User talk:NepalFirst

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: N Paisa Pvt Ltd (August 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:32, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, NepalFirst! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:32, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
NepalFirst (talk) 13:30, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

You can check the reference site why it got rejected

Your submission at Articles for creation: N Paisa Pvt Ltd (August 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by HitroMilanese were:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Hitro talk 13:49, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sushma Adhikari (August 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Jlwoodwa were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
jlwoodwa (talk) 04:03, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sushma Adhikari (August 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JesusisGreat7 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Jesus isGreat7 ☾⋆ | Ping Me 05:59, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sushma Adhikari (August 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rahmatula786 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Plz don’t submit again unless you show new independent sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Rahmatula786 (talk) 11:40, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ramraja Shrestha (August 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
RangersRus (talk) 10:08, 10 August 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Suresh Lal Chitrakaar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Suresh Lal Chitrakaar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Taffer😊💬(she/they) 14:20, 12 August 2025 (UTC)

Welcome

Hello, NepalFirst, and welcome to Wikipedia! While efforts to improve Wikipedia are always welcome, unfortunately your contributions are not written in an English that is good enough to be useful. You appear to be more familiar with Nepali; did you know there is a Wikipedia in Nepali? You may prefer to contribute there instead. In any case, welcome to the project, and thank you for your efforts! If you need help, please feel free to notify me on my talk page. Taffer😊💬(she/they) 14:31, 12 August 2025 (UTC)

Suresh Lal Chitrakaar moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Suresh Lal Chitrakaar. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. sksatsuma 16:30, 12 August 2025 (UTC)

Khadhya Bank moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Khadhya Bank. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has too many problems of language or grammar and Many sources are 404 links. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 03:59, 13 August 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Khadhya Bank (August 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cabrils was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
To avoid disappointment, please do not resubmit this article for review until it has been significantly improved-- it is nowhere near the minimum standard for drafts.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Cabrils (talk) 00:50, 14 August 2025 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Ram Bahadur Khatri.tif

Thanks for uploading File:Ram Bahadur Khatri.tif. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:33, 18 August 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ram Bahadur Khatri

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ram Bahadur Khatri, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Rahmatula786 (talk) 03:24, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

Why you delete the articles ill and criminal intenion NepalFirst (talk) 08:29, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

August 2025

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:Ram Bahadur Khatri. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 07:35, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

I am not attacking that duo but he deleted and report articles inill intention that was not advertisement or paid article NepalFirst (talk) 08:31, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
That was a valid speedy deletion request (hence, I have executed it). Just because you didn't agree with it, you must not call other editors "fraud" or "ill and illegal manner" (whatever that means); these are personal attacks and will not be tolerated. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:47, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
I am newly contributer but as per my knowledge and the reliable sources of Media coverage i have publish the articles that editor had deleted in what ground he reported and deleted ? NepalFirst (talk) 08:52, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
That article was promotional with insufficient referencing and no real evidence of notability. Separate to that, it also included a number of copyright images which you have uploaded as your own work, when they clearly aren't (or if they are, then you have a major conflict of interest in this subject, which you need to disclose).
Precisely for the reason that you are, as you say, a new contributor, I already suggested further down this page that you continue to put your creations through the AfC review system rather than publishing them directly in the main encyclopaedia, until you gain a better understanding of our policies and requirements.
Regardless of all that, the personal attacks must stop, or you will get yourself blocked. Please confirm that you understand. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:02, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
Thank You I got it now i came to know what is next but sure i am not paid writer or advertise anything i just copy the photo which has been available in internet that's it NepalFirst (talk) 09:06, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
Just because something is available on the internet does not mean it is free of copyright. In fact, the vast majority of content is covered by copyright, unless it is expressly and clearly indicated otherwise. If you cannot find evidence that something is free of copyright, you must assume it isn't.
In any case, you must never upload any content as your own work, unless it really is yours (meaning, in most cases, that you have actually created it yourself). When you upload your own work to our servers, you are confirming that it is your property and you are releasing it from copyright and making it available for anyone to do with whatever they please. You obviously cannot release someone else's property in such a way, that is not only against our policies but is actually against the law. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:13, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bunu Uprety

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bunu Uprety requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 07:37, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

Notability, referencing and NPOV

Hi, I would suggest that you continue to put your article creations through the AfC review system until such time as you have a better grasp of our policies regarding notability, verifiability, as well as neutral point of view, among others. Thank you, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:56, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

I got your guidance and i will imporve it NepalFirst (talk) 02:46, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

Control copyright icon Hello NepalFirst! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:13, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: François I School Complex (August 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
RangersRus (talk) 13:09, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

Draft:François I School Complex

Can you tell me why you resubmitted Draft:François I School Complex? You have had no involvement with this draft, that I can see at least, you just went and resubmitted it after it had been restored following a request by another editor. Care to explain? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:33, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Naren Khadka

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Naren Khadka requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Rahmatula786 (talk) 01:06, 23 August 2025 (UTC)

Naren Khadka moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Naren Khadka. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Whpq (talk) 04:21, 23 August 2025 (UTC)

  • Note: In reviewing the sourcing, non-e of the references do anything other than mention the actor in a sentence or worse, just as a name in a list of names. That is far short of whta would be considered significant coverage. -- Whpq (talk) 04:24, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
    Ok i will update the coverage and publish NepalFirst (talk) 04:43, 23 August 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Npaisa

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Npaisa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://tracxn.com/d/companies/npaisa/__iIOhcfzZtgfbbVWhMd7KTEvGBfvVUxk5paJM8g_5le8. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sam Sailor 09:18, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sabina Kafle

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sabina Kafle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://influencernepal.com/sabeena-kafle/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Johnj1995 (talk) 20:39, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

John shall you make it move for draft i will change the deto and make the own NepalFirst (talk). 20:41, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
You must know about Balen Shah who is the mayor of Kathmandu her public information is not someone property or copyright effect here because she is public figure and wife of mayor hope you understand NepalFirst (talk). 20:45, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

stop You have been previously advised of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Despite this, you copied verbatim from a copyrighted source to create the Sabina Kafle article. This is not acceptable. You must write articles in your own words. Continued copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing. -- Whpq (talk) 21:06, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

Ok i got it NepalFirst (talk). 21:17, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

September 2025

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Kaushalya Abeywickrama when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:38, 21 September 2025 (UTC)

Kaushalya Abeywickrama moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Kaushalya Abeywickrama. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Thilsebatti (talk) 17:35, 21 September 2025 (UTC)

Its not promotion or interest of conflict never known that persons , In my whole life i don't have single person from srilanka NepalFirst (talk). 18:00, 21 September 2025 (UTC)
Hi. The draft is entirely promotional. Dr. Kaushalya Abeywickrama is a multifaceted leader, visionary entrepreneur, and passionate humanist who has seamlessly bridged the worlds of media, academia, healthcare, and social service. See WP: Writing an article. Rewrite the draft and submit it for review. Thanks. Thilsebatti (talk) 18:04, 21 September 2025 (UTC)
Ok i will edit that line NepalFirst (talk). 18:22, 21 September 2025 (UTC)
Not only that line. The whole draft needs to be rewritten. Thilsebatti (talk) 03:32, 22 September 2025 (UTC)
Ok NepalFirst (talk). 03:33, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

Kaushalya Abeywickrama moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Kaushalya Abeywickrama (journalist). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and this article require WP:RS, WP:IS for WP:V. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. QEnigma  07:02, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

@NepalFirst: This article require WP:RS and WP:IS sources for verifiability. Please refer to Wikipedia's tutorial on creating your first article for guidance on drafting an article and to Referencing for beginners for instructions on formatting references correctly. Kindly note that original research is not permitted. In addition, please refrain from creating duplicate articles regarding the same subject. Regards. QEnigma  07:07, 22 September 2025 (UTC)
@NepalFirst, I have just deleted a paragraph from this draft, which was copied verbatim from a source clearly claiming copyright. I have warned you about copyright violations before, and I can see that at least one other admin has since done the same. Copyright violations are a serious matter, and persistent violations are also considered a form of vandalism, therefore this must stop now. If you're unwilling or unable to stay within the rules, I will have no option but to block you from editing.
Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:31, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

Ways to improve Pradhumna Mahat Chhetri

Hello, NepalFirst,

Thank you for creating Pradhumna Mahat Chhetri.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please fix/remove unrelated references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Agent VII}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Agent 007 (talk) 17:11, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

Kindly help me to make best practices as per standard NepalFirst (talk). 17:17, 23 September 2025 (UTC)
You cam check the citation and published article in academic journal etc check in reference libk and kindly make the best update as you can make NepalFirst (talk). 18:03, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pradhumna Mahat Chhetri

Hello NepalFirst,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Pradhumna Mahat Chhetri for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia. (See notability of politicians)

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Josey Wales Parley 18:22, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Devighat, Nuwakot

Hello NepalFirst,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Devighat, Nuwakot for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Josey Wales Parley 19:54, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

Ok Delete it NepalFirst (talk). 20:06, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

September 2025

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.
If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Whpq (talk) 21:28, 23 September 2025 (UTC)
That incident will not happen again plz unblock me , i am learning but its hard for me to get block ,plz sir consider me last time NepalFirst (talk). 21:42, 23 September 2025 (UTC)
Pardon me i will never repeat such mistake and i will learm and fullfill all the benchmarks and editor guidless ,Hope you will grace upon me NepalFirst (talk). 08:04, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
cross icon
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NepalFirst (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log) • SI)


Request reason:

Kindly unblock me for human minor errors i will not do the same mistake NepalFirst (talk). 16:23, 24 September 2025 (UTC)

Decline reason:

In order to lift the block, we need to be certain that you understand how copyright works on Wikipedia. To allow the reviewing administrator to assess your understanding, please respond to the following questions in your next unblock appeal, explaining in your own words:

  • What is copyright?
  • How is Wikipedia licenced?
  • Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?
  • Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?
  • How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?

Your answers will enable us to establish whether or not you should be unblocked.. I also very strongly recommend you stop WP:BLUDGEONING; for example, make no more than two responses here per 24 hour period. Yamla (talk) 17:03, 24 September 2025 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You were give very explicit warnings about copying text just a few days ago which you acknpowledged, yet you continue to copy text from the web. -- Whpq (talk) 21:30, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

Unblock me i beg you pardon i will not repeat i again NepalFirst (talk). 08:02, 24 September 2025 (UTC)

Kindly Unblock for me I will not translate or copy from any place

That incident will not happen again plz unblock me , i am learning but its hard for me to get block ,plz sir consider me last time NepalFirst (talk). 21:41, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

To be unblocked, you need to follow the instructions provided in the block notice. I strongly recommend you read the guide to appealing blocks. You will also need to explain why we should believe you when you previously stated that you stated you understood when I explicitly told you to write content in your own words. Whpq (talk) 00:27, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
Ok i got it kindly unblock me NepalFirst (talk). 07:01, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
Please follow the instructions in the block notice. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 07:05, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
Can you guide me NepalFirst (talk). 07:06, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
Write your unblock request, put it at the bottom of the page, then put it in the unblock template listed in the block notice. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 07:07, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
I beg you pardon plz unblock me NepalFirst (talk). 08:00, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
I am not an administrator, so I am unable to do that. Please write your unblock request. I can add it to the correct template later, or another editor can. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 08:02, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
It's quite clear that you haven't "got it". Nor does it look like you have bothered to read guide to appealing blocks. -- Whpq (talk) 13:24, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
I had already requested and i try to request again it is showing like this msg .It has been detected that you or someone else may be trying to spam our system with appeals. Please wait until your previous appeal is closed, or if it is already closed, please try again about 2 days later. If you are applying for an unblock of an IP address, this could mean that an appeal has already been submitted for your IP. In this case, please try again later or contact us to help clarify the issue. Email: utrs-admins@googlegroups.com NepalFirst (talk). 13:34, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
You used the UTRS system to appeal which is really only needed if your talk page access has been revoked or there is some other reason why you cannot post your appeal on your talk page. The block message above tells you how to post an appeal to this talk page. In any case, admin Deepfriedokra reviewed your case and declined it. -- Whpq (talk) 13:47, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
I'd say copyvios aren't the only problem here, there are clearly some CIR issues as well. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:50, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
As I said at UTRS, in light of past assurances, the assurance made at UTRS was not confidence inspiring. I also explained about the anti-spamming lock-out. (sigh) -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:05, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
I request admins make me unblock i learned from past experience and mistakes which is human errors learning by doing and doing by learning is common phenomenon hence i beg you pardon and give me grace upon my simple mistake don't punished my accounts NepalFirst (talk). 14:45, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
I cannot speak for other admins, but I for one will not be creating an unblock request for you. If you cannot follow simple instructions to create your own request, then you probably should remain blocked anyway.
The UTRS lock-out is something of a red herring, because no one told you (as far as I'm aware) to lodge your appeal via UTRS in the first place. You are clearly still able to edit this talk page, and therefore should be appealing here and not at UTRS. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:53, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
Your comment sounds like full of egos , i am not senior like you in wikipedia i am learning but you kickout from the class what a fate ? NepalFirst (talk). 14:58, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
Again, please read Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks. And then please create an unblock using the knowledge from there. And please follow the instructions in the block notice; they are please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 15:11, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
How about you read the block notice and follow the instructions for requesting an unblock? Thanks, -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:14, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
I had made request for utrs request on of the admin got angryi don't find proper link to request unblock NepalFirst (talk). 16:21, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
I declined the UTRS. I am not angry. Was not angry. Just hoping you will follow instructions. I see you have. Thanks. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:32, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
Can you exactly guide me because i am junior than you plz guide me NepalFirst (talk). 16:34, 24 September 2025 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Pradhumna Mahat Chhetri

Hello NepalFirst, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Pradhumna Mahat Chhetri, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pradhumna Mahat Chhetri.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Josey Wales Parley 19:30, 24 September 2025 (UTC)

@Joseywales1961: as the user is currently blocked, they may find taking part in the discussion difficult. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:53, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
Ah, Page curation automatically produces these talk page notices when creating a CSD, or AfD Josey Wales Parley 12:20, 25 September 2025 (UTC)

October 2025

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
asilvering (talk) 18:43, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Suresh Lal Chitrakaar

Information icon Hello, NepalFirst. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Suresh Lal Chitrakaar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:09, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Khadhya Bank

Information icon Hello, NepalFirst. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Khadhya Bank, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:08, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Suresh Lal Chitrakaar

Hello, NepalFirst. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Suresh Lal Chitrakaar".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 17:25, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Kaushalya Abeywickrama (journalist)

Information icon Hello, NepalFirst. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kaushalya Abeywickrama (journalist), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:08, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Naren Khadka

Information icon Hello, NepalFirst. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Naren Khadka, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:08, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Khadhya Bank

Hello, NepalFirst. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Khadhya Bank".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:34, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Naren Khadka

Hello, NepalFirst. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Naren Khadka".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 09:25, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Sushma Adhikari

Information icon Hello, NepalFirst. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sushma Adhikari, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:08, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI