User talk:Maja Fredrika

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hi Maja Fredrika! I noticed your contributions to Ulla-Lena Lundberg and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Tacyarg (talk) 10:48, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

December 2025

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Nalle Valtiala, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Please don't add red categories ^SMason_Garrison 21:57, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Maja Fredrika. Thank you for your work on Nalle Valtiala. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please establish notability per WP:NAUTHOR. Thank and have a wonderful day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 07:51, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

@Mariamnei:

Hi! I have now added a few sources. Maja Fredrika (talk) 08:36, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Maja Fredrika. Thank you for your work on Torsten Steinby. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for your work on this article. While notability is established by inclusion in "Biografiskt lexikon för Finland", please add more sources and footnotes to back up all the information. Thanks and have a wonderful day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 07:56, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

@Mariamnei:

Hi! I have now added a few sources that I feel have all the information in the Wikipedia article. Maja Fredrika (talk) 08:07, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

Thank you! I still recommend adding more footnotes so readers can know where to find the information. Thanks and have a great day! Mariamnei (talk) 09:23, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Maja Fredrika. Thank you for your work on Jan Olof Mallander. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Since it falls under WP:BLP, please add more sources and footnotes to back up each claim with a reliable source. Please also establish notability per WP:NAUTHOR. Thank and have a wonderful day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 07:58, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

@Mariamnei:

Hi! I have added sources for each claim. Maja Fredrika (talk) 08:28, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

Thank you. It's certainly an improvement in terms of BLP and I removed that tag. I'm still not connvinced about the notability since they are not the primary subject of most of the sources. Thanks and have a great day! Mariamnei (talk) 09:26, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Maja Fredrika. Thank you for your work on Christer Kihlman. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for your work on this article. Please establish notability as per WP:NAUTHOR. Please also add more sources and footnotes to back up each claim with a reliable source. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 08:09, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

@Mariamnei:

Hi! I have added a few sources to back up the claims. Maja Fredrika (talk) 08:19, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

Nice work! I have removed the templates from this page. Have a great day! Mariamnei (talk) 09:27, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

Elsa von Born moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Elsa von Born. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. scope_creep^Talk 19:58, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Svea Jansson has been accepted

Svea Jansson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 24% of accepted submissions, well done! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ChrysGalley (talk) 13:05, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

April 2026

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Henrik von Cöllen, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. please be careful about categories when you translate articles ^SMason_Garrison 00:53, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Friedrich Wilhelm von Buxhoeveden, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Koluvere was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:06, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicken Rönngren has been accepted

Nicken Rönngren, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

bonadea contributions talk 16:43, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vihtori Kosola, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tavastia was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:07, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kurt Martti Wallenius, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Petsamo was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 21:31, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lolo Krusius-Ahrenberg has been accepted

Lolo Krusius-Ahrenberg, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 10:20, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elsa von Born has been accepted

Elsa von Born, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MCE89 (talk) 13:45, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Matts Dreijer (May 15)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, .nhals8, left the following feedback:

This draft lacks inline citations. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources. We require inline citations (footnotes) to show which source supports which specific statement.

You must place an inline citation directly after:

quotations;
any material whose verifiability is likely to be challenged or is contentious;
any material about living people.

Please edit your draft to support your statements with inline citations. Learn how to create inline citations in the:

Source Editor: Introduction to referencing with Wiki Markup.
VisualEditor: Introduction to referencing with VisualEditor.

Next steps

Edit Draft:Matts Dreijer to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

nhals8 (rats in the house of the dead) 01:34, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Maja Fredrika! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! nhals8 (rats in the house of the dead) 01:34, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Matts Dreijer has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Matts Dreijer. Thanks! nhals8 (rats in the house of the dead) 01:36, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

May 2026

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Axel Lille when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:40, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richard Danielson-Kalmari (May 16)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, StarryGrandma, left the following feedback:

This draft appears to be a duplicate of an existing article. Wikipedia does not permit multiple articles on the same topic.

To improve the existing article, please edit it directly at Johan Richard Danielson-Kalmari. If the article is protected and you cannot edit it, propose your changes on the article's talk page.
If you are writing about a different subject with the same name, ask the reviewer to rename your draft to distinguish it.

Please expand our short article on Danielson-Kalmari instead.

Next steps

Edit Draft:Richard Danielson-Kalmari to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

StarryGrandma (talk) 18:55, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emil Wichmann (May 18)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Bonadea, left the following feedback:

This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.

Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.

Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.

He is notable, no doubt about that, but it would be very much preferrable if a draft of this length did not depend on just one source.

Next steps

Edit Draft:Emil Wichmann to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

bonadea contributions talk 11:57, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Axel Olof Freudenthal, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bauta was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:08, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Hermanson (May 20)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, ChrysGalley, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

This just needs some more work on it. I can see there is presumed notability due to being a member of parliament, but all those "citations needed" are troublesome. Can perhaps the draft be edited to remove material which is not sourced?

Next steps

Edit Draft:Robert Hermanson to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

ChrysGalley (talk) 13:04, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lennart Hohenthal has been accepted

Lennart Hohenthal, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 4% of accepted submissions, excellent work! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tacyarg (talk) 05:14, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Translations and copyright

Hi Maja Fredrika, thank you for the recent contributions! Unfortunately, I have some copyright concerns. I noticed that the article Draft:Emil Wichmann is a rather direct translation of the corresponding BLF article. There are some differences (e.g. the paragraph about being the editor-in-chief for the "ultrasvekomanska" newspaper has been dropped), but overall the structure of the text is the same as in the source, also on the sentence level. For example, take this paragraph:

År 1916 avgick Wichmann med pension från sin post som direktor för seminariet i Nykarleby. Han nöjde sig emellertid inte med att vila på lagrarna, utan verkade 1916–1919 som lärare vid Åggelby svenska samskola i Helsinge. Därefter var han t.f. arkivarie vid sjöfartsstyrelsen 1919–1923 och t.f. äldre lektor vid Ålands lyceum 1927–1929. Wichmann var en uppskattad och flitigt anlitad föredragshållare, fr.o.m. 1919 föreläste han bl.a. i krigshistoria vid landets svenskspråkiga truppförband. Vid 73 års ålder företog han 1929 tillsammans med dottern Gerda en rundresa i Förenta Staterna, som inbjuden föredragshållare av därvarande finlandssvenska kretsar. Han skrev också en bok om sina intryck av finlandssvenskarna i USA. År 1930 anställdes Wichmann som biträdande propagandatalare vid Nylands södra skyddskårsdistrikt.	After his retirement in 1916, Wichmann continued as a teacher at the Oulunkylä Swedish co-educational school in Helsinki (1916–1919), as acting archivist at the National Board of Navigation (1919–1923), and as acting senior lecturer at the Åland Lyceum (1927–1929). From 1919 he was a sought-after lecturer on military history at the Swedish-speaking units of the Finnish Army, and in 1930 he was engaged as assistant propagandist by the southern Uusimaa district of the Civil Guard. At the age of 73, in 1929, he undertook a lecture tour of the United States together with his daughter Gerda, on the invitation of Finland-Swedish communities there.

Despite some changes from the original, I find the similarities significant enough for this to be a violation of WP:NONENGPLAG. And since, as far as I know, BLF is not in the public domain or published with a suitable license it is also a WP:COPYVIO. Could you comment on this? Jähmefyysikko (talk) 08:08, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

I'd also like to invite @Robertsilen here since this seems to be the way Projekt Fredrika is currently writing articles. For example, this diff has the same problem. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 01:10, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

@Jähmefyysikko Thank you for raising this – it is a legitimate concern and we take it seriously.

You are right that some of our articles have been written with BLF articles as a very close basis. Our intention has been to summarize and reference BLF, not to translate it directly, but in practice the line has apparently been crossed in some cases. This may be an issue especially for articles we have created from scratch and have not needed to adapt to existing texts.

We will review our past articles and the process going forward. Where the similarity is too close, we will rewrite the content in our own words, keeping BLF as a cited source rather than as a source to be translated directly.

We are working in coordination with SLS, the publisher of BLF, and will inform them of this issue. Robert (talk) 06:48, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply! Good to hear that you recognize the problem and I trust you'll find ways to improve the process. To offer a suggestion, Uppslagsverket Finland could perhaps be used a basis for some articles (with attribution), since it is licensed as CC-BY-CA 4.0. Many of its biographies are short, but there are also some longer ones. Additional information could then be added from BLF. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 07:34, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

I see that you've now expanded your source base, which is a step to the right direction. However, Draft:Karl Jacob Gummerus still contains the following (comparison against BLF):

[...] började i pressen publicera romantiserande och sedelärande skildringar av folklivet. De utgavs sedermera i bokform. Sin första längre novell ”Veljekset” (Bröderna) utgav Gummerus 1862, och den fick uppmuntrande recensioner av bl.a. J.V. Snellman. Gummerus gavs i uppdrag att redigera den skönlitterära avdelningen i tidningen Suometar, fennomanernas huvudorgan.	Gummerus began publishing romanticised, morally instructive sketches of rural life in the Finnish-language press during the 1860s. His first longer novella, Veljekset ("The Brothers"), appeared in 1862 and received an encouraging review from the statesman and philosopher Johan Vilhelm Snellman. Gummerus was subsequently entrusted with editing the literary section of Suometar, the principal newspaper of the Fennoman movement.

It is not enough to interleave plagiarized passages with each other, you truly need to write the content in your own words. (Unless you're using Uppslagsverket, in which case you can use Template:Free-content attribution to indicate the origin of the text) Jähmefyysikko (talk) 06:28, 23 May 2026 (UTC)

FYI, I've added a copyvio template to Julius Tallberg, written by User:Sara Fredrika, as I noticed that even today's edit follows the same pattern of direct translation. There is a risk of a lot of effort being wasted here, both on Projekt Fredrika's part and by the copyright clerks. It might be best to pause and adjust the writing process before creating more articles. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 16:24, 23 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi, I've noted the problem and fixed Gummerus' draft. In the future, I'll be extra careful not to write in a way that could be classified as plagiarism. Maja Fredrika (talk) 19:32, 23 May 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for the effort! However, I am still concerned about the Writer and editor section. In my opinion, it is very difficult to work with a single short source text without resorting to close paraphrasing; there simply isn't enough detail in the source material to recount the events in your own words. In this case, the original author of the BLF article has chosen to highlight the stories "Veljekset", "Johannes" and the translations of Bunyan, Holberg and Lie. If this is the only material available to you, it is practically impossible to avoid mentioning the exact same items. The same applies to the reception: the BLF author has chosen some details to illustrate it, and since these are the only details you know, you mention them too. In my opinion, the draft still contains close paraphrasing, but I have left a comment to ask the reviewer of the draft for a second opinion.

For practical guidance on how to avoid close paraphrasing, see WP:Close paraphrasing#How to write acceptable content. Note that the example assumes that one has at least two detailed sources that can be synthesised. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 10:24, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for bringing that to my attention! I have now rewritten the Literary work section using a new source, Kirjasampo. Maja Fredrika (talk) 15:55, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karl Jacob Gummerus (May 25)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, ChrysGalley, left the following feedback:

This draft appears to be generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice.

These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies:

hallucinations: they often invent false information and cite non-existent references.
unencyclopedic tone: they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual.
copyright issues: they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.

This looks to be an AI / LLM assisted submission. Some LLM buzz words have crept in, and there is that fuzzy disconnection between the source wording and the draft's wording. There are a number of other flags to AI usage.

Next steps

Edit Draft:Karl Jacob Gummerus to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

ChrysGalley (talk) 15:59, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Georg Henrik Jägerhorn (May 28)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, KeyolTranslater, left the following feedback:

This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.

Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.

Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.

A notable individual, however more sources are required for a biography, at least three in depth ones, like the one you already have.

Next steps

Edit Draft:Georg Henrik Jägerhorn to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

The Grenadian Historian (Aka. Mwen Sé Kéyòl Translator-a) (talk) 13:03, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lauri Kivekäs (May 30)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, EatingCarBatteries, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

See WP:ONESOURCE

Next steps

Edit Draft:Lauri Kivekäs to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

EatingCarBatteries _{(contribs | talk)} 07:38, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hugo Ekhammar (May 31)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, A.Classical-Futurist, left the following feedback:

This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.

Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.

Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.

This draft basically only cites one source, and for that one book source, there are no page numbers. Please provide the book's page numbers support each statement you citied with it and please find and use other sources and citations; this draft is promising but need more differing references to backup the cited information further. Thank you for your submission and please re-submit it when you've cited more differing references. Prost,

Next steps

Edit Draft:Hugo Ekhammar to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

A.Classical-Futurist (talk) 03:56, 31 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emil Wichmann has been accepted

Emil Wichmann, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

EaglesFan37 (talk) 19:55, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Matts Dreijer (August 1)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, DoubleGrazing, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

This person could be notable, but the sources cited aren't quite enough to establish that. The Upplandsverket piece is based on his school matricula, which is a primary source. The Mariehamns stadsbibliotek piece (barely more than a capsule profile), likewise. The strongest of the lot is the BLF bio: although that is partly based on a personal memoir, it also relies on a Festschrift which could indicate a degree of notability. However, there is nothing here that would meet WP:NPROF in an obvious way (that Birka hypothesis possibly comes closest?), and the BLF source alone isn't enough to satisfy WP:GNG, so for now I must decline.

Next steps

Edit Draft:Matts Dreijer to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:12, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Hermanson has been accepted

Robert Hermanson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.

Future articles

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:56, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hugo Pipping has been accepted

Hugo Pipping, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.

Future articles

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

nf utvol (talk) 08:39, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aarno Karimo (August 13)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Suitskvarts, left the following feedback:

This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.

Next steps

Edit Draft:Aarno Karimo to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Suitskvarts (talk) 09:30, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Maja Fredrika. Thank you for your work on Hugo Pipping. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 11:06, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alexander Slotte has been accepted

Alexander Slotte, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.

Future articles

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Kovcszaln6 (talk) 18:09, 14 August 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Johan Christopher Frenckell (1719–1779)

Hello, Maja Fredrika. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Johan Christopher Frenckell (1719–1779), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:06, 7 September 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Johan Christopher Frenckell (1719–1779)

Hello, Maja Fredrika. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Johan Christopher Frenckell".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 03:23, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Richard Danielson-Kalmari

Hello, Maja Fredrika. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Richard Danielson-Kalmari, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:08, 16 October 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks