User talk:ARoseThorn
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hi ARoseThorn! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 20:31, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
February 2026 GOCE blitz awards
 |
The (old school) League of Copy Editors Barnstar | |
| This barnstar is awarded to ARoseThorn for copy edits totaling over 15,000 words (including rollover words) during the GOCE February 2026 Copy Editing Blitz. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! GoldRomean (talk) 00:43, 24 February 2026 (UTC) |
 |
The Copy Editor's 10K Star | |
| This barnstar is awarded to ARoseThorn for copy-editing at least one individual article of more than 10,000 words during the most recent Guild of Copy Editors' Drive or Blitz. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! GoldRomean (talk) 00:43, 24 February 2026 (UTC) |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Mariama Sonko has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 24% of accepted submissions, well done! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
- See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.
Future articles
- Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.
- Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Next steps
- Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
- Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
- You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
- Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
- The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
- For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
MCE89 (talk) 08:57, 24 March 2026 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Sara Faridi (April 6)
- evidence that the subject meets any of the specific criteria for academics;
or multiple published secondary sources that:
- provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Next steps
- Edit Draft:Sara Faridi to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
 |
Hello, ARoseThorn!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Wisenerd (talk) 20:56, 6 April 2026 (UTC) |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Nadia Habash has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 24% of accepted submissions, well done! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
- See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.
Future articles
- Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.
- Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Next steps
- Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
- Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
- You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
- Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
- The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
- For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Sahib-e-Qiran, EasternShah 01:32, 10 April 2026 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Lee Yaron has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
- See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.
Future articles
- Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.
- Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Next steps
- Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
- Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
- You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
- Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
- The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
- For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Htanaungg (talk) 15:32, 11 April 2026 (UTC)April 2026 GOCE blitz award
 |
The Modest Barnstar | |
| This barnstar is awarded to ARoseThorn for copy edits totaling over 2,000 words (including rollover words) during the GOCE April 2026 Copy Editing Blitz. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 22:49, 20 April 2026 (UTC) |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Estartenf843h3er201105 (April 21)
Next steps
- Edit User:Estartenf843h3er201105 to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Animu Athiei has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
- See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.
Future articles
- Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.
- Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Next steps
- Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
- Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
- You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
- Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
- The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
- For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Greenman (talk) 22:37, 24 April 2026 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Samantha Kureya has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
- See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.
Future articles
- Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.
- Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Next steps
- Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
- Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
- You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
- Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
- The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
- For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Theroadislong (talk) 16:56, 27 April 2026 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Fadia Nasser-Abu Alhija has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
- See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.
Future articles
- Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.
- Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Next steps
- Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
- Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
- You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
- Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
- The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
- For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Theroadislong (talk) 16:59, 27 April 2026 (UTC)Editor experience invitation
Hi ARoseThorn. I'm looking for experienced editors to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 16:41, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
- Hi Clovermoss-- I'm interested, but I'm not sure I really count as an experienced editor? My account's existed since 2021 but I've only really started editing in earnest this year. ARoseThorn (talk) 18:26, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
- I usually look for at least 1,000 edits or so, especially if someone has decent content contributions. You count. :) Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 00:28, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Fatmana Binta has a new comment
- @MCE89 Since I don't see a place to respond on the article, I will respond here: Yeah, that was a very silly mistake on my part. I've fixed it in the text of the article, but I don't know the way I should rename the draft. (Thank you for the quick response!) ARoseThorn (talk) 16:39, 19 May 2026 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Fatmata Binta has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 24% of accepted submissions, well done! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
- See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.
Future articles
- Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.
- Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Next steps
- Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
- Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
- You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
- Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
- The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
- For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
MCE89 (talk) 08:58, 20 May 2026 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Selly Raby Kane has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 24% of accepted submissions, well done! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
- See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.
Future articles
- Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.
- Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Next steps
- Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
- Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
- You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
- Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
- The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
- For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
MCE89 (talk) 17:22, 23 May 2026 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Patience Nabukalu (May 30)
- provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Next steps
- Edit Draft:Patience Nabukalu to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
DYK for Fatmata Binta
On 14 June 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Fatmata Binta, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Fatmata Binta (pictured) used her monetary award from the Basque Culinary World Prize to support women farmers' cultivation of fonio? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fatmata Binta. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Fatmata Binta), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.
— Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:02, 14 June 2026 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Queen Kalimpinya (June 25)
- provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Next steps
- Edit Draft:Queen Kalimpinya to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Queen Kalimpinya has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 24% of accepted submissions, well done! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
- See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.
Future articles
- Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.
- Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Next steps
- Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
- Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
- You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
- Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
- The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
- For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
grapesurgeon (talk) 14:04, 25 June 2026 (UTC)Drafts in userspace
Hey it's grapesurgeon from discord; just a tip, I recommend drafting new articles in your userspace from now on, and not in draftspace. For example, User:ARoseThorn/Azul Rojas Marín y otra vs. Perù instead of Draft:Azul Rojas Marín y otra vs. Perù.
Draftspace is mostly for AFC; it's also implicitly timed because drafts that have been inactive for 6 months get autodeleted. Userspace has no such timer.
Also a reminder to just skip AFC and create articles directly from now on! grapesurgeon (talk) 05:17, 27 June 2026 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Zim Flores (July 7)
- provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Next steps
- Edit Draft:Zim Flores to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
Pangram drafts
Looks like we had the same idea. Any interest in working together on this? As you can see I'm very much at the "throw sources at the wall and see what sticks" stage :) Rusalkii (talk) 05:43, 22 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Rusalkii I'm down! I took the liberty of beginning the conversion of facts into prose on your draft, and added some more information. Hopefully I'm not messing with your article-writing process too much. ARoseThorn (talk) 19:29, 22 July 2026 (UTC)
- Re: "I can't see the preview on mobile so I have to published before I can check the result", does the "Review your changes" button on the bottom left of the edit summary screen come up for you? It's kind of hidden and rather inconvenient but that's what I use if I'm writing on my phone.
- The first stage of turning factdumps into running prose is my least favorite part of the drafting process, have right at it. This way I might even not procrastinate with the draft in skeleton stage for months. Rusalkii (talk) 20:24, 22 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Rusalkii I don't see a button like that; there's a "Preview" screen which appears before publishing edits, but for any page which is more than a handful of paragraphs the preview appears completely blank. I'm editing on the Wikipedia app; I don't know if what you're discussing applies to the mobile site, or if I'm just missing something right in front of me.
- As for writing prose: I don't feel adding content to a draft which isn't in prose; it seems my drafting method is a bit unusual. Either way, that's the part of the process I enjoy more, so we might make a good team in that respect :) ARoseThorn (talk) 02:53, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
- Oooh. Yeah the app sucks for editing, I'm shocked you've managed to use it so successfully. I always use the website, no idea if there's a way to preview on the app.
- I think this is pretty normal as a drafting method, my [sources dump] -> [random bits I think might be useful from the sources] -> [coherent prose] pipeline isn't something I see a lot of editors doing. Rusalkii (talk) 02:59, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Victoria Heilman (August 2)
- provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Next steps
- Edit Draft:Victoria Heilman to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Drag Night Namibia has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.
Future articles
- Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.
- Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Next steps
- Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
- Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
- You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
- Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
- The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
- For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
FuzzyMagma (talk) 13:48, 2 August 2026 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Llion Jones has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.
Future articles
- Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.
- Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Next steps
- Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
- Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
- You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
- Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
- The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
- For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Czarking0 (talk) 20:55, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Disambiguation link notification for August 4
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Toubou people, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Laal was added.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Léo Kret has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.
Future articles
- Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.
- Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Next steps
- Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
- Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
- You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
- Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
- The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
- For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Rkieferbaum (talk) 20:34, 6 August 2026 (UTC)Concern regarding Draft:Usha Mukherjee
Hello, ARoseThorn. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Usha Mukherjee, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:06, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: David Ha has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.
Future articles
- Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.
- Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Next steps
- Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
- Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
- You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
- Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
- The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
- For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Cabrils (talk) 02:23, 11 August 2026 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Video games in Pakistan has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.
Future articles
- Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.
- Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Next steps
- Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
- Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
- You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
- Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
- The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
- For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
TNM101 (in solidarity · chat) 04:21, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Sara Guerín de Elgueta
Hello, ARoseThorn. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sara Guerín de Elgueta, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:07, 24 August 2026 (UTC)
August 2026
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Balintang Islands when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Specifying |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= needs to be defined in the template in order to work. You can look at the documentation for the template being used, but it is also helpful to use the preview button before saving an edit; this helps find any errors that have been made and ensures that the values added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is highly recommended that editors use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions of if I can help explain further, please let me know! You can also contact the help desk for assistance.
Thank you. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 23:36, 27 August 2026 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Bratwurst-Röslein when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Specifying |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= needs to be defined in the template in order to work. You can look at the documentation for the template being used, but it is also helpful to use the preview button before saving an edit; this helps find any errors that have been made and ensures that the values added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is highly recommended that editors use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions of if I can help explain further, please let me know! You can also contact the help desk for assistance.
Thank you. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 00:00, 28 August 2026 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Lurganure when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Specifying |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= needs to be defined in the template in order to work. You can look at the documentation for the template being used, but it is also helpful to use the preview button before saving an edit; this helps find any errors that have been made and ensures that the values added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is highly recommended that editors use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions of if I can help explain further, please let me know! You can also contact the help desk for assistance.
Thank you. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 04:00, 29 August 2026 (UTC)
- (talk page watcher) @Zackmann08: I don't think three separate warnings to the same user is necessary. ~ rusty meow ~ 04:06, 29 August 2026 (UTC)
- When a user continues to cause the same error and issue repeatedly, warnings are warranted. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 04:09, 29 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Zackmann08 Apologies; in fairness, the issue is entirely with Wikipedia's app, which I was using for adding Wikidata-suggested images. For some reason it applies the incorrect parameters in some cases; unfortunately, because of how the official app is set up, I can't check the parameters before publishing. I'll avoid using that feature of the app in the future, and I suppose figure out how to file a bug teport. ARoseThorn (talk) ARoseThorn (talk) 04:23, 29 August 2026 (UTC)
- That is fair and noted. In the future, please check that once you upload the image that both the image and caption you uploaded are actually being displayed. If not, that is a red flag that you need to check your edit. No harm done if you fix it in the next edit... The issue is that some of your edits you think you have added an image/caption to the page but one, or both, are not actually being displayed. Just double check your work going forward! That's all. Appreciate you adding images! Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 04:26, 29 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Zackmann08 Thank you for the notice; I'll try and be more careful in the future. ARoseThorn (talk) 04:31, 29 August 2026 (UTC)
- That is fair and noted. In the future, please check that once you upload the image that both the image and caption you uploaded are actually being displayed. If not, that is a red flag that you need to check your edit. No harm done if you fix it in the next edit... The issue is that some of your edits you think you have added an image/caption to the page but one, or both, are not actually being displayed. Just double check your work going forward! That's all. Appreciate you adding images! Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 04:26, 29 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Zackmann08 Apologies; in fairness, the issue is entirely with Wikipedia's app, which I was using for adding Wikidata-suggested images. For some reason it applies the incorrect parameters in some cases; unfortunately, because of how the official app is set up, I can't check the parameters before publishing. I'll avoid using that feature of the app in the future, and I suppose figure out how to file a bug teport. ARoseThorn (talk) ARoseThorn (talk) 04:23, 29 August 2026 (UTC)
- When a user continues to cause the same error and issue repeatedly, warnings are warranted. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 04:09, 29 August 2026 (UTC)
DYK for Pangram (AI detector)
On 5 September 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pangram (AI detector), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that an analysis by Pangram found that 21% of peer reviews for a machine-learning conference were AI-generated? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pangram (AI detector). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (Pangram (AI detector)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.
Concern regarding Draft:Rudo Chigudu
Hello, ARoseThorn. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rudo Chigudu, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:07, 11 September 2026 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Joyce Jenje-Makwenda
Hello, ARoseThorn. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Joyce Jenje-Makwenda, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:08, 12 September 2026 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi ARoseThorn. Thank you for your work on List of mathematicians who did research in prison. Another editor, Scope creep, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Is ref 21 ok.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Scope creep}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
scope_creepTalk 18:55, 13 September 2026 (UTC)
- @Scope sceep: Probably not; I'll remove the link. ARoseThorn (talk) 19:06, 13 September 2026 (UTC)
Disambiguated links
Just to let you know, editor ARoseThorn, Viacom is now a disambiguation page. So when you link to the company, the way you did at Mass media, please use:
[[Viacom (2005–2019)|Viacom]]
See more about linking at the help page and the project page. Thank you for your edits and for your support in this! P.I. Ellsworth , ed. – welcome! – 05:20, 15 September 2026 (UTC)
Wikipedia:The Asia-Oceania Destubathon
Hi, just to let you know that I'm running The Asia-Oceania Destubathon in November in support of Wikipedia:Asia Month. £2000 (about $2,689.54) in prizes. As you signed up for the Destubathon of the Americas, letting you know first. Sign up if interested! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:34, 16 September 2026 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Waluj MIDC, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nagar was added.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:53, 18 September 2026 (UTC)