Talk:The Giant Spider Invasion
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Giant Spider Invasion is currently a Film good article nominee. Nominated by GamerPro64 at 19:37, 19 February 2026 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review this article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor. When complete, this review will be closed by the reviewer. To view the review and add comments, click discuss review. |
| The Giant Spider Invasion (final version) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which was archived on 5 March 2025. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
| This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peer review
The Giant Spider Invasion
| This peer review discussion is closed. |
Trying to get this to Good Article but I feel like I'm missing something and would like some suggestions on improvement. GamerPro64 06:53, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
Comments by Jaguarnik
Good articles need to pass 6 criteria (WP:GACR), so I'll comment based on those 6 criteria.
Well-written
Consider making the lead a bit longer - the lead should be a good summary of the article; the lead is too short while also having information that isn't necessary for the lead ("The script was written by having Rebane locking Easton in a cabin to on the incentive of being fed." - this isn't necessary, just write "The script was written by Easton".)
- Some parts feel awkwardly written and could be rephrased. For example,
Davey Perkins, a reporter, visits Sheriff Jones for a story, but the Sheriff says things are quiet.
andDavey and Terry drive to a local junkyard where they engage in a romantic encounter.
The use of engage here sounds odd, and since they're dating, is it relevant that they have a romantic encounter?This sentence as wellIn general, try reading it out loud to see if it sounds good.Ev, heavily intoxicated, swats at spiders Dan dismisses as hallucinations.
should probably have "that" between "spiders" and "Dan". Originally conceived as an idea from Richard Huff, he and actor Robert Easton, a friend of Rebane, were tasked to write the script.
Should probably be "an idea by Richard Huff. Be careful also with phrasing, because it makes it seem as though "he and actor Robert Easton" were originally conceived as an idea.
*Gross was also critical on the film's script
switch "on" for "of"
Michael Weldon, in The Psychotronic Encyclopedia of Film, while criticizing the special effects and comparing them negatively to The Giant Claw, he considered the movie to be "Lots of laughs".
Remove "he" between "Claw," and "considered";"considered the movie to be "lots of laughs"" doesn't make sense and can be rephrased as "considered the movie to be funny".
*thought that the unintentional laughs from the film worn thin quickly.
- wore
Regarding the episode, Director Bill Rebane thought it was strange, but overall accepted it due to its popularity.
- although we know that Rebane is the film's director, I would specify here just in case, because it implies that Rebane is the episode director.
*During the episode, as Pearl, Brain Guy, and Bobo were out camping, they inadvertently unleash
- "while Pearl, Brain Guy, and Bobo are out camping"
In case I missed something, consider also looking at MOS:FILM for more advice for the article.
Verifiable
Citations look fine, I won't go and check them all individually but each statement has a citation and I don't see any problematic sources. I also checked earwig and it doesn't flag any issues.
Neutral
No problems as far as I can see
Stable
No edit wars as far as I can see
Media
All three images are licensed for usage.
That's my advice for good article, hope your nomination succeeds. Jaguarnik (talk) 19:16, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hi @Jaguarnik and @GamerPro64, I did some of the points on copyediting. Did "spiders that Dan", "critical on the film", "while Pearl, Brain Guy...", "lots of laughs", "wore thin quickly", which you can strikethrough. RFNirmala (talk) 02:13, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
GA review
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- This review is transcluded from Talk:The Giant Spider Invasion/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: GamerPro64 (talk · contribs) 19:37, 19 February 2026 (UTC)
Reviewer: Crystalite13 (talk · contribs) 00:19, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
GA review
- This review is transcluded from Talk:The Giant Spider Invasion/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: GamerPro64 (talk · contribs) 19:37, 19 February 2026 (UTC)
Reviewer: MailJail (talk · contribs) 04:44, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
I will review this entry. My initial comments should be posted in a few days. MailJail (Talk|Contributions) 04:44, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
Infobox
- Be sure to only link an article once. I see that you have linked Bill Rebane twice.
- Done. GamerPro64 23:07, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
- There is a specific release, but there is no source inside the infobox, or anywhere else.
- I just made it just October 1975. GamerPro64 23:07, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
Lead
The lead is generally well written. The reader would know what the film is about just by reading the first sentence.
- Despite this, the lead should be more detailed. A synopsis in the lead may give the reader a glimpse of what they will read.
- I added little more information to the lead. GamerPro64 23:07, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

