Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- Please add requests for MILHIST participation to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Requests for project input. This includes requests for comment, requested moves, articles for deletion, and more.
| Main page | Discussion | News & open tasks | Academy | Assessment | A-Class review | Contest | Awards | Members |
Requests for project input
Please add requests for MILHIST participation to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Requests for project input. This includes requests for comment, requested moves, articles for deletion, and more.
Looking for help on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SageGreenRider/Joe_Peterburs
I went to an interesting talk by centenarian Joe Peterburs, a USAF pilot. I started a draft but I'm not a WWII expert and wondered if anyone here can help. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SageGreenRider/Joe_Peterburs Thanks! Talk to SageGreenRider 17:03, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Air Combat Group RAAF
Air Combat Group RAAF has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 18:08, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Battle of Kursk
Battle of Kursk has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 18:13, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Japanese battleship Kirishima
Japanese battleship Kirishima has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 18:31, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Heraclius
Heraclius has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 17:38, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Nomination of November 2025 United States military video controversy for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/November 2025 United States military video controversy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.– MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 10:59, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Obiekt 140#Requested move 7 March 2026

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Obiekt 140#Requested move 7 March 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. HurricaneZeta alt (talk) 18:47, 14 March 2026 (UTC) === Requested move at Talk:Charles de Batz de Castelmore d'Artagnan#Requested move 9 March 2026 ==+=

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Charles de Batz de Castelmore d'Artagnan#Requested move 9 March 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPathtalk 21:14, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Operation Rentier#Requested move 10 March 2026

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Operation Rentier#Requested move 10 March 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Jacksonvil (talk|contribs) 08:20, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
Italian official histories
Western European events removed from Template:Post-Cold War European conflicts
I initially raised the issue at Template talk:Post-Cold War European conflicts about the removal of Western European events seen in this version (oldid link), but I've yet to see replies. I'd like to know the justifications of such removals, or... Can related events in western Europe be reinserted? George Ho (talk) 21:33, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
- From what I can see the template was substantially reduced from this to the present version. But this also cleaned up a lot of bloat.
- For Western Europe, it used to list
"Basque conflict (1959–2011) The Troubles (late 1960s–1998) Corsican conflict (1976–present) Dissident Irish Republican Campaign (1998–present)"
. I think the issue here is all but one of these are not clearly "post-Cold war European conflicts", because they extend in the largest part long before the end of the cold war. Indeed, they are only weakly linked to the cold war. FOARP (talk) 11:10, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Iranian Navy
This article is a sorry underreferenced mess. Now that we have to figure out which ships have *actually* been sunk (hovercraft anyone??) I will start to work it over. There are also new Northern Fleet and Southern Fleet articles that need to be linked etc. In addition, the Bayandor-class corvettes have no data about how they were sunk. Any assistance would be appreciated. Buckshot06 (talk) 12:24, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Buckshot06: - all entries for Iranian Navy losses in the war on the list of shipwrecks in 2026 are referenced. Feel free to copy over. Mjroots (talk) 03:05, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
China superpower status
Should Wikipedia present China as a superpower since the 2020s or should we present an academic debate? See Talk:Superpower#China superpower status Moxy🍁 03:36, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Any Polish speakers?
I was looking to add at least one citation to the 1920 Battle of Cyców article to remove it from the project's backlog of uncited articles (now down to 341, from 581 at the start of the March 2026 WikiProject Unreferenced articles drive). There look to be two decent articles from 1920s Polish military journals linked from the Polish Wikipedia article that might be used. I tried Google Translate but it wasn't that helpful; perhaps someone better equipped than me could look them over and, if they are reliable sources, add a citation or two to the article? Many thanks - Dumelow (talk) 19:54, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Piotrus and Daniel Case: Dumelow: In my experience, User:Piotrus would be the active editor most likely to be able to help on this. User:Daniel Case, a very active administrator, is also listed as a user who has offered to help with Polish translations. Donner60 (talk) 02:21, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Dumelow What's the problem with translation? Most modern AIs like ChatGPT should be able to handle the translation well (perhaps in chunks if you hit word limits). All sources cited on pl wiki (the two old academic ones + the book) look reliable, although the book is a bit hard to get. If you want to read the relevant page yourself, asking at pl equivalent of WP:RX should procure the relevant scans for you in few days/weeks (and again, AI will translate them even if they aren't ORCed; these days language is becoming increasingly irrelevant of a barrier). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:00, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks Piotr. I was having issues working out if it was an academic-style article or something like a letter from someone who had been involved. I'm always a bit nervous about sources that are close in time to the event in question but will try to add this if I can. Google was a bit frustrating with work limits, I have not tried ChatGPT but will give it a go. Thanks - Dumelow (talk) 09:25, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Dumelow A quick glance on pl wiki shows that both authors of the cited articles are notable; the bio of the second one does confirm he was a participant of that particular battle. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:20, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks Piotr. I have added a quick summary of the action from Rakowski (his account focuses on the 7th Uhlans) but I was reluctant to use Bystram as he was the Polish commander for the engagement, though Commons has some maps from his report that I will add. It sounds like an interesting action if other editors want to expand upon it - Dumelow (talk) 15:52, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Dumelow A quick glance on pl wiki shows that both authors of the cited articles are notable; the bio of the second one does confirm he was a participant of that particular battle. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:20, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks Piotr. I was having issues working out if it was an academic-style article or something like a letter from someone who had been involved. I'm always a bit nervous about sources that are close in time to the event in question but will try to add this if I can. Google was a bit frustrating with work limits, I have not tried ChatGPT but will give it a go. Thanks - Dumelow (talk) 09:25, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
While we are at it: I ran a Bot job against our task forces to comment out members who have been inactive (ie have not edited) in more than 365 days. This has reduced the participants in Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Polish military history task force to just Piotr. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:00, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
Battle of Leros 1943
Are there any Italian artillery aficionados around? I'm trying to link the guns in the table Leros artillery in the OOB but can't help wonder if things like 120/45 are typos? Thanks Keith-264 (talk) 14:39, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
- The one at PL127 noted in the article as "90/35" is shown in Rogers p239 as "90/53", presumably Cannone da 90/53? The others are as the source has them - Dumelow (talk) 15:47, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
- I don't have any real knowledge but the 76/50s might be QF 14-pounder naval gun Mk I & II which are the right calibre and barrel length and saw service with the Italian navy. The 120/45s would presumably be Schneider-Canet-Armstrong 1918s known to be used as coastal artillery - Dumelow (talk) 19:19, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Lord Mountbatten#Requested move 10 March 2026

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Lord Mountbatten#Requested move 10 March 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Jacksonvil (talk|contribs) 22:27, 17 March 2026 (UTC)