User talk:IQR

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, IQR! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introductory tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The Teahouse

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Dcotos (talk) 16:01, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

It is a place to show that we are all human.

A tag has been placed on Anna Sujatha Mathai requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 16:08, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sudhakar Tomar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sudhakar Tomar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ☆ Bri (talk) 00:23, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Banaqeeb requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dps04 (talk) 03:48, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Hello, IQR. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gaurav Medatwal".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 06:13, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Naser Banaqeeb requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naser Banaqeeb. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Tanbiruzzaman (talk) 17:50, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello, IQR,

If you want this article to ever be in main space, you must write a draft and submit it for review to Articles for Creation. If you keep putting an unchanged version of this article back into main space, it will continue to be tagged for deletion.

If you have questions, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:38, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amir Ali Khan (subedar) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amir Ali Khan (subedar) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Lindsey40186 (talk) 14:06, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Quba Colony. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 12:59, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Mustafa Hills. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 13:00, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi IQR. Thank you for your work on Balan Putheri. Another editor, Dcotos, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dcotos}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dcotos (talk) 17:23, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

@Dcotos: Thanks a lot. I appreciate it. IQR (talk) 19:47, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Hi friend, your message on the article Anil Lamba refers. The article now appears to be OK. The notability tag was placed in the beginning but the article has improved quite a lot since then. I guess one of the admns will remove the tag eventually. Please remember to sign your comments; your post on my talk page was deleted as it was not signed and I could get it only from the history. --jojo@nthony (talk) 04:31, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

thanks a lot for your guidance IQR (talk) 06:11, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Baburam Yadav (Art). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:22, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Hi there. While reviewing new pages, I noticed that a page you created, HBR Layout metro station, does not appear to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines as a standalone article. As an alternative to deletion, I've redirected it to Hyderabad. If you disagree, feel free to revert my redirect and we can proceed to a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:54, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

@IQR, this is Augnablik with a very weird problem. I posted this message to Dhtwiki first but wanted to contact another Guild coordinator so someone could get on this without further delay, and you were alphabetically the first on the list.

I tried to join the Guild today, following the directions carefully, but despite many tries — after which I tried to delete what had been appearing for me, which I could never get to be correct — I've now thrown off the way the table should look so that the information for the editor who last joined now appears out of place. Then I'll follow up here with a 2nd message to explain what was going on for me, as well as what I was trying to post. Augnablik (talk) 08:34, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

Here is what was going on for at least a half hour, perhaps longer.

First of all, trying to insert the coding and my personal information was inordinately slow. Once I finally got everything to look the way I wanted it to in the Source editor, the next strange thing was that in the top row of my entry, it kept saying User:Augnablik instead of just Augnablik. I checked to make sure the coding was correctly done, and saw that it was ... but when I checked in the Visual editor after I'd made the entry, it still displayed User:Augnablik. Then I tried copying the same coding from another editor's entry and replaced that name with mine in the two correct places. Still, it kept displayinging User:Augnablik.

Here's another strange thing. Even though I replaced what I'd earlier typed in the COMMENT row, what was displayed in the Visual editor was what I'd typed earlier, not the replacement text. This went on several times.

At that point, I decided to simply delete my entire entry. But when I did so, that's what screwed up the row with the name of the editor who'd been at the top of the list when I started to add my own information. I just couldn't fix it. Which is when I wrote you and the next coordinator at the top of the list of your team.

Perhaps I'd better ask you or Dhtwiki to try to add me rather than for me to try again, in case the gremlins playing around with that page decide to re-emerge from the woodwork. Here's what I was trying to insert:

|-

| Augnablik

| 3 March 2025

| A magnet for problematic grammar, punctuation, spelling, clarity, and flow. 🧲

|- Augnablik (talk) 08:57, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

@IQR, @Dhtwiki helped me straighten all this out. All is now (finally) well at the list of participants. Augnablik (talk) 16:16, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

@Augnablik great then! @Dhtwiki -have a great day! @IQR IQR (talk) 06:16, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello, IQR. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mustafa Hills, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:08, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Chitta Ranjan Mishra requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.immt.res.in/webroot/upload/admin/people/personal_doc/2020-05-01_personal_doc_1588315765.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:22, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi, the link you have provided is of a researcher from Orissa with whom Chitta Ranjan Mishra has coauthored some of the research papers. But, since you have mentioned that it is a copyright infringement so all those papers have been removed. Please, guide if i am wrong. Thanks a lot. IQR (talk) 00:54, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

@CycloneYoris If you check out the research articles on Google Scholar coauthored by Chitta Ranjan Mishra then you can find the name of the same researcher too that is Dr. BHAGYADHAR BHOI - You have given this link: https://www.immt.res.in/webroot/upload/admin/people/personal_doc/2020-05-01_personal_doc_1588315765.pdf But, since you have mentioned that adding those articles is a copyright violation so all those articles have been removed. Thanks a lot. IQR (talk) 01:06, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi there, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! I noticed you recently marked an edit as "minor" when it may not have been (e.g., here). On Wikipedia, the "minor edit" feature should be used only when an edit cannot be construed to change the meaning of the article's content, such as fixing typos or correcting formatting. Using this feature correctly helps maintain transparency and ensures other editors can accurately assess the nature of your edits. For future edits, please ensure that you only mark truly minor changes as "minor." If you have any questions or need clarification, feel free to reach out or review the Wikipedia guideline on minor edits. Thanks for your understanding and continued contributions! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 09:47, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

@Significa liberdade Thanks a lot, i will keep in mind next time and do it accordingly. mark it as minor only when it is a minor edit. thank you. IQR (talk) 11:08, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi IQR, please don't forget about this, as there's a few edits to George Lindaris you've marked as minor which weren't. Thanks. -Kj cheetham (talk) 16:38, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Indian laparoscopic surgeons indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:59, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello, IQR. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Quba Colony, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Subhash Khanna is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subhash Khanna (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Russ Woodroofe (talk) 17:44, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello, IQR. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Quba Colony".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:07, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello, IQR. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Baburam Yadav (Art), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:08, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello, IQR. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Baburam Yadav".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 17:30, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Chitta Ranjan Mishra. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:46, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

@Onel5969 I am sorry to say but I do not have any conflict of interest. Can you explain what more you expect from this page or from me to make it acceptable on Wikipedia? I am curious to know. I would love to learn from you! Thanks a lot. IQR (talk) 12:18, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Sorry, but there are definite signs that you have some sort of relationship with the article's subject. Please take a look at WP:COI and WP:UPE, and follow the instructions of whatever one applies to your instance. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:11, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

@Onel5969 thank you for your reply. I want to say that I have no conflict of interest in the subject. I was just doing my best to contribute to Wiki and crate pages for people who have contributed to the society I am a part of. Thanks a lot for your guidance. IQR (talk) 15:40, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Again, sorry. You obviously have a conflict of interest. What is your relationship with the article's subject? Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:13, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

@Onel5969 I have no relationship with the article's subject. I am just concerned here because I created that page. thanks a lot. IQR (talk) 18:03, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

Sorry, do not believe you. How do you know the subject? Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:51, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

With all due apologies, I really do not know the subject. I respect you for your concern, but I have no ways to prove! IQR (talk) 00:21, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello, IQR,

Thank you for creating Dipti Ranjan Sahoo.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Far too much of this lacks sources, or only has his page as the source. This applies also to his elections, which would justify him as notable.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Ldm1954 (talk) 10:50, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dipti Ranjan Sahoo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dipti Ranjan Sahoo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

LKBT (talk) 12:11, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi IQR. Thank you for your work on Pradyumn Kumar Sahoo. Another editor, Dionysodorus, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

IQR, do you have a source for the first paragraph of the "Education and career" section? All information in a biography of a living person ought to be correctly referenced. Also, you might like to consider adding some links to this page from other pages on Wikipedia, as it is currently an "orphan" with no pages linking to it from anywhere.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dionysodorus}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dionysodorus (talk) 21:51, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Surendra Pratap Singh (academic). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Bakhtar40 (talk) 05:17, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For an unblock to be considered, you must:

• Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
• State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
• Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

331dot (talk) 13:34, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

---

Administrators: if this block includes a Volunteer Response Team ticket number, this block was placed as part of the conflict of interest VRT queue and the user must not be unblocked without the express consent of a user with access to the queue. ticket:2025110110007549

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

IQR (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I understand my account was blocked for undisclosed paid editing. I now confirm that I have read and understood the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements. I apologize that I had not disclosed that some of my edits were paid. I agree that I did wrong by not disclosing my edits as paid (that I had already made). From now on, after I am unblocked, if I am editing for pay, then I will certainly disclose it as per the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. I will also disclose paid editing (or that I am a paid editor) in at least one of the following ways. I will place a statement on my user page, which is User:IQR. I will certainly supply a clearly visible list of my paid contributions on my main user page. Or I can also place a statement on the User talk:IQR showing my paid contributions. Or I will also supply a statement in the edit summary accompanying any paid contributions (for all my future edits).

I have re-read and understood Wikipedia content policies related to paid editing. I will continue to make only neutral edits. I will focus more on adding only verifiable information, improving the article with neutral language, and proper references. I will not engage in any kind of promotion or branding. ensure full compliance with the Wikipedia Terms of Use and paid-contribution disclosure requirements. Please unblock me as I will edit Wikipedia with more focus on its vision and mission. I hope you will consider it. Thank you.

Decline reason:

Removing your appeal from the queue so you can appeal to the Arbitration Committee. 331dot (talk) 22:15, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Someone else will review your request. As the number of people who can view the information on the ticket the block is based on is limited, you may also appeal to the Arbitration Committee via email which may be slightly quicker.

Aside from disclosing your clients(whether they have actually paid you or you are editing with the expectation of being paid), you are also required by the paid editing policy to link to any websites/social media where you offer your paid editing services. I also find it difficult to believe that you had never heard of the paid editing policy in the 9 years your account has existed. 331dot (talk) 20:15, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

@331dot I guess I started some 9 years ago. For the first two years I was active. I had no knowledge of editing. I tried to learn basics of it. But then I was inactive for more than five years. Sorry, I couldn't check when I actually stopped or restarted editing after a long gap. Yes, when I came back, I was only a little aware of it but not certain of how it should be. My focus was only on neutral content by following the right referencing style and formatting, to the best of my knowledge of Wikipedia editing. I am looking for chance to come back and edit it more meaningfully with focus on ethical editing. Please, guide me, how can I email to the Arbitration Committee? IQR (talk) 21:47, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

Please go to WP:ARBCOM and scroll down to "contacting the committee". 331dot (talk) 22:15, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

@331dot I have emailed to the Arbitration Committee. I am requesting for a second chance since I was aware of paid editing but not actually aware of the rules concerning the same. But now, I have learned a lesson. Trust me, if 40% of my edits are paid then 60^% are unpaid too. I intend to edit Wikipedia with all good faith, following all Wikipedia editing guidelines. I understand that you have blocked me from editing because I failed to disclose that some of my edits were paid. but, in the future, I will focus on all the rules. If any of my future edits are paid, then I will certainly disclose it as per the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. Please, help out if you can. As this is my first account, a nine-year old account. Your support will be appreciated. I promise to follow the rules and edit it ethically. Thank you for your support. Regards. IQR. IQR (talk) 08:59, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

I'd be surprised if that ratio is correct- especially since October 2024(the bulk of your edits have been since then)- but, as I said, you may disclose your clients now, along with websites or social media pages where you offer your paid editing services. 331dot (talk) 09:38, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

@331dot My company's website (client) is content-writers.co.in - It is the site where I seldom get freelancing projects from. I do not know the subjects (all individual clients) personally. Like I have said, I have no proof, but yes, there are many pages that I created for free too as I was experimenting, learning how to edit it more confidently (restarting from Oct 2024). It was a good learning process for me too. Some pages that I created (paid editing) are also strictly based on Wiki content policies of Neutrality (to the best of my knowledge of editing). I am open for learning. Like I have said, yes, I will be disclosing my edits as paid as per the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. Your support or help me appreciated. Thanks a lot. IQR (talk) 11:50, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

In the future, too, my edits could be a mix of both paid and unpaid. My concentration will be more on fair editing, following all Wikipedia editing policies. I look forward to your support. Your support will be encouraging, too. Please, help me out. Take care. Thanks a lot. IQR (talk) 11:56, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, IQR. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chitta Ranjan Mishra, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:08, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, IQR,

Thank you for creating K. P. Yadav (academic).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Vice Chancellor of Private University is not notable

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SaTnamZIN}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

SatnaamIN (talk) 04:56, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi IQR. Thank you for your work on Shubha Tiwari. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating this page for an Indian academic (and now Vice chancellor), likely to meet WP:NAUTHOR because her books are targetted a popular audience. However, as another editor has comments, notability is questionable; it would be helpful to find book reviews or critical analysis to support the notability of her output.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 20:03, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on S. R. Shankapal, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. SatnaamIN (talk) 22:53, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

I have moved this to Draft:S. R. Shankapal because it did not seem unambiguously promotional. ~Anachronist (who / me) (talk) 01:10, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article K. P. Yadav (academic) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K. P. Yadav (academic) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Klbrain (talk) 23:17, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Z. P. Patel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Z. P. Patel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ldm1954 (talk) 14:06, 27 February 2026 (UTC)