Wikiwand AI

User talk:Sadid Hasan 2014 March

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome Sadid Hasan 2014 March!

Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 54,184,638 registered editors!
Hello, Sadid Hasan 2014 March. Welcome to Wikipedia!

I'm FULBERT, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

To help get you started, you may find these useful:
The Five Pillars (fundamental principles) of Wikipedia
Introduction to Wikipedia (and Editing)
Writing a New Article
Teahouse: Ask a Question
When editing, follow the 3 Core Content Policies:
1. Neutral point of view: represent significant views fairly
2. Verifiability: claims should cite reliable, published sources
3. No original research: no originality; reference published sources

Always cite Independent and Reliable sources for all claims you make when editing.

Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.

Sincerely, FULBERT (talk) 20:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC)   (Leave me a message)

18th Meril-Prothom Alo Awards moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 18th Meril-Prothom Alo Awards. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 14:35, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

Control copyright icon Hello Sadid Hasan 2014 March! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 16:15, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bajrangi Bhaijaan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Pratapgarh and Rajesh Sharma. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 20:01, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 18th Meril-Prothom Alo Awards (November 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at 18th Meril-Prothom Alo Awards instead.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers.

If the article either is ready for the encyclopedia or appears to be ready for the encyclopedia, the draft will be redirected to the article. However, the article could have been moved into article space instead.

If the article does not appear to be ready for the encyclopedia, the article may be nominated for deletion, and the draft will be kept.

This draft is either essentially the same as the article with the same name, or a subset of the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 05:37, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Sadid Hasan 2014 March! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:37, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

Always cite reliable sources

Information icon Hello, I'm Worldbruce. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Premi O Premi, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:34, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

December 2025

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Odanr(she/it)(talk) 09:51, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Priyo Chattopadhyay moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Priyo Chattopadhyay. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CNMall41 (talk) 00:26, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Priyo Chattopadhyay for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Priyo Chattopadhyay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priyo Chattopadhyay until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CNMall41 (talk) 07:07, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

January 2026

Information icon Hello, Sadid Hasan 2014 March, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Sadid Hasan March 2014 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:01, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

Could you please respond to this, and let me know why you have multiple accounts? I assume Sadid Hasan 2014 is also yours? Any others? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:35, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
Once more, I want to ask why you have three accounts, and whether you have, or previously have had, others? While using multiple accounts isn't disallowed, you must not misuse them, and need to declare them as alternative accounts of the same user, see WP:VALIDALT for more on that. Please note that while operating multiple accounts which have not been disclosed as alternatives, you run the risk of being blocked for sockpuppetry, even if you're not strictly speaking abusing them. I look forward to your soonest response. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:31, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
@DoubleGrazing, I am sorry. I don't know that having multiple accounts is wrong. But, @Sadid Hasan 2014 March is my present account. I don't want to use my other two accounts. You are free to delete my other two accounts except it. Sadid Hasan 2014 March (talk) 16:06, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
Using multiple accounts isn't "wrong", as such, but it is an easy way to get into trouble if you're not careful. One of the ways of being "careful" would be to clearly indicate on each account's userpage that they are alternatives accounts of the same user, that way you're being open and transparent about it.
I was also just curious as to why you feel you need to have multiple accounts?
User accounts cannot be deleted, but if you don't wish to use two of these you can simply stop using them, and perhaps mark them with the {{abandoned account}} template. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:34, 15 May 2026 (UTC)
@DoubleGrazing, I put an alternate account template on the user pages of my other two accounts. Sadid Hasan 2014 March (talk) 05:56, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of List of political families of Bangladesh

Thank you for your interest in No contentious topic code has been specified. Due to past disruption, a special set of rules apply to anyone editing in this topic area. Specifically, No contentious topic code has been specified. Since you currently do not meet the requirements to contribute to this topic area, the page you created has been nominated for speedy deletion under G5.

If you think this page does not fall under the general sanctions described, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally you may wish to read about the topic restrictions No contentious topic code has been specified. Chess enjoyer (talk) 04:58, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days in order to make edits related to two subtopics: (1) Indian military history, or (2) social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Chess enjoyer (talk • contribs) 05:02, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Nusraat Faria

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Nusraat Faria, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:14, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Lichur Bagane for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lichur Bagane is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lichur Bagane until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CNMall41 (talk) 10:47, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

Onek Dame Kena moved back to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Onek Dame Kena. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources and wasn't ready to move to mainspace. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Chess enjoyer (talk) 06:51, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Priyo Chattopadhyay for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Priyo Chattopadhyay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priyo Chattopadhyay (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Owen× ☎ 15:54, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

I moved this article to draftspace. I will improve its content, please don't delete this article. And please remove the article-for-deletion notice. Sadid Hasan 2014 March (talk) 04:26, 28 February 2026 (UTC)
I reverted your move. Please do not move the page until the AfD is over. Thank you. Owen× ☎ 11:25, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Priyo Chattopadhyay

Warning icon

The page Priyo Chattopadhyay has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Liz Read! Talk! 05:28, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of 18th Meril-Prothom Alo Awards for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 18th Meril-Prothom Alo Awards is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/18th Meril-Prothom Alo Awards until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ckfasdf (talk) 05:33, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Prince: Once Upon a Time in Dhaka moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Prince: Once Upon a Time in Dhaka. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because More bludgeoning. See Draft:Prince (2026 film, Draft:Prince (film), and Draft:Prince (2026 film).. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CNMall41 (talk) 20:25, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Shyamol Mawla

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Shyamol Mawla, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 05:45, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Domm: Until The Last Breath

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Domm: Until The Last Breath, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:48, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prince: Once Upon a Time in Dhaka (March 24)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, RangersRus, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the film meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for films. The draft requires either:

or multiple published secondary sources that:

  • provide significant coverage: discuss the film in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the film, such as press releases, the studio's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

Need help?

Scam warning

RangersRus (talk) 10:23, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

March 2026

Information icon Please do not move vandalize pages without going through AFC review especially if the reviewer does not find the page notable. Your move for Draft:Rakkhosh (2026 film) to mainspace does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please find and add multiple critical reviews to pass notability. Please submit the draft through AFC review. RangersRus (talk) 10:35, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

Domm (film)

Please find and add multiple critical reviews for this film to pass notability. What it currently has under reception is not review by critic nor a full fledge article on the subject the page is on. RangersRus (talk) 10:42, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Prince: Once Upon a Time in Dhaka has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Prince: Once Upon a Time in Dhaka. Thanks! RangersRus (talk) 11:01, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

April 2026

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Nusraat Faria, you may be blocked from editing. --Worldbruce (talk) 12:20, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

@Worldbruce, I found this reliable source about the article Patalghar (OTT film). If the information is correct, can I edit it? Sadid Hasan 2014 March (talk) 04:37, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Article Nusraat Faria already says she appeared in the Chorki webfilm Patalghar in 2023. The Prothom Alo article doesn't say much more about it, not even what her role was, but you could cite it for that row of her filmography. --Worldbruce (talk) 09:11, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Patalghar (film)

Notice

The article Patalghar (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFILM. Nothing to support notability found in a BEFORE.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. DonaldD23 talk to me 14:36, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Rakkhosh

In this edit, you added a bunch of sources. Did you get this from a draft or from your own research? CNMall41 (talk) 04:01, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

@CNMall41, I found this sources from this Bengali Wikipedia article Sadid Hasan 2014 March (talk) 04:05, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Rakkhosh (2026 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rakkhosh (2026 film), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rakkhosh (2026 film) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

@SDZeroBot, This article is made by @Aqsis Bey. I am only edited and added contents to it. Sadid Hasan 2014 March (talk) 05:02, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rockstar (2026 film) (May 14)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, RangersRus, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the film meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for films. The draft requires either:

or multiple published secondary sources that:

  • provide significant coverage: discuss the film in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the film, such as press releases, the studio's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Rockstar (2026 film) to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

RangersRus (talk) 13:00, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abu Hayat Mahmud (May 21)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Meena, left the following feedback:
This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.
  • Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
  • Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.
Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.
Per WP:BLP, every statement on an article about a person needs a reference to be included on Wikipedia.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Abu Hayat Mahmud to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

– Meena • 19:34, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Ways to improve Masud Rana (2026 film)

Hello, Sadid Hasan 2014 March,

Thank you for creating Masud Rana (2026 film).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Cite multiple reviews by nationally known critics, if available.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|GrabUp}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

GrabUp - Talk 09:03, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Onek Dame Kena

Information icon Hello, Sadid Hasan 2014 March. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Onek Dame Kena, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:06, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks