Talk:Robin (Honkai: Star Rail)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Robin (Honkai: Star Rail) is currently a Video games good article nominee. Nominated by In solidarity, Gommeh (talk 🎮 sign) at 20:27, 15 July 2026 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review this article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor. When complete, this review will be closed by the reviewer. To view the review and add comments, click discuss review. |
| This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A fact from Robin (Honkai: Star Rail) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 May 2026 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
| This article was edited to contain a partial translation of 知更鳥 (崩壞:星穹鐵道) from the Chinese Wikipedia. Consult the history of the original page to see a list of its authors. |
Did you know nomination
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. Track your hook after promotion. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:25, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
- ... that the Honkai: Star Rail character Robin's songs were used to raise awareness about hearing loss? Source: Ah, Qi (2024-12-04). "不止是游戏,《崩坏:星穹铁道》用公益凝聚大爱无疆 - 资讯 - 游戏日报". 游戏日报 (in Chinese). Retrieved 2026-04-02.
- ALT1: ... that the Honkai: Star Rail character Robin was compared to American actress and model Marilyn Monroe? Source: Yang, Ming (2024-05-08). "《崩坏:星穹铁道》知更鸟背景披露,将以何种姿态冲破牢笼? - 资讯 - 游戏日报". 游戏日报 (in Chinese). Retrieved 2026-04-02.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Kryptonita
Gommeh (talk! sign!) 20:06, 5 April 2026 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| QPQ: Done. |
Reviewer: UpTheOctave! (talk · contribs) 03:33, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
GA review
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Robin (Honkai: Star Rail)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Hi Gommeh, nice to work with you! I'll be reviewing this article over the coming days as part of WT:GARC#104. I think we've crossed paths a couple times before, but it will be fun to become properly acquainted with your work. I hope you find my review an enjoyable experience – I should complete it over the coming week, but please ping me if it seems like I've gotten sidetracked somewhere else.
As you see below (and at examples like Talk:Sabre Dance/GA1), my usual process is to keep meta discussion up here while gradually filling out the comments below. As I go, I will assess each criterion in the progress section to give us a visual indicator of where the review is at. At the end of my preliminary review (baring a quick-fail), I will place the review on hold to give you time to complete – please do not make substantive edits until I do this! Please indent your comments below my bullet points and sign with your initials to help differentiate them. Once the review is over, I will tidy everything up and give a final verdict in this section.
One last thing (or rather, one first question before I start): are you intending on taking this article beyond GA? If so, as a semi-frequent FAC reviewer (source + prose), I am always willing to give some more substantial comments alongside the standard GA stuff to help with preparations. Just say! Thanks, UpTheOctave! • 8va? 03:33, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
Progress
Good Article review progress box
|
Comments
A good article is...
Well-written:
Verifiable with no original research:
Broad in its coverage:
Neutral:
Stable:
Illustrated:

