User talk:Yvarta
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Yvarta, you are invited to the Teahouse!
![]() |
Hi Yvarta! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 29 July 2016 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for August 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zulekha Daud, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Economic Times. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Reference errors on 9 August
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Elections in Venezuela page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Constitution of Venezuela into Elections in Venezuela. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 01:04, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Your Kids 'R' Our Kids (YKROK)
- added links pointing to Economic Times and The Financial Express
- Cristóbal Mendoza
- added a link pointing to Civil law
- Nicolás Maduro
- added a link pointing to National Electoral Council
- Presidency of Nicolás Maduro
- added a link pointing to National Electoral Council
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Meika Hollender
- added links pointing to Inc., Fast Company and Seventh Generation
- Guillermo Tell Villegas
- added a link pointing to Libertador
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Julián Castro, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pedro Gual. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Boxing Bear logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:Boxing Bear logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:29, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Ignacio Andrade
- added a link pointing to Miranda
- Iran–Venezuela relations
- added a link pointing to La Prensa
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Ayauhcihuatl
- added a link pointing to Queen
- Cacamacihuatl
- added a link pointing to Queen
- Chichimecacihuatzin I
- added a link pointing to Queen
- Huacaltzintli
- added a link pointing to Queen
- Huitzilxotzin
- added a link pointing to Queen
- Ilancueitl
- added a link pointing to Queen
- Matlalatzin
- added a link pointing to Queen
- Miahuaxihuitl
- added a link pointing to Queen
- Miyahuaxochtzin
- added a link pointing to Queen
- Tezcatlan Miyahuatzin
- added a link pointing to Queen
- Xiuhcuetzin
- added a link pointing to Queen
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Cleopatra Selene I
- added a link pointing to Ptolemais
- Laodice IV
- added a link pointing to Priestess
- List of Syrian monarchs
- added a link pointing to Ptolemais
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Talkback

Message added 13:50, 26 September 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
StonefieldBreeze (talk) 13:50, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Cleopatra Selene I
- added a link pointing to Queen
- Laodice III
- added a link pointing to Queen
- Laodice IV
- added a link pointing to Queen
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- List of Syrian monarchs
- added links pointing to Cleopatra Selene, Demetrius II and Artavasdes I
- Cleopatra Selene I
- added a link pointing to Queen
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
October 2016

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Paul Singer (businessman). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
You are encouraged to discuss on the talk page. Per WP:BRD this needs to stay at status quo. Lemongirl942 (talk) 17:24, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Paul Singer (businessman) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Lemongirl942 (talk) 17:28, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
- Hello Lemongirl942. I have enjoyed conversing with you, and would rather not report you for disruptive editing. Please provide a counterargument and rationale for your reverts, or it will be apparent you are ignoring valid guidelines. Yvarta (talk) 17:30, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
- You started an RFC and it didn't conclude in a way you would have liked. You need to accept the community consensus now. If you have problems, go ahead and start another RFC or start another discussion. What you are doing however is ignoring consensus. Please refrain. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 17:32, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
- I do not engage in edit wars, but turn to arbitration when required, per guidelines. However I shall not refrain from protecting my edit, despite your request, until you provide evidence there is a consensus. Frankly I thought I made that apparent from the beginning. Yvarta (talk) 17:35, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
- We discuss. We do not revert (unless there is an egregious BLP violation). See WP:STATUSQUO for more. Anyway, let's keep this discussion at one place. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 17:48, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
- I and others have argued that there is, as you say, an "egregious BLP violation." Please focus your discussion on content, including the WP:BLPREQUESTRESTORE guideline I have brought to the table. In fact, specifically that, as it with that guideline I am justifying my deletion. Yvarta (talk) 17:55, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
- We discuss. We do not revert (unless there is an egregious BLP violation). See WP:STATUSQUO for more. Anyway, let's keep this discussion at one place. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 17:48, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
- I do not engage in edit wars, but turn to arbitration when required, per guidelines. However I shall not refrain from protecting my edit, despite your request, until you provide evidence there is a consensus. Frankly I thought I made that apparent from the beginning. Yvarta (talk) 17:35, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
- You started an RFC and it didn't conclude in a way you would have liked. You need to accept the community consensus now. If you have problems, go ahead and start another RFC or start another discussion. What you are doing however is ignoring consensus. Please refrain. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 17:32, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
- Hello Lemongirl942. I have enjoyed conversing with you, and would rather not report you for disruptive editing. Please provide a counterargument and rationale for your reverts, or it will be apparent you are ignoring valid guidelines. Yvarta (talk) 17:30, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Yvarta. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
The Civility Barnstar | |
| Thanks for your comments on the Murder of Maria Ladenburger article. Wikipedia really needs more editors like you who try to cool down heated discussions and to stay focussed on the content of an article. LucLeTruc (talk) 14:20, 24 December 2016 (UTC) |
- Thank you kindly for the barnstar, LucLeTruc, and do keep up the good work on BLP-related articles! Even though such topics can get tempers heated, they are of course also the ones that can have the most incidental impact on real people, and they benefit from your close attention to content. Happy holiday season! Yvarta (talk) 12:25, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
Fort Bend Christian Academy
Hi! I notice the notability tag. Anyway thank you for looking for sources on that. I could try checking the Houston Chronicle archives later to see what I can find. I have a library card so I can use the online NewsBank directory and check.
Anyway if this was nominated for AFD it would very likely be kept because it has a senior high school component. Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Common_outcomes#Schools states: "Most independently accredited degree-awarding institutions and high schools are usually kept except when zero independent sources can be found to prove that the institution actually exists."
Also, if you haven't tried this, it may help to look up all of its names, current and former, in search terms. WhisperToMe (talk) 14:26, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- Hi User:WhisperToMe, thanks for the note. I would have no problem with you removing the notability tag if we can get in at least one independent source on the page, per the guideline you link above. Best, Yvarta (talk) 15:46, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- Found one :) About the name change WhisperToMe (talk) 22:28, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- For high school articles which only rely on primary sources there is a special template saying the school article relies too much on self-published sources and sources too close to the school. Using those templates acknowledges common outcomes but still makes it clear that it needs work. I forget which one it is but I can find it for you if you like! WhisperToMe (talk) 22:52, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for bringing back the source and removing the tag, User:WhisperToMe! I have seen those templates with one source before, but since the page is still a stub with mundane information at this point, I'm not too worried about it. Maybe if it was full-size and still based on press releases or official websites, but it still has growing to do. Yvarta (talk) 18:32, 6 January 2017 (UTC)


