User talk:DrOrinScrivello

On 16 April 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Norwich Historic District, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that some mill workers in a historic district in Virginia gave their ages as fourteen despite appearing much younger? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Norwich Historic District. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Norwich Historic District), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

Excellent work. Bearian (talk) 23:27, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

That's awfully kind, Bearian, thank you. DrOrinScrivello (talk) 23:48, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi DrOrinScrivello, a while ago you reviewed one of my requests for the Nina L. Diaz article. I made another one that you may also be interested in reviewing. Cheers, BINK Robin (talk) 19:33, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello again. Just noting for the record here that I have responded at the talk page. DrOrinScrivello (talk) 16:44, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article National Geographic Society Headquarters you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rollinginhisgrave -- Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 04:05, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

The article National Geographic Society Headquarters you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:National Geographic Society Headquarters for comments about the article, and Talk:National Geographic Society Headquarters/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rollinginhisgrave -- Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 00:41, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

On 10 July 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article National Geographic Society Headquarters, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a 1932 building (pictured) of the National Geographic Society Headquarters was constructed in part to house the group's collection of 300,000 photographs? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/National Geographic Society Headquarters. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, National Geographic Society Headquarters), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

SL93 (talk) 00:02, 10 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi DrOrinScrivello! In future should you wish to retract UPOL notices like you did here, please remove the category as well. In the instance of that user, I just blanked the section (which is also another good way of doing it). TheSandDoctor ^Talk 21:50, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

@TheSandDoctor: Thank you for letting me know, I sometimes forget the behind the scenes aspects of some templates. I'll keep this in mind going forward, but hopefully won't have to retract any more notices! Thanks again, and sorry for the trouble. DrOrinScrivello (talk) 21:58, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

It wasn't a trouble! I agree that hopefully no more need retracting, but wanted to share just in case you come across any others in future. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 22:00, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

Hello! I saw the original off-broadway production of Little Shop of Horrors in 1982. It was mind blowing at the time, and I don't think there was anything else like it in the world. Viriditas (talk) 22:26, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

@Viriditas: I'm sufficiently jealous. All I've seen are a couple of Off-Off- (off-, off-) Broadway showings, but nevertheless I'm of the opinion that the more homemade the Audrey II, the more enthusiastic the performances – it's always been a blast. Thanks for reaching out! DrOrinScrivello (talk) 00:14, 27 August 2025 (UTC)

My pleasure. I distinctly recall how frightened and upset I was during the last scene. Our Wiki page says "Audrey II slithers towards the audience threateningly", and on stage, the plant did just that and seemed to come out over the first few rows (might have been my young imagination). I was scared silly! Viriditas (talk) 00:19, 27 August 2025 (UTC)

On 22 September 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Monuments Men (book), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the subjects of Robert M. Edsel's book The Monuments Men returned more than five million works of art stolen by the Nazis during World War II? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Monuments Men (book). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, The Monuments Men (book)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

October 2025 GAN Backlog Drive
On 1 October 2025, a one-month backlog drive for good article nomination reviews will begin in hopes of addressing the growing backlog and to reduce old nominations. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number, length, and age of nominations reviewed. Each article review will earn 1 point; for each 90 days an article has been in the backlog, an additional half-point is awarded; one extra point will be awarded for every 2500 total reviewed words. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:57, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	This award is given to DrOrinScrivello for accumulating at least 7 points in the October 2025 GAN Backlog Drive. Your dedicated reviews contributed to the successful reduction of the backlog and helped improve the quality of articles. Here's our token of appreciation. Thank you for your time and efforts, and hopefully we'll see you soon again! Bgsu98 (Talk) 20:46, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

I thought your attention to source-text integrity and very clear, actionable points made your reviews especially strong IAWW (talk) 14:12, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

I have to concur with IAWW: you are among the best reviewers I've worked with! Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 18:42, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

Aw shucks, y'all are going to make me blush. IAWW, I appreciate the feedback and kind words, and Pbritti, it was a pleasure collaborating with you on an interesting and well-written article! DrOrinScrivello (talk) 19:06, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

Why did you remove from the Grammy voting member Nikki Hornsby’s page factual data about the gift of her NARAS status from membership 2006 to the voting membership for over ten years? Factual data proof online many places of the document on the office wall of cjp-nhrecords.com and websites online. 2600:8801:8606:350:8DD3:6AC6:D343:6FD8 (talk) 07:37, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello again, IP. This has been discussed pretty extensively on the article talk page in the past, but here's a summary: Most editors do not feel as if being a voting member for a professional organization is notable enough for inclusion in an encyclopedia article. Even if it were – and this is the most important part – its inclusion would have to be verified by a reliable, secondary source. The only sourcing you or anyone else has been able to provide for that claim is self-published. And that's not terribly surprising, because if it were a notable piece of information, it would have been written about and we could include it. But it isn't, so it hasn't, so we don't.

I'm sorry if that seems blunt, but you're exhibiting WP:IDHT behavior in response to multiple editors telling you that all additions to biographies of living persons have to be reliably sourced. The article as it is currently written is not in bad shape, and including one random bit of trivia is not going to improve it. DrOrinScrivello (talk) 14:23, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:16, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Paper Girl at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! 4meter4 (talk) 04:19, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

On 20 December 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Paper Girl, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Paper Girl concluded that the super-rich are removing the "ladder of upward mobility" from the lower class? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Paper Girl. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Paper Girl), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 16,464 views (686.0 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of December 2025 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Accidental Gods is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MCE89 -- MCE89 (talk) 22:01, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Accidental Gods has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MCE89 -- MCE89 (talk) 22:22, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

		WikiProject National Register of Historic Places Award
		In appreciation for all your practical guidance on the WikiProject talk page. - RevelationDirect (talk) 22:14, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

@RevelationDirect: Thank you! I've gotten a lot of assistance from the project during my time here so I'm always happy to pay it forward when I can. Hope you have a happy new year! DrOrinScrivello (talk) 15:55, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

DrOrinScrivello,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Volten001 ^☎ 05:43, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Volten001 ^☎ 05:43, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Good article nominations | February 2026 Backlog Drive
February 2026 Backlog Drive: On 1 February, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talk page.
You're receiving this message because you have conducted a good article review in the past year or participated in the previous backlog drive.

-- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:00, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi can you please consider for the super bowl article for the actual article part to include the information about the nbcsports app and website with authentication given the sources included in the super bowl talk page thread ~2026-53064-7 (talk) 01:33, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

On 24 March 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article D-Day: The Battle for Normandy, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that, according to D-Day, the US Army treated 30,000 cases of combat exhaustion during the Battle of Normandy? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/D-Day: The Battle for Normandy. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, D-Day: The Battle for Normandy), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:03, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi, I was wondering why you removed a phrase from the Grenadian French Creole article here , Wikipedia isn’t censored and if it is a phrase used then it should be kept, it should be kept for its language content regardless of whether the sentence is a weird one. The Grenadian Historian (Aka. Mwen Sé Kéyòl Translator-a) (talk) 20:08, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello, thanks for reaching out. I understand that Wikipedia is not censored, but the principle of least astonishment is also important to keep in mind. That article contains over 50 example phrases, which is arguably too many to begin with (the purpose of an encyclopedia article about a language is not to teach the language), and one describing how to call someone a "whore" is not helping the reader and is frankly jarring in an encyclopedic context. I hope that helps explain why I removed it. DrOrinScrivello (talk) 20:18, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

I completely understand that reasoning and I support the change, these creole phrases can be jarring and/or humorous in circumstances, I’ve encountered many such phrases. Thanks for the edit and swift reply and have a great rest of your day. The Grenadian Historian (Aka. Mwen Sé Kéyòl Translator-a) (talk) 20:24, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

I must say I did chuckle when I saw it. Thanks for understanding, though, and I hope you have a good day as well. DrOrinScrivello (talk) 20:27, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article D-Day: The Battle for Normandy is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ErnestKrause -- ErnestKrause (talk) 03:02, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article D-Day: The Battle for Normandy has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ErnestKrause -- ErnestKrause (talk) 17:02, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article The Monuments Men (book) is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LunaEatsTuna -- LunaEatsTuna (talk) 23:12, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article The Monuments Men (book) has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LunaEatsTuna -- LunaEatsTuna (talk) 17:46, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article The Monuments Men (book) has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LunaEatsTuna -- LunaEatsTuna (talk) 00:28, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Paper Girl is under review. See the talk page for more information. This may take up to seven days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. InfernoHues (talk) 04:15, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Paper Girl has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of InfernoHues -- InfernoHues (talk) 18:25, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Paper Girl has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of InfernoHues -- InfernoHues (talk) 01:24, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

On 24 May 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Vol. II (Angine de Poitrine album), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a critic scored Angine de Poitrine's album Vol. II a perfect 10 despite calling it "pretentious and performative"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Vol. II (Angine de Poitrine album). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Vol. II (Angine de Poitrine album)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

Good article nominations | June 2026 Backlog Drive
June 2026 Backlog Drive: Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process? On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles reviewed. Mentors are available, and new reviewers (<6 reviews) get bonus points! Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talk page.
You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:58, 25 May 2026 (UTC)