User talk:Fróis

Please see the discussion in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Nuno_Loureiro#Argument_for_not_cropping_the_image Apandada1 (talk) 19:55, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

I noticed you made the article 30 September 1639 into a redirect. I have reversed this for now. Please consider starting a merge discussion for this article. I can help you do this if you wish. If you don't believe any content can be merged, please consider an Articles for Deletion discussion. aaronneallucas (talk) 20:14, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Fróis

I edit here too, under the username Aplucas0703 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Siege of Monção, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 January 2 § Siege of Monção.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Aplucas0703}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

aaronneallucas (talk) 01:00, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Rui Freire de Andrada, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Htanaungg (talk) 03:27, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Katagiri Sekishū, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ibaraki. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi, while your image shows him while being king, it's monochrome with oval shape, and it just doesn't look good to me. A lead image should be an image that represents the subject the best, which should be the best looking portrait and contemporary, if it was his time as king as well then that's just a bonus, this is a 17th century, you can't find portrait of him in every years, it's just a weird choice for me that you choose a monochrome portrait even though contemporary color portrait of him exists even if it showed his during his reign, this portrait shows him when he's an adult, contemporary, and just look better than the monochrome one. Alfdeckse (talk) 10:45, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Please take this to the article's talk page so it can be discussed openly. Fróis (talk) 11:24, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

sureAlfdeckse (talk) 11:40, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello Fróis. The blank and redirect you performed about a week ago has been questioned at RFD here. You have been asked to explain yourself there, so please do so if it hasn't been closed by the time you read this. Thank you. Chess enjoyer (talk) 04:39, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi Fróis. Thank you for your work on Sack of Bombay (1626). Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for taking the time to write this article! Your contributions are greatly appreciated. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 07:32, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi Fróis. Thank you for your work on 1577 Portuguese voyage to Japan. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please add more sources - primarily secondary sources - and footnotes to back up each claim with a reliable source. Please also establish notability as per WP:NEVENT. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 12:45, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to José Maria do Carmo de Sousa Botelho Mourão e Vasconcelos when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 16:50, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi Fróis. Thank you for your work on José Luís de Sousa Botelho Mourão e Vasconcelos, 3rd Count of Vila Real. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please add more sources - primarily secondary sources - and footnotes to back up each claim with a reliable source. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 12:44, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi Fróis. Thank you for your work on Fernando de Sousa Botelho Mourão e Vasconcelos. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please add more sources - primarily secondary sources - and footnotes to back up each claim with a reliable source. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 12:45, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to José Luís de Sousa Botelho Mourão e Vasconcelos, 3rd Count of Vila Real. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Vestrian24Bio 16:06, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Fernando de Sousa Botelho Mourão e Vasconcelos. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Vestrian24Bio 16:07, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to João Pereira Froas. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and in particular, the article needs at least three reliable independent sources with significant coverage of the subject. There's useful information about how to choose good sources and avoid bad sources here. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. SunloungerFrog (talk) 08:54, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Kawano Michiari. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ckfasdf (talk) 15:28, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kawano Michiari is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kawano Michiari until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ckfasdf (talk) 05:47, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi Fróis! I noticed that you've made several edits in order to restore a version of Tahmasp II. The impulse to repeatedly undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure that you're aware of Wikipedia's edit warring policy. Repeatedly undoing the changes made by other users in a back-and-forth fashion like this is disallowed, even if you feel what you're doing is justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages in order to try to reach a consensus with the other editors involved. If you are unable to come to an agreement at Talk:Tahmasp II, please use one of the dispute resolution options that are available in order to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of repeatedly reverting other editors' changes can help you avoid getting drawn into edit wars. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 15:31, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi Fróis. Thank you for your work on Matsuki Tantan. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please establish notability as per WP:NAUTHOR. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 13:56, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Portuguese conquest of the Amazon, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dutch was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi Fróis. Thank you for your work on Kunishige Tanaka. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Unfortunately, it is not yet ready for main space. Please add sources and establish notability as per WP:BIO. I will be moving it to draft. Please feel free to republish once it meets the above criteria. Thanks and have a wonderful day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 07:07, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi Fróis. Thank you for your work on Portuguese conquest of Minas Gerais. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice start!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 10:32, 9 March 2026 (UTC)