User talk:Paramount force

Hello, I'm Arjayay. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Ukrah, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 17:08, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

According to XTools, you are nowhere near 16,500 edits on wikipedia, and do not have extended confirmed rights on this account. However, if you have had a previous account, you should not put those stats on this account. Tenebre_Rosso_Sangue, Editing with SSStyle! Call for Medic! My Stats! 16:31, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

My faults...its about previous account data that putted here for curriculum purpose. Paramount force (talk) 16:33, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Oh, its all good! If i came across as stern, i didn't mean too. However, If I were you, I just would put it there, but I would say ¨I had a Previous account that had (insert edit amount here)¨ Also, I would put your account here, so people think that you aren't a new editor. Tenebre_Rosso_Sangue, Editing with SSStyle! Call for Medic! My Stats! 16:39, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Thank you Paramount force (talk) 01:10, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:35, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Paramount force,

If you mess around with other editor's User pages and move them around, you will be blocked from editing. There is no valid reason for doing this unless this is an alternate account of yours and if it is, this should be mentioned on both of your User pages or it could be seen as sockpuppetry. Do not move around User pages or User talk pages, period.

If you have questions, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:40, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ukrah, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.
In addition, please do not repeat sections, as you did in the same edit - Arjayay (talk) 12:09, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

thank you for guidance Paramount force (talk) 16:00, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Ukrah. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 22:46, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and/or Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 22:46, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

We are residence of this place, and we know this place better than you brother....So don't try to be oversmart. Again n again we requesting you and team members to help us...but no, you have to shown up your attitude by overlapping the correct information we have putted. So fucked up with your rules and regulations Thanks Paramount force (talk) 03:32, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Paramount force. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nagarukhra Gram Panchayat, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:08, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Paramount force. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Nagarukhra Gram Panchayat".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 10:25, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nagarukhra High School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nagarukhra High School (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mccapra (talk) 23:37, 8 January 2026 (UTC)