User talk:Citation-PageScanner

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ek Nayi Chhoti Si Zindagi have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ek Nayi Chhoti Si Zindagi was changed by Citation-PageScanner (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.867227 on 2025-09-14T13:58:48+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:59, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

Sorry its by mistake changed 2409:40C2:2049:BE15:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 14:01, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Anil Kapoor. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. BBC is considered reliable and it covered the "Jhakaas" and the misuse/sue part. Do not remove longstanding sources without discussion and do not edit war. If necessary, seek WP:CONSENSUS per WP:BRD in the talk page. Also go through WP:ICTFSOURCES and WP:RSP for a list of sources. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 21:22, 24 September 2025 (UTC)

Good day Citation-PageScanner. I have reviewed most of your submissions to AFC about Indian people and all of them doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG. I understand it may be frustrating for you but here are things you need to know.

Since you are working on films, actors and actresses, you need to read and know these criteria: WP:NFILM for films, WP:NFILMMAKER for filmmakers/producers, WP:NACTOR/WP:NACTRESS for actors/actresses. Thank you as you read them. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 07:27, 15 September 2025 (UTC)

Thank You Citation-PageScanner (talk) 17:58, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Govinda (actor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBFC. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 21 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello. In this edit (unhelpfully summarized as "Fixed Grammer" [sic]), you added some citations to the article's lead. For one thing, those were unnecessary per WP:LEAD since the material was already cited in the body. Much more concerning, however, is the fact that at least one of the added refs appears to not exist. There is no such Washington Post article titled "Preserving Europe's Art" by John Smith (!) that I can find, and another ref you added took a tagline from the cover of Rescuing Da Vinci and made it a subtitle. To me, these are highly indicative of careless use of AI while editing. Can you please confirm whether you used AI for this or other edits on the project, and if so, whether you are aware of the dangers of doing so without proper oversight and caution? Thank you. DrOrinScrivello (talk) 15:33, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

j Citation-PageScanner (talk) 15:43, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

I understand your concern — I did not intend to add any fabricated sources, and I’ll carefully review and correct any errors to ensure compliance with WP:VERIFY Citation-PageScanner (talk) 15:45, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

Using AI to write your response doesn't fill me with optimism. DrOrinScrivello (talk) 15:51, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

I do use AI only to help me check whether sources are reliable or not, but I don’t rely on it to create or invent citations. So you got it? 2409:40C2:1B:6578:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 16:06, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

I do use AI, but only as a tool to cross-check reliability of sources, never to fabricate them. Every citation I add is verified against actual published references — AI is just an aid, not a replacement for verification Citation-PageScanner (talk) 16:08, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

Every citation I add is verified against actual published references^{[citation needed]}

In all seriousness, I hope you take what the AI wrote for you to heart, particularly the AI is just an aid, not a replacement for verification bit. It's one thing to use it to help with your grammar, but it's another thing altogether to replace it with actual encyclopedic research and writing. DrOrinScrivello (talk) 16:45, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

Got it thanks.by Citation-PageScanner (talk) 16:47, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

I also just noticed that you changed the section header. Per WP:TPO please don't edit other users' comments and titles, even on your own talk page. DrOrinScrivello (talk) 16:52, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

Do your work dont interfere in my works Citation-PageScanner (talk) 17:15, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

Unfortunately that's not how Wikipedia works, and anyway you "interfered" with my work first when you introduced hallucinated AI slop into an article I wrote. Just be extra careful going forward, is all I ask. DrOrinScrivello (talk) 17:47, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

When i interfered your works? Citation-PageScanner (talk) 17:53, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello! fellow editor. Only the websites and/or newspapers in WP:ICTF have chance to not get reverted. Thank you. MSAOM (talk) 20:09, 24 September 2025 (UTC)

One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:04, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

• I have again undone your edit to Donal Bisht, because you added back the image that does not show proper licensing. You claim that you hold copyright over the image. If that is the case, not only will you need to email the Volunteer Response Team to explain how you have the rights to the image and that you are donating it, but you will also need to make any necessary disclosures about your conflicts of interest with article subjects or the media entity that is paying you to edit. —C.Fred (talk) 13:49, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

• Please provide a specific link to where the Instagram photo is under a Creative Commons license. —C.Fred (talk) 14:18, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Donal Bisht, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 15:44, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

I removed the older photo of Donal Bisht because it is outdated and not from 2025. The article should reflect the most current and relevant image. Citation-PageScanner (talk) 15:53, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

You are incorrect. The image that should be used should be representative of the subject and must be uploaded under a compatible licence; there is no requirement that an image used must be "the most current". Note that fair use cannot be claimed for images of living persons.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:00, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. An edit war occurs when two or more users begin repeatedly reverting content on a page in a back-and-forth fashion to restore it back to how they think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree with their changes. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or undo the edits made by other editors when your changes are reverted. Instead, please use the talk page to work toward creating a version of the page that represents consensus among the editors involved. The best practice at this time is to stop editing the page and to discuss the disagreements, issues, and concerns at-hand with the other editors involved in the dispute. Wikipedia provides a page that helps to detail how this is accomplished. If discussions reach an impasse, you can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard, or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection while a discussion to resolve the dispute is ongoing.

Continuing to engage in further edit warring behavior can result in being blocked from editing Wikipedia—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, or whether it involves the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also, please keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your demeanor, behavior, or conduct indicate that you intend to continue repeatedly making reverts to the page.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:03, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring and logged-out disruption. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:11, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Suhana Khan (actress). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of machine-generated text and contains hallucinated sources. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. tony 18:17, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Citation-PageScanner. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Narendra Singh (filmmaker), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:09, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Citation-PageScanner. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Narendra Singh (producer), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:08, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Citation-PageScanner. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Karan Boolani, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:08, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Citation-PageScanner. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ramnagar Bunny, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:09, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Citation-PageScanner. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shree Upadhyaya, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:09, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Citation-PageScanner. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Narendra Singh".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 20:25, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Citation-PageScanner. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Narendra Singh".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 08:25, 15 March 2026 (UTC)