User talk:ExclusiveIndia

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. BhikhariInformer (talk) 15:46, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Kaliachak Chapter 1—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 15:12, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, ExclusiveIndia. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the Edit Request Wizard), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 15:47, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

what is the problem in the article please explain me. ExclusiveIndia (talk) 15:48, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Please read the notability guideline for actors. He does not yet meet that guideline, so Wikipedia cannot have an article about him. --bonadea contributions talk 15:53, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello. Your recent edit to Malda, West Bengal appears to have added a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:27, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:ExclusiveIndia, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=ExclusiveIndia|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. .

All your edits have been concerned with adding Resad Ajim's name to Wikipedia articles and creating a draft about him. You have also uploaded a photo of Ajim which you claim to have taken. You have to clarify what your connection to him is. bonadea contributions talk 10:31, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Resad Ajim is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Resad Ajim until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Kqol • talk 10:42, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Resad Ajim requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Resad Ajim. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.

_signed, Aafi ^(talk) 19:18, 31 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi ExclusiveIndia. Thank you for your work on Bike Ambulance Dada. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please show coverage outside of The Telegraph and The Times of India in order to establish notability as per WP:NFILM. Thanks and have a wonderful day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 11:28, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Bike Ambulance Dada. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and As an upcoming film, this needs to meet WP:NFF, with more than just the routine fluff coverage that's currently in the article. The production itself needs to be considered notable.. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ravensfire (talk) 16:52, 9 June 2026 (UTC)