User talk:Mar11

Hello! Your submission of Mangal Shobhajatra at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:16, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

On 24 January 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mangal Shobhajatra, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Mangal Shobhajatra (pictured) has been declared an intangible cultural heritage by UNESCO? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mangal Shobhajatra. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Mangal Shobhajatra), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Schwede66 12:01, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for having a look at this article, but a one-paragraph article does not need to be divided into sections, so I suggest that it wasn't helpful to add that tag. On the other hand you could usefully have tagged it with {{link rot}}, otherwise known as {{Bare URLs}}. Thanks. PamD 08:05, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the suggestions. - Mar11 (talk) 07:25, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

About nine months ago you tagged Freedom of religion in Bangladesh to be merged into Secularism in Bangladesh. Since then the former has changed considerably. You didn't lay out at the time why you thought merging would be a good idea. Could you take another look at the articles as they stand today, see if you still feel a merge is the best approach, and if so either complete the merger or briefly sketch out on the discussion page what you'd like to see accomplished in a merger? --Worldbruce (talk) 22:13, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Your last chance to nominate yourself or any New Page Reviewer, See Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Coordination. Elections begin Monday 20 February 23:59 UTC. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 21 February 2017 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.44.251.34 (talk) 13:39, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Mar11, I noticed you removed my addition to the Nokia 3310 (2017). I feel it was a mistake and I think you should revisit it again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by David.Nwachukwu (talk • contribs) 17:27, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi @David.Nwachukwu: I have restored your edits but with much better grammar and a better, more well known source. :) Kamran Mackey (talk) 18:08, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi, sorry about that. This was a while back now, evidently my ISP does recycle IP addresses.

Are you familiar with the concept of dark energy? Seems that antigravity is indeed possible and I have experimental proof. Releasing a paper very soon which could earn me a Nobel one day, if my analysis is indeed later found to be correct and could be a giant step towards a ToE. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.3.100.46 (talk) 02:58, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

I do believe this info is accurate & relevant. Have added it to the Talk Page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 113.255.66.236 (talk) 19:33, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anjhula Mya Singh Bais and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 04:50, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

@SwisterTwister: Hi have you checked the references I added in the article? Searched in google news? I think the issue is not about reliable sources. The subject got enough coverage to pass notability. The issue here was notability claim. We discussed this issue Here and I re-wrote the article and claimed notability as an international refugee psychologist. What's your thought? Why did you declined it for insignificance coverage? - Mar11 (talk) 05:33, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

• Evaluating its weight shows it would simply not be enough for notability hence not significant enough. SwisterTwister talk 05:45, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

I noticed you tagged StargateARMAserver with G5 but left out the blocked user. I can't find any obvious signs but what is the account? (I'm just curious) CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 12:03, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

@Chrissymad: I don't know why the user was not notified. I used twinkle to tag the article. May be the problem is in Twinkle. - Mar11 (talk) 12:09, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Mar11 Twinkle doesn't notify for G5 - it's one of the few exceptions but it's not the issue of notifying the user. Who is the blocked user you suspect created it in violation of their ban/block? CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 12:10, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

@Chrissymad: I don't even remember tagging the article with G5. As far I can remember, I tagged it with G11+A7. This is the user I think. - Mar11 (talk) 12:16, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello Mar11. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Archana Akhil Kumar, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims importance/significance of the subject. Thank you. SoWhy 13:35, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

And I've just declined it again. The article clearly makes a credible claim of significance. Please stop tagging it for CSD - this is at least the third time it's been nominated and declined, and repeatedly doing so could be considered disruptive and lead to sanctions. GoldenRing (talk) 12:14, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

@GoldenRing: I think you are talking about VideoBlocks, not Archana Akhil Kumar. - Mar11 (talk) 18:34, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Bah, sorry, you are quite right. Nonetheless, it's survived speedy three (four?) times now. It's not going to be deleted. If you're still convinced it's not notable, WP:AfD is thataway. GoldenRing (talk) 18:39, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

On 17 May 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Socialism in Bangladesh, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Socialism in Bangladesh. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Socialism in Bangladesh), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—David Levy 03:44, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Please explain why you restored a link I removed with the edit summary "Rv blank" as if you were reverting a common vandal. I explained in my edit summary that I considered the link to be spam masquarading as a reference. I think I deserve a better explanation than "rv blank". Printed circuit boards, as the platform for 90% of modern electronics, hardly needs a reference in a list of electronic components. Even if it did, a page that does not confirm that they are an electronic component, or even hardly mention them, is not an appropriate reference. The site belongs to a manufacturer selling pcbs, which is the likely reason for its insertion rather than to verify any actual fact in the article. SpinningSpark 16:31, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

@Spinningspark: Sorry....My mistake. I was about to revert the blanking previously done by a vandal. But somehow reverted your edit. That was silly, restored a spam while reverting a section blanking. - Mar11 (talk) 03:30, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Please don't use the {{Stub}} tag if you can find a more specific stub tag; stub sort whenever you are able. To do otherwise will backlog Category:Stubs. Thank you. (I realize some people aren't able to stub sort very well due to issues surrounding memory or feeling overwhelmed by the unfortunately long list of stub types; sorry if you're one of them). -- I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 07:20, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello! Last year, you signed up to participate in Wikipedia Asian Month (WAM) 2016 on the English Wikipedia. The event was an international success, with hundreds of editors creating thousands of articles on Asian topics across dozens of different language versions of Wikipedia.

I'd like to invite you to join us for Wikipedia Asian Month 2017, which once again lasts through the month of November. The goal is for users to create new articles on Asian-related content, each at least 3,000 bytes and 300 words in length. Editors who create at least four articles will receive a Wikipedia Asian Month postcard!

Also be sure to check out the Wikipedia Asian Art Month affiliate event - creating articles on Asian art topics can get you a Metropolitan Museum of Art postcard!

If you're interested, please sign up here for the English Wikipedia. If you are interested in also working on other language editions of Wikipedia, please visit the meta page to see other participating projects. If you have any questions, please visit our talk page.

Thank you!

- User:SuperHamster and User:Titodutta on behalf of The English Wikipedia WAM Team

This will be the last message you receive from the English Wikipedia WAM team for being a 2016 participant. If you sign up for WAM 2017, you will continue receiving periodic updates on the 2017 event.

Hello Mar11. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Shohortoli, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Being signed to a notable label indicates importance/significance (WP:CCSI#SINGER, WP:CCSI#BAND). Thank you. SoWhy 14:59, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Explain your AFC accept at Draft:MagForce AG and your NPP review at HYPR.Regards:)Winged Blades ^Godric 08:15, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Dear Mar11,
You have "released" article Draft:MagForce AG a month ago. Your decision has been overruled by another user. Winged Blades asked you (in a harsh tone) to explain your release. Do you like to do that? The article, which of course I think is good, is pending for weeks…
Atomiccocktail (talk) 11:08, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

The company clearly passes notability, a google news search (MagForce Nanotechnologies/MagForce AG) will show that. Most of the information in the draft are cited with secondary sources and some with primary sources (information about them). The article seemed non-promotional to me (that varies from person to person I think) and the creator didn't violate policy of WP:PAID (disclosed affiliation and didn't publish the article themselves). I think we should appreciate the editors who disclose COI/PAID. Otherwise they will try to publish articles incognito. - Mar11 (talk) 06:26, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Dear Mar11,
Thank you for your statement. I will inform Winged Blades and ask him to reverse his decision.
To whom it may concern: I have written this article for the company respectively its PR agency. I have completely disclosed that. See the talk page. Atomiccocktail (talk) 17:39, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Hello Mar11. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Anshul Pandey, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: playing non-extra roles on multiple notable shows indicates significance. Thank you. SoWhy 08:20, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

I would like to know why are you removing birth date, other names, notable works informations from Mehazabien Chowdhury's page? All the information have been given by herself in interviews and social media. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joybiswas391 (talk • contribs) 07:10, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

@Joybiswas391: One of the five pillars of Wikipedia is, each statement in an article must be sourced from a reliable source. Unsourced information in WP:BLP must be removed. Personal website and social media are not regarded as reliable sources in Wikipedia. Information heard from someone is not reliable source either. - Mar11 (talk) 17:23, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

@Mar11: so how we would I prove them? All the information are given by Mehazabien Chowdhury herself. So how would I prove those statements?

I'm connected with her. Other actors like Ziaul Faruk Apurba, Farhan Ahmed Jovan don't have source from verified sources. Unlike other actors and celebrities I want Mehazabien Chowdhury's wiki page clean and clear but you are continuously removing those information. I don't get it. :(

@Joybiswas391: You should refrain from editing that article. It is prohibited to edit article of a connected person by this policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. It is because, connected contributor can never edit an article from a neutral point of view. A general reader will understand how much promotional you have made this article. However, You can suggest information with published, secondary reliable sources on the talk page of the article. - Mar11 (talk) 17:46, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

And also, don't upload images downloaded from Facebook. The copyright terms of Facebook and Wikipedia do not match. If you have any image that you captured yourself, you can upload them without hesitation. There must be exif information with the image. Thanks. - Mar11 (talk) 17:55, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

@Mar11: I am editing the article from neutral point of view. I get connected with her to verify the information. That's it. Anyway I give up :)

I'm not contributing anymore no matter how many times I edit,add things there's someone else who asks for the verification! How can a person prove each and every words!

@Joybiswas391: That's how Wikipedia works. Anyway thanks for your efforts. You should not give up. Suggest your changes in talk page. Edit and improve other articles to which you don't have any conflict of interest. - Mar11 (talk) 18:25, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi. I noticed that you are interested in law. Can you please take a look at this discussion about Reid Collins & Tsai article? I would appreciate your expert advice on the subject. -- Bbarmadillo

Hello Mar11,

Thanks for your work. It is pretty clear to me that CarlosL is trying to write a page about Corybas walliae and has tried to upload an image to illustrate that species of orchid. Please hold off with the deletion while I try to help him. Thanks. Gderrin (talk) 05:16, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

@Gderrin: Appreciated. -Mar11 (talk) Sorted. Thanks for your patience. Gderrin (talk) 05:43, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Hello Mar11. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Michał Frąckowiak, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Founding a notable company indicates importance/significance (WP:CCSI#BIZBIO). Thank you. SoWhy 10:07, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi

Wikipedia has separate contents for supply chain and supply chain management. There is an overlap of supply chain management in the supply chain page. The supply chain content is not neutral.

Consider my editing on the supply chain page as essential, although I just started to contribute to wikipedia pages.

Sukumaran s (talk) 21:56, 30 January 2018 (UTC) Sukumaran

@Sukumaran s: Thanks for your concern about the article. But this is not the way the lead section of an Wikipedia article is written or edited. There are certain rules for writing the lead which can be read here WP:LEAD. Changes in the lead section should be upon consensus among the editors. You can propose your changes on the talk page of the article and ask for suggestion and seek consensus from other editors. - Mar11 (talk) 04:19, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

An article that you have been involved in editing—Internal conflict in Bangladesh —has been proposed to be renamed and moved. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 16:37, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect WPUNDUE. Since you had some involvement with the WPUNDUE redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BillHPike (talk, contribs) 08:34, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Hello Mar11. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of DJ KGB, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: producing albums for notable artists is a claim of significance. Try PROD or AFD instead. Thank you. SoWhy 09:17, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Hello Mar11

This is with regards to my editing issue. I have given my contribution without any sort of payment and to help grow more information of the present world by building and editing articles from the information derived from the global news sites. With no motive of income, these edits are absolutely free and have been made during the free and pass time as an interest in writing and editing. Please consider the request for letting me help to build new informative and present company, popular icons, and upcoming innovators who shape are shaping the world and bringing change. Strictly following the interest and laws of Wikipedia, I swear to continue to do free edits and creation of pages.

Thank You! — Preceding unsigned comment added by StrRdYUUdK (talk • contribs) 19:38, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Hello Mar11. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of NordVPN (software), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 cannot be applied to software. Thank you. SoWhy 11:49, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

I clearly mentioned that it's a company that develops mobile games for iOS and Android devices. I added its history, its growth and its impact on the mobile gaming industry. I also added the necessary categories and references. It is short because there aren't many reliable sources, but I am still adding more sources and information. Perhaps just give it time? Undead Organism (talk) 04:58, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

@Undead Organism: Moved it to draftspace. Submit it for review when you think it's complete. - Mar11 (talk) 05:03, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

@Mar11: I have emphasized the significance of the article and added the logo. What are your thoughts? Undraftify? - Undead Organism (talk) 05:26, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

@Undead Organism: The draft does not contain any secondary sources to help the subject pass WP:GNG. Please read the Notability criterion of Wikipedia before submitting any article for review. - Mar11 (talk) 10:28, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for your warm welcome message. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Russ manzil (talk • contribs) 03:27, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Application_strings_manager — Preceding unsigned comment added by Russ manzil (talk • contribs) 03:33, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Hello Mar11, Regarding your reason for deletion of the page, I have removed the information about the fundraising by the company and its connected sources. Some of the other sources that have been used for citation include https://www.thehindubusinessline.com - A very independent and noteworthy newspaper website of the country, https://www.crunchbase.com/ - an independent, reliable website that tracks information about all companies using their own sources, http://bwdisrupt.businessworld.in - an independent business Magazine's website, https://economictimes.indiatimes.com - (used in multiple citations)Economic Times is a section of the noteworthy and independent newspaper of the country The Times of India.

Raw Pressery is trying hard to educate the people of India about the concept of Cold-pressed juice. Cold pressed juice being free of preservatives, artificial flavours and chemicals is a very healthy (and a much needed) alternative to the other tasty but non cold-pressed juices available in the market. I have also observed that Raw pressery promotes a healthy lifestyle among the masses through their Yoga/exercise related events/workshops etc. and they not only care about the health of the people but also that of the environment, through their initiative called RAWcycle, which is about creating polymer based tshirts/clothes by recycling the plastic (their plastic bottles). I have not added this information in the article because of lack of better and noteworthy sources. All of these facts about the brand and it's growing popularity among the masses inspired me to do some research and write this article. When @MatthewVanitas approved the afc submission of this article, it was graded as StartClass and this article can have a better future if you do not delete it, as our Wiki community will add more on the page. In fact, given your expertise on Wikipedia, you can guide me into making relevant changes to the article if needed instead of deleting it. Rest is up to you. Thank you for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akash1221 (talk • contribs) 07:59, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

I'm curious as to why you marked the above article as patrolled minutes after I had prodded it while patrolling. Articles that are marked up for deletion shouldn't be marked as patrolled. Why? If the prod is removed or a speedy declined, it will remain marked as patrolled. Pretty obviously, if one editor thinks it deficient enough to warrant immediate deletion, and a second editor disagrees, shouldn't a third editor be looking at it? Also, mechanically speaking, marking an article patrolled removes the NOINDEX attribute from it. We don't really want new articles that are up for deletion showing up in a Google search, do we? John from Idegon (talk) 04:15, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

@John from Idegon: I was also trying to add a speedy tag to the article but due to the edit conflict with you i had canceled it. Don't know how it was marked patrolled in this time. - Mar11 (talk) 04:20, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

It's a bug in the script. If you use the sidebar to access a deletion process, it will mark the page as patrolled. If just use Twinkle, it won't. Out of curiosity, what criteria were you going to use for speedy? That always baffles me for films. John from Idegon (talk) 04:29, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for clarification. I was trying to add A11, as there is no source in the article and nothing appears on google search. - Mar11 (talk) 04:38, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

You sure wouldn't be stepping on my toes if you went ahead and did that. I agree it's junk and could even be a hoax. John from Idegon (talk) 04:59, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi. I have revoked your ability to review new pages as from a review of your recent reviews (and even stretching back to 2017) you have reviewed numerous articles that appear to be undisclosed paid editing. Some examples are below:

• CALinnovates (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
• ControlUp (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
• Leadfeeder (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
• Le_Tote (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
• The_NAGA_Group_AG (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
• KMS_Lighthouse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
• Strategic_Vision_(company) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
• 6_River_Systems (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
• Booksy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
• Payment21 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
• Care_Sourcer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

While it's obviously impossible for me to know whether this is due to malice or incompetence you obviously cannot be trusted to review pages. SmartSE (talk) 22:51, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Mar11_reviews. SmartSE (talk) 23:14, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing The NAGA Group AG, Mar11.

Unfortunately SamHolt6 has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

Unreviewed, review has been stripped of their new page reviewer rights per a COIN discussion

To reply, leave a comment on SamHolt6's talk page.

SamHolt6 (talk) 00:24, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I'm SamHolt6. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Dr. Cleaner, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

SamHolt6 (talk) 02:44, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I'm SamHolt6. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, CALinnovates, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

SamHolt6 (talk) 04:33, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Mar11, you thanked me for one of my recent edits, so here is a heart-felt...  YOU'RE WELCOME! It's a pleasure, and I hope you have a lot of fun while you edit this inspiring encyclopedia phenomenon! SamihaRahman (talk)

13:18, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Haldaa poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:The Bangladesh Gazette.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:56, 19 December 2021 (UTC)