User talk:Jadeja97

Hi Jadeja97! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:43, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi Jadeja97, when you're citing Wikipedia pages in your edit summaries, please make sure you're actually citing a policy (like WP:V, with a green checkmark at the top) or a guideline (like WP:RS, with a blue checkmark at the top). Please avoid citing information pages (like WP:NEEDCITE) or essays as if they were authoritative. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:45, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Ok Jadeja97 (talk) 20:48, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

For warning new users, you may like to use the template list at Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:47, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Ok Jadeja97 (talk) 20:51, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Jadeja97

Thank you for creating Vadhel.

User:MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

please add relevant quotes from the sources in the refs

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:01, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

@MPGuy2824:Vadhel Rajput clan found in state of gujarat.history is my subject and I’m creating wikipage by using authentic sources and books.you can check references they are authentic and published by government of India. Jadeja97 (talk) 11:12, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Please read WP:RS. I'm asking you to include quotes to check that they meet WP:SIGCOV. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:23, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Ok Jadeja97 (talk) 11:34, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Kinship Rajput Group of Gujarat requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 17:28, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

I was going to add content after cross-examination and research. Jadeja97 (talk) 17:36, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

While you are working, I have moved the page to Draft:Kinship Rajput Group of Gujarat. Please do not move it back to articlespace until you have put significantly more work into it. As it currently stands, it is not even clear to me what it is about. I would suggest using Articles for Creation when you are ready to publish. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 04:21, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Packer&Tracker. Your recent edit(s) to the page Chauhan appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Packer&Tracker «Talk» 17:47, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Chauhan are found in gujarat I can't find authentic references.

Jadeja97 (talk) 17:50, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Draft:Kinship Rajput Group of Gujarat. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 23:22, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Jadeja97. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:VADHEL, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Jadeja97. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kinship Rajput Group of Gujarat, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:03, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Jadeja97. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "VADHEL".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:21, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vadhel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ider. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

I will correct that mistake.it is IDAR NOT IDER Jadeja97 (talk) 15:58, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days in order to make edits related to two subtopics: (1) Indian military history, or (2) social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

It's been a while since you edited, so note that this was added recently, since you last edited in February. This covers all edits and articles related to this topic, including edits made to two articles you directly edited recently, Molesalam and Vadhel, which both fall under this restriction. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 14:38, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

Understandable Jadeja97 (talk) 11:33, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

I didn’t edit what is not in reference the two topic you are referring I just retracted their references Jadeja97 (talk) 11:35, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

Just to be clear, I wasn't suggesting there was anything directly wrong with the edits. I just wanted to give you a notification that the rules had changed since the last time you had posted regularly, so that you were properly notified and wouldn't run into issues with any extended-confirmed restrictions. You're not very far from extended-confirmed access anyway (500 edits, you currently have 399). CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 18:15, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

thank you for clarifying. Jadeja97 (talk) 18:17, 17 September 2025 (UTC)