User talk:Reverosie
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| 💞 Welcome to my talk page! 💞 | ||
|---|---|---|
| 💞 Please don't be afraid to reach out! I'm always happy to chat, and I reply to messages on my talk page as soon as possible 💞 Please remain civil, per Wikipedia's guidelines
|
Women in Red September 2025
Recognized as the most active, topic-based WikiProject by human changes.
Announcements:
Tip of the Month:
Progress ("moving the needle"):
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 23:55, 31 August 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Nomination for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open!
Nominations for the upcoming Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Geometry Dash Review
Hey, this is the GA nominator for Geometry Dash. I don't mean to rush you, but it's been a while since you've made any comments. I addressed your concerns about 10 days ago and replied to your post a few days ago, but I still haven't heard anything. Just checking in to make sure you were still okay with the review. ZKevinTheCat (talk) 13:31, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
- Hello! First of all, I'm so sorry for the late reply! I was very busy off of Wikipedia. Second of all, I believe that the article could very much be passed, but I'm still pondering over the game's history section. I'm not sure if a second opinion may be needed. 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 00:35, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
As promised
Hi Reverosie, as you promised, would you be able to review Independence Day (Nigeria)? Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:22, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
- Hello! I'll open the review later today when I'm available! 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 14:05, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
- Okay Reverosie, thank you. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:22, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
- Just sending a reminder, Reverosie :) Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:00, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
- Hello! I'm sorry it's taken me so long. I've been busy off of Wikipedia. Expect me to open this today or tomorrow depending on when I'm available, and expect the review to start on Sunday! 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 20:06, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Reverosie, I was planning on at least having a DYK for the Independence article on October 1. But whatever works best for you, no rush. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 06:28, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
- Hello! I'm sorry it's taken me so long. I've been busy off of Wikipedia. Expect me to open this today or tomorrow depending on when I'm available, and expect the review to start on Sunday! 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 20:06, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
- Just sending a reminder, Reverosie :) Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:00, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
- Okay Reverosie, thank you. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:22, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you Reverosie for the review. I have advanced to an FAC now. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:39, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open!
Voting for the Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Voting closes at 23:59 UTC on 29 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Women in Green's 9th Edit-a-thon

Hello Reverosie:
WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Editathon event in October 2025!
Running from October 1 to 31, 2025, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) editathon event with the theme What Women Do! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 different occupations or professions (or broader roles in society) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.
We hope to see you there!
Grnrchst (talk), Spookyaki (talk) & Alanna the Brave (talk)
You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:38, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
September thanks
Thank you for improving article quality in September! - Today is the birthday of the 16th Thomaskantor after Bach, remembered. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:19, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you so much Gerda! And the performance is wonderful! 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 14:34, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for listening! I never heard a live concert with him, but the choir with both successors (the last one pictured on my talk). --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:51, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
- John Rutter 80 today! I sang his major choral works with four choirs, and many of his uplifting anthems, 13 DYK? I watched him explain his Magnificat in person in 1998, and now see it on Youtube: he wore the same outfit. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:33, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
AfC reviewing
I'm delighted to see a new medievalist around the place, especially one who's already launched full-tilt into our content review processes. You know, I had no idea there was a WP:CANTWP? Actually, I think you might have been the first person to notice that task force exists in the last decade. If you ever decide to take any more of those to GA, I'd be more than happy to review, just let me know. (Also rather happy to not have to do the work myself... they've been on my task list for ages.)
I see you've been doing a lot of reviewing work of the WP:RATER variety. (This too we have in common. I did a lot of that early on.) Can I interest you in a somewhat more advanced reviewer role? WP:AFC always has a monstrous backlog and we'd love to have you. There's a lot of slogging to be done there, it's true. But you also get to be the one handing out the kind of acceptances that made you so happy when you started editing, and that's very rewarding. -- asilvering (talk) 21:49, 26 September 2025 (UTC)
- I'd absolutely love to!! I've actually wanted to do AFC since I got more active on Wikipedia, and now that my account is well over 90 days old, I've applied. 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 23:15, 26 September 2025 (UTC)
- Glad to see it. If you have any questions, the AFC talk page is open and welcoming. There's also a Discord server for WP:NPP (we've got a channel there) if you're interested: . -- asilvering (talk) 23:21, 26 September 2025 (UTC)
- Congrats Rosie!! I never thought you would become an AFC reviewer, let alone be referred to one, seeing as you're one of the best GAN reviewers! Just for the record, I am also an AFC reviewer. I occasionally review and accept drafts (see my AFC reviews here). I also have page mover and template editor rights, which only 436 and 196 users have respectively. JuniperChill (talk) 23:53, 26 September 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you so much!!! If I ever need help with AfC, I know who to reach out to :) 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 23:58, 26 September 2025 (UTC)
- Congrats Rosie!! I never thought you would become an AFC reviewer, let alone be referred to one, seeing as you're one of the best GAN reviewers! Just for the record, I am also an AFC reviewer. I occasionally review and accept drafts (see my AFC reviews here). I also have page mover and template editor rights, which only 436 and 196 users have respectively. JuniperChill (talk) 23:53, 26 September 2025 (UTC)
- Glad to see it. If you have any questions, the AFC talk page is open and welcoming. There's also a Discord server for WP:NPP (we've got a channel there) if you're interested: . -- asilvering (talk) 23:21, 26 September 2025 (UTC)
Trouted
Whack!
You've been whacked with a wet trout.
Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.Congrats!!! You got AfC rights without meeting the criteria fully!! Also, if you wanna review[Joke]... Earth605 (talk) 13:20, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you so much!! I was just as surprised as you might be. Also, I'd be happy to review your draft!!! 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 13:33, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks! That last one was a joke, but if you are going to do it, I'm not, not happy. Btw, I just changed my signature. What do you think? Earth605talk 13:37, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
- I really like it! And I know it was a joke, but I love reviewing articles (hence why I think I got AfC rights without fully meeting the criteria), so I saw it as an opportunity :) 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 13:39, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
- I thought you were Reverosie, not Reviewrosie. (This took me so much time) Earth605talk 13:57, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
- That got a really good chuckle out of me. Also, your draft is now in the mainspace :) 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 13:59, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
- You're being rather over-modest, you know. You meet the criteria just fine. -- asilvering (talk) 21:07, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
- I thought you were Reverosie, not Reviewrosie. (This took me so much time) Earth605talk 13:57, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
- I really like it! And I know it was a joke, but I love reviewing articles (hence why I think I got AfC rights without fully meeting the criteria), so I saw it as an opportunity :) 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 13:39, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks! That last one was a joke, but if you are going to do it, I'm not, not happy. Btw, I just changed my signature. What do you think? Earth605talk 13:37, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
Women in Red | October 2025, Vol 11, Issue 10
Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes.
Announcements:
Tip of the Month:
Progress ("moving the needle"):
Statistics available via various tools: previously, Humaniki tool; currently, QLever.
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:32, 29 September 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Inaccessible sources when reviewing GA
Hi Reverosie. I am currently reviewing Queen's Theatre, Hornchurch (review) and a good portion of the sources are inaccessible to me either cause their offline or require a subscription. How do you deal with them and how do I proceed? Its good that I didn't start the prose only to then come to a halt. JuniperChill (talk) 09:58, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
- Hello,
- First of all, don't be afraid to ask the nominator for access to sources or proof that the article is backed up by a source you can't access yourself! That is something quite important.
- Second of all, what do you mean by offline? Most books should be found online (+ Internet Archive and Google Books frequently have the entire thing there for you).
- With books, sometimes you need to get creative. With google books, you often have to search for page numbers and key words when you can't access the full PDF in order to find the right quote and verify a source.
- But most importantly, GA reviews are not FA reviews! Make sure that all of the citations match up with the sources, but don't review every single source or you'll drive yourself mad. If there's anything else I can help you with, please let me know! 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 22:07, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you so much! Offline sources on Wikipedia are defined as a source that is not published on the internet (ie, books and newspapers). I don't really read books these days. I will get into reviewing that article tomorrow by asking the nominator if I happen to land on an offline source, seeing as its cited to an offline newspaper. Seeing as the article I'm going to review has 66 sources, is checking 10 (15%) enough? I also note that I accidentally reviewed two articles that contain the word "Queen" on them, the other being Talk:Queenstown MRT station/GA1 JuniperChill (talk) 23:17, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
- While articles with a lot of sources therefore need more to be reviewed, it comes down to quite a few factors:
- 1. How many sources are cited in total?
- 2. How many citations come from the same source?
- - Accounting for citations that come from the same page of the same source?
- 3. How many different types of sources are there? Are some easier to check than others?
- - This isn't to say that a source being harder to check means you should skip over it, but that it doesn't hurt to review a few extra sources that are easier for you.
- Based on all of these factors, it comes down to your own preference, but unless an article doesn't cite many sources (which is usually justified by a shorter length), 10-20% is generally a good rule of thumb to follow :)
- And remember:
- 1. Even if an editor is trustworthy, NEVER skip a spot check. Working with somebody more often means reviewing a bit less, but not skipping over it entirely.
- 2. If something that looks problematic comes up in the spot check, most (if not all) of the time, you should assume good faith and point it out instead of trying to punish the nominator. 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 23:38, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
- Ok thank you for helping me! This is the first time that I needed to help with reviewing an article for GA because of access to sources. I started reviewing the prose of the article today. I have decided to check two offline newspaper sources, one paywalled source, and six free-to-access sources (including one PDF).
- I would say you're one of the best GAN reviewer's I've ever seen in my two years of editing Wikipedia! considering you started reviewing GAs within a month of editing! Maybe I could also be in a position to help users with GA, as I currently do with DYK. JuniperChill (talk) 16:58, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you so much for the kind words! And if you ever need help with anything else, don't be afraid to reach out! 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 21:06, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you so much! Offline sources on Wikipedia are defined as a source that is not published on the internet (ie, books and newspapers). I don't really read books these days. I will get into reviewing that article tomorrow by asking the nominator if I happen to land on an offline source, seeing as its cited to an offline newspaper. Seeing as the article I'm going to review has 66 sources, is checking 10 (15%) enough? I also note that I accidentally reviewed two articles that contain the word "Queen" on them, the other being Talk:Queenstown MRT station/GA1 JuniperChill (talk) 23:17, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
October music
My story today is about a mezzo as a thinking person, DYK? (The nomination wasn't by me, which probably helped to a short review.) - Look at the video if you have a few minutes. I never saw her on stage, but (in 2022) the last Carmen production at the Bastille Opéra that she was in, - see music. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:40, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Happy 50th birthday, Alain Altinoglu!) - I let the video begin with a closeup of the octobass ;) Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:06, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks so much Gerda! The videos are incredible as always :) 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 23:27, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
- You are welcome! - I am proud to have brought two performing women to the main page. Sadly, death kept both from performing more, one sooner, the other much later. If you have little time just listen to the one who died young and see if it touches you (in today's story, - I don't want to sprinkle youtube links outside my user pages). Latest pics from a day to the opera in Frankfurt, and afterwards (because train service is only once an hour) a lovely stroll along the Main river with illumination and the moon reflected. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:36, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
- I always love watching your videos and reading your stories. I always learn something new from them, and the music always sounds beautiful! 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 21:51, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you, I love to hear that. Today I am sad that I had to bring two more people there. At least the video in my story is cute, made for children. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:00, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for improving article quality in October. My latest: Roberta Alexander, - listen. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:21, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
- Today Sequenza III on Luciano Berio's centenary. You can listen with the score or to the first performer, Cathy Berberian (link in the work's article), - I couldn't decide ;) - btw, I think your signature matches the flowers well. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:56, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- I always love watching your videos and reading your stories. I always learn something new from them, and the music always sounds beautiful! 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 21:51, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
- You are welcome! - I am proud to have brought two performing women to the main page. Sadly, death kept both from performing more, one sooner, the other much later. If you have little time just listen to the one who died young and see if it touches you (in today's story, - I don't want to sprinkle youtube links outside my user pages). Latest pics from a day to the opera in Frankfurt, and afterwards (because train service is only once an hour) a lovely stroll along the Main river with illumination and the moon reflected. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:36, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
Your userpage on simple wikipedia
Thanks!
This has been the smoothest, friendliest interaction I've had on this site yet.
Thank you very much! for your efforts on the GA review and everything else. PS: keep an eye out for Barhebraeus's GA nomination once I finish it. Less crusades, more Mongol on that Syriac author


Spread the loving power of flowers by adding {{subst:Flowers}} to someone's talk page with a friendly and loving message!.
Hogshine (talk) 18:11, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you so much for the kind words!!! I'm very interested in medieval history as a whole, so I'd be happy to review Barhebraeus's article in the future :) 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 18:13, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Hello! I hope all is well. As promised, Barhebraeus is a GA nomination :) would greatly appreciate it if you could take a look at it
Thanks Hogshine (talk) 06:44, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Hello! I hope all is well. As promised, Barhebraeus is a GA nomination :) would greatly appreciate it if you could take a look at it
Concern regarding Draft:Rainald II Masoir
Hello, Reverosie. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rainald II Masoir, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:06, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
Women in Red - November 2025
Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes.
Announcements:
Tip of the Month:
Progress ("moving the needle"):
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 17:07, 30 October 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
November article improvement drive
Starting on 1 November, the month-long 2025 Article Improvement Drive will target a number of content improvement areas and backlogs. Participating editors will be in line for barnstars and other awards; articles from all aspects of the project will be eligible so there will be something for everybody. Interested editors are encouraged to sign up now! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:18, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
Asian Month
Hi again! I am inviting you to participate in Asian Month! I will be participating and aiming for the postcard. To have the comfort of a foreign reviewer I have decided to make the four articles in the AfC format, but the backlog is too big...
Can you review my Asian Month articles? I already have Draft:Nanyang University Memorial almost ready to go! Earth605talk 06:06, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- Well, that one got promoted. But I have finished Draft:Agasthya lake! You'll have to move it to Agastya lake, though, I messed up the COMONNAME. Earth605talk 07:09, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
- Reverosie? That one also got promoted, but I finished up this one: Draft:Agriculture in Timor-Leste. Can you review it? Earth605talk 16:55, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
November thanks
Thank you for support in November! - On St. Cecilia's Day - patron saint of music - I remember a composition by Benjamin Britten, and have a woman on the main page who illustrated songs, with a sense of humour. My places take you to Milan, my first visit to La Scala, and music features our latest choral Abendlob, with English music. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:24, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
Women in Red - December 2025
Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes.
Announcements:
Tip of the Month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:19, 28 November 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your draft article, Draft:Rainald II Masoir

Hello, Reverosie. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Rainald II Masoir".
Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 18:26, 29 November 2025 (UTC)
Nominations are now open for military historian of the year and newcomer of the year awards for 2025!
Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2025! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Nominations are open here and here respectively. The nomination period closes at 23:59 on 30 November 2025 when voting begins. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:43, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
Nominations are now open for military historian of the year and newcomer of the year awards for 2025!
Correction: nominations are open until 23:59 (UTC) on 14 December 2025.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:21, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting is now open for military historian of the year and newcomer of the year awards for 2025!
Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2025! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Cast your votes here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2025. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 15 December 2025 (UTC)
Seasons Greetings

- Thank you very much, and happy holidays to you too! 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 03:54, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
December thanks
Season's greetings!
|
Where to start? Reverosie, since joining this project, you’ve done some terrific work over at GAN (casually side-questing a GA on simplewiki too, which is nothing to scoff at), are building an entire WikiProject, and won Editor of the Week (and I certainly truly mean every word we wrote in our nomination). Seeing you do it so well was what actually encouraged me to start reviewing GANs—and I really do now declare Fomalhaut, which I didn’t know existed six months ago, to be one of my favourite stars! Our paths don’t cross as often now, but as always, your incessant diligence, kindness, and enthusiasm are seen and appreciated. If you can do all this in about six months, what’s to come in a year? Happy holidays to you and yours, and I look forward to seeing you shine in 2026! |
GoldRomean (talk) 19:13, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!
| A greeting from JuniperChill! | |
| Hi Reverosie! Merry Christmas! Thank you for your time greatly improving Wikipedia, reviewing GANs and creating a new WikiProject since starting Wikipedia in May 2025! I hope for the best in 2026 and beyond!! JuniperChill (talk) 20:13, 26 December 2025 (UTC) |
Women in Red - January 2026
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 23:33, 26 December 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Happy New Year, Reverosie!


Reverosie,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Volten001 ☎ 17:58, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Happy 25th
Women in Red February 2026
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 22:49, 31 January 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Green reviewing drive

Hello Reverosie:
This month, February 2026, WikiProject Women in Green is participating in the February 2026 GAN Backlog Drive, in which we're aiming to review as many outstanding Good Article (GA) nominations about women and women's works as possible. If you want to help out, you can check out the project talk page for a list of nominations in need of review (including some WiG originals). If you haven't reviewed a GA nomination before, be sure to check out the reviewing instructions and guidelines and feel free to ask for a mentor to check your work.
We are also working together with a wikithon hosted on 5 February by Wikimedia UK, which will focus on writing and improving articles about women involved in sustainable development. If you want to join the event, feel free to sign up at the eventbrite page; or if you would be interested in providing a 20-minute assessment and/or a full GA review of the submitted articles in the weeks following, put your name down on the project talk page for updates as the event progresses.
We hope to see you there!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:05, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
Women in Red - March 2026
Announcements from other communities: Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 09:30, 25 February 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging
English
Hi I love you guys so much!!!!! ~2026-17085-77 (talk) 21:15, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
March thanks
Thank you for improving article quality in March! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:55, 20 March 2026 (UTC)
on Bach's birthday, a story about my joy --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:13, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Women in Red – April 2026
Announcements from other communities: Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Chocmilk03 (talk) 20:17, 29 March 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April thanks
Thank you for improving article quality in April! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:30, 20 April 2026 (UTC)








