User talk:Dr. Precursor

Hello, I'm TechnoSquirrel69. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Gamtec, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 17:56, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on JungleTac requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Runmastery (talk) 06:03, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article JungleTac is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JungleTac until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 18:43, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Funky Karts. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ... discospinster _talk 01:57, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

TarnishedPath^talk 09:42, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Is the page i edited the page for Elliot Rodgers? Dr. Precursor (talk) 01:55, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

Yep. It's in a contentious topic area. Please be aware that there are higher expectations for editors when they are editing in contentious topic areas. Since it didn't look like you'd been advised of that before, I thought that I would advise you. TarnishedPath^talk 07:58, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

Okie dokie artichokie. Dr. Precursor (talk) 06:36, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Waixing Technology, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GRINCHIDICAE🎄 17:30, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

What exactly do I need to fix specifically on the article? Dr. Precursor (talk) 22:02, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

If the draft is not accepted, does the page get deleted or can i keep editing it until it is ready for the mainspace? Dr. Precursor (talk) 07:35, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello Dr. Precursor. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Dr. Precursor. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Dr. Precursor|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GRINCHIDICAE🎄 17:31, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

What makes you think that? The page for Waixing? Bottom line is I am not being paid anything to make articles! Dr. Precursor (talk) 18:08, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

I edit Wikipedia because I choose to. I am not being hired to do it. Dr. Precursor (talk) 20:23, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Makon Soft, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GRINCHIDICAE🎄 21:17, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

I didn't know about the draft space when i made the article. Dr. Precursor (talk) 22:54, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

To answer your question: the reasons why we don't include the person you mentioned:

1. we normally only include people with their own wiki pages in the "Notable people/residents" section. Since they don't have their own page (their article got salted), we can't include them
2. they already have a site dedicated to them, which is written in a way that might violate WP:NPOV or WP:BLP

I hope this explains it a little better... - OpalYosutebito (talk) 14:27, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Dr. Precursor. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Funky Karts".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 02:23, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

Hey,

Just wanted to reach out about your recent moving of Tour F to F Tower.

I moved it back because I believe there should not only be consensus on the naming of the building by Wikipedians (and to an extent, sources)

I've seen it labeled in the sources provided in the article currently as "F Tower", "F-Tower", "Tower F", and "Tour F". At this point until further clarification is provided by the government of the Ivory Coast/Cote d'Ivore (who i believe own the building) about the name (e.g. like the name of the country previously mentioned, the name of the building is contested)

TLDR (or in my opinion) I think it would be better if we started a discussion about a possible move over at Talk:Tour F. Thanks!

Hurstbergn (talk) 00:33, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Dr. Precursor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Diddy Kong, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:08, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Dr. Precursor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nice Code Software, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:08, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Dr. Precursor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Makon Soft, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:11, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It started today on Monday June 16 and will run until Sunday July 13. There is over $3300 going into it, with $500 the top prize. If you are interested in winning something to save you money in buying books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for subjects which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested. Even if you can only manage a few articles they would be very much appreciated and help make the content produced as diverse and broad as possible!♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:45, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello, thanks for your improvement.

I gathered more information about Super Contra 7 on Bootleg Games Wiki on Fandom and I added it. I also added Super Contra 7 to the disambiguation page called Super 7. I forgot to put citation links on it. Since you added the Super Contra 7 section, you improved my edit.

Also, thank you for fixing my mistakes. RW Gamer (a typical editor and a gamer) (talk) 03:22, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for adding more information. However, I am not sure that the BootlegGames Wiki is a reliable source, due to it being a Fandom wiki. You should look for other websites to cite instead. Dr. Precursor (talk) 02:37, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Manualbadeditfix (talk) 04:58, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

Are you referring to my edits on Nothing? Dr. Precursor (talk) 03:13, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

The redirect La La La Lava, Ch Ch Ch Chicken has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 10 § La La La Lava, Ch Ch Ch Chicken until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 10:00, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Hey, I wanted to give you a head's up on why CWC isn't mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia. The basic gist is that the coverage just isn't there. She did get some coverage for the legal issues with her mother and a tiny smattering for the Game Stop arrest, but a lot of that was written in a tabloid-esque style. Quite a large chunk of it was published in places that Wikipedia wouldn't see as reliable either. Of the incest charges, a lot of it came about when CWC was initially arrested. Most of them didn't follow up on things and the ones that did tended to be more along the lines of outright tabloids or were otherwise unusable.

Honestly, there's really no reason to cover CWC on here. Even the Kiwi Farms article doesn't really need to cover her in any true detail, because what made them notable wasn't her. There's also the fact that people have tried using Wikipedia as an avenue to try and harass her. I seem to remember hearing that some were trying to make a "Wikipedia saga". Wikipedia isn't censored, but the site also tries to avoid including people in cases where notability is dubious at best and there's a chance of it causing real world distress for the subject.

The argument to include her has always been ongoing and at this point, I don't know that she will ever be notable enough for an article. If she is to be included, the article would have to go through both AfC and the admin board before it got approved. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:19, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

You have recently made edits related to living or recently deceased subjects of biographical content on Wikipedia articles. This is a standard message to inform you that living or recently deceased subjects of biographical content on Wikipedia articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics.

If you continue to try and discuss Christine Chandler you will be topic banned from discussions concerning them, and if it continues beyond that you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:37, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

I apologize. I was merely attempting to provide information as to why I believed she wasn't allowed to be mentioned on Wikipedia. Dr. Precursor (talk) 21:53, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Dr. Precursor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Makon Soft".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:52, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Dr. Precursor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Nice Code Software".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:53, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Orange Beach, Alabama, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:13, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Dr. Precursor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:SameBoy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:08, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Dr. Precursor. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Diddy Kong".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 16:26, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

That's not a problem, as an official Diddy Kong page exists now. As a matter of fact, the draft had no reason to exist, and I would have probably nominated it for deletion anyway. Dr. Precursor (talk) 18:41, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Geography of Montenegro, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:37, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Vancouver, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:58, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

The redirect 67 Merry Rizzmas has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 February 25 § 67 Merry Rizzmas until a consensus is reached. – LuniZunie_(talk) 16:53, 25 February 2026 (UTC)