Talk:Taylor Swift
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Taylor Swift article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
 | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (center, color, defense, realize, traveled) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | Taylor Swift is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on August 23, 2019. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This  level-4 vital article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to living or recently deceased subjects of biographical content on Wikipedia articles.The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
 | The following reference(s) may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
Lead Image RFC
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Should the article change the lead image? Octaviyanti Dwi Wahyurini (talk) 02:40, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
Started because the image is too old so which image should be used as the lead image so included these images for the replacement of the old image refer to Zara Larsson talk page:
.png)
A. Image used in infobox for current day (2023)
_1.jpg)
B. Image used for the first replacement of the old lead image (2024)
C. Image used for the second replacement of the old lead image
Pinging for every editor to discuss the lead image:@Ippantekina@Negative MP1@SnowyRiver28.
Disclaimer:The reason i am creating RFC for the lead image because some editors want it to change the lead image in the talk page because the A one is too old and i am sorry for making mistake for the new lead image in RFC.
Thank you. Octaviyanti Dwi Wahyurini (talk) 02:40, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
- A but I don't think an RFC was needed yet. Skyshiftertalk 02:47, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
- A. The second image is AI enhanced + looks worse, and the third one is a substantially worse shot of Swift. I don't understand why y'all want to use worse images for the sake of being less than a year newer. λ NegativeMP1 02:57, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
- A: The RfC is not needed at all. The picture from 2023 does just fine. 〜 Festucalex • talk 04:55, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
- A as per the comments above. M. Billoo 07:37, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
- A. Photo 2023 better conveys the image of Swift, abstract and sublime, and at the same time high-status and recognizable. Lasius (talk) 09:37, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
- A. Her appearance hasn't changed, so no need to replace with photo-B. Also, photo-C is the poorest at showing her face. Theo wiki user (talk) 07:20, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
- A. Nothing's happened to her appearance. Still looks the same. B seems different (enhanced) in some way, and C is like the kind of photo we would use for people who only have one public domain photo. 🚂ThatTrainGuy1945 Peep peep! 20:24, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Quotes by Taylor Swift
However they feel about themselves and their life will be projected onto how they perceive you. - New York Times interview ~2026-27200-89 (talk) 02:47, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
Relationships in the 'Life and Career' section?
Most celebrity pages have personal relationships sequestered to the 'personal life' section; do we need to have her various relationships sprinkled into a section that is mainly about her work? Twistybrastrap (talk) 23:34, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
- Considering that her claims to fame are writing songs about that and grifting her fans to sell reheated leftovers, yes, yes it is. Magnetees (talk) 15:19, 8 May 2026 (UTC)