User talk:SleepTrain456

Hello, SleepTrain456, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:SleepTrain456, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!   // Timothy :: talk  02:53, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

I have received your message. Thanks for letting me know about signatures! SleepTrain456 (talk) 23:05, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:SleepTrain456, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.   // Timothy :: talk  02:53, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

I have received your message (and you already deleted my page, but I made a page that's hopefully less self-centered.   //  SleepTrain456 (talk) 23:03, 27 July 2020 (UTC)SleepTrain456 23:03, 27 July 2020 (UTC)SleepTrain456SleepTrain456 (talk) 23:03, 27 July 2020 (UTC) 23:02, 27 July 2020 (UTC) 23:02, 27 July 2020 (UTC) 10:25 PM, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on User:SleepTrain456 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.   // Timothy :: talk  13:44, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

I have gotten your message, and I'll try to recreate without mentioning anything other than what I do here: edit articles. SleepTrain456 (talk) 02:03, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Establishment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Democratic Party. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for mentioning it! I'm glad it's been edited! SleepTrain456 (talk) 01:52, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Carlton Trail Railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hudson Bay Railway.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

I've fixed the disambiguation link now! That was my mistake. I'm glad you were there to help me help this site. Thanks for mentioning it! SleepTrain456 (talk) 21:59, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Villa Comaltitlán railway station. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Significa liberdade (talk) 01:05, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

I understand. I look forward to seeing the station pages, on English and Spanish Wikipedia, be developed. Until then, I admit that there's so little info about this station (I am not even sure if it is one of the ones that will be reopened!) that it was right for you to draftify it.

For now, thanks for moving that page!

Yours sincerely

- SleepTrain456 (talk) 01:15, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

Hello, SleepTrain456. Thank you for your work on Ixtepec–Ciudad Hidalgo Line. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:35, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Hello, SunDawn! You're welcome! I'm glad I was able to help expand this site! SleepTrain456 (talk) 01:20, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Villa Comaltitlán railway station, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 14:09, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

You're welcome, Bkissin! I'm glad my newly-edited article is now published! SleepTrain456 (talk) 21:45, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Tudor Arghezi metro station, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 01:37, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

You're welcome, Dan arndt, and thanks for accepting the new article!

- SleepTrain456 (talk) 22:31, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello, SleepTrain456. Thank you for your work on Tequila railway station. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! I have marked the article as "reviewed". I really appreciate your work in expanding Wikipedia by creating this article. Have a good day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 05:15, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

SunDawn, you are very much welcome! I'm glad I can help expand this site!

- SleepTrain456 (talk) 20:16, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

Metra has not chosen a vendor for the New Battery Powered Trainsets due to the contract being locked out currently. This means that a vendor has not been chosen. While others have speculated that Stadler would be the most optimal choice for Metra to go with, it is not the finalized vendor. This is misleading information. 2601:245:4600:CC10:F9F2:8DB:9E0C:A4B7 (talk) 08:11, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

That explains why I was not able to find any sources for it! I will adjust the infobox accordingly.

Thanks for the comment!

Yours sincerely,

- SleepTrain456 (talk) 21:50, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2025 in rail transport, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:21, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Please don't add articles to Category:Railway stations opened in 2023 unless the station actually did open in 2023. GA-RT-22 (talk) 23:24, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Got it! Thanks for the advice!

- SleepTrain456 (talk) 23:07, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Tri-Rail, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:42, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2024 in rail transport, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:43, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Template:Coatzacoalcos-Mérida Line has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:44, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Tri-Rail, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:58, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2024 in rail transport, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:58, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

An article that you have been involved in editing—Cancún Airport-Tren Maya Station Connection—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. GA-RT-22 (talk) 14:10, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Hi SleepTrain456, please remember to always use edit summaries. It is very important for other editors to understand what you are doing. Additionally, per WP:NOTBROKEN, please do not make edits like this that bypass redirects. In many cases, like this one, these redirects are intentional - in this case, East Boston Tunnel may eventually be an article rather than a redirect. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:30, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Good points! After all, you would want to make sure you know what I am doing. Also, some of those topics might deserve a future article someday (such as the East Boston Tunnel, as you mentioned), if someone wants to make it.

Thanks for the advice!

Sincerely

- SleepTrain456 (talk) 02:08, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Terminal 1–Lindbergh station

added a link pointing to Metro Transit

Terminal 2–Humphrey station

added a link pointing to Metro Transit

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

I see you uploaded a page for this Ukrainian architect. That's fantastic! I've been working on the same project for the last 3 weeks in my sandbox here: User:Oona Wikiwalker/TWA/Earth/3. (I'm so slow!) I did more than translate the original page. Would it be okay with you if I replace what you have with what I have? It goes into more detail as I read the sources on the Ukrainian page and found others... Oona Wikiwalker (talk) 06:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

I don't mind if you inserted your additions. In fact, I'd be glad that the page I fist uploaded is growing further!

Thanks for asking!

- SleepTrain456 (talk) 02:24, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello, SleepTrain456. Thank you for your work on Metrorrey Line 6. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:03, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

@SunDawn:, Thank you for the kind words! My dad thought it cool that you made the message. I also made the articles for Metrorrey Line 4 and 5.

I'm glad you appreciate my work!

Yours sincerely

- SleepTrain456 (talk) 01:54, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

I am glad to be able to encourage you! ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:02, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited METRORapid University Line, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Montrose station.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi! I hope it's fine to ask for some assistance since you seem to have a knack for being able to fix route diagram templates, especially with collapsible sections, but yeah, I couldn't figure out the issues on Template:2 Line (Sound Transit) for the Northgate Link Extension at the top and Template:Millennium Line for the Broadway Subway Project at the top. The issue for both is that they're not really aligning properly with the rest of the diagrams. Is this alright with you? Thanks! OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 11:20, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

I'll edit these templates right now! Thanks for the request, OrdinaryScarlett!

- SleepTrain456 (talk) 02:13, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Thank you! OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 02:37, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

You're welcome, OrdinaryScarlett! I'm glad I can help!

- SleepTrain456 (talk) 01:25, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:SEPTA Metro. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:51, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

You're welcome! I'll discuss the SEPTA Metro draft on Talk:SEPTA, like you suggested.

Thanks for the comment!

- SleepTrain456 (talk) 17:01, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Template:Cross-Border Trolley has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 06:11, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

I have created Template:SDMTS route to help make bus route links more easily. See this diff for an example of usage. Cheers! -- RickyCourtney (talk) 20:13, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

I was thinking that this would be needed. From now on, I'll use that to make links to bus routes. I'll also make a Template:NCTD route, for that purpose. Thanks for making this!

- SleepTrain456 (talk) 20:29, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

MBTA Kinki Sharyo Type 7, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 16:40, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

You're welcome, Ozzie10aaaa! Thanks for the message!

- SleepTrain456 (talk) 02:27, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Template:Holly Trolley (VTA) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:05, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Did the Holly Trolley ever operate the Convention Center–Diridon section? If so, then green (not grey) icons should be used; if not then the additional stations are unnecessary. Useddenim (talk) 04:59, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Good question! According to this article from 2018, it operated all the way to Diridon. However, articles relating to the 2019 season (including one by the VTA itself) show that it only operated to the Convention Center.

Thanks for asking!

- SleepTrain456 (talk) 18:39, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for translating and creating articles on train lines in Mexico. I know that's tough work. Please watch out for the 'dbpedia' source that you used on Regiomontano (train) and Tapatío (train), though. It is a site that copies and scrapes content from Wikipedia articles on es.wiki under license - note the disclaimer at the bottom of each page ("This content was extracted from Wikipedia"). Sam Kuru (talk) 23:12, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

I'll watch out for "dbpedia" in the future. Thanks for the information!

- SleepTrain456 (talk) 02:17, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Belgrano station, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 23:43, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Sounds reasonable.

Thanks for the message!

- SleepTrain456 (talk) 19:01, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

Template:Conrail Crusader has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:13, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi, thank you for your contributions. I note your recent edits concerning future Valley Line services.

In Edmonton, the transit centres are for bus service. In the case of an LRT station or stop which also has a transit centre:

• The LRT stop or station gets its own standalone article
• The transit centre gets a section within that article.

So, in this case, there would be new articles for Jasper Place stop, Meadowlark stop, West Edmonton Mall station, and Lewis Farms stop. The existing transit centre information would then be moved to a section within those articles. 162 etc. (talk) 17:05, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

I see. Thanks for the clarification!

- SleepTrain456 (talk) 19:52, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Green Line (MARTA), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ashby station.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Hi SleepTrain456, thanks for adding former services to some stations. When adding former services, there's no need to duplicate existing services if only the stopping pattern has changed. The service itself is still the same. (For example, Andover station (MBTA) doesn't need to list the Haverhill Line with pre-1980 stations). Thanks, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:59, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

You're welcome, and thanks for the suggestions! - SleepTrain456 (talk) 00:12, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Also, do make sure that the services and adjacent stations are correct for the period. For example, Reading Highlands was generally only served by Reading Highlands–Boston short turns; it was skipped by trains for Haverhill and north, and closed entirely in the 1950s. Wellington was only served by Medford Branch trains by the 1930s until its 1957 closure, and nothing longer than Reading Highlands trains and Salem branchline trains before that. If you're not sure about any, feel free to ask me.

We have a decent selection of timetables on Commons at commons:Category:Timetables of the Boston and Maine Railroad. I recommend the 1929 and 1946 timetables as representative examples of 20th-century B&M service. The B&M, like most railroads, had a wide variety of stopping patterns. We only need to reflect the major services/stopping patterns in adjacent stations; oddities like all-stops overnight mail trains don't need to be included. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:06, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Thanks, Pi! I'll use that for the future. SleepTrain456 (talk) 00:30, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi! I need help with another route diagram template. I flipped the orientation of Template:Confederation Line to west to east since that appears to be the general convention used for route diagram templates, but in doing so, I just cannot get the collapsible sections, specifically the top one to line up the way they did prior to it. I did manage to get the bottom one to line up after some tinkering, but if this one could also be improved in some way, that would also be appreciated. Thank you!

P.S. Here's how the template looked prior to me flipping it. OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 03:41, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

I can do this easily. Thanks for asking me, OrdinaryScarlett! I am glad I can help! - SleepTrain456 (talk) 21:48, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your help! I really apologize for having to make you come back and having to refix things over and over again after I add more changes; I tend to be the type of editor who changes their mind as they go. I probably should've came to ask you after I was absolutely certain I was happy with the level of detail in the template, hopefully you can bear with that. I'm very happy with the way it turned out! OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 06:27, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

P.S. An old one I worked on a while back was Template:Paris Métro lines 16 and 17, which I also couldn't get to work. Maybe if you'd be interested in checking out that one too? OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 08:30, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

You're welcome! Glad I can help! I'll give this template a go.

Thanks!- SleepTrain456 (talk) 20:47, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi SleepTrain456. Thank you for your work on Mexicali (train). Another editor, Rosiestep, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Oh my gosh! I was delighted to read this article as I traveled on this train, from Mexicali to Guadalajara, on my honeymoon, a long time ago. Thank you for creating it.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Rosiestep}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Rosiestep (talk) 07:02, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

You're welcome, Rosiestep! I'm glad I can help, and that my article brought back happy memories for you! - SleepTrain456 (talk) 22:02, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Please stop adding "next station" templates to articles about communities. The next station template is for articles about train lines. If you are confused whether the article is about a train line or a community, please leave a note on the article talk page. Thank you for your understanding. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:32, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Okay. I'll stop adding those until a discussion on the talk pages can determine whether or not to do it.

Also, I've got an idea on how to make the "Adjacent stations" modules less intrusive: have it be hidden by Template:Collapsible list, like so:

Thanks for the message!

- SleepTrain456 (talk) 20:55, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

How were you able to the AirTrain to say next clockwise? Endrias Kassa (talk) 06:37, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

Good question! Insert "["circular"] = "yes",", then set up the left and right.

Thanks for asking! - SleepTrain456 (talk) 03:33, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of organizations designated as terrorist or extremist by Russia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Leonid Volkov.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

Belgrano station, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hoary (talk) 00:29, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

You're welcome! I'm glad this article was accepted! SleepTrain456 (talk) 02:18, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

I appreciate your effort to create these line diagrams for the former Portland Vintage Trolley service – I am stopping short of 'thanking' you, because line diagrams are not maps and in my opinion are mainly only useful mainly for intercity rail lines, not urban transit (and are very overused on WP, in my opinion), since they are not to scale and do not show turns or any geographic orientation the way a true map does – but I need to point out that the diagram for the Vintage Trolley routing on the Portland Streetcar line is erred at the southern end. The service did not turn around at 10th & Market. (The TriMet page you cited only says vaguely that the service went to PSU.) It turned around by having the cars reverse on Montgomery Street – the operator moving from one end of the car to the other, and likewise lowering the current collector/pantograph at the car's west end and raising the current collector at the east end – the same thing that the modern streetcars did at that time, and until March 2005, when Portland Streetcar service was extended to RiverPlace. During the years when VT ran on PS, the tracks dead-ended on Montgomery Street between 4th and 5th, but in the process of writing this note to you, I discovered that the relevant WP articles (on PS, the NS Line, and Vintage Trolley) had failed to ever describe the exact location and configuration of the 2001–2005 southern terminus of the Portland Streetcar line, so I can understand how you could have reached the wrong conclusion about where, in the PSU area, the VT cars turned around.

I have now corrected that long-standing omission from all three articles (in the PS and NS Line articles it is in the "History" sections). FYI, here is a direct link] to the map that was contained within the October 2001 magazine article that has long been cited in the Portland Streetcar article for several details of the system's early history.

Personally, I'd much rather seen an actual map of these routes than line diagrams, but I don't have any mapping software, let alone the knowledge of how to use it. If you do, it would be great if you could make scale maps for the three VT routes (either separately or a single map for all, using different colors for the three different routes/periods). But I imagine you made the line diagrams by starting with the existing line diagrams for the MAX and PS lines, which presumably would have been much easier than creating whole new (actual) maps.

Also, here is another (more minor) error in the VT-on-PS ("secondary route") diagram: The three stops (aka "stations" but they aren't really) on NW 10th and 11th that were closed in 2016 should be added to this map, as they all existed when VT was running on PS, and your diagram only covers that period. Data can be found at a 2017 archived version of the NS Line map; they are annotated there as "closed 2016", but that text and coloring can be modified to treat them the same as all other stations on this VT map.

There are also a few errors on your 1991–2009 Vintage Trolley map:

• The 4th/Mall and 5th/Mall stops need to be added, since they didn't close until years after VT service ended (and they do have articles).
• All references to the A and B loop lines, and to tracks on Grand and 7th, should be removed, as they did not exist until 2012, whereas this map's end date is 2009, when the VT service stopped serving Holladay Street.

– SJ Morg (talk) 10:08, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

I see. Thanks for the suggestions! I'll add these. SleepTrain456 (talk) 22:41, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

Thanks. That was a very fast response! I made a few more changes to try to fix things were still not quite right on the 2001-2005 VT-on-PS diagram, but I have zero experience editing these rail-line diagrams, so I hope it got it right. I used the NS Line diagram as a guide for the tracks coming together (on Montgomery Street) south of the 5th & Montgomery stop. SJ Morg (talk) 10:00, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

You're welcome. Also, because of your edits, now, I know there was a non-passenger stop on 4th and Montgomery.

Thanks for making those changes! SleepTrain456 (talk) 20:37, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

Yes, 4th and Montgomery was where the track dead-ended until 2005 and operators (of both modern streetcars and Vintage Trolleys) had to reverse directions by walking from one end of the car to the other. But passengers could not get on or off there (and normally were not allowed to stay on board past 5th & Montgomery). SJ Morg (talk) 06:34, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

I see. Thanks for the comment! SleepTrain456 (talk) 21:00, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi SleepTrain456. Thank you for your work on Haarlemmermeer station. Another editor, Noleander, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

I've done a cursory Google search, and this station appears to be somewhat special & notable. However, the article needs more sources ... many paragraphs have no citations at all.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Noleander}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Noleander (talk) 03:48, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

I see. Thanks for the information! SleepTrain456 (talk) 21:20, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

How did you add the Streetcars for the NOUPT services? Endrias Kassa (talk) 01:27, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

Good question, Endrias! I used Module:Adjacent stations/NORTA, which can be inserted as follows:

Thanks for asking!

- SleepTrain456 23:02, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

Since when did Laurelton (LIRR station) have a former train route going to the Garden City-Mitchel Field Secondary? And why just this station out of every other in this long route around to the former Central Branch of the Long Island Rail Road? ---------User:DanTD (talk) 16:27, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

Good question! The Garden City-Mitchel Field Secondary lists "Central Avenue (LIRR station)" (which redirects to Laurelton station) as a station on the route.

Thanks for asking!

- SleepTrain456 22:58, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

FYI, that's a different Central Avenue LIRR station. That should be fixed, and it's an example of the reason I opposed enforcing the current naming conventions of WP:Stations. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 03:49, 5 September 2025 (UTC)

I see. Thanks for the information!

- SleepTrain456 18:48, 5 September 2025 (UTC)

Hi SleepTrain456. Thank you for your work on Francisco Goitia light rail station. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! Have a blessed and beautiful weekend!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 04:18, 6 September 2025 (UTC)

You're welcome. Thank you for the kind words! I appreciate it.

- SleepTrain456 19:45, 7 September 2025 (UTC)

Hi SleepTrain456. Thank you for your work on Kuban Partisan Movement. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 00:24, 15 September 2025 (UTC)

You're welcome, SunDawn! I'm glad you liked my article. I will have a blessed day, and may you have one, too!

- SleepTrain456 01:21, 15 September 2025 (UTC)

Template:Old Town Transit Center Platform Layout has been nominated for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 18:15, 15 September 2025 (UTC)

Hi SleepTrain456! I noticed that you've made several edits in order to restore your preferred version of British Rail Class 799. The impulse to repeatedly undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure that you're aware of Wikipedia's edit warring policy. Repeatedly undoing the changes made by other users in a back-and-forth fashion like this is disallowed, even if you feel what you're doing is justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages in order to try to reach a consensus with the other editors involved. If you are unable to come to an agreement at Talk:British Rail Class 799, please use one of the dispute resolution options that are available in order to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of repeatedly reverting other editors' changes can help you avoid getting drawn into edit wars. Thank you. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 01:41, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

Okay. I'll leave an entry on the talk page. Thanks for the comment, Danners!

- SleepTrain456 19:38, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello SleepTrain456, a month ago you produced this article about Electrische Museumtramlijn Amsterdam and at the bottom it says it is a translation of the original Dutch article. When reading the English version, I stumble over so many language errors that I cannot understand how this article could ever be made as is. My guess is that even Google Translate would have done a better job than what you have published. As I understand from your profile, you're a native English speaker, so I may assume you can also see those errors.

In general it's good practice that prior to publication of any text (be it written by oneself, or be it a translation), one reads a text from A to Z, preferably out loud, to see if everything is correct.

So may I ask you to check the article and correct the sentences that miss words, that do no flow, that simply mean nothing, etc. etc.? After you've done so, I don't mind going through the article as well, to check if the translation actually reflects what was written in the original (because without knowledge of the original language, one cannot verify that easily).

Best regards,   Erremm   17:30, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Good points. I simply used Google Translate for this, since I don't know that much Dutch.

Thanks for the advice!

- SleepTrain456 18:01, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page São Paulo Metropolitan Trains rolling stock, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:17, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

Hi there, I've removed your recent edit at Lyngby railway station for now, because it damaged the infobox and I wasn't able to fix it... apart from a curly bracket issue, the problem seems to be the unrecognized parameter "note." Thanks! Jessicapierce (talk) 21:37, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

Thanks, Jessica! I'll try it again. - SleepTrain456 23:31, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Zackmann08. I noticed that you recently removed content from Goleta station without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 02:10, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

It's all right: the Goleta extension was cancelled anyways.

Thanks anyways!

- SleepTrain456 04:09, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Sorry about that! User:Pi.1415926535 set me straight... In the future, just be sure to add an EDITSUMMARY? It was technically "unexplained content removal". I now understand why you removed it, but your edit did not include any explanation for why you commented out that bit of code. Moving forward just be sure to include a quick summary. In this case saying "the project was cancelled" would have been perfect. Otherwise, keep up the good work! Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 04:17, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Okay. Thanks for the advice!

- SleepTrain456 04:19, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of organizations designated as terrorist or extremist by Russia, a link pointing to the disambiguation page All-Union Communist Party was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi, thank you for your contributions. I note your recent reverts of edits I've made to former Rocky Mountaineer stations.

Per https://www.rockymountaineer.com/preparing-to-go/train-schedule, these are the current stations:

Kamloops: Kamloops train siding, 525 CN Road (not Kamloops station)

North Vancouver: North Vancouver train siding, Philip Ave. and W 1st St. (not North Vancouver station)

Banff: Banff train siding, 98 Mount Norquay Road (not Banff station)

Do you know of reliable sources that say otherwise? 162 etc. (talk) 20:40, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Now that you mention it, I should add the new addresses to the articles.

Thanks for clarifying!

- SleepTrain456 21:21, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

No, that's not the answer. These are not stations. They are literal dots on a map where the train stops. These locations in no way meet WP:SIGCOV. 162 etc. (talk) 21:23, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Indeed, they are not notable enough to be standalone articles. Thus, I am mentioning them in the same articles as the stations they replaced. Also, removing the infoboxes also takes out the info about the original stations, which are undoubtedly notable.

Thanks anyways!

- SleepTrain456 21:36, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Such information could be added to Rocky Mountaineer. The information, however, is unrelated to Kamloops station, North Vancouver station, and Banff station.

I'll also note that based on the thin sourcing at North Vancouver station, it's unclear if Rocky Mountaineer actually ever served the former PGE station at Lonsdale Quay. Unless you can point me towards some secondary source coverage regarding that, a major rewrite is in order. 162 etc. (talk) 21:56, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Excellent points. In fact, the PGE station is now The Polygon Gallery, and I've rewritten the infobox at North Vancouver station to clarify that Rocky Mountaineer's station was not the same as that one. SleepTrain456 21:59, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Rocky Mountaineer has never used North Vancouver station. Therefore the article should not use a Rocky Mountaineer infobox, and in fact should make no mention of Rocky Mountaineer at all.

The North Vancouver train siding can be mentioned at Rocky Mountaineer; it does not have any real notability to sustain its own article. 162 etc. (talk) 22:08, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

I've done a rewrite of North Vancouver station to refocus it solely on the PGE station which was at Lonsdale Quay. Any information about Rocky Mountaineer can be re-added if:

1.) It actually pertains to this location, not the unrelated train siding

2.) Is cited to a reliable secondary source.

Thank you for your continued contributions. 162 etc. (talk) 23:04, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

You're welcome! In fact, I think I'll draft a page about the Rocky Mountaineer station + siding. SleepTrain456 00:26, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

North Vancouver Train Siding, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Agent 007 (talk) 18:36, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

You're welcome! Thanks for publishing that article! SleepTrain456 19:04, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article North Vancouver Train Siding, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Vancouver Train Siding until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 1 April 2026 (UTC)