Wikiwand AI

User talk:RomeofromPjmask

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 2026

Information icon Hello, I'm Prothe1st. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent additions to the page Nheengatu language was removed because it appeared to be in a language other than English. We can only accept English-language text on this version of Wikipedia; if you would like to contribute to a Wikipedia in another language, please visit the list of Wikipedias and see if a version of Wikipedia exists in your desired language. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! --Prothe1st (leave me a message)-- 16:57, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Information icon Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Nheengatu language, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. LizardJr8 (talk) 17:04, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tegwolo, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop making additions in non-English language on the English wikipedia LizardJr8 (talk) 17:09, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nheengatu language. Janan2025 (talk) 17:28, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

February 2026

Hi, thank you for your contributions.

Note that you can't just pick drafts out of WP:AFC and publish them without going through the AFC process. I've moved several such articles back to draftspace. See WP:WPAFC#How to get involved. 162 etc. (talk) 21:47, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at draft:Untitled K-pop film, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. You moved multiple drafts to article space before they were ready. Stop moving drafts to article space without review. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:17, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of K-pop films (February 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ScalarFactor was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
ScalarFactor (talk) 06:53, 14 February 2026 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, RomeofromPjmask! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ScalarFactor (talk) 06:53, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peppa Pig season 6 (February 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Hurricane Wind and Fire were:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
References 1 and 4-9 are unreliable because Wikipedia is user-generated and References 2 and 3 do not significantly cove4 the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 00:03, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:파일-Andrew Choi.webp

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:파일-Andrew Choi.webp. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under the non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sophisticatedevening(talk) 19:13, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peppa Pig season 6 (February 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NeoGaze was:
Please adress the issues mentioned by User:Hurricane Wind and Fire rather than resubmit without any changes.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
NeoGaze (talk) 20:55, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Debut (song) (February 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by ScalarFactor were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
ScalarFactor (talk) 20:23, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2nd D Awards has been accepted

2nd D Awards, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

grapesurgeon (talk) 03:40, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeong Yunho (February 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Paper9oll were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
the subject currently does not meet the WP:GNG, WP:NBLP, WP:SINGER, and WP:BANDMEMBER criteria with no significant coverage for individual notability from secondary reliable sources that are independent of the subject apart from passing mentions from reportings related to Ateez and Imitation.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
🧧🍊 Paper9oll 🍊🧧 (🔔📝) 18:14, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Myung Jae-hyun (February 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Paper9oll were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
the subject currently does not meet the WP:GNG, WP:NBLP, WP:SINGER, and WP:BANDMEMBER criteria with no significant coverage for individual notability from secondary reliable sources that are independent of the subject apart from passing mentions from reportings related to BoyNextDoor, including but not limited to routine and/or trivial material that is derivative and/or contextually driven.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
🧧🍊 Paper9oll 🍊🧧 (🔔📝) 18:16, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Martin Edwards (February 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Didier Landner was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Notability is not inherited. Greater emphasis detailing individual's achievement is required as described by significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
Didier Landner (talk) 20:55, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asa (Japanese singer) (March 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AllWeKnowOfHeaven was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This musician might be notable but better sources are needed.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 23:42, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CORTIS, poses during its debut showcase held in Seoul on 18th August 2025.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CORTIS, poses during its debut showcase held in Seoul on 18th August 2025.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peppa Pig season 9 (March 14)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, JuniperChill, left the following feedback:
This draft does not have sufficient content to warrant a standalone article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at List of Peppa Pig episodes.
  • Edit the existing article to include your text and citations into an appropriate section.
  • If the article is protected and you cannot edit it, propose your changes on the article's Talk page.
I don't see an article for Peppa Pig season 1, Peppa Pig season 2, Peppa Pig season 3, Peppa Pig season 4, etc as the first two are redirects and the other two are (currently) a redlink. (cant believe this was one of my favourite TV series when I was at primary school and that I used to watch this a lot back in the day)

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Peppa Pig season 9 to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

JuniperChill (talk) 13:54, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Danny Chung (April 13)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Flexagoon, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for music. The draft requires either:

or multiple published secondary sources that:

  • provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

It is often easier to prove the notability of an album or artist than an individual song or band member. If the subject is not yet notable, consider improving a relevant existing article instead.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Danny Chung to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

🍅 fx (talk) 02:15, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hong Eunchae (April 27)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, D.18th, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for music. The draft requires either:

or multiple published secondary sources that:

  • provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

It is often easier to prove the notability of an album or artist than an individual song or band member. If the subject is not yet notable, consider improving a relevant existing article instead.
The subject does not currently meet WP:GNG, WP:BIO, WP:SINGER, or WP:BANDMEMBER criteria. There is no significant coverage from independent, secondary reliable sources to establish individual notability, aside from passing mentions in reports related to Le Sserafim.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Hong Eunchae to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 𝙼𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊𝚐𝚎 𝚖𝚎 09:01, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Demian (singer) has been accepted

Demian (singer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 07:16, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asa (Japanese singer) (July 8)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Paper9oll, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for music. The draft requires either:

or multiple published secondary sources that:

  • provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

It is often easier to prove the notability of an album or artist than an individual song or band member. If the subject is not yet notable, consider improving a relevant existing article instead.
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
the subject currently does not meet the WP:GNG, WP:NBLP, WP:SINGER, and WP:BANDMEMBER criteria with no significant coverage for individual notability from secondary reliable sources that are independent of the subject apart from passing mentions from Babymonster-related reportings

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Asa (Japanese singer) to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Paper9oll (🔔📝) 01:01, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

July 2026

icon Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Draft talk:CaseOh. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Please stop making empty edit requests. JFHJr () 17:57, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Incest in anime and manga (July 9)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Stuartyeates, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
Sources are going to have to be MUCH, MUCH better than this.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Incest in anime and manga to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Stuartyeates (talk) 04:11, 9 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Martin (singer) (July 24)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Sulfurboy, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for music. The draft requires either:

or multiple published secondary sources that:

  • provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

It is often easier to prove the notability of an album or artist than an individual song or band member. If the subject is not yet notable, consider improving a relevant existing article instead.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Martin (singer) to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Sulfurboy (talk) 18:10, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sunoo has been accepted

Sunoo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Raihanur (talk) 17:09, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elsa Mora (August 9)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, M kuhner, left the following feedback:
This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.
This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.
  • Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
  • Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.
Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.
Look at the statement about the themes in her art; then look at the source document. It says nothing about themes. This is often a symptom of using LLM to write the article and/or read the sources; even if it is not, it's unacceptable to claim a source says something it does not say. (Did you try to work out the themes by looking at the paintings and their titles? We're not allowed to do that: see WP:No original research.)

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Elsa Mora to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

M kuhner (talk) 05:52, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks