User talk:Evolution and evolvability

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


THOMAS SHAFEE
Catalytic triad of TEV protease
THOMAS SHAFEE
Evolution and Evolvability



Inspiration

I recently received a "thank you" notice from you for 998115350. This led me to look into you and eventually I stumbled upon and was inspired by your interview with Ainali. Perhaps I should become more involved with WJ. —Uzume (talk) 22:49, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

@Uzume: You're definitely welcome to! There are a range of ways to get involved either sporadically or ongoing: from formatting & copyediting (many new articles created are by first-time wikimedians, so references often inserted as plaintext; example) through to submitting an article (created from scratch, or submitted from wikipedia; WP:JAN) through to joining the user group as an ongoing associate/board editor (example). Happy to give more info if you're interested. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 23:53, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
@Evolution and evolvability: as a long time Wikimedia editor, I am interested. I also have some concerns.
I have a background in Informatics, Computer and Systems sciences and engineering (applied sciences) so these might play into Wiki.J.Sci. and Wiki.J.Pre. I might start off in WP:JAN as that is not so far from editing Wikipedia content but I can also see myself perhaps becoming an editor and/or making submissions (but obviously not on the same submitted materials as that would be a conflict of interest). Making "review" submissions with heavy Wikipedia content is interesting but I think eventually "original research" submissions would prove more interesting to me. I also like bibliographic information sciences content and have been working on Wikidata and SDC.
I read somewhere that submitters and editors might have to divulge legal names and I would likely want my legal name credited with published works authored or edited by me anyway, however, I would prefer to not have my legal name associated with this account (providing some anonymity). I would not mind making another "public" account for such but that probably runs awry with sockpuppety unless I publicly link them and that defeats the purpose of making such to begin with. Can submissions be made without an WP:SUL? How would that work? I envision emailing content to a submission email address or similar. Can someone be an editor without an WP:SUL? I imagine there is no issue with using this account for WP:JAN duties (do copy editors get credited?). —Uzume (talk) 00:45, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
@Uzume: At the moment, we've done almost zero advertising, so probably 50% of submissions come from people with an existing interest from the wikipedia side of things. I suspect that as the journals mature, original research articles will make up an increasing proportion as a fee-free OA publishing option. As well as the mixture of reviews and original research. Really good questions on the universal login question. We've had people send submissions in by email previously, so could easily receive a wikimarkup file (previously ppl have sent in latex and docx files, which we've later had to ask them to convert or convert for them). Conceivably, it's possible that a user could create a valid second account (WP:VALIDALT) and notify a checkuser (WP:ALTACCN) if they were to use that account only for the purpose of submission and editing of the article under their real name and keep it fully separate from any activities associated with their existing main pseudonymous account. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 05:15, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
0597235851 makiy
@@ 2A02:CB80:40B1:1F5E:1808:AFF:FE9D:CC40 (talk) 05:11, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
Italic 2A02:CB80:40B1:1F5E:1808:AFF:FE9D:CC40 (talk) 05:12, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Template error

Hi E&e: I see that you've regularly modified the {{Template:Academic peer reviewed}} template. Can you take a look and see if you can fix the error it's now throwing up? It shows on the documentation page too. Thanks! MeegsC (talk) 18:54, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Editing news 2021 #1

Read this in another languageSubscription list for this newsletter

Reply tool

Graph of Reply tool and full-page wikitext edit completion rates
Completion rates for comments made with the Reply tool and full-page wikitext editing. Details and limitations are in this report.

The Reply tool is available at most other Wikipedias.

  • The Reply tool has been deployed as an opt-out preference to all editors at the Arabic, Czech, and Hungarian Wikipedias.
  • It is also available as a Beta Feature at almost all Wikipedias except for the English, Russian, and German-language Wikipedias. If it is not available at your wiki, you can request it by following these simple instructions.

Research notes:

  • As of January 2021, more than 3,500 editors have used the Reply tool to post about 70,000 comments.
  • There is preliminary data from the Arabic, Czech, and Hungarian Wikipedia on the Reply tool. Junior Contributors who use the Reply tool are more likely to publish the comments that they start writing than those who use full-page wikitext editing.
  • The Editing and Parsing teams have significantly reduced the number of edits that affect other parts of the page. About 0.3% of edits did this during the last month. Some of the remaining changes are automatic corrections for Special:LintErrors.
  • A large A/B test will start soon. This is part of the process to offer the Reply tool to everyone. During this test, half of all editors at 24 Wikipedias (not including the English Wikipedia) will have the Reply tool automatically enabled, and half will not. Editors at those Wikipeedias can still turn it on or off for their own accounts in Special:Preferences.

New discussion tool

Screenshot of version 1.0 of the New Discussion Tool prototype.

The new tool for starting new discussions (new sections) will join the Discussion tools in Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-betafeatures at the end of January. You can try the tool for yourself. You can leave feedback in this thread or on the talk page.

Next: Notifications

During Talk pages consultation 2019, editors said that it should be easier to know about new activity in conversations they are interested in. The Notifications project is just beginning. What would help you become aware of new comments? What's working with the current system? Which pages at your wiki should the team look at? Please post your advice at mw:Talk:Talk pages project/Notifications.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 01:02, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

COVID questions

Hey Thomas, I just started reading Misinformation related to the COVID-19 pandemic by China, where I see for instance this study listed as an example of misinformation spread by the Chinese government, based on these references . First, does the Biosafety and Health article check out, in your view? And second, are the newspaper / industry critiques sufficient to classify this as misinformation? Sorry, I'm a little out of my depth here. -Darouet (talk) 21:12, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

@Darouet: It's probably worth asking over at WT:WikiProject COVID-19. My initial impression is that it seems facts of the study aren't being particularly questioned, but it's interpretation and subsequent usage in decision-making. In that sense, the usage of those subsequent refs are probably reasonable (several seem to be citing a WHO report on the matter, which TBH would be the better ref). As for the first ref, It'd probably be better to include this one, which has a whole review section on 'Frozen food and cold chain transportation'. However it looks like there's been a lot of overall debate over content over that last week at its talkpage that might also be relevant. Hope that helps! T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 03:43, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Merchandise Giveaway Nomination – Successful

A Wikimeida t-shirt!
A Wikimeida t-shirt!

Hey Evolution and evolvability,

You have been successfully nominated to receive a free t-shirt from the Wikimedia Foundation through our Merchandise Giveaway program. Congratulations and thank you for your hard work! Please email us at merchandise@wikimedia.org and we will send you full details on how to accept your free shirt. Thanks!

On behalf of the Merchandise Giveaway program,

-- Vermont (talk) 00:24, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Bio-like structures

Hi. I strongly apologise to bother you, but if you do not mind, I would like to ask you a favour. Recently, I have created a 'draft' of an article regarding structures described by the Soviet microbiologist V. O. Kalinenko. If you find some time, could you check it, please? Since you are an experienced Wikipedia user as well as an expert in the fields of biochemistry and evolutionary biology, I am really interested in your opinion. Also, please feel free to make some changes, additions and adjustments, if applicable. Thank you very much. --Pinoczet (talk) 13:30, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

@Pinoczet: No problem at all! I've replied over on User talk:Mrjulesd, since I found an existing discussion there and it's probably sensible to centralise. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 02:48, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for the reply, I appreciate it. Some of the Russian papers are available online, see: Biopodobnyye struktury, — Можно ли сделать амебу?, — Нет, амебу сделать нельзя!. In fact, Kalinenko did not "observe" the structures in distilled water, but rather "obtained" them under the influence of electric current. To my knowledge, these statements were not called into question; the problem was what these structures truly are. As for "caudate rockets", after checking some sources, I am pretty sure it was meant to describe a shape resembling a "tailed" comet. I really felt all this information deserves a standalone Wikipedia article (two primary sources and four secondary sources), but now, it seems not to be the case. Therefore, I decided to give up. Anyway, thanks a lot once again. Kind regards, --Pinoczet (talk) 11:35, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

about this image

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:WikiJournal of Psychology, Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences

Catalytic triad citation issues

Listeriabot

Share your feedback on the OCR improvements!

Question about the rating of Dicke model

Structured data across Wikimedia is starting!

WikiLoop 2020 Year in Review

OA in australia

Nomination of List of preprint repositories for deletion

Editing news 2021 #2

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jamila Gordon (July 17)

Talkback: you've got messages!

You have got an Email

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Wikipedia articles published in PLOS ONE

Transposable element

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Wikipedia articles published in PLoS ONE

Nomination for deletion of Template:JAN talk

Concern regarding Draft:Lauren Gawne

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

A kitten for you!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jamila Gordon has been accepted

Nomination for deletion of Template:Menu icon blue

Nomination of Computational and Statistical Genetics for deletion

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Paracopy

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Wikipedia articles published in PLOS ONE

Nomination for deletion of Template:Introduction to tables/tabs

"MOS:caption" listed at Redirects for discussion

Nomination for deletion of Template:WiR table row

Nomination for deletion of Template:WiR table start

Nomination for deletion of Template:WiR table end

WikiProject Tree of Life Newsletter – 018

Nomination for deletion of Template:Evolution and evolvability/sandbox/styles.css

WikiProject Tree of Life/Newsletter/019

WikiProject Tree of Life Newsletter – 020

Editing newsletter 2022 – #1

Linus Pauling DNA triple-helix coordinates

Wikijournal nom

Editing news 2022 #2

Concern regarding Draft:Junk DNA

Your draft article, Draft:Junk DNA

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Please create doppelganger accounts

Merry Christmas!

Editing news 2023 #1

Draft:PepSeq

Precious anniversary

File:DE_cycle.png

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Wikipedia articles published in peer-reviewed literature (J2W)

WikiProject Tree of Life Newsletter Issue 21

WikiProject Tree of Life Newsletter Issue 22

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members

WikiProject Tree of Life Newsletter Issue 23

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

WikiProject Tree of Life Newsletter Issue 24

WikiJournal nomination

WikiProject Tree of Life Newsletter Issue 25

WikiProject Tree of Life Newsletter Issue 26

Need permission to use MT gene figure in presentation

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

WikiProject Tree of Life Newsletter Issue 27

Drift draft

porting an article from a refereed academic journal to Wikipedia?

Nomination for deletion of Template:Remove numbers

Good article reassessment for Catalytic triad

Inactive peer review volunteer

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Lists of sequenced genomes

WikiCite 2025

Illinois Long Term Selection Experiment

Happy New Year!

Always precious

Listing for discussion of Template:Preloaddraft/Activist

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI