what policies exactly? Or else withdraw your objection to the change. Thanks Tiamut (talk) 09:05, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

You have recently made edits related to the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups. This is a standard message to inform you that the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups is a designated contentious topic.

Additionally, editors must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days in order to make edits related to two subtopics: (1) Indian military history, or (2) social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal.

This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Absolutiva 04:17, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

I'm a bit hesitant to weigh in at ANI due to past drama, but if you leave diffs to each of Croyston's previous ANI's, the time where they said they'd communicate and all the warnings since then, people will find it veryhard to ignore your post...

Literally lay out the history in diffs - perhaps do a timeline? Like: ANI1, ANI2, block, reply, ANI3, block...

Show a clear pattern of behaviour that's hard to ignore.

I'm happy to vote on sanctions if needed, but an admin was concerned that I was clerking on ANI so I've avoided doing too much on that noticeboard (otherwise I'd write it myself!). Blue Sonnet (talk) 08:36, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

Blue Sonnet (talk) is wishing you Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Blue Sonnet (talk) 00:48, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

Christmas? Bah Humbug

Happy Humbug! Pincrete (talk) 09:34, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

Space4TCatHerder🖖 17:28, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

Hey, sorry to bother you. I noticed you reverted my edit on the Minnie Driver article on her citizenships. I just want to clarify why I made that edit, it was to make it consistent with other articles about people with more than one citizenship, as they typically list the full names of the countries that person had citizenship in, not just the abbreviations; one example being Mark Carney's page, where on his infobox it lists him as having had Canadian, Irish and United Kingdom citizenship, as opposed to Canadian, Irish and UK citizenship. Obviously what you did was a good faith edit and I just want to underscore that I'm not mad about this at all, I just wanted you to know. Have a good new year! EngineerGaming9999 (talk) 00:41, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

@EngineerGaming9999: First off, let's ignore irrelevant other stuff. Second, we have MOS:VAR (which states, "Edit warring over style, or enforcing optional style in a bot-like fashion without prior consensus, is disruptive and is never acceptable.") and, like I said, MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE (which states, "... information should be presented in a short format wherever possible ..."). Third, writing |citizenship={{ubl|United Kingdom|United States (from 2017)}} instead of |citizenship={{ubl|UK|US (from 2017)}} doubles the parameter's length. Fourth, there's a consensus to write "US" or "U.S." instead of "United States" in |birth_place= and |death_place=, so I really don't see why we can't do the same to |citizenship=. Thedarkknightli (talk) 09:42, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

I just want to reassure that I am absolutely not trying to edit war, but I am glad that's how you immediately seem to view my intentions as being. I would also like to point out that my precedent seems to be more relevant to the "citizenship" part of a person's infobox than yours, and that you calling it "irrelevant" without explaining why seems to be rather reductive. Either way, though, I do recognize that this is an entirely frivolous debate and even though I still believe it would make more sense to display the full names of the countries, I'm not going to revert it anymore as, like I said, I do not want an edit war, especially not over something as trivial as this. Have a good day and a happy new year! EngineerGaming9999 (talk) 19:25, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

OK @EngineerGaming9999, I've just restored my edit.

and that you calling it "irrelevant" without explaining why seems to be rather reductive Well, while consistency within the same article is almost always necessary per WP:MOS, consistency between different articles usually isn't cuz they possibly have different consensus on the same issue. Thedarkknightli (talk) 04:18, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

That's fair. Thank you for explaining. Sorry about the passive-aggressiveness from earlier. EngineerGaming9999 (talk) 06:27, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

This heading was added by Thedarkknightli (talk) 11:30, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

	Happy New Year!
	Hello Thedarkknightli: Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels? Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:25, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message

CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:25, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

Thank you, @CAPTAIN RAJU! Happy New Year! Regards, Thedarkknightli (talk) 11:32, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 January 3 § Category:Female models from Bangkok on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kaffet i halsen (talk) 23:22, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

Regarding the Mannerheim RfC, a few comments: The RfC should be its own section, with ==Title== instead of three ='s. The title should also be more descriptive than just RfC. There should probably be more options with three items, with either the manor or the municipality removed. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 17:02, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

Category:American people by religion and century has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mclay1 (talk) 08:24, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

Greetings. The documentation for Template:Infobox person was recently changed to remove the mention that present-day countries should be included in the main text instead of the infobox for the birthplace. I have started a discussion and would appreciate your input: Template talk:Infobox person#Present-day countries in birthplace. Mellk (talk) 07:15, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a battleground for dispute resolution noticeboard about people in lede and infoboxes, as well as contentious topics. Please understand the following not to disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. Absolutiva 05:44, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

@Absolutiva, could you please be specific? Thanks, Thedarkknightli (talk) 06:01, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Since recently you started DRN for Volodymyr Zelenskyy, which is considered contentious topic (also WP:RUSUKR). Other articles designated as contentious topic include Mohamed Hadid, under that you previously started an DRN.

For now, please refrain the use of DRN from any contentious topic area, or you will be subjected a topic ban. Absolutiva 06:14, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Well @Absolutiva, I still don't get what you're talking about. TBH, I don't see how I've (recently) violated WP:BATTLEGROUND or WP:POINTY, or an explicit restriction on how many contentious topic-related DRN cases I can file. Thedarkknightli (talk) 04:17, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Misuse of infoboxes by Thedarkknightli. Absolutiva 06:09, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000030/quotes/ "I never think of myself as an icon. What is in other people's minds is not in my mind. I just do my thing." - Audrey Hepburn. There's also a video of her saying that. --DoveTheEditor (talk) 20:35, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

@DoveTheEditor, I've just reverted your edit, see . I'm afraid that neither of the URLs you've provided can be treated as a reliable source, see WP:RS, WP:IMDB, and WP:CITEIMDB.

There's also a video of her saying that. Well, please provide a URL that contains the video so that we can assess its reliability. Thanks, Thedarkknightli (talk) 19:38, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Please use the article talk page to explain your objections to AlphaVictorDelta0107's edit to Vinayak Damodar Savarkar before you revert back. I know that you explained in your edit summary when you made your first revert, but he/she did not get it. Maybe a more detailed explanation on the article talk page would do the trick.-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:53, 23 May 2026 (UTC)