User talk:Eastmain2

March 2019

@Breawycker: I didn't create the page, so I'm allowed to remove a tag that is no longer correct. I do not think the draft in its current state is a copyvio. Лисан аль-Гаиб (talk) 01:10, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Oh! I'm so sorry. I misread the page history. I have undone my edit and removed the warning from your talk page. Breawycker (talk to me!) 01:19, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

A cookie so there are no hard feelings

Breawycker (talk to me!) 01:25, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Thank you, @Breawycker:. No hard feelings. Лисан аль-Гаиб (talk) 01:42, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

About your job on IAbot...

It seems to have gotten stuck... (it's https://tools.wmflabs.org/iabot/index.php?page=viewjob&id=3865 btw). Could you kill it? Thanks! Remagoxer (talk) 12:38, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

@Remagoxer: Thank you for your message. I just killed the job. Лисан аль-Гаиб (talk) 17:07, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot! Shame it had to come to this, but yeah... Remagoxer (talk) 17:15, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Just a heads-up, it's happened again - job #14802 this time. Whoop whoop pull up ^{Bitching Betty ⚧️ Averted crashes} 20:11, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

@Whoop whoop pull up Thank you. I just killed the job. Лисан аль-Гаиб (talk) 22:14, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

Y'welks - oh, and job #14805's having that issue now. Whoop whoop pull up ^{Bitching Betty ⚧️ Averted crashes} 23:09, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

Oh dear. I killed that job as well. Лисан аль-Гаиб (talk) 16:26, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

I'm back, bringing news of job #14831. Whoop whoop pull up ^{Bitching Betty ⚧️ Averted crashes} 23:05, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Thank you. I just killed it. Лисан аль-Гаиб (talk) 23:32, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

...aaand now job #14834's having trouble. Whoop whoop pull up ^{Bitching Betty ⚧️ Averted crashes} 01:43, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

fixed. Лисан аль-Гаиб (talk) 01:47, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Thanx! :-) Whoop whoop pull up ^{Bitching Betty ⚧️ Averted crashes} 01:55, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Heads-up regarding job #14895. Whoop whoop pull up ^{Bitching Betty ⚧️ Averted crashes} 11:57, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Thank you. Лисан аль-Гаиб (talk) 16:56, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Jobs #14927 and #14930're acting up. Whoop whoop pull up ^{Bitching Betty ⚧️ Averted crashes} 15:05, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Done. I wish this issue could be fixed. Лисан аль-Гаиб (talk) 17:21, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Job #14948. Whoop whoop pull up ^{Bitching Betty ⚧️ Averted crashes} 01:51, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Good news! IAbot figured this one had finished without any help from me. # 09:33, 2023-09-12 InternetArchiveBot completed bot job 14948 Лисан аль-Гаиб (talk) 19:02, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wasatch County School District (September 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

Please remove the external links from the body. --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 11:37, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wasatch County School District and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 11:37, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amata sperbius has been accepted

Amata sperbius, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

NotAGenious (talk) 05:44, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Guardians of the North (October 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CurryTime7-24 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Blockquote from the studio is not needed. Without it or any useful information from reliable sources to replace it, this draft is little more than a directory entry.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Guardians of the North and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CurryTime7-24 (talk) 22:10, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Лисан аль-Гаиб! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CurryTime7-24 (talk) 22:10, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Union Pacific 8080 (April 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Union Pacific 8080 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 11:46, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chesapeake and Ohio 1642 (April 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Trainsandotherthings was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chesapeake and Ohio 1642 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Trainsandotherthings (talk) 20:37, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miranda Wilking (June 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Wilking Sisters. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Miranda Wilking and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 09:19, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on Springhill, Nova Scotia

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Springhill, Nova Scotia, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:43, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

Ben C. Rain High School moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Ben C. Rain High School. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Twinkle1990 (talk) 08:52, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Taxa named by Eugenio Sismonda

A tag has been placed on Category:Taxa named by Eugenio Sismonda indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:43, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isurus desori has been accepted

Isurus desori, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 21:44, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Deletion of Bill Smith, aka Bluebird Bill

Why didn't you voice your concerns on the talk page before deleting this article? The Bluebird K7 pages already have an issue with "too much detail". There is no information on the Bluebird K7 article about Bill Smith's underwater survey of HMHS Britannic where his work solved a long-standing question of how the hospital ship was sunk in 1919. Admin had already posted previously "PROD-deleted or speedily deleted articles are not eligible under this criterion, although they may be deletable under other criteria." What alternative criteria were you using? @JalenBarks:Nigel PG Dale 16:23, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

The information at HMHS Britannic could be added to that article. The article about Bill Smith was originally deleted as the result of a discussion at Articles for deletion. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 19:07, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

Лисан аль-Гаиб didn't delete this article, they converted it to a Redirect which was completely appropriate. It was the recreation of an article deleted through an AFD so it was headed towards deletion until they found a way for the page to be retained in the main space. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:57, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

June 2025

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. LibStar (talk) 01:49, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

Since your personal attack you have edited 2 articles that I recently edited, how did you discover these articles? LibStar (talk) 04:07, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Лисан аль-Гаиб, I'm not tracking your editing habits but I did want to say please do not comment negatively on other editors in Project space. I know that AFDs can be tense areas where editors can feel frustration but please remember to be civil at all times. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:42, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Thaxterogaster artosoides has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Thaxterogaster artosoides. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 18:15, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thaxterogaster artosoides has been accepted

Thaxterogaster artosoides, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 18:16, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carcharodon plicatilis has been accepted

Carcharodon plicatilis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

UtherSRG (talk) 23:54, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2025 United Nations Security Council Emergency Meeting on the Kyiv Attack (August 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at 2025 United Nations Security Council Emergency Meeting on the Kyiv Attack. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2025 United Nations Security Council Emergency Meeting on the Kyiv Attack and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RangersRus (talk) 12:28, 2 August 2025 (UTC)

@RangersRus: The merge target that you suggested does not exist. Did you mean some other page? Лисан аль-Гаиб (talk) 12:34, 2 August 2025 (UTC)

Removal of CSD G11 tag

Hello Лисан аль-Гаиб, I noticed that you removed the CSD G11 tag I placed on Draft:PATRICK TCHOKOTHE AIME and moved the draft to Draft:Patrick Aime. In your edit summary, you stated that the presence of two references meant CSD was not applicable. However, the draft was tagged for CSD because it contained promotional content and was a recreation of a previously deleted draft. Both the article and the redirect have since been deleted. I would appreciate it if you avoid removing CSD tags without proper justification in the future. Best regards. QEnigma 论 15:21, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

@QEnigma: I thought the article might be salvageable. Promotional text can always be edited out. Remember, a lot of good articles started out as comparatively weak stubs. Лисан аль-Гаиб (talk) 16:50, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

@Лисан аль-Гаиб: It was not a weak stub but a promotional article about a non-notable individual that failed to meet WP:GNG, which was the reason it was nominated for CSD G11. Thank you for your reply. QEnigma 论 16:56, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Glugea vincentiae has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Glugea vincentiae. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:23, 27 August 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Glugea vincentiae has been accepted

Glugea vincentiae, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:23, 27 August 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ternstroemites (August 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ternstroemites and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 21:46, 27 August 2025 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Pteroheterochrosperma has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Pteroheterochrosperma. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:48, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pteroheterochrosperma has been accepted

Pteroheterochrosperma, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:48, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Blauhúster Dakkapel

Hello, Лисан аль-Гаиб. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Blauhúster Dakkapel, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:07, 4 September 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amycolatopsis acidiphila has been accepted

Amycolatopsis acidiphila, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BuySomeApples (talk) 21:00, 8 September 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lasioglossum lactescens has been accepted

Lasioglossum lactescens, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 01:57, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Taxa named by Friedrich Karsch

A tag has been placed on Category:Taxa named by Friedrich Karsch indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:24, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Taxa named by Friedrich Karsch

A tag has been placed on Category:Taxa named by Friedrich Karsch, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

The category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories. (See section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. SomeoneDreaming (talk) 03:28, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

Draft:Talitsa_(Slutsk_district)

Morning! I have already fixed the page: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Talitsa_(Slutsk_district) Could you approve?! Thank you for your help! Igor Viktorovich Yakhno (talk) 21:19, 28 September 2025 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Frankliniella hawksworthi has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Frankliniella hawksworthi. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:51, 30 September 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frankliniella hawksworthi has been accepted

Frankliniella hawksworthi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:52, 30 September 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Laila Lockhart Kraner (October 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Laila Lockhart Kraner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 14:33, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Heterospilus alternicoloratus has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Heterospilus alternicoloratus. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:19, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Heterospilus alternicoloratus has been accepted

Heterospilus alternicoloratus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:19, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Brachygaster gussakovskiji has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Brachygaster gussakovskiji. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:26, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brachygaster gussakovskiji has been accepted

Brachygaster gussakovskiji, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:26, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Draft:Talitsa_(Slutsk_district)&redlink=1

Morning =) Would you like to promote thisone: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft%3ATalitsa_%28Slutsk_district%29&redlink=1# Have a nice day! Thank you a lot! Igor Viktorovich Yakhno (talk) 01:43, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

CS1 error on FoodMaxx

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page FoodMaxx, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 03:46, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited FoodMaxx, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bathygobius andrei has been accepted

Bathygobius andrei, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 09:20, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amanita heterochroma has been accepted

Amanita heterochroma, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 16:41, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Josef Chuchro has been accepted

Josef Chuchro, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Patre23 (talk) 17:40, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saint Callinicus of Cernica (October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Valorrr was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Saint Callinicus of Cernica and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Valorrr ^{(lets chat)} 20:20, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Calostoma rodwayi has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Calostoma rodwayi. Thanks! Aesurias (talk) 14:32, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Calostoma rodwayi has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Calostoma rodwayi. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:07, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Calostoma rodwayi has been accepted

Calostoma rodwayi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:08, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Soliformovum has been accepted

Soliformovum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mgp28 (talk) 17:33, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ufa Ton-Woche 471/1939 (November 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Earth605 was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Ufa Tonwoche instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ufa Ton-Woche 471/1939 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Earth605^talk 08:28, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ufa Ton-Woche 471/1939 (November 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Earth605 was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Ufa Tonwoche instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ufa Ton-Woche 471/1939 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Earth605^talk 08:28, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: White Trash (2021 film) (November 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Guninvalid was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:White Trash (2021 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

guninvalid (talk) 18:55, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ternstroemites (November 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheInevitables was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ternstroemites and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheInevitables (talk) 17:39, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Heptapterus carnatus (December 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HwyNerd Mike was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

While this would work as an article, the sources are not reliable. If you can find more reliable sources, I would gladly accept it.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Heptapterus carnatus and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

HwyNerd Mike (t | c) 08:22, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Heptapterus carnatus has been accepted

Heptapterus carnatus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MCE89 (talk) 12:42, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ternstroemites has been accepted

Ternstroemites, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MCE89 (talk) 12:45, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Laila Lockhart Kraner (December 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hurricane Wind and Fire was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Laila Lockhart Kraner instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Laila Lockhart Kraner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 02:15, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saint Callinicus of Cernica has been accepted

Saint Callinicus of Cernica, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

monkey_smashing^keyboards (talk) 17:14, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ascarina coursii has been accepted

Ascarina coursii, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ca ^{talk to me!} 05:11, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Moenkhausia oligolepis has been accepted

Moenkhausia oligolepis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nil🥝 12:48, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Лисан аль-Гаиб!

Happy New Year!

Лисан аль-Гаиб,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Volten001 ^☎ 03:47, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Volten001 ^☎ 03:47, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zoë Mc Pherson (January 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Pythoncoder were:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zoë Mc Pherson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 23:45, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Zoë Mc Pherson

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Zoë Mc Pherson, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GPL93 (talk) 00:53, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lara Wall (January 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ChrysGalley was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The comment the reviewer left was:

We need more than a few words.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lara Wall and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ChrysGalley (talk) 19:03, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Moenkhausia forestii has been accepted

Moenkhausia forestii, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sophisticatedevening^(talk) 10:02, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Erotides

Hello, Лисан аль-Гаиб. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Erotides, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:10, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Monodictys castaneae

Hello, Лисан аль-Гаиб. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Monodictys castaneae, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:07, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Astrocaryum confertum

Hello, Лисан аль-Гаиб. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Astrocaryum confertum, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:07, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on River Arun

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page River Arun, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:06, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Astrocaryum confertum has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Astrocaryum confertum. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 18:33, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Astrocaryum confertum has been accepted

Astrocaryum confertum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 18:33, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Monodictys castaneae has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Monodictys castaneae. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:47, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Monodictys castaneae has been accepted

Monodictys castaneae, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:48, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Pristimantis koki has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Pristimantis koki. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:13, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pristimantis koki has been accepted

Pristimantis koki, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:14, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lara Wall has been accepted

Lara Wall, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CNMall41 (talk) 19:37, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Marcusenius altembesi has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Marcusenius altembesi. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 16:11, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

February 2026

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

asilvering (talk) 19:12, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Asilvering the block is actually indefinite. JBW (talk) 18:55, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Ugh my bad, I just copied the template from the original on the "master". At any rate, fixed now. -- asilvering (talk) 21:41, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marcusenius altembesi (February 3)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Ethmostigmus was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This appears to be a hoax. There is no described species named Marcusenius altembesi - the three sources used in this draft are about a real species known as Marcusenius altisambesi, and do not contain any mention of a M. altembesi to support any of the claims in this article. There are 0 mentions of this M. altembesi anywhere in the scientific literature (or anywhere on the internet besides this draft and pages that link to it) and as far as I can find there is no Altembese River in the DRC either.

Ethmostigmus 🌿 (talk | contribs) 06:19, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Arambagh Prafulla Chandra Sen Railway Station

Hello, Eastmain2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Arambagh Prafulla Chandra Sen Railway Station, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:07, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Picris davurica

Hello, Eastmain2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Picris davurica, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:07, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Achillea occulta

Hello, Eastmain2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Achillea occulta, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:08, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Achillea sergievskiana

Hello, Eastmain2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Achillea sergievskiana, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:08, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Agelanthus crassifolius

Hello, Eastmain2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Agelanthus crassifolius, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:08, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Tapinanthus quequensis

Hello, Eastmain2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tapinanthus quequensis, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:09, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Blauhúster Dakkapel

Hello, Eastmain2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Blauhúster Dakkapel".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:09, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Listing for discussion of Template:Congo Basin endemic fishes

Template:Congo Basin endemic fishes has been listed for discussion, which may result in the template being merged or deleted by consensus. You are invited to comment on the proposed action at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:03, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles E. Hewett (March 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Grapesurgeon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Need at least three pieces of reliable secondary sources to pass notability standards, and I'm only seeing two; the maine mag and portland press herald. Others are just brief mentions of him, which don't count to notability, or press releases, ditto. Much of the article is unsourced; need a source for at least each paragraph.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Charles E. Hewett and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

grapesurgeon (talk) 03:19, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Homalattus marshalli

Hello, Eastmain2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Homalattus marshalli, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:08, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Picris davurica

Hello, Eastmain2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Picris davurica".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:11, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Achillea occulta

Hello, Eastmain2. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Achillea occulta".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 06:25, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Achillea sergievskiana

Hello, Eastmain2. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Achillea sergievskiana".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 13:25, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Soliformovum expulsum

Hello, Eastmain2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Soliformovum expulsum, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:06, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Marcusenius pongolensis

Hello, Eastmain2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Marcusenius pongolensis, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:07, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Drimia kniphofioides

Hello, Eastmain2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Drimia kniphofioides, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:07, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles