Talk:Super Mario RPG

Leaving and left under Legacy seems like an odd choice as it's a completely new build, new developers, minor changes from the original version, etc. 2603:3020:2102:5400:48A9:43A6:88B6:F8BF (talk) 13:39, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

We should only create a new page if there is sufficient stuff to write about based on coverage in reliable secondary sources to justify it. (That might be the case, I haven't checked.) Popcornfud (talk) 14:32, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

That’s just lazy. 2600:1017:B000:A5D2:509C:E087:D8E0:1801 (talk) 23:46, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

You're more than welcome (and capable) to write up a separate article for the remake yourself. ThomasO1989 (talk) 02:10, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

I think that if the remake gets its own page, this page's name should be changed to "Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars" since that's the full name of the original and the remake takes the plain "Super Mario RPG" name. 136.54.66.53 (talk) 23:40, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Agreed. I think there's enough reasons to split and it seems there is more than enough sufficient material to write about. 22ManzanaBoy (talk) 18:15, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

To meet the GA criterion for breadth, the article really needs to be updated with the calvalcade of new sources on the remake's reception. czar 12:50, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

You forgot to add in the sales of the remake, which sold 3.14 Million units, surpassing the lifetime sales of the original game. GuyUser81 (talk) 05:53, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

The redirect Super Mario RPG 2 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 27 § Super Mario RPG 2 until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 20:19, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

What left is there to do in this article? 22ManzanaBoy (talk) 16:08, 25 May 2025 (UTC)