User talk:IND123456

Hi IND123456! I would like to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:50, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of commercial nuclear reactors have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of commercial nuclear reactors was changed by IND123456 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.870694 on 2024-05-03T05:35:31+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:35, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Rajapuri. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 14:19, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Ok,Thank you... IND123456 (talk) 15:43, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Ok, Thank you IND123456 (talk) 12:36, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Sir/madam, I am unable to search any reilable sources for the page. Please do try if you can. There is very little information on the internet for this topic.

Thank you. IND123456 (talk) 15:38, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Tree. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments belong on the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and may respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Frost 12:27, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

You are most welcome. IND123456 (talk) 12:33, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Shivajirao Patwardhan. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 14:25, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Steam generator (nuclear power), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages GCR and LMR. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

Ok, I will take precautions next time to avoid any problems.

Thanks for your assistance. IND123456 (talk) 16:12, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm 10mmsocket. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Heysham nuclear power station, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 10mmsocket (talk) 07:12, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Ok. Thank you. I will do the needful. IND123456 (talk) 11:34, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello, IND123456. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fernandina, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:07, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello, IND123456. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rajapuri, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:07, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tarapur Atomic Power Station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BWR.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Marincyclist. I noticed that you recently removed content from Kudankulam Nuclear Power Plant without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Marincyclist (talk) 06:03, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

As per my information, the plans for construction of units 7 and 8 have not been practically applied and have been dormant for years. Hence, I felt that there is no need of the outdated information. So, I tried to delete it. There was an error while doing it, and also I did not give any edit summary. I apologise for that.

Thank you. IND123456 (talk) 06:09, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your response. I suggest discussing on the article talk page, as the removal of sourced material is generally problematic. If consensus can be achieved, then removal could be appropriate. Best, Marincyclist (talk) 06:22, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Ok. Will do. First I will verify and then add a new topic on the talk page.

Thanks. IND123456 (talk) 07:11, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello, IND123456. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Fernandina".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:20, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for that update. I have been searching for proper sources and references but with little success. Will do as you adviced when I find some. IND123456 (talk) 03:17, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello, IND123456. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shivajirao Patwardhan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:06, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Laura240406 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

no meaningful change since last decline

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shivajirao Patwardhan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Laura240406 (talk) 10:47, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello, IND123456! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Laura240406 (talk) 10:47, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi Laura240406, I am very happy that you have clearly mentioned the reason for the draft been declined. Will work on ot as soon as possible and resubmit it. Thank you. IND123456 (talk) 15:26, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Shivajirao Patwardhan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MCE89 (talk) 11:32, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Thank you MCE89. IND123456 (talk) 15:29, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

I undid this edit to LaSalle County Nuclear Generating Station as it did not cite a source. Per wp:verifiability, please cite wp:reliable sources. See help:referencing for beginners. Also, these edits: [1], [2], and [3] to Tarapur Atomic Power Station do not cite any source. Please note that failure to cite sources may result in a block. Question? Please ask at the wp:Teahouse for fast, expert answers.

You removed the citation here to IPHWR-700. Why? If it is out of date, please find an updated source or leave it in place or move it to an appropriate location. Please leave an wp:edit summary giving reasoning for your edits. If a link is dead, it should be left per wp:KDL. If content is not sourced, please add a {{citation needed}} tag (or use the redirect {{cn}}). See WP:TMSOURCE for more information on adding cleanup tags. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 20:41, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

Ok. Will do the needful and keep in mind about whatever you said.

Thank you IND123456 (talk) 11:52, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bharat small modular reactor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:14, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Ok, will do the needful. thank you IND123456 (talk) 14:22, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Please do not introduce links to draft articles in actual articles, as you did to IPHWR. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 14:37, 15 October 2025 (UTC)

Ok, will keep in mind. Thank you for correcting my mistake. IND123456 (talk) 17:07, 15 October 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kostroma Nuclear Power Plant, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PWR.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

Hi IND123456. Thank you for your work on Partial meltdown of Leningrad unit 1 and Chernobyl unit 1. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Unfortunately, since it has not sources, it is not ready for main space. I will be moving it to draft space. Please feel free to republish once you have added sources and footnotes. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 12:43, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Will surely continue working on the page. I am in search of relevant data. Thank you for your support. IND123456 (talk) 14:03, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved content from Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant into Draft:Partial meltdown of Leningrad unit 1 and Chernobyl unit 1. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content (here or elsewhere), Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s).

When copying within Wikipedia, at a minimum, give attribution in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination.

Please add attribution if no one has done so yet. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:20, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Ok, got it. Will keep in mind. Thank you IND123456 (talk) 02:31, 23 October 2025 (UTC)

Hi IND123456. Thank you for your work on Sharavathi Pumped Storage Hydropower Project. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please add more sources - primarily secondary sources - and establish WP:Note. Please also fix the bare URL. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 08:13, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your contribution, working on the article and will notify you on it when it's ready. IND123456 (talk) 08:59, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Jeraxmoira. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Srijan Pal Singh, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 14:27, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi, I am aware about the requirement of a reliable source, which I am in search for. Will add one once it is available and will let you know. Thanks IND123456 (talk) 15:54, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days in order to make edits related to two subtopics: (1) Indian military history, or (2) social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. — Newslinger talk 16:40, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Sorry about the accidental revert in Special:Diff/1325180381, which happened because I had misread your edit count. I've restored your edit in Special:Diff/1325180605. Thanks. — Newslinger talk 16:41, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Ok, I got what you are trying to say. It's ok. Thank you IND123456 (talk) 10:34, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheInevitables was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bharat small modular reactor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheInevitables (talk) 02:23, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

Ok, got it, thanks IND123456 (talk) 10:06, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ktkvtsh was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Far too under sourced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Partial meltdown of Leningrad unit 1 and Chernobyl unit 1 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ktkvtsh (talk) 05:14, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello sir, you recently reviewed my draft. Could you please guide me on what type of sources must be added to it so as to make it ready for the main space.

Thank you. IND123456 (talk) 11:24, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

Sharavathi Pumped Storage Hydropower Project, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Stuartyeates (talk) 07:21, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for reviewing and clearing the draft. But there is an issue. When searched on a browser as 'Sharavathi Pumped Storage Hydropower project' and specially mentioning for the Wikipedia page, the page searched is 'Talk: Sharavathi Pumped Storage Hydropower project'. Kindly take a note of this, and take the necessary action.

Thank you IND123456 (talk) 10:26, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Saraswati River, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 12:05, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

I get what you a trying to say. But the first line itself, which says a mythological river is which I feel must be changed. Many reports from the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) using modern satellite imagery, independent studies by various institutions in India and abroad, and even NASA has studied the region using modern technology and have confirmed using river palaeochannel mapping that a large river described as Saraswati in the Vedas and other texts existed in the region until around 2000BCE. I even had attached a report to my edits. I feel that the article does not count for relevant resent development and largely refers to 19th and 20th century studies, many conducted by the British administration or others with a colonial mindset. I think that the article must be updated accordingly to include new findings alongside the former ones. I will be happy to co-operate for this change. I may have been a bit careless in my edits, my apologise for it. Hoping you respond to this positively asap.

Thank you. IND123456 (talk) 12:20, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

"Identification of a mighty physical Rigvedic Saraswati with the Ghaggar-Hakra system is therefore problematic, since the Ghaggar-Hakra had dried up well before the time of the composition of the Rigveda." Regards, Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 12:45, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

I will verify my knowledge and revert back to you soon. Thanks IND123456 (talk) 12:46, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Ok, I just read two reports published officially by the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO), both of which conclude that the river flowed at the described place which was investigated through drilling borewells to test the ground water for its properties. These water tests were conducted by the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC). Satellite mapping was used to trace the palaeochannel. You may read these reports yourself. They are available as a .pdf file in the internet. IND123456 (talk) 13:05, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Saraswati River, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on Talk:Saraswati River. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 08:26, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/IND123456. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 18:17, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Nighfidelity, left the following feedback:

This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.

• Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
• Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.

Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.

What are cites 18 and 19. Additionally, couldn't the info here be merged to the main articles at the Leningrad and Chernobyl plants instead?

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Partial meltdown of Leningrad unit 1 and Chernobyl unit 1 to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Nighfidelity (talk) 15:00, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Thanks, will take the necessary steps. IND123456 (talk) 09:05, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Sanjay Kumar Manjul requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. LithyLithium (talk) 14:37, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for the information, I will take the necessary action. I was creating the page, but didn't move it to draft space, leading to deletion, will create it again. IND123456 (talk) 16:19, 14 April 2026 (UTC)