User talk:Zigzig20s

Hey, you OK? Haven't seen you in a while. Take care.

Drmies (talk) 23:07, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Zigzig20s,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 00:20, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 00:20, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Porter Flats Apartments is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Porter Flats Apartments until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Aydoh8 (talk) 02:53, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Why did you remove my message - was this intentional because it seems very rude? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 17:10, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

User:MSGJ: Please ask more broadly at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anthroponymy. Many of us do this, for example see this by User:Edwardx (many more examples on his userpage!). I will delete this message when you've seen it. Thanks.Zigzig20s (talk) 17:20, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Could you help with this draft? I have no objection if you want to start fresh. FloridaArmy (talk) 18:49, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

This Mississippi architect seems pretty interesting. William Stanton and William A. Stanton should link to his entry. He's discussed here and here for starters. I hope all is well with you. Take care. FloridaArmy (talk) 21:57, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi. Could you help with this draft? Draft:Bryan Frist

I see you have been involved with edits and contributions for other members of the Frist family over the years such as Thomas Frist, Sr and Thomas Frist III. It was suggested that I reach out. Te82436 (talk) 15:00, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

I was wondering if you are still interested in WikiProject Christianity. Please respond to this within a week if you are still interested in helping out. If you do not respond within a week you will be classified as inactive on the WikiProject member list. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con 09:13, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:32, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frederick Earl Emmons is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frederick Earl Emmons until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Boynamedsue (talk) 00:26, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

Please note r.e. Talk:Rashid Muslih that the only way to identify the article as a BLP is to use the parameter inside {{WikiProject banner shell}}. At the same time you could move to listas and class parameters into this template. Thank you! — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 18:44, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Miralles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Francisco Miralles.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 22:34, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Autzen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Autzen.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:51, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

The article Eric Olsen (businessman) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

does not meet WP:BIO specific event of interest can be elsewhere on a diff page but even then it's not interesting or noteworthy

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:32, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello Zigzig20s, I see that you’re involved with WP:Conservatism and interested in biographies. I thought you'd be interested in some cleanup suggestions for Antonio Gracias. Here is the link to my request: Talk:Antonio_Gracias#Article_cleanup. If you agree with these suggestions, please make the updates. Thank you! Stripedcroissant (talk) 16:44, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

The article Santa Fe Times has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Newspaper isn't notable. Article lacks sources to establish notability.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Eric Schucht (talk) 14:49, 12 March 2026 (UTC)