Wikipedia:Categories for discussion

Wikipedia page for discussing categories From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Categories for discussion (CfD) is the central venue for discussing specific proposals to delete, merge, rename, or split categories and stub types in accordance with the guidelines for categorization, category naming, and stub articles.

Shortcut

For general discussion about the category system, use other appropriate venues such as Wikipedia talk:Categorization, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Categories, and relevant WikiProjects' talk pages.

How to use CfD

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion process § CFD
Shortcut

For detailed instructions about using CfD, see § How to nominate a category for discussion below. Briefly, nominations are handled through one of two processes:

  1. Speedy renaming and merging, for uncontroversial proposals that meet specified criteria—see § Speedy renaming and merging below.
  2. Full discussion, for all other proposals. Discussions typically remain open for at least seven days and are closed once a rough consensus has formed or no objections to the nomination are raised.

exclamation mark  Important: In general, do not depopulate a category when nominating it for CfD. If, during (or just prior to) the discussion, you modify the population of a category, or in other ways edit the category while it is subject to a CfD discussion, note that you did so in the CfD (for transparency), and be prepared to revert your edits upon community request. Such editing can hamper other editors' efforts to evaluate a category and participate in the discussion.

If you have an issue with a CfD closure, and discussion on the CfD closer's talk page does not resolve the issue, the process at Wikipedia:Deletion review is used to ask the community to review a CfD closure (as long as all steps are followed), to determine whether or not the close was reasonable and consistent with the spirit and intent of common practice, policies, and guidelines.

Wikipedia:Move review is used for a CfD closure that is limited in scope to renaming.

Current discussions

Add a new entry

Closing procedure

Main page: Wikipedia:Deletion process § Closing discussions that have run their full time
Shortcut

After seven days, an administrator (or possibly a non-admin) will determine if consensus has formed, and close the discussion. If appropriate, the discussion instead may be relisted to allow for more discussion. Editors closing discussions must follow the administrator instructions and implement the result or log it at the Working page to ensure it is implemented. As noted at Wikipedia:Deletion process#Non-administrators closing discussions, non-admins may follow the process at Wikipedia talk:Categories for discussion/Working, and list discussion results there for an admin to review, and to log to the page directly.

Discussions awaiting closure

More information V, Dec ...
XFD backlog
V Dec Jan Feb Mar Total
CfD 0 0 72 109 181
TfD 0 0 0 1 1
MfD 0 0 0 8 8
FfD 0 2 5 30 37
RfD 0 0 0 113 113
AfD 0 0 0 0 0
Close

How to nominate a category for discussion

Shortcut

Nomination procedure

Twinkle

You may use Twinkle to facilitate CfD nominations. To install Twinkle, go to Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets and check "Twinkle" in the "Browsing" section. Use the now-installed "XfD" (Start a deletion discussion) tab while viewing the page you want to nominate.

Twinkle only allows you to nominate a single category or stub template. For bundled nominations including multiple categories, see § MassCFD.

MassCFD

You can use the script User:Qwerfjkl/scripts/massXFD to automatically make mass nominations.

Manual nominations

I
Preliminary steps.
Shortcut

Before nominating a category:

In the following special cases:

  • If a category is a red link, then it is already deleted (or was never created in the first place) and does not need to be nominated.
  • If a category is unpopulated, use {{db-catempty}} to request it be speedily deleted in 7 days. Note that some project categories may be empty as part of their typical process cycle.
  • Before nominating a project category (even if empty!), check Special:WhatLinksHere, to see if the category is (or has been) populated by a template, and if so (or even if the populating template has been deleted), note the template name(s) in the CfD nomination.

For further information, see Wikipedia:Categorization and Wikipedia:Manual of Style.

II
Edit the category.

Add one of the following templates at the beginning of the category page (not the talk page) of every category to be discussed. For nominations involving large numbers of categories, help adding these templates can be requested here.

Otherwise, if nominating a single category:
If nominating a group of related categories, use a bundled nomination:
  • For deleting, use {{subst:Cfd|CfD section name}}
  • For merging, use {{subst:Cfm|Other category|CfD section name}}
    • For merging to two categories, use {{subst:Cfm-double|Other category 1|Other category 2|CfD section name}}
  • For renaming, use {{subst:Cfr|Proposed name|CfD section name}}
  • For splitting, use {{subst:Cfs|Proposed name 1|Proposed name 2|CfD section name}}
  • For converting the category into a list, {{subst:Cfl|Proposed name|CfD section name}}
  • For other options (containerization, etc.), use {{subst:Cfd|type=nature of proposed discussion|CfD section name}} (see Template:Cfd/doc#Optional parameter)
  • Include "CfD", "CfM", "CfR", "CfS" or "CfL" in the edit summary, and do not mark the edit as minor. Preview before saving.
  • To add the template for previous nomination days, use the "full" version of the template by appending "full" to the template name, i.e. {{cfd full}}, {{cfm full}}, {{cfr full}}, {{cfs full}} and {{cfl full}}. Use the |day=, |month= and |year= parameters to make the banner link to the correct CfD page.
  • Consider adding {{subst:cfd notice|Category name|2026 March 23|CfD section name}} ~~~~ to the talk page of the category's creator.
  • For details about these templates, see each template's documentation.
III
Create the CFD section.

Click THIS LINK to edit the section of CfD for today's entries.

Follow the instructions (visible in edit mode) to copy and paste one of the templates below. When inserting category names into these template's parameters, except the text= parameter, omit the Category: prefix and do not use wikilinks, as the template takes care of this.

If nominating a single category:
  • For deleting, use {{subst:Cfd2|Obsolete category|text=Your reason(s) for the proposed deletion. ~~~~}}
  • For merging, use {{subst:Cfm2|Origin category|Destination category|text=Your reason(s) for the proposed merge. ~~~~}}
    • For merging to two categories, use {{subst:Cfm2|Origin category|Destination category 1|target2=Destination category 2|text=Your reason(s) for the proposed merge. ~~~~}}
  • For renaming, use {{subst:Cfr2|Current category|Proposed name|text=Your reason(s) for the proposed rename. ~~~~}}
  • For splitting, use {{subst:Cfs2|Current category|Proposed category 1|Proposed category 2|text=Your reason(s) for the proposed split. ~~~~}}
  • For converting the category into a list, use {{subst:Cfc2|Current category|Proposed article|text=Your reason(s) for the proposed conversion. ~~~~}}
  • For other options (containerization, etc.), use {{subst:Cfd2|Current category|type=other type|text=Your reason(s) for the proposed conversion. ~~~~}}
For a bundled nomination, use one of the standard templates to build the "Cfd section name" for the first nominated category. After saving that, the second and subsequent nominations must be inserted manually, as follows:
==== Cfd section name ====
* 1st category
* 2nd category [Make clear whether you propose deletion, merging or renaming]
* Your reason for nominating the categories, and signature.
  • If a bundled nomination is too long, consider using {{hidden}} to hide some of the nominated categories.
  • In your reason, use links if mentioning articles or categories. To link to a category, use the colon trick by adding a colon (:) to the beginning of the link, e.g. [[:Category:Foo]].
  • Preview before saving to check that your nomination is formatted correctly, and remember to include your signature at the end of the nomination.

Stub types

I
Preliminary steps.

In general, a stub type consists of a stub template and a dedicated stub category. Before nominating a stub type for deletion, merging or renaming:

  • Read and understand guidance for creating stub types and stub type naming conventions.
  • Review the list of existing stub types—be advised, this list may not be comprehensive.
  • If you wish to:
    • Create a new stub type—follow the procedure for proposing new stub types.
    • Delete, merge or rename a stub category only, without deleting or renaming the associated stub template—follow the instructions above this section.
    • Delete or rename a stub template—continue to section II.
II
Edit the template.

Add one of the following tags at the beginning of the template to be discussed.

  • For deletion, use {{subst:Sfd-t|Section name}}
  • For renaming, use {{subst:Sfr-t|Proposed name|Section name}}
  • Please include "SFD" or "SFR" in the edit summary, and don't mark the edit as minor. Preview before saving.
  • Consider notifying the template's creator on their talk page. To find the contributor, check the page history of the stub template.
III
Create the CFD section.

Click THIS LINK to edit the section of CfD for today's entries.

Follow the instructions (visible in edit mode) and paste the following text (remember to update the default parameters):

  • For deletion, use {{subst:sfd-t2|TemplateName|text=Your reason(s) for the proposed deletion. ~~~~}}
  • For renaming, use {{subst:sfr-t2|TemplateOldName|TemplateNewName|text=Your reason(s) for the proposed deletion. ~~~~}}
  • In your rationale, mention how many articles currently use the template to help other editors. When linking to a category in your rationale, always add a colon (:) to the beginning of the link, like [[:Category:Foo]]. This makes a category link that can be seen on the page, and avoids putting this page into the category you are nominating.
  • Preview before saving to check that your nomination is formatted correctly, and remember to include your signature at the end of the nomination.

Notifying interested projects and editors

In addition to the steps listed above, you may choose to invite participation by editors who are likely to be informed about a nominated category. All such efforts must comply with Wikipedia's guideline against biased canvassing. In addition, to help make your messages about the CfD discussion clear, avoid Wikipedia-specific abbreviations, link to relevant policies or guidelines, and link to the discussion itself.

Notifying related WikiProjects

WikiProjects consist of groups of editors who are interested in a particular subject. If a nominated category is within the scope of one or more WikiProjects, consider adding a brief, neutral note on their talk page(s) about the nomination. You may use {{subst:cfd notice|Category name|2026 March 23|CfD section name}} ~~~~ or write a personalized message.

Tagging the nominated category's talk page with a relevant WikiProject's banner will include the category in that WikiProject's Article Alerts if they subscribe to the system. For instance, tagging a nominated category with {{WikiProject Physics}} will add the discussion to Wikipedia:WikiProject Physics/Article alerts.

Notifying substantial contributors to the category

While not required, it is generally considered courteous to notify the good-faith creator and main contributors of the category that you are nominating for discussion. To find the creator and main contributors, check the category's page history or talk page. You may use {{Cfd notice}} to inform the category's creator and all other editors.

Notifying other interested editors

It may be helpful to invite other subject-matter experts by posting a message on the talk page of the most closely related article, such as Protein family for Category:Protein families. You may use {{Cfdnotice}} for this.

Speedy renaming or speedy merging of categories may be requested if they meet one of the speedy criteria listed below. To nominate a category:

  1. Determine which speedy criterion applies.
  2. Tag the category page with {{subst:cfr-speedy|New name}} or {{subst:cfm-speedy|Merge target}}.
  3. List the request along with a speedy criteria reason at § New requests.

Speedy renaming and merging

Shortcut

Speedy requests must state which of the narrowly defined criteria strictly applies. Hence, any other non-speedy criteria, even "common sense" or "obvious", may be suitable points but only at a full discussion at Categories for discussion.

The nomination and its discussion may get moved further down the page purely for organizational convenience. Categories that qualify for speedy deletion can be tagged with the regular speedy tags with no required delay or listing. Renaming under C2E may be processed instantly (at the discretion of an administrator) as it is a variation on G7.

Opposing

Requests generally take about 48 hours to process after listing if there are no objections. This delay allows other users to review the request to ensure that it meets the criteria and raise any objections.

To oppose a speedy request, insert this immediately under the nomination: 

* '''Oppose''': Explain your objection. ~~~~

If you belatedly notice and want to oppose a speedy move that has already been processed, contact one of the admins who process speedy nominations. If your objection seems valid, they may reverse the move, or start a regular CfD discussion. Unless you withdraw your opposition, the nomination may be turned into a regular CfD discussion.

Contested speedy requests become stale and can be untagged and delisted after 7 days of inactivity. Optionally, if the discussion may be useful for future reference, it may be copied to the category talk page, with a section heading and {{Moved from|[[WP:CFDS]]|~~~~}}. If the nominator wants to revive the process, this may be requested at CfD in accordance with its instructions.

Speedy criteria

Shortcut

The category-specific criteria for speedy renaming or merging are strictly limited to:

C2A: Typographic and spelling fixes

Shortcut
  • Correction of spelling errors and capitalization fixes. Differences between American and British spelling (e.g. Harbours → Harbors) are not considered errors; however, if the convention of the relevant category tree is to use one form over the other, then a rename may be appropriate under C2C. If both spellings exist as otherwise-identical category names, they should be merged.
  • Appropriate conversion of hyphens into en dashes or vice versa (e.g. Category:Canada-Russia relations → Category:Canada–Russia relations).
  • Correction of obvious grammatical errors, such as a missing conjunction (e.g. Individual frogs toads → Individual frogs and toads). This includes pluralizing a noun in the name of a set category, but not when disagreement might reasonably be anticipated as to whether the category is a topic or set category.

C2B: Consistency with established Wikipedia naming conventions and practices

Shortcut

C2C: Consistency with established category tree names

Shortcut
  • Bringing a category into line with established naming conventions for that category tree, or into line with the various "X by Y", "X of Y", or "X in Y" categorization conventions specified at Wikipedia:Category names.
  • This should be used only where there is no room for doubt that the category in question is being used for the standard purpose instead of being a potential subcategory.
  • This criterion should be applied only when there is no ambiguity or doubt over the existence of a category naming convention. Such a convention must be well defined and must be overwhelmingly used within the tree. If this is not the case, then the category in question must be brought forward to a full CfD nomination.
  • This criterion will not apply in cases where the category tree observes distinctions in local usage (e.g. Category:Transport in the United Kingdom and Category:Transportation in the United States).

C2D: Consistency with main article's name

Shortcut
  • Renaming a topic category to match its eponymous page (e.g. Category:The Beatles and The Beatles).
  • This applies only if the related page's current name (and, by extension, the proposed name for the category) is:
    • unambiguous (so it generally does not apply to proposals to remove a disambiguator from the category name, even when the main article is the primary topic of its name, i.e. it does not contain a disambiguator); and
    • uncontroversial, either because of longstanding stability at that particular name, or because the page was just moved (i) after a page move discussion resulted in explicit consensus to rename, or (ii) unilaterally to reflect an official renaming which is verified by one or more citations (provided in the nomination).
  • C2D does not apply if the result would be contrary to guidelines at WP:CATNAME, or there is any ongoing discussion about the name of the page or category, or there has been a recent discussion concerning any of the pages that resulted in a no consensus result, or it is controversial in some other way.
  • This criterion may also be used to rename a set category in the same circumstances, where the set is defined by a renamed topic; e.g. players for a sports team, or places in a district.
  • Before nominating a category to be renamed per C2D, consider whether it makes more sense to move the article instead of the category.
  • Just disagreeing with the article title is not enough reason to oppose a C2D request. Instead, if someone disagrees with the article title, they can start a WP:RM procedure on the article talk page and they can request the CFDS discussion be put on hold while the RM discussion is running. However, arguing that it is desirable to have the article and the category at different titles may be an adequate reason to oppose C2D.

C2E: Author request

Shortcut
  • This criterion applies only if the author of a category requests or agrees to renaming within six months of creating the category.
  • The criterion does not apply if other editors have populated or changed the category since it was created. "Other editors" includes bots that populated the category, but excludes an editor working with the author on the renaming.

C2F: One eponymous page

Shortcut
  • This criterion applies if the category contains only an eponymous article, list, template or media file, provided that the category has not otherwise been emptied shortly before the nomination. The default outcome is an upmerge to the parent categories, where applicable.
  • Nominations should use {{subst:cfm-speedy}} (speedy merger) linking to a suitable parent category, or to another appropriate category (e.g. one that is currently on the article). When listing the nomination at WP:CFDS, you must manually add all the appropriate parent categories as targets if the member page is not already in them.
Admin instructions

When handling the listings:

  1. Make sure that the listing meets one of the above criteria.
  2. With the exception of C2E, make sure that it was both listed and tagged at least 48 hours previously.
  3. Make sure that there is no opposition to the listing; if there is a discussion, check if the opposing user(s) ended up withdrawing their opposition.

If the listing meets these criteria, simply have the category renamed or merged – follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Administrator instructions, in the section "If the decision is to Rename, Merge, or Delete"; to list it for the bots, use the Speedy moves section.

A nomination to merge or rename, brought forward as a full CfD, may be speedily closed if the closing administrator is satisfied that:

  • The nomination clearly falls within the scope of one of the criteria listed here, and
  • No objections have been made within 48 hours of the initial nomination.

The closure will be regarded as having been a result of a speedy nomination. If any objections have been raised, then the CfD nomination will remain in place for the usual 7-day discussion period, to be decided in accordance with expressed consensus.

For out of process deletions, check Category:Empty categories awaiting deletion. In some cases, these will need to be nominated for discussion and the editor who emptied the category informed that they should follow the CfD process. After renaming, copy and paste the listing to Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Working/Manual.

Current requests

If the category does not match one of the above criteria or you are not sure it qualifies, do not list it here. Instead, use the main CfD process. Requests may be completed if more than 48 hours old; i.e., if the nomination was created before 09:32, 21 March 2026 (UTC). Currently, there are 510 open requests (refresh).

To list it here, use the following format on a new line at the beginning of the list: 

* [[:Category:old name]] to [[:Category:new name]] – Reason ~~~~

If the current name should be redirected rather than deleted, use: 

* REDIRECT [[:Category:old name]] to [[:Category:new name]] – Reason ~~~~

If human action is required, e.g. updating templates that populate the category, use: 

* NO BOTS [[:Category:old name]] to [[:Category:new name]] – Reason ~~~~

Remember to tag the category page with: {{subst:cfr-speedy|New name}}

New requests


Opposed requests

  • Category:Australian rules football podcasters to Category:Podcasters on Australian rules football – C2C: sibling is Category:Podcasters on American football SMasonGarrison 02:11, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
    Oppose: Australian rules football is not ambiguous like American football can be, so it doesn't need to deviate from the established format per C2C. Mclay1 (talk) 07:10, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
    @Mclay1 @Dresq23 Well what are we supposed to do for Australian nationals? User_talk:Dresq23#Category:Australian_rules_football_podcasters SMasonGarrison 22:26, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
    Rename: Per discussion, the category was meant to be for Australians (nationality) who podcast about the sport of Australian Rules Football and not the sport itself. I did not want to call it "Australian Australian Rules Football podcasters." Can be renamed to something like Category:Australian podcasters on Australian rules football. Dresq23 (talk) 22:28, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
    @Dresq23 @Smasongarrison There is no need to make the category specifically for Australian people. Diffusing by nationality for that sport is not necessary, and it wouldn't make sense without a broader category for the sport. Mclay1 (talk) 23:20, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
    To be clear on this, it can still fall within the parent category of Australian sports podcasters, correct?Dresq23 (talk) 23:28, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
    @Mclay1's saying that same thing I am that as written it isn't specific to Australian sports podcasters. So adding the parent category of Australian sports podcasters isn't approipriate. SMasonGarrison 23:32, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
    @Dresq23 Sorry forgot to tag youSMasonGarrison 23:32, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
    In that case would have to then put all the Australian sports podcasters back into that parent category. Would sort of defeat the purpose of having the more specific category here, which was the initial purpose in making that category.Dresq23 (talk) 23:42, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
    yep. but that's how categorization diffusion works unfortunately. SMasonGarrison 23:56, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
    I think it would be fine to add it as a subcategory of Australian sport podcasters, like how Category:Military personnel of the American Civil War is a subcategory of Category:American military personnel by war – it doesn't use a nationality unlike all its siblings because the nationality is a given. If there are ever any articles on non-Australian Aussie rules podcasters, then we can revisit. Mclay1 (talk) 00:07, 17 March 2026 (UTC)


On hold pending other discussion


Moved to full discussion
  • Category:British humourous columnists to Category:British humorous columnists – C2A: Yes, this looks correct because of the British spelling of humour. However, according to the Oxford English Dictionary "humorous" is the correct spelling in all varieties of English. See Oxford English Dictionary See: https://doi.org/10.1093/OED/1187468962 🌿MtBotany (talk) 22:01, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
    Oppose, "humourous" was good enough for Jonathan Swift, and he was a better writer than any of us. DuncanHill (talk) 22:30, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
    Seriously? Jonathan Swift has been dead for 280 years. As much as I admire historical research, you really ought to point to a modern dictionary if you are going to oppose this and are not making a joke. If you are joking, well played, you got me. 🌿MtBotany (talk) 23:00, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
    @DuncanHill: "Humourous" is definitely incorrect in modern English. "Humour columnists" might be better anyway, but would need a full CfD. Mclay1 (talk) 01:19, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Empty categories awaiting deletion

The categories listed below have been identified as empty using {{db-catempty}}, and will be speedily deleted after 7 days unless populated. (Note: Due to technical limitations, all contents of the category may not be displayed; view the category directly to see all contents.)

Empty categories awaiting deletion
Private schools in Milton Keynes
Real Sranang players
TC Rheinbach
Schools in Recife
Transportation theory
Tanzanian people of Iranian descent
Iranian people of Tanzanian descent
Iran–Tanzania relations
Schools in West Kalimantan
Austria–Vanuatu relations
Ragusan trade with India
Deaths from cholera in the Austrian Empire
Urban planning in Sindh
Urbanisation in Sindh
Ambassadors of Jamaica to Paraguay
Ambassadors of Jamaica to Uruguay
Drama (rapper) songs
Ambassadors of Jamaica to Chile
Ambassadors of Jamaica to Brazil
Ambassadors of Jamaica to Argentina
Geography of Kiên Giang province
Geography of Hà Nam province
Geography of Kon Tum province
Buildings and structures in Trà Vinh province
History of Trà Vinh province
Geography of Quảng Bình province
Tourist attractions in Quảng Bình province
Landforms of Quảng Bình province
History of Quảng Bình province
Tourist attractions in Bình Thuận province
1915 establishments in Ecuador
1915 in Ecuador
History of Hải Dương province
Torchwood audio covers
Tourist attractions in Nam Định province
History of Hà Nam province
History of Nam Định province
History of Bạc Liêu province
History of Bắc Giang province
History of Vĩnh Phúc province
Municipalities of Vietnam by city
Ambassadors of Nepal to Bangladesh
Ambassadors of the Republic of China to Costa Rica
Costa Rica–Taiwan relations
France at the 1962 FIFA World Cup
January 1958 sports events in the United Kingdom
People executed by Tennessee by hanging
Ambassadors of Lebanon to Poland
Ambassadors of Lebanon to Lithuania
Permanent delegates of North Macedonia to UNESCO
November 1961 sports events in Mexico
November 1961 in Mexico
Ambassadors of Jamaica to South Korea
Malaysian expatriates in Bahrain
Malaysian expatriates in Azerbaijan
Malaysian expatriates in Chile
Malaysian expatriates in Algeria
Malaysian expatriates in Argentina
Qijing vehicles
Italian people of Puerto Rican descent
Fictional superhuman speedsters in comics
Argentine football clubs 2023 season
Women in Shenzen
Stavros Konstantinou songs
1881 disestablishments in the Russian Empire
Permanent delegates of Nicaragua to UNESCO
1350s establishments in North America
1350s in North America
Dirk Pitt films
Dirk Pitt
History of Udupi district
Ambassadors of Cape Verde to Senegal
Dirk Pitt characters
User Egyd-1
Malaysian expatriates in Jordan
Malaysian expatriates in Kenya
Malaysian expatriates in Hungary
Ambassadors of the Comoros to Madagascar
Ambassadors of Costa Rica to Uruguay
Ambassadors of the Democratic Republic of the Congo to South Africa
Ambassadors of the Democratic Republic of the Congo to the Republic of the Congo
Ambassadors of Croatia to North Korea
Ambassadors of the Democratic Republic of the Congo to Chad
Ambassadors of the Democratic Republic of the Congo to the Central African Republic
1959–60 NCAA men's basketball independents season
St. Edward's Hilltoppers basketball navigational boxes
Chad–Democratic Republic of the Congo relations
Lars Kaufmann Motorsport drivers
Mongolian monarchists
Monarchism in Mongolia
Events at the 2026 Asian Beach Games
2026 Asian Beach Games
1958–59 NCAA men's basketball independents season
1958–59 NCAA men's basketball season
Tram routes in Saint Petersburg
Ambassadors of Romania to Liechtenstein
Ambassadors of Sierra Leone to the Czech Republic
Czech Republic–Sierra Leone relations
Ambassadors of Sierra Leone to Ukraine
Liechtenstein–Romania relations
Ukrainian people of Sierra Leonean descent
Sierra Leone–Ukraine relations
Malaysian expatriates in Kuwait
Kuwait–Malaysia relations
1993 in Gabonese sport
Chinese expatriates in the Central African Republic
Geography of Bà Rịa-Vũng Tàu province
England at the 1994 FIFA World Cup
Founders of populated places in Mississippi
Electronic literature Peruvian writers
Golfers from Nagano Prefecture
Waterways of Vietnam
Scottish video game characters
Sportspoeple from Remedios, Cuba
Angola–Seychelles relations
Angola–Uganda relations
Libya–Republic of the Congo relations
Angola–Eswatini relations
Angola–Madagascar relations
Angola–Benin relations
Angola–Togo relations
Angola–Senegal relations
Antigua and Barbuda–Italy relations
Brazil–Chad relations
Chad–Cuba relations
Austria–Chad relations
The Gambia–Republic of the Congo relations
Mali–Republic of the Congo relations
Guinea-Bissau–Republic of the Congo relations
Cape Verde–Republic of the Congo relations
Chad–Greece relations
Chad–Portugal relations
Chad–Liechtenstein relations
Chinese expatriates in Lesotho
Chinese expatriates in Montenegro
Chinese expatriates in Seychelles
Chinese expatriates in North Macedonia
Angola–Burundi relations
Songs written by Alex Skolnick
Song recordings produced by Alex Perialas
Chinese expatriates in the Dominican Republic
Songs written by Chuck Billy (vocalist)
Songs written by Eric Peterson
Chinese expatriates in São Tomé and Príncipe
Chinese expatriates in the Democratic Republic of the Congo
German people of Saudi Arabian descent
Ghanaian abolitionists
Ambassadors of Ivory Coast to South Korea
Ambassadors of South Korea to Benin
Benin–South Korea relations
Ambassadors of South Korea to Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso–South Korea relations
Ambassadors of South Korea to the Central African Republic
Ambassadors of South Korea to Chad
Chad–South Korea relations
Ambassadors of South Korea to the Democratic Republic of the Congo
Ambassadors of South Korea to the Republic of the Congo
Republic of the Congo–South Korea relations
Ambassadors of South Korea to Gabon
Ambassadors of South Korea to Ivory Coast
Ambassadors of South Korea to Luxembourg
Ambassadors of South Korea to Madagascar
Mauritania–South Korea relations
Ambassadors of South Korea to Mauritania
Ambassadors of South Korea to Niger
Ambassadors of South Korea to the Netherlands
Ambassadors of South Korea to Portugal
Ambassadors of South Korea to Senegal
Ambassadors of South Korea to Togo
Ambassadors of Barbados to Cuba
Ambassadors of Barbados to Costa Rica
Barbados–Costa Rica relations
Barbados–El Salvador relations
Ambassadors of Barbados to El Salvador
Barbados–Nicaragua relations
Ambassadors of Barbados to Nicaragua
Ambassadors of Barbados to Mexico
Ambassadors of Barbados to Honduras
Barbados–Honduras relations
Ambassadors of Barbados to Guatemala
Ambassadors of Belgium to Azerbaijan
Ambassadors of Belgium to Cambodia
Ambassadors of Ivory Coast to Ethiopia
Ambassadors of Belgium to Turkmenistan
Ambassadors of the Dominican Republic to the Czech Republic
Ambassadors of the Dominican Republic to Poland
Ambassadors of Denmark to Ghana
Tambur players
Belize–Cuba relations
Neighbourhoods in Doğanyol
Loricariini
Pakistani female powerlifters
Pakistani powerlifters
Malaysian expatriates in Cuba
Ambassadors of Russia to Eswatini
Sikh terrorist incidents in the 1940s
Terrorist incidents against Muslims in the 1940s
Ambassadors of Botswana to Argentina
Ambassadors of Botswana to Brazil
Botswana–Brazil relations

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI