User talk:~2026-29101-67

Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

You are welcome to edit without logging in; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages and upload media).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

If you have any questions, just use this link to ask for help; a volunteer will visit you here shortly!

Happy editing! Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:43, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

@~2026-29101-67 If you are, as I suspect, the same user behind previously-blocked TAs (which I suspect because of your conspicuous edit here pushing the same incredibly niche animated movie as those previous TAs) I am genuinely pleased to see that, contrary to your typical behaviour on previous TAs, you've actually decided to start editing articles directly. That's good, I hope you're finding it to be a rewarding process.

However, you are still banned from Wikipedia due to your actions on previous accounts. We would love to welcome you here as a productive editor, but if you want to stick around you'll need to submit an unblock request and get yourself unblocked.

The best way to do that is to create an account and disclose publicly that you are the same user from blocked TAs such as ~2026-25300-33 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), and demonstrate that you understand why your previous behaviour was problematic and why you believe you should now be allowed to edit Wikipedia. Athanelar (talk) 19:38, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

@AthanelarI assume that multiple people want to add The Rodfellows Movie because of a saltydkdan video, which now sits at 408K views. So of course there would be multiple people that would want to edit in Wikipedia. ~2026-29101-67 (talk) 19:43, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

I'm telling you this because I want you to be able to edit Wikipedia. To do that, you need to follow the instructions I gave you. Otherwise, you are going to be blocked again for evading your previous block, and that'll be that. Like I told you last time, your denials will not fool anybody, your behaviour is very unique. Athanelar (talk) 19:46, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Question: if a person admits they're the same user, will they get blocked or not? ~2026-29101-67 (talk) 19:50, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

If you admit you're the same user, you will be blocked, yes; because you need to request and be granted an unblock before you can continue editing.

However, being unblocked requires you to actually admit to and acknowledge the block evasion, and demonstrate to the admins that you understand why your past behaviour was problematic and that you will not repeat it in the future.

If you do not admit it, you will be blocked anyway (because it is incredibly obvious you are the same user) and so long as you continue to deny and insist you sre a different person, there is no chance you will be unblocked. Athanelar (talk) 19:53, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

How do you know if i'm the same user as other accounts and not someone else? ~2026-29101-67 (talk) 19:54, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

It's incredibly obvious from your unique pattern of behaviour, communication style, and subject of interest; and beyond that, a WP:Checkuser can view technical details associated with your account to confirm the link. Athanelar (talk) 20:05, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

@AthanelarBut what if it's a coincidence? ~2026-29101-67 (talk) 20:06, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

You and I both know it isn't, so I don't know why you insist on wasting both of our time with this back-and-forth every time. Athanelar (talk) 20:11, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Hmm... what if i live in the same city as them? ~2026-29101-67 (talk) 20:11, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

You're closer to losing access to this page than to being unblocked. 331dot (talk) 20:47, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

And now you have admitted to being all those accounts please just take the advice Goetia [She/They] (talk) 16:41, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

@The Ars GoetiaOk, i had multiple ID users and did sockpupetring, and did disruptive behavour with edits that didnt had sources and wasted others time, im sorry. ~2026-29101-67 (talk) 16:47, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Its completely all right just move forward in the right direction and go through the process instead of just saying sorry, as me and many others have said a dozen times please get rid of the TAs make an account admit to the TAs and submit a formal unban request Goetia [She/They] (talk) 16:49, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

@The Ars GoetiaWhat are TAs? and how to get rid of TAs? ~2026-29101-67 (talk) 16:52, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

A TA, or 'temporary account,' is the way you're currently communicating with us - notice how your username shows up as a string of numbers. That's what happens when you edit without registering for an account.

As Goetia has said, this is your path forward; create a proper registered account, and immediately follow the instructions at WP:UNBLOCK to submit an unblock request on that account, explaining that you are submitting the unblock request because you were indefinitely blocked while editing on a temporary account and that you would now like to be formally unblocked so that you can begin editing in good standing. Athanelar (talk) 16:54, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

@AthanelarI keep having temporrary accounts because it keeps changing temporary accounts, and because i use both mobile and computer. I don't want to create a account because it is too hard, why bother make a account when i could just use temporary accounts? ~2026-29101-67 (talk) 17:18, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Because you've used the fact that temporary accounts change in a deceitful manner, claiming that previous temporary accounts aren't you on multiple occasions. Creating an account is far easier than making actually helpful edits on Wikipedia. If you were serious about editing Wikipedia, you'd take responsibility for your actions, and create an account, rather than continue to abuse the temporary accounts system. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 17:23, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

I am willing to walk you through the process of making an account, its not that hard you've done it before no? Temporary accounts are okay normally but you are banned and cannot edit so using TAs (and 5 is far more than would be accidental) signals ban evasion, if you want to edit again you have to make an account so you can make a formal unblock request.

If it truely is too hard for you to make an account then the ban will likely be indef Goetia [She/They] (talk) 17:23, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for block evasion.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request through the unblock wizard or through your talk page.  Izno (talk) 17:24, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Now that you're blocked, if you seriously would like to become an editor in good standing in English Wikipedia and contribute to building an encyclopedia, there are steps you need to take. First off, this IP range is now blocked for a month. So after a month has elapsed, and with no more block evasion over that month, start a new account, and post a message on your user page disclosing this and any other TA you know that you have used. Then, make an unblock request, detailing the problems with your conduct, and why that conduct was problematic, and explain how you plan to avoid that conduct in the future. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 17:48, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days, and you are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

I would recommend reviewing WP:ECREXPLAIN, which covers expectations and best practices for new editors engaging with highly contentious topics. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:24, 21 May 2026 (UTC)