Talk:Khazars
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Khazars was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
| Current status: Former good article nominee | ||||||||||||||||
| Khazaria.com was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 11 April 2009 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Khazars. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
| This It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
Section sizes
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rewrite paragraph
"After Khazaria fell, many nations claimed to have Khazar lineage and Turkic origin. In late 19th century a group of scholars claimed that Ashkenazi Jews in Europe are descended from Khazars. Back then theory politically supported by Nazi German intellectuals to legitimize war crimes and the Holocaust. In modern academia theory rarely finds a mention. and generally associated with antisemitism and anti-Zionism."
This section has poor English. Please rewrite it. 5.20.199.34 (talk) 09:36, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- It isn't just poor English, it is gibberish. No Nazis in the late 19th century. Zerotalk 11:53, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- pretty obvious "back then" refers to the 1900s rather than 19th century. ~2025-39131-17 (talk) 01:34, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 10 December 2025
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
"Although Khazars were likely a confederation of Turkic-speaking tribes..." There is no dispute about Turkic origin of Khazars. Obscure origin is about how they formed and where they came from. This line has a citation from Britannica and in the link it says:
"Khazar, member of a confederation of Turkic-speaking tribes that in the late 6th century ce established a major commercial empire covering the southeastern section of modern European Russia."
So I think it should be replaced with "Although Khazars were a Turkic-speaking confederation..." ~2025-39823-01 (talk) 17:17, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. The text you propose to replace is not present in the article. Day Creature (talk) 18:54, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Day Creature "Although Khazars were likely a confederation of Turkic-speaking tribes..." to "Although Khazars were a Turkic-speaking confederation..."
- There is no dispute about Turkic origin of Khazars. Citation of that sentence says:
- "Khazar, member of a confederation of Turkic-speaking tribes that in the late 6th century ce established a major commercial empire covering the southeastern section of modern European Russia."
- It's a POV pushing. ~2025-39937-58 (talk) 19:17, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
- I mean it's now what it says in the source. This is user's own comment. ~2025-39937-58 (talk) 19:20, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
- The text "Although Khazars were likely a confederation of Turkic-speaking tribes" is not found anywhere in the article. Day Creature (talk) 19:29, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
- "Although they were likely a confederation of different Turkic-speaking peoples," in the summary. ~2025-39937-58 (talk) 19:39, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
- Removed "likely." Andre🚐 22:59, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you. ~2025-39823-01 (talk) 23:53, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
- Removed "likely." Andre🚐 22:59, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
- "Although they were likely a confederation of different Turkic-speaking peoples," in the summary. ~2025-39937-58 (talk) 19:39, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
- The text "Although Khazars were likely a confederation of Turkic-speaking tribes" is not found anywhere in the article. Day Creature (talk) 19:29, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
- I mean it's now what it says in the source. This is user's own comment. ~2025-39937-58 (talk) 19:20, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Title Khazars, but infobox about khaganate
Semi-protected edit request on 16 March 2026
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change the lead from "southeastern Russia" (which would be Russia's east near N Korea, China and Japan) to "southwestern Russia" which would then properly link to European Russia. The editor that added the line made an east/west swap mistake.
BTW: I am human. I am manually editing. hCaptcha is a prefereable human testing mechanism since Google took part in the Gaza genocide. And since it's a visual test, I can understand hCaptcha wishing to interrogate my browser canvas and client rectangles; but I strongly object to the Plugin Enumeration as a violation of my privacy. Temporarily allowed for this edit. ~2026-16500-07 (talk) 10:22, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
- I understand the concern. It is reasonable, but I see a potential concern about "southwestern Russia" especially for people who are NOT thinking of modern Russia. The concept of Russia in the era of the Khazars is quite fuzzy, and it is potentially a source of confusion and sensitivity regarding modern Russia (and modern Ukraine). I've made a different tweak which I hope is a suitable solution.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 14:04, 16 March 2026 (UTC)






