Talk:Deadlock (video game)

> The game features two teams with six players

Is that two teams of six players, or six players across two teams? Needs rewording, but I don’t know what the correct answer is. Mazz0 (talk) 01:25, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

The main mode is two teams of six players, not six players across two teams. Dotvi (talk) 23:45, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

At the end of the development section, the last sentence in the second to last paragraph and the final paragraph state essentially the same things. I haven't edited any wikis or Wikipedia before, so I'm not sure what grammar to use in the final sentence, but one sentence mentions it being a major update and having quality of life updates while the other instead calls it by the name of the update. Other than that, they contain the same information and could probably be combined. Dotvi (talk) 23:51, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

 Done Fixed. Popcornfud (talk) 02:09, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

I noticed in a couple places on the internet (albeit not reputable sources) there are mentions of the original idea of Neon Prime being that the Patrons in the game were originally meant to of been controlled by VR-Headset-wearing players who would of worked with their non-VR teammates to defeat the enemy team (who worked the same way), but I cannot for the life of me find any reputable source that says this (this COULD just be a hoax that's still burning in some corners of the internet, but it seems too weirdly specific to not be). Anyone that can find this, drop the link/citation in a reply and I'll happily edit the article myself to reflect the info, you'll have my thanks. Gato1260 (talk) 17:35, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

Do we really need the map in the article? There are currently two images in the gameplay section, which is relatively small. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 13:22, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

I'll go ahead and remove this on Sunday if no one is objected to this. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 19:23, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

why is ivy porn a topic on the deadlock wikipedia page ???????????????????????? ~2026-27384-51 (talk) 00:51, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

I don't think it should be there but I'm open to hearing opinions from other editors. I will refrain from removing that passage from the article as I see that there was edit warring due to that addition. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 19:21, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

i wanted to say the same thing, i think briefly mentioning there existing a large amount of fan art of the character in general would be succinct. anyone familiar of the nature of the internet can interpret what that entails. Cinnonym (talk) 06:47, 10 May 2026 (UTC)