User talk:SomeoneDreaming

Women in Red | January 2026, Vol 12, Issue 1, Nos 357, 358, 359, 360 Online events: New: Sports (year-long initiative) | Alphabet run - countries starting with A Continuing: #1day1woman ( year-long initiative) | Women who died in 2025 Announcements from other communities Wikipedia turns 25! Celebrate Wikipedia Day on Jan 15, 2026. Tip of the month: Consider becoming a new page reviewer to help reduce the huge backlog of women's biographies. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 23:33, 26 December 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Happy New Year!

SomeoneDreaming,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Volten001 ^☎ 06:56, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Volten001 ^☎ 06:56, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Infoboxes on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 20:31, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 00:31, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 18:31, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

This was the reason for your rejecting my Draft:False or misleading statements by Bob Dylan.

None of the handful of quotations were extensive; I was operating under what I thought was 'fair use.'

But I will try to rework my draft accordingly to bring it into compliance and resubmit.

Thank you. M.mk (talk) 18:24, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

I felt like your article was relying mostly on quotations rather than putting things in your own words, which led me to be concerned about copyright. One or two quotations is not necessarily a problem, but the article seemed to be mostly copyrighted material (although I do appreciate that you cited it). I could have definitely explained that clearer, though. SomeoneDreaming (talk) 22:55, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Could 3 citations be reasonable? Ell22Moore (talk) 22:52, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

In some cases, yes. But I don't think it's necessary for things that are uncontroversial, and it's easier to review a submission that sticks to the best sources rather than every source available. SomeoneDreaming (talk) 22:53, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

I trimmed them to 3 at best. Ell22Moore (talk) 23:03, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you. I'll take another look. SomeoneDreaming (talk) 23:17, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Is it good? Ell22Moore (talk) 01:53, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

It's still a LOT of citations. I can't look at it tonight. SomeoneDreaming (talk) 03:56, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

That's okay. Take your time. Ell22Moore (talk) 04:03, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi! Thank you for reviewing my submission and for helping fix the copyright violation. I looked at the notability criteria, can you help me understand why the author doesn't meet the notability criteria, if the book does? I was looking at notability criteria for authors. Do I need to find more coverage of the author herself? Or would it be better to create a page for the book? Or both? I so appreciate the help and guidance! Buffythevampslyr (talk) 23:00, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

I think it would definitely make sense to go ahead and create a page for the book, and then if you can find more coverage of the author herself or her other works, that would help improve the author's page. Rereading the notability criteria, she might qualify based on the coverage of her book, but if all the independent coverage is just of the single book then I think a book page makes more sense. Thanks for asking! I'm new to being an AFC reviewer so I'm still getting all the nuances. SomeoneDreaming (talk) 00:25, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

It's okay I'm also new! Okay I'll work on it some more! Thank you :) Buffythevampslyr (talk) 02:09, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Institute for Spirituality and Health, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Institute for Spirituality and Health until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

Women in Red | February 2026, Vol 12, Issue 2, Nos 358, 359, 361, 362, 363 Online events: New: Alphabet run: countries starting with B | Black Women | Works by women: theatre, opera, music Continuing: #1day1woman ( year-long initiative) | Sports (year-long initiative) Announcements from other communities Join Wikipedia:26 for '26 and create or substantially improve twenty-six Wikipedia articles during the year 2026, at least one for each letter of the English alphabet. Tip of the month: Our redlists are a great resource, but not every redlinked subject is notable. Be sure to research before starting a new article. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Lajmmoore (talk 22:50, 31 January 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging

You left 'likely' on Princess Zahrah Mustapha Mona Audu's draft. Help explain what that means. Bassey2026 (talk) 06:15, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

I meant that based on the sources that were in the article, it seemed like she wasn't notable yet, but there might be more sources that could change my mind. SomeoneDreaming (talk) 21:44, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Oh! Thank you for the explanation. Bassey2026 (talk) 04:07, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, can you check the update I have made on the draft? Maybe it could fly now. Bassey2026 (talk) 15:53, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello Bassey2026 (talk) 14:48, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

I'm really busy off-wiki at the moment; you'll have to wait for a review through the normal process but there's a backlog right now. SomeoneDreaming (talk) 23:47, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:North Africa on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 23:47, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Stephen Wolfram on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 07:31, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Women in Red | March 2026, Vol 12, Issue 3, Nos 358, 359, 364, 365, 366 Online events: March 1-31: Artists & Activists | Artworks by women | Alphabet run: countries starting with C Continuing (year-long initiatives): #1day1woman | Sports Announcements from other communities: Celebrate Women Unreferenced articles backlog drive Wiki Loves Ramadan Tip of the month: Those experiencing difficulties with new articles can follow the guidance in our essays, perhaps starting with our Ten Simple Rules. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 09:31, 25 February 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Donald Trump on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 09:30, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi Sebastian, thanks again for answering the COI edit requests I shared for the "history" section of the Yahoo Mail article. I've posted some new edit requests for the "User interface" and "Spam policy" sections at the talk page. If you have a chance to take a look, I'd appreciate it! Either way, thanks for all your work helping reduce the edit request backlog. Mary Gaulke (talk) 19:59, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi SomeoneDreaming. Thank you for your work on Funds of knowledge. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for this engaging article, sources from 3 distinct reliable sources where 'Funds of knowledge' was the primary focus.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 13:26, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Stella O'Malley on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 13:30, 23 March 2026 (UTC)