User talk:ILoveSport2006

Thanks for uploading File:2026 Men's European Volleyball Championship logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:2026 Women's European Volleyball Championship logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to 2026 AVC Women's Volleyball Cup Pool B. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. I am bad at usernames (talk · contribs) 21:03, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2026 FIVB Men's Volleyball Nations League preliminary round, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matthew Anderson was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:03, 11 June 2026 (UTC)

Hello! Thank you for your efforts to improve Wikipedia, and in particular for adding references! However, adding a bare URL is not ideal, and exposes the reference to link rot. It is preferable to use proper citation templates when citing sources, including details such as title, author, date, and any other information necessary for a bibliographic citation. Here's an example of a full citation using the {{cite web}} template to cite a web page:

Lorem ipsum<ref>{{cite web |title=Download the Scanning Software - Windows and Mac |publisher=Canon Inc |work=Ask a Question |date=2022 |url=https://support.usa.canon.com/kb/index?page=content&id=ART174839 |access-date=2022-04-02}}</ref> dolor sit amet.

which displays inline in the running text of the article as:

Lorem ipsum^[1] dolor sit amet.

and displays under References as:

1. ^ Download the Scanning Software - Windows and Mac". Ask a Question. Canon Inc. 2022. Retrieved 2022-04-02.

If you've already added one or more bare URLs to an article, there are tools available to expand them into full citations: try the Citer tool, or in the wikitext editor, try the reFill tool, and in the Visual Editor, the reference dialog can convert some bare urls into a full citation. Once again, thanks for adding references to articles. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 13:22, 11 June 2026 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to 2018 FIFA World Cup, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 14:35, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

Hello, ILoveSport2006. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Central Europe Women's League".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 22:25, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2026 FIVB Women's Volleyball Nations League preliminary round is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be redirected to 2026 FIVB Women's Volleyball Nations League.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2026 FIVB Women's Volleyball Nations League preliminary round until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

ꕥ 𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 ꕥ ^{→𝙼𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊𝚐𝚎 𝚖𝚎←} 12:53, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2026 FIVB Men's Volleyball Nations League preliminary round is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be redirected to 2026 FIVB Men's Volleyball Nations League.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2026 FIVB Men's Volleyball Nations League preliminary round until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

ꕥ 𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 ꕥ ^{→𝙼𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊𝚐𝚎 𝚖𝚎←} 12:58, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2026 AVC Women's Volleyball Cup Pool A is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be redirected to 2026 AVC Women's Volleyball Cup.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2026 AVC Women's Volleyball Cup Pool A until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

ꕥ 𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 ꕥ ^{→𝙼𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊𝚐𝚎 𝚖𝚎←} 00:05, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi ILoveSport2006. Thank you for your work on 2026 AVC Women's Volleyball Cup Pool A. Another editor, Aplucas0703, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

marking as reviewed, as it has been placed on Articles for Deletion. Having checked for a copyright violation, I did not find any.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aplucas0703}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

AaronNealLucas (talk) 00:14, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

The third round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 28 June at 23:59 (UTC). As a reminder, good article nomination reviews now receive 10 points, while peer reviews, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 3 will advance to round 4 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.

Round 3 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points; eight scored over 500; and thirteen scored over 300. The top three contestants had at least one featured article (two of them with two apiece). The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:

• MCE89 (submissions) with 1567 points, mainly from good and featured articles about Australian people and geography, as well as some article reviews
• Bgsu98 (submissions) with 1547 points, mainly from good articles, featured articles, featured lists, and a good topic about figure skating, along with 20 article reviews
• Reconrabbit (submissions) with 1004 points, mainly from a high-multiplier featured article on European rabbit and several good articles, DYKs, and reviews
• A.Cython (submissions) with 1004 points, mainly from good articles about warfare, along with 22 article reviews
• Generalissima (submissions) with 859 points, mainly from good and featured articles about rivers and East Asian topics

The full scores for round 3 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 12 featured articles, 12 featured lists, 7 featured-topic articles, 117 good articles, 74 good-topic articles and more than 30 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 13 In the News articles, and they have conducted nearly 180 reviews. The tournament points table has been updated.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed in Round 4. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

I closed this as you were getting upset and lashing out when editors did not agree with you. You were an the edge of getting sanctioned so the kindest thing to do was to end it.

You need to find a way to deal with disagreement that doesn't include personalising that disagreement. I have been clashing with some of the DRV regulars for the best part of 20 years but that's because our philosophies differ not because they are bad people and robust debate makes better outcomes. Spartaz ^Humbug! 19:46, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

I am not saying to be rude to you as your reply is fine, but if I was on the edge of getting sanctioned, that's pathetic. What did I say that was personal?

People need to understand that for me as an autistic person, my points being ignored gets me very upset. Also, being told what to do when I felt very hurt by the volleyball people originally was not going to get anywhere. Also, can you explain to me why the following questions?

• Why is passive aggression allowed in Wikipedia? I have had numerous editors be passive aggressive to me in the past and they get no sanctions.
• Why do people constantly ignore my points? It feels so unjust, unfair and gets me upset. It is like people don't take me seriously.

Don't take anything I said personally, but please answer the two questions as that will help my mental health.

Best regards ILoveSport2006 (talk) 19:58, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

What you did that you were about to be sanctioned for was casting aspersions by saying that the nominator was acting out of spite, in the AFD, and then saying: you are a liar saying I selectively targeted them.. That is what you did that you were about to be sanctioned for. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:23, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

Well he did say I selectively targeted them when I didn't. Wouldn't that would make anyone upset? Also, he said my work was commendable but then ten days later nominated my pages for deletion and it did feel a bit like spite. The spite comes from the fact that a day before the nomination, I started editing and making changes to the Volleyball Nations Leagues pages again. He reverted to it and then right after nominated my pages for deletion. So it felt very coincidental and since he had been giving me problems already, it did feel like spite.

Also your response proves my point about being ignored as again, I have to explain for the third time my points. I don't want to be lectured about how I acted because I am always civil 99% of the time, but I felt very hurt by the volleyball editors and felt they weren't listening to me which as I've said numerous times gets me very upset.

So if you want me to stop replying, You have got to stop making me repeat the same points I've made.

Also, the passive aggressive question wasn't answered so can I please have that answered as it would make help my mental health. ILoveSport2006 (talk) 20:38, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

Frankly, you are in complaining about the speck in other editors' eyes while ignoring the beam in your's territory. Spartaz ^Humbug! 21:16, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

What? ILoveSport2006 (talk) 21:53, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

See The Mote and the Beam. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:42, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

I guess my mental health isn't worth being improved by you people. That says it all. ILoveSport2006 (talk) 22:03, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

You are going to be sorely disappointed if you think editors here will change their approaches to pander to your mental health. I'm saying this for absolute clarity, if you try and guilt other editors this way again then I'm going to remove you from participating. Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:28, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

I guess when my mental health is at stake for a month, people didn't give a damn. Don't reply I am not replying again to this conversation with people that dislike me. I tried to be nice but that didn't work. ILoveSport2006 (talk) 10:21, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

You wrote: Why do people constantly ignore my points? It feels so unjust, unfair and gets me upset. Your points were not ignored. They were read and disagreed with. There is a difference between being ignored and being in a minority and disagreed with. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:23, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

Coming here to follow up on my colleague's comments. Your posts on @D.18th's Talk and at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2026 FIVB Women's Volleyball Nations League preliminary round are entirely uncalled for. Please consider this a final warning or you will be blocked and potentially topic banned from sports articles. Star Mississippi 01:16, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

He tried to say I canvassed on the talk page which infuriated me. You don't know what I dealt with for a month. This hasn't changed the way as I am as I know I am one of the nicest people you will meet. This has made my opinion on people who runs the deletion or help desk pages significantly worse. My questions were constantly not answered in exchange for unhelpful opinions that didn't serve to help the situation but rather made the situation worse. I told you how I react in situations where it feels unjust but you still have no understanding and that has been shown the whole time in these conversations. There are some good people on this site, people who offer a lot and add brilliant ideas, but it definitely doesn't to all. This is my final reply on this situation and I am ready to live my life. ILoveSport2006 (talk) 10:18, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours because your recent edits appear to be disruptive. Please note that this is not necessarily an assessment of faith or character, and we welcome good faith edits that are also constructive and in line with our policies. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request through the unblock wizard or through your talk page.  Spartaz ^Humbug! 13:58, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

You can't say you weren't warned. Everyone has been patient with you but a) drop the stick, b) stop waving your MH around like a talisman to guilt other editors to your pov and c) go find something productive to do that doesn't involve you taking away time from other volunteers. Spartaz ^Humbug! 14:00, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:2025 World Aquatics Men's U20 Water Polo Championships logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 21:03, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:2025 World Aquatics Women's U20 Water Polo Championships logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 21:04, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2028 Women's European Volleyball Championship, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use placeholder names, or the name of the newspaper or organisation, instead of the source's actual author or editor name. If no human author is given, the fields should be removed. (Fix | Ask for help). Below are the references causing this error:
  • says, Editor (July 16, 2026). "Las Palmas de Gran Canaria will host the 2028 Women's Volleyball European Championship – The Observatorial". {{cite web}}: |first= has generic name (help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:02, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2026 Centrobasket Women, a link pointing to the disambiguation page MVP was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:08, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2027 Women's Baseball World Cup Group A is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be merged into 2027 Women's Baseball World Cup.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2027 Women's Baseball World Cup Group A until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 13:34, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 July 28 § Alexandria basketball containers on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ScalarFactor (talk) 02:42, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Women by populated place in Egypt indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:12, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

Hello, ILoveSport2006. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2029 FIVB Women's Volleyball World Cup, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:07, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

User:B.J deleted my question to you about netball, have you ever heard of this sport before ~2026-44117-43 (talk) 08:45, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

I am English so of course I have heard of netball. I started the 2027 Netball World Cup page and also started the detailed table of the qualified teams. I was happy when they made the World Cup every 2 years from now on.

Best regards ILoveSport2006 (talk) 08:53, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

Will Malawi ever be in that netball World Cup next year in Australia?, what do you think? ~2026-44117-43 (talk) 09:18, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

Of course they will. They are one of the best netball teams in the world. ILoveSport2006 (talk) 09:41, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

I live in Ukraine ~2026-44117-43 (talk) 10:50, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

Nice. Where? ILoveSport2006 (talk) 17:22, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

Odesa ~2026-44117-43 (talk) 08:06, 12 August 2026 (UTC)

Was never announced somewhere so we do not add it. And please see WP:BRD and dont just revert again. Kante4 (talk) 14:36, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

They say the pots in the draw. Here's the link: https://watch.hockey/video/934350?from=%2Finterstitial%2F934350&t=0 ILoveSport2006 (talk) 14:38, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

I am not changing it to be difficult but they do say it in the draw. ILoveSport2006 (talk) 14:40, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

Tbh, if you need to log in to watch, better not use it as a reference as it cant be verified quickly imo (not sure about the guidelines though). Looked at YT but was nothing there and no news article posted as far as i can see (what a bad move). Kante4 (talk) 14:43, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

What is a bad move? ILoveSport2006 (talk) 14:44, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

Not publishing a news article. Kante4 (talk) 14:48, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

I don't understand what is wrong with the logging in to watch. Making an account does take two seconds. ILoveSport2006 (talk) 14:45, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

I do not want to log in there for example, so now i cant verify it. And did you read BRD? You did revert again... You were bold and added something, i reverted and then you should start a discussion (what i have done) and it gets not added back unless the discussion is over. Doing that is disruptive so please remove it again. Kante4 (talk) 14:47, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

But I did log in and I can verify what they said the seeding was. ILoveSport2006 (talk) 14:49, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

If you select a country then in the world rankings page then you can see their ranking before the draw. Also, on the men's side, I found an archive which shows the rankings before the draw. ILoveSport2006 (talk) 14:48, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

You dont get what i want. Where was it said that they used the world rankings? And you still did not answer about the BRD thing and why you revert again... Kante4 (talk) 15:00, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

I had reverted before you made that previous comment. On your Where was it said that they used the world rankings? point, I deleted that bit for now. But in the draw video, they do say the seeding and mention the world rankings as the reasoning for the seeding before every pot is drawn. ILoveSport2006 (talk) 15:09, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

Still BRD is clear and status quo stays (how it was before you added something) and that was without the seeding, which are still there. And again, dont think a video behind a login wall is good to use. It should stay removed until the matter is cleared. Kante4 (talk) 15:14, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:CEV EuroVolley 2026 Men logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 25 August 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:CEV EuroVolley 2026 Women logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 25 August 2026 (UTC)

The fourth round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 29 August at 23:59 (UTC). Everyone who competed in round 4 will advance to round 5 unless they have withdrawn or been removed. Round 4 was competitive, though slightly less so than round 3. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points; six scored over 500; and nine scored over 300. Each of the top five competitors had hundreds of points accumulated from multiple GAs. The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:

• Generalissima (submissions) with 1,318 points, mostly from 13 good articles and 3 featured articles about creeks and Chinese and Japanese subjects
• Vanderwaalforces (submissions) with 1,208 points from 2 featured articles, 2 featured lists, and 12 good articles about African leaders, along with over two dozen reviews
• A.Cython (submissions) with 1,084 points from 16 good articles and a small good topic about warfare and Greek elections, along with over two dozen reviews
• Vestrian24Bio (submissions) with 955 points, mostly from 2 FLs, 2 featured topics, and 16 GAs about cricket, and almost two dozen reviews
• Bgsu98 (submissions) with 837 points from 4 FLs and 8 GAs about figure skating, along with two dozen reviews

The full scores for round 4 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 10 featured articles, 11 featured lists, 8 featured-topic articles, 103 good articles, 6 good-topic articles and more than 30 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 11 In the News articles, and they have conducted 170 peer reviews, FA and GA reviews. The tournament points table has been updated.

Remember that any content promoted after 29 August but before the start of Round 5 can be claimed in Round 5. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 30 August 2026 (UTC)