User talk:Danielsamideriba

Thanks for uploading Image:CDFOODS123.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:05, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Quad FEELING RESCAN01.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:26, 11 April 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey 14:26, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Boy Kill Boy1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:06, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Raulbravo2007.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:08, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:DiegoLopezRodriguez.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:05, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Banana. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SparrowsWing _(talk) 02:45, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Jelly Belly, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NawlinWiki 02:49, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Hi you appear to have uploaded an image called ghosts which has overwritten an earlier upload used for a Strawbs album of the same name. I will attempt to rename and relink your article. Best Witchwooder (talk) 13:50, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi again. I was unable to save the image - I have reverted it back to the original image and severed the link from The World Is Outside. Could you reload the image using a different filename? Best Witchwooder (talk) 13:58, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to Talk:Luís Otavio Bonilha de Oliveira, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. -- Luk ^talk 13:45, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

The article Matheus Caldeira Vidotto de Oliveira has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Has yet to play senior football, fails wp:athlete.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Paste _{Let’s have a chat.} 22:49, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

The article Denner Paulino Barbosa has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Osarius : T : C : Been CSD'd? 23:18, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

The article Denner Paulino Barbosa has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Osarius : T : C : Been CSD'd? 13:42, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed a file deletion tag from Denner Paulino Barbosa. When removing deletion tags, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Osarius : T : C : Been CSD'd? 13:43, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

The article Denner Paulino Barbosa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. Soccerway confirms that he has only named to the substitutes bench. Possible copyright violation, as prose appears to be a google translation of the Corinthians website player profile.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

The article Caique França Godoy has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:36, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

The article Matheus Caldeira Vidotto de Oliveira has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:36, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

The article Clemerson Ravi Teixeira Paschoa has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:36, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

The article Marcos Aoás Corrêa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. Corinthians player profile confirms that he has not played.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk)

The article Nickolas Mariano da Silva has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:36, 31 January 2012 (UTC) Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:26, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

The article Caique França Godoy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who had not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:05, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

The article Willian Arão has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable young player who fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 13:47, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

The article Matheus Cotulio Bossa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable young player who fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 13:49, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

The article Antonio Carlos Capocasali has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable young player who fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 13:54, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi Daniel

Many of your articles have been nominated for deletion because of notability. There is also a problem with understanding the text written in some of these. If you have been using an online translator such as Babelfish, please note that these cannot be relied upon to make good translations. An example is the text of the article Willian Arão, which shows how limited tools like Babelfish are when dealing with language concepts such as metaphor. The result is barely comprehensible and unintentionally funny.

Have you heard of Simple English Wikipedia*? You will probably find it more rewarding to contribute there and - if you want to improve your English - will find others with the same goal willing to help. Plutonium27 (talk) 19:23, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

• Here is the direct link - http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page

Fala aí corintiano. Estou editando um pouco o artigo sobre o Tite. Você poderia dar uma olhada e dizer o que pensa a respeito?

(Translation: Hello, look at my Tite article and give me your take on it). Moro-no-lixo (talk) 16:32, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited Antonio Carlos Cunha Capocasali Junior, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RJ (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited Paulo André Cren Benini, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Champions League (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

The article Guilherme Andrade Silva has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable footballer

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 05:46, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matheus Cotulio Bossa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matheus Cotulio Bossa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:39, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

The article Romário Ricardo da Silva has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Salvidrim! 03:45, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Picture from website Meutimao.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 06:53, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Chicao corinthians.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 06:57, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Fabio Santos Romeu.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 06:59, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Jorge henrique de souza.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 07:00, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Leandro Castán.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 07:02, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Paulinho photo.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 07:04, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Ralf de souza teles.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 07:05, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited José Paulo Bezerra Maciel Júnior, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Champions League (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Francisco Souza dos Santos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caxias (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Taubaté (Brazilian footballer born 1991), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Botafogo Futebol Clube (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:20, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

The article Igor Fernandes da Silva Araujo has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ... discospinster _talk 04:33, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited José Paulo Bezerra Maciel Júnior, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page La Bombonera (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Logo corinthians.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- Toshio Yamaguchi 19:05, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Logo corinthians.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:26, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paulo Victor de Menezes Melo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Forward (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

The article Cleber Janderson Pereira Reis has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Boleyn (talk) 08:11, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi. I just wanted to let you know that when making statistical updates such as your edit at Alexandre Pato you must update the entire stats table according to the source/sources and then also update the date of when the table was last updated. Now it says it was updated 11 October, which is incorrect. The same is for infoboxes where the pc-update or clubupdate parameter must be updated to the correct time and date (done best by using ~~~~~). Thank you. QED237 (talk) 12:34, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

I have told you about the timestamps. Next time I have to start with warning templates and if that dont work, a block. QED237 (talk) 11:06, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Paolo Guerrero‎. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Your were repeatedly told to update the time stamps (as in the section above). What is your problem? Such edits as yours introduce factual errors to articles and are considered vandalism. --Jaellee (talk) 19:14, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Paolo Guerrero, you may be blocked from editing. --Jaellee (talk) 06:13, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Petros Matheus dos Santos Araújo, you may be blocked from editing. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 03:37, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi man, why are you continously adding the unreferenced statistics at Stiven Mendoza? RRD13 দেবজ্যোতি (talk) 07:21, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi, when updating club stats in the infobox you should update the |pcupdate= or |club-update= parameter by adding five tildes (~~~~~), which generates the specific time the update was made. Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 23:29, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Please keep this in mind. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:21, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

I see you've still not taken this on board. Please start updating the timestamps, every time to update a player biography. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:16, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

And Danilo Gabriel de Andrade is another one that's not had the timestamp updated for over three years! Please take the above on board. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:39, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Please do the dates by adding the five tildes, rather than writing them manually, not least because you've been failing to capitalise the month. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:16, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Table dates need updating too. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:26, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Please taken on board what you've already been asked to do: to write five tildes (~~~~~), rather than write the date manually and not bother to capitalise the month. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:02, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Vágner Love. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Please refer to User talk:Danielsamideriba#Infobox dates. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:25, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Jádson. Please refer to User talk:Danielsamideriba#Infobox dates. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:36, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Jádson, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please refer to User talk:Danielsamideriba#Infobox dates. Mattythewhite (talk) 12:55, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mattythewhite (talk) 21:44, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Felipe Augusto de Almeida Monteiro. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Please refer to User talk:Danielsamideriba#Infobox dates. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Vágner Love. Please refer to User talk:Danielsamideriba#Infobox dates. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:06, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list and
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Mattythewhite (talk) 23:11, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Lucca Borges de Brito, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Per #Infobox dates. Mattythewhite (talk) 01:15, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mattythewhite (talk) 01:47, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Giovanni Augusto. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Career statistics table that was entirely uncited. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:57, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Luciano da Rocha Neves. Per #Infobox dates. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:41, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Lucca Borges de Brito, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Per #Per #Infobox dates. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:00, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mattythewhite (talk) 23:55, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Caetano (footballer, born 1999), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Campeonato Brasileiro. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fernando Gomes (footballer, born 1993) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fernando Gomes (footballer, born 1993) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Svartner (talk) 17:39, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to João Vitor (footballer, born 2007). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 01:58, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi Daniel, thanks for your contributions to Memphis Depay and Yuri Alberto among others. Please follow the MOS guidelines when editing stats for players who have played in Brazil. State league appearances and goals should be included in the infobox per the player template and per this talk page discussion. Thanks. Rupert1904 (talk) 06:29, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi Daniel, please follow the correct standards when updating stats for players who play in Brazil. Rupert1904 (talk) 16:27, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi Daniel, you continue to remove Brazilian state league apps and goals from infobox and revert my edits putting those apps and goals in with no explanation or reasoning. As I shared with you previously here, the consensus is to include apps and goals in the Brazilian state leagues in players' infoboxes. Adding in @GiantSnowman, @Kante4, @MYS77, @ChrisTheDude who were involved in establishing this consensus. Rupert1904 (talk) 14:36, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

See WP:FOOTYBRAPPS which confirms the consensus. Rupert, please ping me if he continues to edit against consensus. GiantSnowman 18:06, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

First of all, thank you for sharing this article with me. I hadn’t seen it in my infobox. Regarding the 'nonsense in this article' — this resolution is quite recent (February 4, 2022, UTC) in other words...I wouldn't know anyway! I’ve been focusing on editing Corinthians players and doing my best to keep the statistics as up to date as possible. That has been my exclusive focus. Apologies for any misunderstanding.

Every time I see these articles being used by users who are not logged in and days go by without a rollback. I think this should be taken into consideration before these complaints if they can be resolved without these types of offenses, you know? But I will not revert your changes. Danielsamideriba (talk) 04:28, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for reviewing & your response. Hopefully there will be no issues going forward. Cheers. Rupert1904 (talk) 08:23, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

Thank you! Rupert1904 (talk) 08:23, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

@GiantSnowman he continues, time and time again at Héctor Hernández (footballer, born 1995) (at least there, so i imagine in many more articles too)! The nonsense in this article does not stop there, as another user is now "contributing" by adding ALL competitions to the infobox... "Sigh" indeed! --RevampedEditor (talk) 18:41, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

There have been no edits since my post. GiantSnowman 18:55, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Dieguinho (footballer, born 2007). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 09:37, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Danielsamideriba. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "João Vitor".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 07:26, 28 September 2025 (UTC)

Hi Danielsamideriba. Thank you for your work on João Vitor Barros Silva. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please establish notability as per WP:SPORTSBIO. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 08:57, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Lucas Passarelli. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and sources should be reliable and independent with significant coverage of the subject. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:08, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

Thank you. For now I added more informations on a bio with quality references. Can you re-check this changes? Danielsamideriba (talk) 16:44, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi Danielsamideriba. Thank you for your work on Paulo César Fonseca Brandão. Another editor, Gommeh, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Would recommend adding a biography section and turning the hono(u)rs section into prose instead of bullet points. I do not follow soccer at all, so I'm not sure if these are considered major awards either.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Gommeh}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Gommeh ^{(talk! sign!)} 16:00, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Felipe Santos da Silva. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 07:08, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi Danielsamideriba. Thanks for creating Thomás Kayck Martins de Lima. Going forward, please use the standard layout and formatting for career statistics tables as outlined at Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Players which is the result of past discussions of the community of football editors at Wikipedia:WikiProject Football. Specifically,

• there should be no totals for single-season stints,
• there shouldn't be duplicate links per MOS:REPEATLINK,
• the table for club stats should have a title saying "Appearances and goals by club, season and competition",
• the bolding with ''' is unnecessary, the ! already does that.

Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 11:13, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

At Thomas Lisboa, the title was missing. Robby.is.on (talk) 22:47, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Matheus Ferreira de Sousa. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boynamedsue (talk) 21:14, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Thank you! I've submitted a draft to review. Could you please review it again? Danielsamideriba (talk) 04:35, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi Danielsamideriba. Thanks for creating Keven Vinícius Duarte Silva. Going forward, please do not use Ogol as a reference. It was categorised as unreliable; see WP:WPFLINKSNO for details and other unreliable football sources. I have removed the Ogol reference at Keven Vinícius Duarte Silva. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 19:22, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Thanks Danielsamideriba (talk) 18:34, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Hello, would you please create pages without a single source and with a proper well-written storyline? At Vitor Graziani, there's no such thing as "load", it's loan. Furthermore, your career statistics section is formatted in an incorrect way. Take a look at Gabriel Felix (footballer, born 1997) (which had incomplete information BTW) to create proper pages from now on. Thank you, BRDude⁷⁰ (talk) 05:43, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi. If you noticed that other people reviewed the same page, please make proper fixes to avoid using bad words in comments. I can see every suggestion that was made as well. As for Gabriel Felix (footballer, born 1997), I couldn't find any other sources, so I only added the one I found. Feel free to add more sources about Vitor Graziani. It was just a typing error. That's all. Let's maintain good relations in the Wikipédia community, All right? Thank you Danielsamideriba (talk) 15:23, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

"Typing error" which occurred in 20 consecutive articles? I don't think so. Please read WP:CIR before creating several single-sourced articles which might not meet the criteria. Furthermore, it's not about "good relations", as CIR already explains. You're not a new editor (to be honest, your account is way older than mine), so maybe your contributions would be more effective in the Portuguese Wikipedia instead of the English one, as your sources and sentences and references are clearly Google-translated. Happy week, BRDude⁷⁰ (talk) 18:48, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

"What happened in 20 consecutive articles?" Actually, I created 27 articles, you only corrected 3? Seriously? The other reviewers sent me messages asking me to fix some articles, and I am genuinely reviewing everything they recommended. Believe me, there are many reviewers who are willing to point out problems without making all this fuss. There are articles with the infamous "load" issue that you didn't even notice, and I'm already correcting them. I also have articles in draft that I'm adjusting because high level reviewers recommended it, and they always do so in a much more cordial manner than you. Regarding "several single-sourced," many of them have already passed review, by the way.

Furthermore, some of them were also added, such as the drafts of "Matheus Ferreira de Sousa" and "Felipe Santos da Silva". I just looking for more sources on internet to improve the notability. If you notice I have create some articles following Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Players.

Have a nice week for u2 Danielsamideriba (talk) 19:37, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

I assume you don't know the amount of work to "correct" your own articles (which wouldn't need "correction" if you had created them in a proper way, respecting WP:GNG and within the guidelines of WP:CIR, TBH)... I only "corrected" three (10 now) because I actually expanded them to comply with the guidelines. "Passing review" is not the criteria of a good or even an acceptable article. If these articles remain the same way, they will be deleted by WP:PROD some time later on. The main point of "making this fuss" is to see if you actually improve on your creation skills, which I appreciate since I'm the one wasting my time "correcting" them. Thank you, BRDude⁷⁰ (talk) 21:10, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

It would be much kinder of you to post on my discussion page, mention everything you'd like to change or improve, and that's it! I'll do it! I'd do it with pleasure, and you wouldn't have to waste your time editing it. Simple as that! There's no need for those respectful comments in articles history class etc etc. The funny thing the other users have made some comments and changes, and I have promptly addressed their suggestions or accept it. You may have noticed that other users have been improving the article and adding sources to enhance it. That's how things work here: articles are built through cooperation, and you're welcome to take part without insults or strange comments. About WP:GNG guidelines I just to following as well looking for the other sources and references. Some sources are difficult to find in perfect condition, so I'm constantly editing the article. The article won't be perfect from the first publication, No one knows this better than you, right? I've no interest in returning to this subject. Have a nice week. Danielsamideriba (talk) 23:05, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) BrazilianDude70, please be kind and constructive in your criticism. WP:AGF is one Wikipedia's most basic principles. The important thing is that editors take policy-based advice on board when they get it and Danielsamideriba seems willing to do that.

I have seen a lot of below-par communication in our WikiProject Football and you may have experienced rudeness yourself when you started out. But let's not perpetuate an unfriendly editing environment; rather let's create one that people like to be a part of. Robby.is.on (talk) 19:10, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

@Robby.is.on: I don't see why I'm the one having to be kind and constructive when the user making newbie mistakes has an account three times older than mine and fails to recognize his low level of English and skills overall... Anyway, I'm not trying to offend anyone, just wanted to be helpful in my own way, which I was - just see the most of his creations, compare how they were and how they are now.

I'm here to actually improve and contribute in a good way to the encyclopedia, not to just make articles that are a copy of a Zerozero or Soccerway player profile, which means that it will not make any difference the article actually exists or not. But okay, I guess you might be right, I'll think about it in the future.

@Danielsamideriba: Sorry if I hurt your feelings, please see my comments as a way to encourage and help in your improvement. Cheers to both. BRDude⁷⁰ (talk) 22:53, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

I don't see why I'm the one having to be kind and constructive […] WP:CIVIL applies to everyone. I didn't see any incivility on Danielsamideriba's part.

I think I know the frustration you feel. articles that are a copy of a Zerozero or Soccerway player profile That is problematic. But as far as I can tell the issues you have raised here weren't previously brought up on this Talk page. Danielsamideriba deserves the chance to learn from mistakes.

Thanks for all the improvements you have made to the articles. Robby.is.on (talk) 23:04, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

@Robby.is.on: I did raise the issues on other articles he created, but through edit summaries like this one, which I had no reply. I guess you can say that I didn't go through the proper procedures, and I can give you that as well.

I was already assuming WP:AGF and helping to improve articles that he created since last year without complaining (see Gui Negão, Dieguinho (footballer, born 2007), Felipe Longo, André Luiz (footballer, born 2006) and so on), but most of them were from young players from Corinthians who are beginning their careers, so the sources and references might be limited, indeed. I only raised the issue here because he created 20-ish articles of players who are old enough to have plenty of references to comply with WP:GNG, but these pages were looking like simple WP:RAWDATA rather than quality articles.

Cheers, BRDude⁷⁰ (talk) 23:29, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

@BrazilianDude70: Ok. I won't to discuss about incivility anymore but if you notice, I don't comment on your changes to the articles I've edited. I just respect it. Respect your source, but I also found strange sources in your edits, as was found in the first article you angrily commented on Gabriel Felix (footballer, born 1997) like https://campeoesdofuturo.wordpress.com/10centralizados/10centralizados-jogou-onde-fera/gabriel-felix/ @Robby.is.on: Do you consider campeoesdofuturo.wordpress a good source?

@BrazilianDude70 If you had reached out to discuss this commit from the start, we could have avoided this lengthy thread - do you agree with that?

About the new articles looking like WP:RAWDATA I think they all went through the draft phase and me or other else added more information to comply notability to follow the WP:GNG.

About the articles that are a copy of a Zerozero or Soccerway player profile Actually I didn't use them. I just looking for the latest match results on [FPF official website] and [Globo]. We consider it a good source to filled the articles, am I wrong? I try to keep small teams like Clube Atlético Juventus updated at least. Juventus didn't even have their first-team squad listed on the article page. Nobody was even concerned about that. @BrazilianDude70 wasn't even editing anything on Juventus article. Does it seem like persecution? I don't know. And finally about new players of Corinthians I created the Gui Negão I adding all the information I had at the time, and other users contributions, helped a lot in improving the notability following WP:GNG without unnecessary discussions. We always use the source from [] I don't know if this webpage is on WP:WPFLINKSNO @Robby.is.on can you clarify this question for me please?

Honestly, @BrazilianDude70 doesn't feel open to dialogue in the articles. it feels like an attempt to impose a position. I welcome constructive input from the community and value how people here help sharpen the information, but I'm not seeing @BrazilianDude70 same spirit in his approach. Danielsamideriba (talk) 01:28, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

So you're saying you didn't use Soccerway, but in all pages that you created, Soccerway is used as a reference, right? Okay then. I raised the issue to see if you were willing to improve, but after this amount of pointless replies trying to bring up reasons to your edits, I can see that you're not that willing, to be honest (at least not from my inputs). And could you please tell what other "small teams" other than Juventus did you update? I couldn't see other ones...

It's not about "persecution", it's simply because you edit in my area of edits as well. I edit mainly in Spanish and Brazilian football, and as far as I know, Juventus is a Brazilian team. I think everyone will agree that these articles are way better now than what they were before, but sure, it is unecessary to continue this discussion now. You can go on and mind your own business here, I'll do the same, and I will continue to improve poor pages like these ones, but I won't be wasting more time to say my pieces about it, you already have the suggestions you need. Feel free to ask some advice or help though. Cheers, BRDude⁷⁰ (talk) 02:00, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

I really appreciate that to finish to the discussion. Thank you very much. You honestly realize that you start this pointless discussion from the beginning? About the Gabriel Felix article. Can you explain about this source here? https://campeoesdofuturo.wordpress.com/10centralizados/10centralizados-jogou-onde-fera/gabriel-felix/

It's really important to be a Gabriel Felix article health.

"Juventus is a Brazilian team" Juventus don't deserve more informative. Well-written and comprehensive? It's already like this. How about helping us make it equivalent so we can achieve equality? Wikipedia football pages isn't owned by anyone. That's something worth remembering.

I just kept minding my own business here I'll follow all the suggestion like I said and also I already finish this discussion before, Do you remember? Cheers Danielsamideriba (talk) 02:24, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Since I didn't find any other references about these youth spells, I've removed it. It's as simple as that. Yes, Campeões do Futuro might be Wordpress-published (which is why I don't use them as a reference in the articles) but their informations match with several other articles I've edited and had other sources to back it up, because it is a very local website about players from the state of Goiás (as Futebol de Goyaz is too). Since you're not comfortable with it (and suddenly you're thinking about the "Gabriel Felix article health" after I basically rebuilt it from scratch when it had two unreferenced sentences - one of them being incorrect), we are more than willing to remove the information. I wasn't the one who "revived" the thread - Robby did.

"Juventus don't deserve more informative" - what the hell that was supposed to mean? I assume you couldn't understand what I wrote, so let's rephrase it in a more clear way: the Juventus players you've created were poor, and were in my area of edit (as they are Brazilians or in a Brazilian team), so I improved them. I believe this is an appropriate response.

Questions answered now? BRDude⁷⁰ (talk) 02:36, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Thank you to remove the wrong reference on Gabriel Felix article. Danielsamideriba (talk) 02:43, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

• Can you please revert all the wikilinks you added on all articles I already improved? This is a clear breach of WP:OL and is not the correct approach. I already did it at Ferreira (footballer, born 1993), please follow suit. Thank you. BRDude⁷⁰ (talk) 22:43, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Yes, per MOS:REPEATLINK and also as Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Players indicates, clubs and leagues shouldn't be linked repeatedly. Please revert the re-addition of those links, Danielsamideriba. Robby.is.on (talk) 23:12, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

@Robby.is.on: Already reverted all of 'em. The man seems more interested in proving me wrong than actually getting these articles right, but yeah, he might have them after these, I won't bother them any longer. Cheers, happy week to you both. BRDude⁷⁰ (talk) 02:37, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maycon Douglas, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rio Bonito was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi Danielsamideriba. Thank you for your work on Jhonatan Garcia da Silva. Another editor, Uncle Bash007, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Congrats and thank you for creating this page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Uncle Bash007}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Uncle Bash007 (talk) 08:38, 9 May 2026 (UTC)

Thank you @Uncle Bash007: I'm still putting in the hours to keep the Brazilian teams page up to date. Danielsamideriba (talk) 01:33, 10 May 2026 (UTC)