Wikipedia:Featured list candidates

Quick comments

• The table refers to drought, fire, liming, and shade tolerance. It would be helpful to include some context as to these terms what they measure, vis à vis low/medium/high.
  • This is the explanation given in the database's help document regarding, e.g. drought: "Drought tolerance is defined here in the following fashion: Imagine that in an acre of land there are low areas that have heavy soil and tend to accumulate more soil moisture, and higher areas that have coarse textured soil and tend to accumulate less soil moisture. Some plant species are most frequently found growing in the higher areas with the coarse soil texture. These plant species are considered to be more drought tolerant than the species that are frequently found in the low areas with fine textured soil." That doesn't seem helpful enough to be worth including. Are you looking for anything specific? - Dank (push to talk)

I think that if you feel it's important enough to include that information on the table, then there should be some explanation for the reader as to what the information means. Bgsu98 (Talk) 22:02, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

I'm not sure what you're asking for. I've deleted the fire and drought categories, if that helps; I'd rather not explain what fire and drought are. But I don't think explanations of liming and shade would be out of place, and I'll add those in the Key section. - Dank (push to talk) 22:33, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

No, I’m sorry, I feel like I’m making it worse. What I thought was that the lead is not too big that a bit of explanation would be out of place. Something along the lines of "Hardwood trees are rated on their resistance to drought, fire, liming, and shade." Then a brief explanation of each (as in, what qualifies as low v. medium v. high). There is nothing wrong with including that information on your table and I didn’t mean to imply that you should remove anything. Just a bit of clarification for readers who aren’t well versed in forestry.

I will try to hopefully find some time this week to go through and give your article a proper review because it looks very interesting! Bgsu98 (Talk) 23:17, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Looking forward to it. I'll hold off. - Dank (push to talk) 23:22, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

• I strongly recommend separating all of those state abbreviations with commas.
  • Done. - Dank (push to talk)

I would include the commas in the key as well. That is where they are most badly needed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 22:03, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Done. - Dank (push to talk) 22:33, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

• The phrases after Uses do not need periods as they are not sentences.
  • Done. - Dank (push to talk) 20:36, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Bgsu98 (Talk) 17:33, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Great to see you back! Hope you can stay. I've done an edit to use a way I saw last week for condensing many references to differently-authored chapters () which I then reverted; it was a lot less repeated text and the ref links still worked, but it's your list if there's another way you prefer. --PresN 18:34, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Good to see you too, and yes, I agree that that's an improvement. FWIW, what I understood to be the usual recommended sfn style ("Johnson|1990a" and "Johnson|1990b" when there are two different Johnsons who published articles in the same year) was throwing Harv errors with this template you're using, so I had to use a hack of "last1= Johnson, R. L." and "last1= Johnson, Paul S.", even though those obviously aren't just the last names. If you know a better hack, feel free. - Dank (push to talk) 21:12, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Sorted out a better way. --PresN 22:05, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Never would have guessed that one, thanks. - Dank (push to talk) 22:48, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

TheNuggeteer

I will review the sources. I have checked every source and these are my comments: 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 09:15, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

• for which he won the Boston Society of Film Critics Award for Best Actor I suggest moving this after the source; the source does not say this, but the article does, as it is a summarization.
  • Done
• Add a note for Outstanding Limited or Anthology Series in the Primetime Emmy Awards that it is shared with the crew

• Done

• Best Actor – Miniseries or Television Film that is not the correct award.

• Changed, that's what the award's page is called on Wikipedia though so I might look to get that page moved

• For the 2003 IFTA Film and Drama Awards, you might want to add Best Entertainment, albeit with a note

• I'm not sure of how I'd add that because I think it's for a talk show episode with him as a guest rather than him being awarded, I didn't add it yet but let me know what you think

• That's weird; I'll let it slide.

• Watch source 73's capitalization

• I see what you mean, though it's written like that on the website itself, should I still change it?

• • MOS:SMALLCAPS; I changed it myself

The Dublin Film Critics Circle Award for 2015 is Best Irish, not Best Actor.

• Best Irish is for the film, he's listed in Actor but he's tied in fifth with two others, I've added a note to it

• Add a note for the Toronto Film Critics Association Award that the runner up is shared with another

• Done

• The Vancouver Circle Award source is the nominations, not winners.

• Done

@TheNuggeteer: Thanks for your review, I've replied to all your comments and made most of the changes, let me know what you think. Cavan121012 (talk) 12:02, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Support Great job and thank you for the review! 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 13:58, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Olliefant

• I feel like alot of the lead could be moved into a "Background" section

• Splitting the lead is not a bad idea, however to maintain consistency with the other 63 similar articles keeping the info in a lead instead of a short lead which then has to summarize the second section seems a bit more organized to me. Mattximus (talk) 23:02, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

• In the key, "Provincial capital" -> "Provincial capital and largest municipality".

• Done Mattximus (talk) 22:45, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

• Delink "roads" and "local police" as overlinking

• While this may look like it on the surface, the local police links to Spanish municipal police which is relevant to the article. I'll delink roads though as the link to Transport in Spain which is less relevant. Mattximus (talk) 22:45, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

• Alot of stray MOS:DASH violations

• I think I caught all of them? Mattximus (talk) 23:00, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

• I feel like you could note that the vast majority of the municipalities are losing population

• Done Mattximus (talk) 22:53, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

That's what I found ping me when done. Olliefant (she/her) 15:55, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

• Thanks for the review Olliefant (she/her)! Mattximus (talk) 23:02, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Shwabb1

• Missing Lang templates for Spanish-language text in the lead (see List of municipalities in Seville)

• Done, I think I caught all of them Mattximus (talk) 23:02, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

• Alt text is present and sufficient, and the table is structured properly, so no accessibility issues. Everything else seems fine. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 10:38, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

• Thanks Shwabb1! Recommendations met. Mattximus (talk) 23:02, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

  Support on prose and accessibility. If you're interested I have an FLC open at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Monuments of national significance in Zhytomyr Oblast/archive1, I would appreciate a review. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 08:38, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98 (3/14/26)

Lead

• "Municipalities are the most basic local political division in Spain[4] and can only belong to one province.[5]" --> Citations must go after punctuation marks or at the end of a sentence. As such, source no. 4 needs to be moved to the end of the sentence.

• Done

• "which was passed by the Cortes Generales—Spain’s national parliament—on 2 April 1985[7] and finalised by royal decree on 18 April 1986.[8]" --> Ditto.

• Done

• "The mayor and the deputy mayors are elected by the plenary assembly..." --> You might consider removing that extra "the", although that is purely optional.

• Done

• "...once every two months if they range between 5,001 and 20,000, and once every three months if they do not exceed 5,000." --> To agree with "those" earlier in the clause.

• Done

• You could consider using the {{langx}} template for (Spanish: junta de gobierno local).

• Hmmm it appears it already is? Unless I am missing some formatting issue? Mattximus (talk) 22:29, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

You do! I didn’t realize that template had the means to not link the language.

Table

• The table appears to be properly formatted.

Mattximus & Alavense: Please let me know when you have a chance to examine my comments. Bgsu98 (Talk) 21:06, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

• Thanks for the review Bgsu98! All corrections made. Mattximus (talk) 22:29, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Support. Bgsu98 (Talk) 22:49, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Olliefant

• No image?
• Move the sidebar into the lead section to minimize the shoving its doing to the list
• No mention of Jefferson's vice presidency in the lead
• "an army led by" what army? Is there a relevent link?
• "[the] original six frigates" -> "the [original six frigates]"
• "Murray will hold the position until September 2, 1801" none of the other appointments have this info
• "[Baltimore]" -> "[Baltimore], Maryland" or "[Baltimore, Maryland]" same for any other city on first mention
• Link "inspector general"
• Link "quorum", also is there any particular reason it wasn't met
• I wouldn't include things like "the" and "a" in links but its up to you
• I don't think the see also link is particularly relevent

That's what I found ping me when done. Olliefant (she/her) 15:17, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

• I've added Adams' portrait to the lead
• Sidebars generally shouldn't be put in the lead per WP:LEADSIDEBAR. In my opinion, the best solution to this would be to delete all sidebars and use navboxes instead.
• The army worked differently back then. There wasn't a standing army, armies were raised as needed. I'm not sure how to best convey this.
• Link fixed
• Appointments give the end date if they end after March 3, 1801. Maybe unnecessary?
• I was sure I had read somewhere that cities like Paris don't need disambiguation, but maybe that was only for article titles. Either way, the cities have locations now.
• Linked inspector general.
• Linked quorum. It frequently took them a few days to reach a quorum. It happened several other times and was common enough that I ended up not including them in the timeline except for here in the context of the address. It can be removed from here as well if that's preferable.
• I prefer including the and a in links when referring to a specific entity. I see "the king" and "the king" as implying two different targets.
• Someone added predecessor/successor see also links to all of the presidential timelines a while back. Should they be removed?

Olliefant, I've responded to each point. Thanks for the feedback! Thebiguglyalien (talk) 15:53, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

• I also dislike sidebars
• I'd cut appointment end dates as they vary widely
• Locations aren't needed for things like Paris, I was specically meaning American cities
• Could you note that quorum's
• I think the see also links just bloat the article, especially since they are included in the navbox template below

Olliefant (she/her) 16:11, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Olliefant: end dates, non-American city specifiers, and see also are gone. The sources don't really provide any detail on quorums except that they often took a few days; I suspect it's as simple as they had to travel across the country without cars or airplanes and it took a while to get there. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 20:47, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Support Olliefant (she/her) 20:53, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "The presidency of John Adams began on March 4, 1797, when John Adams was inaugurated the 2nd president of the United States and ended on March 4, 1801" => "The presidency of John Adams began on March 4, 1797, when John Adams was inaugurated the 2nd president of the United States, and ended on March 4, 1801"
• "The performer Gilbert Fox premiers the song" - maybe this an ENGVAR issue but isn't that word spelt "premieres"......?
• "rumors spread that France is building an invasion enforce" - force, surely?
• In July 1798 I see the use of both "Adams's" and "Adams'". Might be worth checking this throughout.....
• "Adams receives a letter from George Washington, where Washington" - a letter is not a location, so "in which Washington" would be more appropriate
• "to form a new diplomatic envoy to France" - is an envoy not a person? This makes it sound like a group of people. Maybe another ENGVAR issue.....?
• That's what I got :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:09, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

  ChrisTheDude, thank you! I've made all suggested changes. For "envoy", I've changed each use to "delegation" but am open to different wording if there's anything better. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 18:13, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:44, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "Produced on a $200 million budget,[6] Black Panther grossed $1.35 million worldwide" - unless it was a flop of colossal proportions, I think you mean 1.35 billion
• There's random unlinked uses of Black Panther against "Feature Film – Effects/Foley" and "Best Adaptation From a Comic" (in the latter case there is other unlinked stuff in the same cell)
• Peter Devlin sorts incorrectly
• That's what I got :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:28, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
  • @ChrisTheDude: Hit the first two. Peter Devlin is sorting correctly for me, with the Cinema Audio Society Awards (where he doesn't have his middle initial) sorting first, then the Academy Award followed by the Satellite Award. Did I miss something with this? - Favre1fan93 (talk) 01:10, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:23, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Olliefant

• Link "Los Angeles"
• Source note b
• "Dolby Theatre" -> "Dolby Theater" American English
• May be worth noting that Black Panther, while others were nomination, was the first MCU film to win an oscar
• Rotten Tomatoes figure is out of date, it currenlty has 526 Reviews
• "Motion Picture - Live Action" is an MOS:DASH violation

That's what I found ping me when done. Olliefant (she/her) 15:35, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

@Olliefant: Done - I have made corrections based on your comments except two. I removed the source note for N'yongo's nomination attributing it two The Last Jedi since I cannpt find a credible source indicating she was also nominated for that film. Regarding the Dolby Theatre, I kept it as it as because that is what the theater is called officially on its website and on news website such as LA Times. Normally according to Wikipedia, while the theater is located in the United States, we usually abide with what the building is called in of itself officially.

--Birdienest81talk 09:37, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Support Olliefant (she/her) 16:40, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Medxvo

• "based on the Marvel Comics character of the same name" - totally optional, but I suggest "based on the Marvel Comics character Black Panther" per WP:OFTHESAMENAME
• "as part of Phase Three" - "as part of Phase Three of the MCU" would be clearer for those unfamiliar with the MCU's concept of "phases"
• Some wikilinks would be useful in the table: the 18th AARP Movies for Grownups Awards, the Dallas–Fort Worth Film Critics Association Awards 2018, the London Film Critics Circle Awards 2018, the Make-Up Artists & Hair Stylists Guild Awards 2018, the Online Film Critics Society Awards 2018, the San Francisco Bay Area Film Critics Circle Awards 2018, the 2018 Seattle Film Critics Society Awards, and the 2018 St. Louis Film Critics Association Awards

That's all from me. Medxvo (talk) 17:52, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

• @Medxvo: Done - All the comments have been addressed.

--Birdienest81talk 20:07, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Support. Medxvo (talk) 20:35, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98 (3/7/26)

• The only suggestion I can make is that when listing the diets on the table, you might consider pluralizing "grain" (to "grains"), since the other foods are plural, and both "grain" and "grains" are acceptable.

• User:PresN: Since that is only a suggestion, I will add my support now. Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:02, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Olliefant

• Table is missing row scopes per MOS:DTAB

Done.

• Table is missing a caption per MOS:DTAB

Done.

• Lead is too short

Done.

• Why is "Mississippi History Now" a reliable source?

"Mississippi History Now is administered by the education staff of the Mississippi Department of Archives and History, along with the Mississippi Historical Society."^[1] I think it is reliable because the MDAH is a government organization, and MHS is a closely related organization.

• Source linking is inconsistent

Linked a few more articles throughout the descriptions. I assume this is what you mean?

• The key should be above the table not in a note

Done.

• "from [the state's legislature]" -> "from the [state legislature]"

Done.

• The templates Template:1987 United States elections and Template:Elections in Mississippi sidebar should be included on the page

Done.

That's what I found ping me when done. Olliefant (she/her) 07:19, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

@Olliefant: Hello! Thank you for the review! I have completed your comments. Delcoan (talk) 18:28, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

TheNuggeteer

Will do the source review. I have reviewed all sources except source 11, which I cannot access. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 12:02, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

• It would be better if you said the specific article (Article VII) for source 2.

• Do the same for source 4

Done.

• but not whether to directly amend the document this is, in my opinion, original research

Removed.

• At the time, many newspapers hoped for a constitutional convention to take place in order for larger changes to occur, rather than for individual amendments to be referred to voters this is not mentioned solely in source 7. I believe you should put all three sources after this.

Moved them to after the newspapers are mentioned.

• in any single year → in every single year

Done.

• I do not think "Vibe" is the correct section header. Should it be "Reception"?

Good idea! Done.

@TheNuggeteer: Hello! Thank you for the review! I have replied to all of your comments. Regarding source 11: this is from a book that I purchased because I couldn't find county level results anywhere online. Would you like me to upload photos somewhere of the results that are detailed throughout the book? Delcoan (talk) 21:54, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Support, I will accept good faith for the book. Great job! 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 23:05, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98 (3/7/26)

Lead

• "...requiring political candidates to live in the district they run in" --> Recommend slightly rephrasing to something like "...requiring political candidates to live in the district they hope to represent".

Good thinking! Done.

History

• Recommend deleting this sentence altogether as it has nothing to do with this particular article: "Before then, with the 1817 Constitution, which was the state's first constitution, the legislature could only place a question on the ballot asking whether a constitutional convention should be held."

Done.

• "...and the other 2 being initiated by citizens." --> Recommend removing the "being".

Done.

• "With 10 amendments being referred to voters in the 1987 election, it remains the largest number of measures voted on by Mississippi voters in every single year since 1912."

Done.

Reception

• "There was no organized opposition to any of the 10 measures that were on the ballot that year"

Done.

• "At the time, many newspapers hoped for a constitutional convention to take place in order for larger changes to occur, rather than for individual amendments to be referred to voters, including The Clarion-Ledger, the Hattiesburg American, and the Sun Herald." --> This whole sentence reads very awkwardly. Newspapers can't hope for anything. The names of the papers should probably be listed right after the mention of "many newspapers". Constitutional convention should probably be linked. Why did these newspapers want a convention rather than amendments voted on by the people?

Rewrote the sentence and added an example newspaper's reasoning.

Ballot measures

• The key needs to appear above the table and not as a footnote.

Done.

• "The following table details the ten amendments." Really? Recommend rewording, something along the lines of "Mississippi citizens voted on ten proposed amendments November 3, 1987."

Done.

• This table really does not need to be sortable, especially the Description, Results map, and Method of referral columns.

Agreed. Done.

• Recommend dewikilinking "constitutional amendment" in the description of the first amendment.

Done.

• "...organizations could legally hold specific interests in land that was willed to them to not longer than 10 years."

Done.

• "...to live in the district that they run in." --> Recommend slightly rephrasing as "for which they are running".

Done.

• "County" and "Circuit Court" do not need to be capitalized.

Done.

• "by a maximum of 20 or more years, or life, imprisonment

Done.

• "...who makes such decision to record their reasoning; and to grant any individual denied bail"

Done.

• "Constitutional amendment to delete a section that allows for corporate stockholders to vote their shares to all directors or one candidate, and to allow the topic of preferred stock without voting." --> This sentence is wordy and hard to follow. Delete a section of what? What does it mean "to vote [ones] shares to someone else?

Rewrote.

• What is the chancery clerk?

Added a footnote explaining.

User:Delcoan: Please let me know when you've had a chance to examine my comments. Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:34, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

@Bgsu98: Hey, I really apreciate all of your feedback! I have replied to all of your comments. Delcoan (talk) 01:00, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Delcoan: You do not need this sentence – For the column below that includes the results by map, the map key is as follows: – with the key. The key speaks for itself. Also, what is currently source no. 11 needs to go at the end of the sentence. Bgsu98 (Talk) 01:07, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Also, that Mississippi template at the bottom of the article should probably go at the top (where an infobox would normally go). The image of the ballot itself could be moved down. Bgsu98 (Talk) 01:12, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

@Bgsu98: I deleted the obvious text for the key, but I still think that source 11 should stay there because that is there to source the claim that it was unenforceable; citation 9, at the top of the column, sources the rest of the information. Regarding the info box: is it ok if I delete it, actually? I agree it fits awkwardly at the bottom, but if I move it to the top and have the sample ballot below, it pushes the amendments table downward and leaves a big gap between the key and the table. Delcoan (talk) 01:25, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Delcoan: Citations must go either after punctuation marks or at the end of a sentence. I agree that avoiding a big whitespace is preferable, so deleting that one template altogether might be the better choice. Bgsu98 (Talk) 01:27, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

With regards to the table, having plain # and % symbols as headers looks unprofessional. I recommend replacing those with {{Abbr|No.|Number of votes received}} and {{Abbr|Pct.|Percentage of votes received}}. (Or something similar.) Bgsu98 (Talk) 01:31, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

@Bgsu98: Okay; done, done, and done! Delcoan (talk) 01:35, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Support. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:04, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Drive-by comment

The descriptions are not sentences so they should not have full stops -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:38, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

@ChrisTheDude: Done. Thank you! Delcoan (talk) 02:08, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Further comments

• It must surely be possible to expand the lead beyond three sentences. Maybe spotlight amendment three, which was the only one where the voting was close.....

Added to the lead about the results, including 3's results.

• Could do with linking Mississippi in the body as well as the lead. Maybe change the first sentence to Beginning with the [[Constitution of Mississippi#1832 Constitution|Constitution of 1832]], the legislature of the [[U.S. state]] of [[Mississippi]]

Done.

• "With 10 amendments being referred to voters in the 1987 election, it remains the largest number of measures voted on by Mississippi voters since 1912." => "In the 1987 election 10 amendments were referred to voters, which remains the largest number of measures voted on by Mississippi voters in a single year since 1912."

Rewrote using similar phrasing

• "wrote editorials in favor of a constitutional convention taking place so that larger changes could occur at a single time, rather than for individual amendments" => "wrote editorials in favor of a constitutional convention taking place so that larger changes could occur at a single time, rather than requiring individual amendments"

Done.

• Was there any coverage of the fact that the aforementioned amendment three was very close?

No, there was not much. Well, at least, I couldn't find any when I was creating 1987 Mississippi Amendment 3's article. Could it make sense, however, to say something like "Despite none of the amendments receiving organized opposition, Amendment 3 narrowly passed." ? Maybe that could go in the Ballot measures section. Or is that just stating the obvious?

• Notes should go before refs -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:30, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Done.

@ChrisTheDude: Hello, I really appreciate your comments; I have replied to them all! Delcoan (talk) 15:11, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:31, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Shwabb1

Glad to see more serial WHS lists coming in. I'll leave my own suggestions as well as some drawn from comparison with the recently featured The Architectural Work of Le Corbusier.

• Refs 1, 2, 5 should have "UNESCO World Heritage Centre" as the publisher (not "UNESCO"). Then, Ref 5's title should be just "Australian Convict Sites".
  • Done MCE89 (talk) 11:59, 28 February 2026 (UTC)
• Following the structure of the existing WHS FLs, the website for Ref 1 ("World Heritage List") is unnecessary. This reference is also missing an access date.
  • Done MCE89 (talk) 11:59, 28 February 2026 (UTC)
• Ref 3 is missing the date parameter (31 July 2010).
  • Done MCE89 (talk) 11:59, 28 February 2026 (UTC)
• All web refs would benefit from being archived though this isn't a requirement.
  • I've been having no luck with IA bot lately, but will have a go at getting it to archive these. Otherwise I'll add them manually when I get a chance. MCE89 (talk) 11:59, 28 February 2026 (UTC)
• Include core and buffer zone areas in the infobox (1,502.51 ha and 3,887.63 ha, respectively). You may use Template:Convert to also show the areas in square miles (per MOS:CONVERSIONS: Generally, conversions to and from metric units and US or imperial units should be provided).
  • Done
• Rename the "List" heading to "Sites".
  • Done
• Consider adding a "UNESCO ID / Property area" column to the table similarly to The Architectural Work of Le Corbusier (the relevant info can be found here).
  • Oh good call, done!
• "1600 kilometres" → "1,600 kilometres"; here and in other cases, kilometres should also be shown in miles (MOS:CONVERSIONS).
  • I generally prefer not to group digits in four-digit numbers, which is allowed by MOS:DIGITS (Numbers with exactly four digits left of the decimal point may optionally be grouped (either 1,250 or 1250), consistently within any given article.)

• In that case, leaving the comma out is fine by me. The conversions of kilometres to miles are missing in the description of the Old Great North Road though.
  • Added those conversions

• "An administrative precinct" → "The administrative precinct"
  • Done
• Wikilink "gaols".
  • Done
• "remains of a lumberyard and quarry" → "remains of a lumberyard and a quarry"
  • Done
• "male convicts who re-offended, who were subjected to" – I'm not a fan of the two "who"s close to each other. Maybe change to "male convicts who re-offended and were subjected to" or something similar.
  • Tweaked slightly differently
• "Overcrowding and disease let to high mortality rates;" → "Overcrowding and disease led to high mortality rates:" (fix typo & replace semicolon with colon).
  • Fixed

• The semicolon → colon change is still not done.
  • Oops, could have sworn I'd changed that! Now done

• Remove wikilink at "quarries" (not linked elsewhere and not an uncommon term IMO).
  • Done
• "including a barracks, hospital, and dry dock" → "including barracks, a hospital, and a dry dock"
  • Done
• "nineteenth century" & "twentieth century" should probably be changed to "19th century" & "20th century" in accordance with using numerals rather than words elsewhere.
  • Done
• "1000 prisoners" → "1,000 prisoners"
  • Per above
• Since the Tasmanian sites are shown on a separate map and their locations aren't clear on the first map, they can be removed from the first one, with the caption extended with "(Tasmanian sites excluded)" and the alt text amended accordingly.
  • Good call, done
• "with one site located to the north of Tasmania" (alt text of the Tasmanian sites map) should instead say "with one site located in northern Tasmania".
  • Fixed
• I believe "Two-story" (alt text of Old Government House) should be "Two-storey" in Australian English.
  • Fixed
• Except for the minor issues listed above, alt text seems fine. The table caption and row/col scopes are present, so no accessibility issues. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 10:24, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

  Thanks so much for the review @Shwabb1! Replied to your comments above. MCE89 (talk) 11:59, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

  Looks good. There are still a few small issues left (replied above), and also I'd like to suggest making the location column sortable; once these are resolved, I'll support. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 12:31, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

  Both done, and changed the column to be sortable as suggested. MCE89 (talk) 12:46, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

  Support on prose and accessibility. I also have a nomination open at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Monuments of national significance in Zhytomyr Oblast/archive1 if you don't mind taking a look. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 13:00, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

  Thank you! Happy to review your nomination, feel free to give me a ping if I haven't gotten to it in the next few days. MCE89 (talk) 13:03, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• Link World Heritage and transportation in the body as well as the lead
  • Done
• "The island's barracks were designs to house 328 men" - presumably meant to say "designed".....?
  • Oops, fixed
• That's all I got! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:31, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
  • @ChrisTheDude: Thanks so much for the review! Both done. MCE89 (talk) 12:53, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:29, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98 (3/7/26)

Lead

• Recommend editing the very first sentence to begin with "The Australian Convict Sites are a World Heritage Site..."
  • Done
• You use both "11" and "eleven" in the same paragraph. You need to pick one (personally, I like "eleven".)
  • Agreed and done
• Wikipedia prefers that the lead contain no citations, as any information in the lead should theoretically be included later in the article. Therefore, what are currently sources no. 1, 2, and 3 should be relocated elsewhere, assuming this information is provided elsewhere. If it is not, it should be.
  • Done
• Wouldn't it be "on Tasmania" since Tasmania is an island?
  • I'm not too sure why, but we definitely say "in Tasmania", possibly because it's treated as a state/jurisdiction and not just as an island — I don't think I've heard "on Tasmania" used before.

History

• The history of these sites should be included here.
  • I've added a paragraph of background on the convict system and penal sites in Australia in general (which also allowed me to remove the citations in the lead). Let me know what you think
    • Only one suggestion: "Convicts were sent to Australia for a range of offences, including for committing petty crimes and for supporting particular political causes."

Kingston and Arthurs

• Recommend wikilinking crankmill.
  • Replaced with "hand-cranked corn mill" as we don't really have a good article to link to

Hyde Park

• "Eventually, however, the barracks began to be used as a trial depot..." --> Recommend rewording as "However, the barracks were eventually used as a trial depot..."
  • Done

Brickendon and Woolmers

• "About 85% of convicts in Australia spent part of their sentence employed through this system."
  • Done

Freemantle Prison

• I don't think the separate system needs to be in quotation marks.
  • Removed

User:MCE89: Let me know when you've had a chance to examine my comments. Bgsu98 (Talk) 18:25, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks Bgsu98! Replied to your comments above. MCE89 (talk) 12:53, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

User:MCE89: Only one additional suggestion above with regards to your new paragraph. Everything else is excellent. I will go ahead and support now. Bgsu98 (Talk) 12:59, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you! Done as well :) MCE89 (talk) 13:02, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

User:MCE89: When you have a minute, check out the improvements I’ve made to Figure skating at the 2002 Winter Olympics – Pair skating. Bgsu98 (Talk) 13:06, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Promise it's on my list! Will take a look later tonight. MCE89 (talk) 13:10, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Camilasdandelions

I see no issues in this article for now, as all of them are cited properly. I'll check the sources soon after. Camilasdandelions (✉️) 06:34, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

@Camilasdandelions: Everything has been done. RedShellMomentum 18:06, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

RedShellMomentum Additional comments below. Camilasdandelions (✉️) 04:07, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

@Camilasdandelions: Done, please check. RedShellMomentum 22:42, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Great work, now I support the nomination. Good luck! Camilasdandelions (✉️) 02:53, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

Overview

• You seem forget |alt= in [[File:Justin Timberlake 2014 February 2.jpg|thumb|right|upright|Justin Timberlake performing on his [[The 20/20 Experience World Tour|20/20 Experience World Tour]] in 2014]]
• Please add table captions to all tables. I won't matter whether you use {{sro}} on them after adding them.
• In Concert tours, where are the citiations for Justified and Stripped Tour?

Comments

• "His 2003 debut The Justified World Tour began at intimate gigs at clubs and theaters " - I would say began with, personally
  • Done.
• "Later that year he recorded a song "I'm Lovin' It", used by McDonald's " => "Later that year he recorded the song "I'm Lovin' It", used by McDonald's "
  • Done.
• "For the release of his sophomore record" - what is a "sophomore record"? I've never heard that term before. Is there an appropriate link?
  • It means the second studio album. It's actually used pretty commonly.
    • I've been a music fan for 40+ years and I have literally never heard it before. Maybe it's a very U.S.-specific term? Could we change it to something more universally understood (e.g. just saying "his second album")....? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:36, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

  I did "second album", removing all mentions of "studio" since all of his albums are studio albums. RedShellMomentum 19:43, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

• "co-headlining with rapper, frequent collaborator Jay-Z." - this doesn't make sense grammatically. I suggest "co-headlining with his frequent collaborator the rapper Jay-Z."
  • Reworded it another way.
• "and it ended with an encore, lasting for a total of 160 minutes" - this makes it sound like the encore lasted for 160 minute. I suggest "and it ended with an encore, the whole show lasting for a total of 160 minutes"
  • Done.
• "a co-headlining concert tour by Justin Timberlake and American rapper Jay-Z" - no need to randomly relink JT here (or use his full name)
  • Done.
• "received acclaim from critics,[21] became the second highest-grossing tour of 2014" => "received acclaim from critics,[21] and became the second highest-grossing tour of 2014"
  • Done.
• "will premiere at the 2016 Toronto International Film Festival" - 2016 was ten years ago, so future tense is not appropriate
  • Done.
• "The Man of the Woods Tour received positive reviews" - why the sudden italics?
  • Removed.
• " And concluded that "The Forget Tomorrow Tour puts Justin Timberlake back in the star chamber for sure." - this isn't a grammatically valid sentence
  • I merged it with the other sentence of what they said.
• In the lead you highlight two Superbowl shows as being among his televised performances and then don't list them anywhere in the article
  • I'll make sure to get it in there.
• That's what I got -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:53, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude: I implemented the Super Bowl performances in the "concerts" section. RedShellMomentum 03:42, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:40, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

Olliefant

• "The Vancouver Sun" -> "the Vancouver Sun" as "the" isn't part of the name
• I think the "Event" column should come before the "Date" column
• Can you list the state next to the city under "Award show performances"
• Under "Award show performances", "Ref" -> "Ref(s)" as some have multiple citations
• Could the lead image could be replaced with something less dark and more clear?

Thats what I found ping me when done. Olliefant (she/her) 16:57, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

@Olliefant: Done. RedShellMomentum 19:05, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

@Olliefant: Making sure you didn't forget this. RedShellMomentum 02:53, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Support Olliefant (she/her) 15:36, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Sorry if I was annoying you with the pings. RedShellMomentum 15:49, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Source review by Icepinner

Thank you for your contributions to this list! I'll be reviewing based on this revision. I know that this has been a major project of yours for a while, so feel free to push back on anything. Icepinner (Come to Hakurei Shrine!) 00:40, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

• A few books/websites are missing identifiers (like ISSN).
• There are a lot of p/pp errors within the SFNs. User:Lingzhi/reviewsourcecheck helps to find them.
• Most book sources are cited using SFNs, yet a few of them are cited as footnotes with the CS1 book template. Probably convert the CS1 book citations to SFN format
• Some websites are missing archived links, like Lewis 2025
• There are a few Harvcite errors, User:Trappist the monk/HarvErrors is helpful for identifying such errors
• Some book sources are missing page numbers
• For the Doctor Who YouTube citations: They are most likely okay since it comes from the TV show itself, so satisfies WP:RSPYT. With that said, there are a few inconsistencies, including:
  • No publisher name for "Behind the Scenes of The Well's Shocking Twist | Doctor Who". YouTube is linked, despite being the third YouTube citation (either link YouTube for all citations or move it to the first instance). The citation also has the media parameter as "Behind the scenes featurette", though none of the other sources have that
  • "The Giggle: Behind the Scenes" has the media type parameter, but the rest of the YouTube sources don't
• WP:BUSTLE says "there is consensus that the reliability of Bustle is unclear and that its reliability should be decided on an instance-by-instance basis". Do you think it's a reliable source and an acceptable one to cite in the context of this list?
• The use of Huffpost here is acceptable in accordance to WP:HUFFPOST as the article was written by "The Huffington Post UK" and it's a non-political topic.
• A few errors in the bibliography section, including:
  • Harvcite errors
  • Missing date for Harmes and Orthia
• For reference, here's the Earwig check for this list

Well, that's all I got based on citation formatting/source reliability. It seems like it would take a long time to fix the citation formatting based on these comments, so I'm leaning towards an oppose (and I really don't want to since I know that this is a very big project). Icepinner (Come to Hakurei Shrine!) 00:40, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

@Icepinner Most of this shouldn't take me too long to go through, as a lot of it is just minor formatting fixes. I've addressed most of these but on a few points:

-Could you clarify which sources are missing identifiers? I did a leaf through and couldn't spot which ones you're referring to.

-Which books are missing page numbers? Same as above.

-What exactly is a p/pp error? I have never heard of it before.

Otherwise I fixed the harvcite errors, formatted the Youtube citations, swapped the Bustle source for some stronger citations, and am currently going through and patching up the archived links. I believe the above three quibbles are the only bits left that need to be addressed. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 01:37, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

To respond to your points:

-"Could you clarify which sources are missing identifiers? I did a leaf through and couldn't spot which ones you're referring to" Nicol 2020, Shuttleworth 2013, Hearn 2014, Morgan-Russel 2019, etc. The Lingzhi script can indicate which sources are missing identifiers (some sources may not have identifiers though)

-"Which books are missing page numbers? Same as above" Rudden 2018, Richards 2015, Russel 2016, etc. The Lingzhi script also helps to identify which sources are missing page numbers.

-"P" is used to indicate that a source cites a single page, whilst "pp" is for citing multiple pages within a source. For example, "Chapman 2006, p. 99-101" should be "Chapman 2006, pp. 99-101" since you're citing 2 pages. Also, apologies if this is pedantic, but per MOS:RANGE, an endash should be used for page ranges instead of a hyphen.

The citation formatting is looking a lot better now! Icepinner (Come to Hakurei Shrine!) 02:36, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

@Icepinner forgive me, but how do I change p to pp? I have admittedly never had to do that before so I'm not sure where the toggle for that in VE is.

For page numbers: Many of the books cited are primary sources and not citing any particular page numbers, basically they're just citing the whole book. For the identifiers I've added them to the ones you've listed, though I couldn't find one for Shuttleworth. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 03:40, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

For the p to pp on VE, click on the footnote and select the "pages" parameter instead of "page". Icepinner (Come to Hakurei Shrine!) 15:18, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

I've begun adjusting the pp parameter, though had to stop due to irl things happening. I will hopefully be finished with the adjustments sometime tomorrow. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 07:49, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

@Icepinner I believe I got the page number issue fixed. Let me know if I missed any, and what else needs to be addressed. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 22:21, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Support. Some book sources used more than once are cited using the full template in the footnote instead of SFNs, but I don't think the "consistent format" criterion extends to citation styles (I doubt that anyone would care about it at this point... I'm also aware of your experiences with SFNs as well). This is one helluva project. Icepinner (Come to Hakurei Shrine!) 15:23, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Three drive-by comments

• The lead should not start "This is a list" per MOS:THISISALIST
• There's nearly 90 uses of "would" which are almost certainly all (or nearly all) inappropriate per WP:WOULDCHUCK. For example, there's no reason to say "the show would run until 1989" rather than just "the show ran until 1989" or "The first season of actor Tom Baker's era as the Fourth Doctor would see the return of many old antagonists" rather than "The first season of actor Tom Baker's era as the Fourth Doctor saw the return of many old antagonists"
• As Doctor Who is a British show, the article should be written in British English per WP:TIES. A cursory search indicated that there's quite a few words spelt with the American "-ize" rather than the British "-ise", also "program" rather than "programme", etc -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:32, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude I believe I have addressed all three. The uses of would have been dropped down to around 15 or so, and only in cases where no other option was available and its usage is justified. Let me know if there's any I missed. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 02:26, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Olliefant

• "educational show" link to Educational entertainment
• "The Chase (Doctor Who)" should be piped under "Dalek"
• Can you add an image to the lead?
• Why is the split 1969/1970?
• Can you describe the inclusion criteria?
• "on display at various Doctor Who events" I wouldn't consider two "various"
• Whats the point of the main article/see also links if the articles in question are then linked in the prose?
• "These robots were later used by the Racnoss in the episode "The Runaway Bride" (2006) and appeared in "The Pandorica Opens" (2010)" in what capacity?
• "Following the show's cancellation in 1989 and an aborted revival attempt, via a television film, in 1996," -> "Following the show's cancellation in 1989 and the unsuccessful television film" or something similar because otherwise it reads fairly awkward ", via a television film, in 1996," in particular
• Under "Graske", "The Sarah Jane Adventures" are linked twice
• "divide of Eartj" tpyo

Might do more later but thats what I found this time Olliefant (she/her) 16:31, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

-The inclusion criteria is defined on the talk page at Talk:List of Doctor Who universe creatures and aliens, with multiple discussions being included further down describing where these came from.

-The split was done this way because of how many monsters were introduced in the 60s. This was initially intended to be split by decade, but given how few were introduced in the 80s, 2010s, and 2020s, I elected to merge them to the wider 70s and 2000s sections, where they work out fine enough size wise, to avoid subheading bloat. The 60s and 70s introduced so many that neither can be contained with the other without being unwieldy.

-Main article and see also are for easy linking to important subjects relating to the topic and to show that further information pertaining to it is held there. If need be I can remove the secondary hyperlinks, I admittedly wasn't sure if they needed to be kept or not.

-Your suggestion for the wording on the film loses the bit on the aborted revival, which feels important to note since otherwise it's unclear why the TV movie is being brought up for non-fans. I'm not against rewording but I'm not sure removing that is the best call.

All other suggestions have been implemented. Let me know your thoughts on the above. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 18:26, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

My only remaining issue is the double comma in ",via a television film, in 1996," Olliefant (she/her) 18:37, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

@Olliefant is this good? Also, just to double check, do you want me to remove the hyperlinks where the "See also" headings are present? Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 21:41, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

Yeah everything looks fine, the links is up to you Olliefant (she/her) 21:51, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

I think I'll keep them in since some of them are helpful on the chance someone is briefly skimming through, though I am definitely not opposed to removing them if need be. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 02:39, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Sipport Olliefant (she/her) 07:22, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "The long running British science fiction television series known as Doctor Who" seems like off wording. I would suggest "Doctor Who, a long-running British science fiction television series"
• Link Voord on first uasage
• "which resulted in The Daleks (1963-1964), being put into production" - no reason for the comma after the brackets
• "often paid homage to, but did not need, prior episodes to be understood by the show's audience" => "often paid homage to prior episodes but did not require them to be understood by the show's audience"
• " saw the first time in the show's revival that a season or series lacked any returning monsters" => " was the first time in the show's revival that a season or series lacked any returning monsters"
• "fighting the Kaleds, the race that will become the Daleks, in combat, though are depicted as being just as evil as they are during the war" => "fighting the Kaleds, the race that will become the Daleks, although in combat they are depicted as being just as evil as them during the war"
• In the Voord section, there's 11 sentences that start with "The Voord". Can you mix the language up a bit, even if only by replacing some of these usages with "they"....?
• "which the Fourteenth Doctor, working alongside his Fifteenth incarnation, are able to win by working together" => "which the Fourteenth Doctor and his Fifteenth incarnation are able to win by working together"
• "A smaller creature, dubbed Cybermats, are first introduced" => "Smmaller creatures, dubbed Cybermats, are first introduced"
• "The Ice Warriors hail from the planet Mars (pictured)" - no need for the last word as it's obviously pictured
• " Due to a rights dispute with another of Lincoln and Haisman's creations, the Quarks" => " Due to a rights dispute concerning another of Lincoln and Haisman's creations, the Quarks" (the dispute was not with the Quarks, as they are fictional)
• "The Quarks were physically portrayed by young children, though were voiced by actress Sheila Grant" => "The Quarks were physically portrayed by young children, but were voiced by actress Sheila Grant"
• "Draconia (The Draconians' home planet)" => "Draconia (the Draconians' home planet)"
• "dying in battle being considered the ultimate honor among their race" - honour is spelt wrong
• "with the Monster (Actually an alien named the Skarasen)" => "with the Monster (actually an alien named the Skarasen)"
• "taking the center stage of their debut serial" - centre is spelt wrong
• "discussed issues such as immigration, refugees, resettlement, ghettoization" => ghettoisation
• "His power grows after as latching onto the TARDIS" => "His power grows after latching onto the TARDIS"
• " being based on the Egyptian God Set," => " being based on the Egyptian god Set,"
• "Stewart had come up with the idea" => "Banks Stewart had come up with the idea"
• "in the 2023 audio drama The Green Man" - title should be in italics
• "several different types of robots act as slave labor" => labour
• "the rich use the Robots for manual labor," - same again
• "and are stated to be so dependent on this labor" - and again :-)
• "They manipulate "Ephemerals" (Their word for mortal beings)" => "They manipulate "Ephemerals" (their word for mortal beings)"
• "in the 2005 episodes "Aliens of London" and "World War Three", which features" => "in the 2005 episodes "Aliens of London" and "World War Three", which feature"
• "which the creation of would cost the same" = "the creation of which would cost the same"
• "Davies had the idea of the Entity in his head for quite a while prior to its usage in "Midnight". The idea for the entity's usage of mimicry hailed from a conversation between showrunner Russell T Davies and producer Phil Collinson," - strange to use his full name the second time rather than the first....
• "Silents, acting alongside the Silence, aim is to kill the Doctor" => "Silents, acting alongside the Silence, aim to kill the Doctor"
• "T'zim Sha (Nicknamed Tim Shaw by the show's characters)" => "T'zim Sha (nicknamed Tim Shaw by the show's characters)"
• "Ux, who he uses to shrink planets" => "Ux, whom he uses to shrink planets"
• "The book, Inside the TARDIS" - no need for comma there
• " by James Chapman, stated" - or there
• That's what I got..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:12, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude I believe I have addressed all of the above. I neglected to do two of them: Voord should be linking here instead of to another article, so I've removed the link in their section and neglected to link it earlier (Since it's circular now) while shifting the redirect to their section. I also did not do the Stewart to Banks Stewart change, as Robert Banks Stewart, in all sources covering him I could find, refer to him only as Stewart and not Banks Stewart, indicating this is not the preferred or common last name shorthand. Let me know if anything else needs to be done or if I missed anything. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 20:29, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

  On that last point, you do refer to him as "Banks Stewart" at one point..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:30, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude Ah, that's a mistake on my part. Addressed. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 20:46, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:25, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Comments

Here'll be some comments from me. Arconning (talk) 13:26, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

@Arconning Done. Min968 (talk) 15:31, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

@Arconning Are you still following this topic? Min968 (talk) 12:38, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Support and passing image review. Arconning (talk) 09:52, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

• Wikilink first mention of the measurement "li"
  • Done.
• "According to some accounts,", could this be more specific?
  • Wang Chen, according to some accounts, was killed by his own officers. The emperor was captured and on 3 September was sent to Esen's main camp near Hsüan-fu. Twitchett & Grimm 1988, p. 325
• "on the night of 2–3 September,", guessing this means that accounts either reported 2 or 3 September?
  • Done.

Comments

• Lead image could be made larger
• "This defeat had a significant impact on the military and also caused political instability in the Ming dynasty for years to come. It is considered one of the worst military defeats in Ming history and marked a significant shift in power along China's northern frontier between the Ming court and the Mongol tribes." - this doesn't seem to be mentioned anywhere in the body, so it will need referencing
• Wang Zhen should be linked in the body as well as the lead
• " A group of officials, led by the Minister of Personnel, submitted a memorial" - I don't think you mean "memorial" there. Maybe "memorandum".....?
• "However, after a warning from a trusted eunuch commander—who had escaped the Battle of Yanghe Pass on 3 August by hiding in tall grass—that proceeding" - as the "hiding in the grass" bit has already been established, I think this can be changed to "However, after a warning from the eunuch commander who had escaped the Battle of Yanghe Pass on 3 August by hiding in tall grass that proceeding"
• "A new rear guard of 40,000 (or 30,000 or 50,000) cavalry" - if all these estimates are equally valid, I would avoid making one more prominent than the others and I would instead say "A new rear guard of either 30,000, 40,000 or 50,000 cavalry"
• That's what I got :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:06, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude Done. Min968 (talk) 17:42, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:29, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• Could you add an image of Wang Zhen?
  • Done.
• I would suggest rewriting "the matter was opposed by officials led by Minister of War Kuang Ye" to "officials led by Minister of War Kuang Ye opposed the matter".
  • Done.
• "He was assassinated in 1455, ending his short-lived supremacy." Is there any clue about who assassinated Esen Taishi?
  • Done.

Векочел (talk) 20:29, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

@Векочел Done. Min968 (talk) 05:23, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

• Support Векочел (talk) 12:17, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "How I Met Your Mother is an American sitcom which ran for nine seasons on CBS" - I know you mention the dates of the individual seasons later on but I feel like it wouldn't hurt to give the overall timespan here Done
• "until the season eight finale, "Something New", where she is portrayed by Cristin Milioti" => "until the season eight finale, "Something New", in which she is portrayed by Cristin Milioti" Done
• "with the season one finale releasing on May 15, 2006" - I don't think "releasing" is right here. Something like "being broadcast" would work Done
• "Season two released from September 18, through May 14, 200" - again, I think "released" is not right. "Was broadcast" would work Done
• "Season seven ran from September 19 through May 14, 2012" - September 19, 2011, presumably, unless it somehow aired backwards through time
  • 2011 was established as the year in the prior sentence, all of the ranges are written like that.
    • Good point
• That's it, I think -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:24, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

@ChrisTheDude: done most, responded to one Olliefant (she/her) 15:35, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:04, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Comments from TheDoctorWho

The following comments are made off of this version of the list:

• The list needs a short description Done
• The image needs alt text Done
• The image should not used a fixed px size Done
• CBS links to CBS Sports Done
• The fact that the series ran for nine seasons is in the first sentence of both the first and second paragraphs Done
• "During the eighth season, Segal stated that he planned to depart the series when his contract expired at the end of the season. As a result, the fate of the series was unknown." it appears, at least according to the character list, that Segal did not leave in season 9. While this is good information to have here, a sentence on why he ultimately stayed (or at least stating that he did, if the why isn't known) would be good Done
• "On May 19, a fifth season, which was mandated by a syndication deal signed with Lifetime,[8] was ordered;[9] it ran from September 21, through May 24, 2010. In January 2010, the series was given an early renewal.[10]" not a full source check, but Lifetime isn't mentioned in any of the three sources attached to that sentence Done
• 2012–2013 television season should likely like to 2012–13 United States network television schedule rather than 2012 in American television, as the latter only covers one year Done
• The second paragraph of the lead as a whole feels very WP:PROSELINEy, likely because you have several announcement/renewal date on top of the other dates. With nine seasons, it feels a bit excessive to list every premiere and finale date. While this works in episodes lists with shorter seasons (ex: List of Torchwood episodes, List of Line of Duty episodes), I've started trimming it in longer lists (ex: List of Station 19 episodes, List of Private Practice episodes, List of My Name Is Earl episodes), both of which had fewer seasons than this. If deciding to cut it though, the lead may benefit from other information as to not be too short (see the aforementioned articles for reference ideas)
  • I don't think its a big enough problem to warrent cutting it
• I feel a brief mention of the existence of How I Met Your Father (and maybe the failed How I Met Your Dad at the end of the lead may be useful Done
• Any reason why Season 8 episodes 11 and 12 are using <hr /> to separate the episodes rather than individual parameters similar to the other two two-part episodes? Done
• Season 9 is missing a table caption Done
• I feel the ratings graphs may be both more visually pleasing and useful to readers if they were were split evenly (seasons 1–3, 4–6, and 7–9) rather than leaving 9 out there on an island all by itself Done
• May be worth appending |20em to the end of the notelist template to kill some of that whitespace Done
• Citation 2 is missing an author Done
• The official website is 404, but looks like there's plenty of archives to pick from Done

Think that's it from me. TheDoctorWho (talk) 07:28, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

• @TheDoctorWho: done all Olliefant (she/her) 07:58, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Cavan121012

• In the second paragraph, is there a reason why seasons one and seven are wikilinked but not the others? I see the eighth and ninth seasons are linked in the opening paragraph but the others aren't
• In the ratings section, the subheadings are wrong (Season 5–8 and Season 9 should be Season 4–6 and Season 7–9)

Didn't see much else, think the other reviewers covered a lot. Ping when done. Cavan121012 (talk) 14:52, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Olliefant

• "Philippines" should be linked on first mention

• Done

• "The Michelin Guides were founded by" I don't think "founded" is the right word to use here

• Changed to created

• "Manila and its other cities in the area" -> "Manila and other cities in the area" or something similar

• Done

• I feel that its somewhat difficualt to figure out what "Mega Manila" is from context

• Changed to Metro Manila and Cavite

• ".[5][1][6][7]" do all four citations support the entire preceding paragraph? Or can they be spread out to avoid the mess of four citations?

• Spread the best I could

• Link "Southeast Asia"

• Done

• "Michelin Guide" appears both with and without italics

• Italicized all instances

• "(DoT)" -> "(DOT)", sources and the relevent wiki article capitalize the O

• Done

• Ref 5 has an MOS:ALLCAPS issue

• Fixed

That's what I found ping me when done. Olliefant (she/her) 08:40, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

@Olliefant: Replied to all. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 08:49, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Support Olliefant (she/her) 09:09, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• The lead image could be made larger

• I'm regularly careful around fixed pixels in images, but done.

• Fixed pixel sizes should not be used, so I changed it to use the upright parameter -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:37, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

• "The inaugural edition of the Michelin Guide in the Philippines was launched in October 2025 at the Manila Marriott Hotel for the year 2026, which covers Manila and other cities in the area, and Cebu City,[5][1][6] officially becoming the fifth country in Southeast Asia to have a Michelin Guide" - this sentence doesn't work grammatically, as the current structure/wording indicates that the guide itself became the fifth country in Southeast Asia to have a Michelin Guide. I suggest re-writing it as "The inaugural edition of the Michelin Guide in the Philippines was launched in October 2025 at the Manila Marriott Hotel for the year 2026, covering Manila and other cities in the area, and Cebu City.[5][1][6] The Philippines became the fifth country in Southeast Asia to have a Michelin Guide"

• Done

• "one having two stars while the rest having one" => "one having two stars and the rest having one"

• Done

• That's what I got -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:27, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

@ChrisTheDude: replied to everything. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 09:34, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:37, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• It says Location (province) in the table, but the table puts cities in brackets, not provinces like the heading indicates. But the first one is province, and no city. This needs to be cleared up. Mattximus (talk) 21:12, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

I just fixed it myself, short list, easy to do! Mattximus (talk) 21:20, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

• Reference 5 should get an archive link though, since it's so important to this list. Mattximus (talk) 21:21, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

  @Mattximus: done. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 22:44, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Cavan121012 (source review)

Since you did a source review on mine, I thought I'd return the favour. Checked all references and they are all good, I've only got a few suggestions

• Not essential but I would recommend archiving all of the references, there's only four without them
• Just for consistency I'd wikilink the name of the website in the references, like you've done in refs 1 and 7

Since the references are all good though and these are only suggestions, I'm happy to Support. Cavan121012 (talk) 11:12, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• My only comment is that linking seems to be inconsistent. "Shrubland" and "grassland" are each linked only once, but "rhizomes" is linked multiple times. Also, if you intend to link any given item once only, make sure it's on the first usage, as "tubers" seems to only be linked on something like the third usage -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:11, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude: Fixed! --PresN 17:03, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:40, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98 (2/24/26)

• You could consider wikilinking bamboo.
• No other issues with the prose or tables.
• I'll go ahead and support right now. I'll try to come back a little later to do the source review unless someone else gets to it first. Bgsu98 (Talk) 21:03, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Shwabb1

• All images have appropriate licenses.
• Alt text is present and sufficient.
• Prose seems fine as well, so support and pass image & accessibility reviews. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 19:57, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98 (2/24/26)

I always appreciate seeing articles of Ukrainian interest!

• Lead

• "All listed monuments fall into at least one of the following categories: archaeology, history, monumental art, architecture, urban planning, garden and park art, landscape, and science and/or technology."

• "Science and technology" is one category, and MOS:ANDOR discourages "and/or" anyway. I can rearrange the categories if you think that would help with clarity.

• Sorry... then go with "...urban planning, garden and park art, landscape, or science and technology." Bgsu98 (Talk) 21:57, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

• Done. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 22:12, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

• "The first attempts to establish registers of protected buildings were undertaken in 1917–1918" --> I'm not exactly sure what the policy is with regards to date ranges, but I would phrase as "between 1917 and 1918".

• Done

• Table

• Because of the different phrasings in each cell, the sort function in the Date constructed column doesn't really accomplish anything.

• I'm using sort templates for dates shown in centuries (similarly to the recently featured Grade II* listed buildings in Greater Manchester). It's a bit awkward but the only workaround to get a more or less chronological order.

• @Shwabb1: Please let me know when you've had a chance to examine my comments. Bgsu98 (Talk) 21:19, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for the comments; I've responded in line. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 21:51, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

• Support. Bgsu98 (Talk) 23:59, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

MCE89

Reviewing as promised, with apologies for the delay in getting to this!

• Monuments of national significance are regarded as especially important — I think the fact that monuments of national significance are regarded as more important than monuments of local significance is fairly self-explanatory, so I'm not sure this sentence is really adding much
• enacted since 2015 and 2023, respectively — Suggest changing "enacted since" to "enacted in" or to "in effect since"
• and are protected and maintained by the Ministry of Culture — Suggest adding "are" to make the sentence read a little more smoothly
• has proceeded more slowly and remains incomplete as of February 2026 — Suggest adding "has" as the verb is ongoing

Otherise the prose looks good, nothing else from me. MCE89 (talk) 08:35, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

@MCE89 all done. Thank you for reviewing. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 10:01, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Support. MCE89 (talk) 05:10, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Olliefant

• Can it be clarified that Metro Surge initially targeted Minneapolis specially and then expanded to Minnesota?
• I don't think the lead image fits, maybe something from C:Category:United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations in Minneapolis in 2026 would be more suitable?
• The link Trump administration is to a set index page
• Link "Bruce Springsteen" under "Background"
• Jesse Welles's full name is used twice in "Background" the second should just be "Welles"
• Link "LP" under list
• What is the criteria for redlinks vs non links?
• Ref 16 isn't piped properly

That's what I found ping me when done. Olliefant (she/her) 08:20, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Thanks, @Olliefant! I'm withdrawing this, but for what it's worth:

• I didn't see that in any of the RSes I found, but if you do find one, let me know on my talk and I'd be happy to put it in?
• Put in File:Protest against ICE in Minneapolis - STOP - Deport ICE.jpg
• Fixed :)
• Done :)
• I know that's an option under MOS, but when I mention the same name in pretty different context (or at least, when there's no narrative throughline), I'm not counting on readers to remember the name and like to reiterate it in full.
• I don't think the lists should have more than one bluelink,* so I'm not sure that'd be a great idea, but I get where you're coming from :)
• Just the ones that looked notable on further searching, wasn't worth redlinking them all.
• Not sure what you mean?

theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 14:37, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

For the piped link, it may have been shuffled around numbers wise but Revolver (magazine) should be Revolver Olliefant (she/her) 14:43, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

ah, yeah! thanks :) theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 16:08, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• Lead image is absolutely tiny and should be made larger using the upright parameter
• "during the second Trump administration" - the link redirects to Second presidency of Donald Trump and I think it would be more appropriate to write that in full
• I think the blue sea of "see also"s at the top of the background section would work better as a dedicated "see also" section at the bottom. Some of them only seem tangentially linked to the specific topic of the article
• " – particularly ICE and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) were sent " - needs a "closing" dash to match the "opening" one
• Link Minnesota in body as well as lead
• "and though Pretti had a gun, he never" => "and, though Pretti had a gun, he never"
• "The same day Pretti was killed, Bruce Springsteen says he wrote "Streets of Minneapolis", which criticizes Trump as a "king" using a "private army"" => "Bruce Springsteen says he wrote "Streets of Minneapolis" the same day Pretti was killed; the song criticizes Trump as a "king" using a "private army""
• "Protest songs that are sung live at protests, however, help with morale and helps" => "Protest songs that are sung live at protests, however, help with morale and help"
• "Then, he had people submit their own additions to the song, instruments and vocals, to release" => "He then had people submit their own additions to the song, in the form of instruments and vocals, to release"
• Notes c and d are not sentences so should not have full stops
• That's what I got -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:31, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

  Thanks, @ChrisTheDude! Done most all of these :) theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 16:14, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

  Tag me when all are done -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:29, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude: Believe they're all done :) theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 15:01, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

  I don't think the second and third comments above have been addressed....... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:08, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Olliefant

• Add Template:Use MDY dates and fix the DMY date in ref 9

Fixed!

• [lead vocalist] [Karen O] is an MOS:SOB violation

Fixed!

• [keyboardist] [Nick Zinner] this too

Fixed!

• [drummer] [Brian Chase] bingo

Fixed!

• Tables are missing captions per MOS:DTAB

It might be because it was generated from the "awards table" template. (FWIW, I took reference from FLs like Metallica's award list and the White Stripes's awards list. So, I changed it all to one big table and fixed the issues pointed out below while doing so.)

• Tables are missing row and column scopes per DTAB

Same as above!

• The citations should be apart of the table instead of having the boilerplate "x won y amont"

Same as above!

• Add an EFN explaining if year means the year of release or the year the ceremony was held

Same as above!

• Tables should be sortable

Same as above!

• "five albums" what kind of album? I'm assuming studio but this should be clarified

Fixed!

• Alot of the tables only have one or two listings and could easily be merged into a big table

Same as above!

That's what I found ping me when done. Also FWIW the general consensus for awards and nom tables is against individual tables and instead having on big one. Olliefant (she/her) 05:29, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your review @Olliefant! I do want to note that I didn't merge the individual tables purely because I think it's more convenient to edit when they're individual. If it's a stopper for FL review, though, I'm not against changing it. Watagwaan (talk) 01:54, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

Support Olliefant (she/her) 07:40, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• " a key work of the 2000s rock movements" - should that be movement (singular)? If it was a key part of multiple movements, can you be more specific as to what those are...?

Fixed!

• On my PC screen there's a huge whitespace between the lead and the TOC. Any way to avoid this?

I put a clear template under the lead so that the table wouldn't get smushed/downsized.

• Any recipient/nominee that starts with quote marks should sort based on the first actual word. Currently all the ones with quote marks sort together at the top, before the ones without

I honestly don't know how to fix it, but to be fair, other featured awards articles like Lorde's seem to do the same thing.

That simply means that one is wrong and needs correcting. All you need to do is use a sort template, so instead of typing, for example, "[[Gold Lion]]", type {{sort|Gold Lion|"[[Gold Lion]]"}}. That will make it sort under G -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:09, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Got it! Hope this was good @ChrisTheDude Watagwaan (talk) 13:00, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

• That's all I got -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:48, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

  Thank you so much for your comments! I really appreciate it @ChrisTheDude! Watagwaan (talk) 11:55, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Looks great! One other thing I didn't pick up on earlier (apologies) - the linking in the recipients/nominees column is a bit random. "Gold Lion" and "Zero" are linked once each, despite appearing multiple times, but other things aren't linked at all. I think everything should be linked every time -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:02, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Don't apologize! Good point, thank you! Fixed @ChrisTheDude! Watagwaan (talk) 13:29, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:35, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Image review

Here will be an image review from me! Arconning (talk) 12:49, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

• File:1966 The Supremes.JPG - Public Domain, source link is dead; either must be replaced with an archived link, image is replaced entirely, or removed.
• File:Aankomst van de Rolling Stones op Schiphol, Bestanddeelnr 916-7420.jpg - CC0
• File:The-Temptations (1964 publicity photo by Kriegsmann).jpg - Public Domain, can't seem to find the image within the source link
• File:Hermans Hermits 1965.jpg - Public Domain
• Almost all of the alt-text for the images is present with the exception of the first image, this should be fixed for accessibility.
• All images are relevant to the article and have proper captioning.
  • @Arconning: - I swapped the two problematic images for other ones -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:03, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

  Pass Arconning (talk) 13:03, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98 (2/22/26)

• "Capitol Records, the label which held the rights to their singles in the United States, initially declined to release them, however, deeming them unsuitable for the U.S. market." --> There's nothing wrong with this sentence, but boy, does Capitol Records sure look stupid in retrospect! 😂
• I have no issues with the prose, the formatting of the tables, or the photo captions. Support. Bgsu98 (Talk) 17:55, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars

• Criteria 3c is an issue here. Does this violate the content-forking guideline? It certainly duplicates material from List of Billboard Hot 100 number-one singles from 1958 to 1969 or vice versa. Those decade lists as is should go to eliminate the redundancy. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 05:43, 27 February 2026 (UTC)
  • @Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars: - I didn't even realise that list existed. Nobody mentioned it at any of my previous nominations....... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:26, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "Early championships were organized by Slovenia's four skating clubs" - if only "early" championships were organised by these clubs, who organises them now and when did it change?
• Stanko Bloudek links to the article on a guy who died in 1959. Presumably the club is named after him, but is the link not a bit EGG.....?
• That's all I got -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:04, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

@ChrisTheDude: Okay, I did some research and it looks like the Slovene Skating Union was founded in 1991 as a federation of the four skating clubs, so those two entities – the Slovene Skating Union and the four skating clubs – are the same thing. I have rewritten the first paragraph to incorporate this new information, but I'm not sure how it reads. Can you take a look and let me know what you think? Bgsu98 (Talk) 21:20, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:51, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

Image review

Here will be an image review from me! Arconning (talk) 12:54, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

• File:Slovene Skating Union logo.png - Fair use
• File:2008 TEB Men Urbas01.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0, source link is dead so it must be replaced with an archived one.
• File:Teodora Postic at 2009 Nebelhorn Trophy.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0, source link is dead so it must be replaced with an archived one.
• File:2008 TEB Men Urbas02.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0, source link is dead so it must be replaced with an archived one.
• File:Grm - 2016 Euro - 2.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0, source link is dead so it must be replaced with an archived one.
• All images are relevant to the article with proper alt-texts for accessibility and captioning.
  • Just these comments and I think we'd be good to go!

• @Arconning: Thank you for letting me know; I have added archive links for all four photos. Bgsu98 (Talk) 14:05, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

Pass Arconning (talk) 13:03, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Shwabb1

I have only a few minor concerns. Great work as usual.

• Slovene uses sentence case for titles (Slovene: Prvenstvo Slovenije v umetnostnem drsanju)
• Not sure if Labod Bled should be translated ("Swan Bled"). Do any of the sources do that?
• Ref 1 is missing the language parameter.

Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 22:27, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Shwabb1: I have addressed all of these. As to the name of organization (Zveza Drsalnih Športov Slovenije), this website shows the name in capital case at the top, but sentence case at the bottom. Which would you recommend? Bgsu98 (Talk) 01:16, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

The website only uses the title case at the top of that page and in the copyright notice (probably a stylistic choice) but sentence case elsewhere. Searching the phrase brings up numerous instances of sentence case and seemingly none using title case. So, Zveza drsalnih športov Slovenije should be correct.

Support. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 07:49, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "as a contest on the dating show" - contestant, surely?
• "His first appearance was in 1996 as a contest on the dating show The Big Date, his first acting role was in 1997 as an extra on Ally McBeal." - you either need to change the comma to a semi-colon or make the second part a separate sentence
• "his breakthrough role role" - spot the stray word ;-)
• "in the 2007 AMC drama series Mad Men." - I am not hugely familiar with Mad Men but I don't believe it took place solely in 2007
• "he told The Hollywood Reporter, "it very conscious decision" - I am guessing he didn't really word it like that
• "citing Saturday Night Live and 30 Rock as examples,[4] he received three Emmy nominations for the latter" - comma to semi colon or new sentence
• "2000 Clint Eastwood film Space Cowboys where he played" => "2000 Clint Eastwood film Space Cowboys, in which he played"
• "various voice roles including, SpongeBob SquarePants" - no need for that comma
• That's what I got :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:12, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude: done all Olliefant (she/her) 15:18, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:37, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98 (2/22/26)

Lead

• You need an en-dash (–) between 2007 and 2015. Done
• "...winning his final nomination in 2015." --> That sounds kind of awkward; perhaps something along the lines of "finally winning in 2015"? Done
• "In 2024, he told The Hollywood Reporter, "it was a very conscious decision to lean into the comedic stuff" --> I'm not positive about this, but shouldn't the "it" be capitalized, assuming it was the beginning word in Hamm's statement?
  • It wasn't, the full quote is "That’s why, for me, it was a..."
• The tables all appear to be properly formatted!

@Olliefant: Let me know when you've had a chance to examine my (very few) comments. Bgsu98 (Talk) 18:05, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

@Bgsu98: done all Olliefant (she/her) 20:42, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Support. Bgsu98 (Talk) 20:50, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Image review

Here'll be an image review from me. Arconning (talk) 04:02, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

• File:French Federation of Ice Sports logo.svg - Fair use
• File:Evgeniia Lopareva & Geoffrey Brissaud 2024 Worlds Free Dance 2.jpg - CC BY 3.0
• File:Kevin Aymoz 2025 Skate America Short Program 06.jpg - CC BY 4.0
• File:2019 Internationaux de France Saturday ladies FS group 1 Lea SERNA 8D9A9151.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Vanessa James and Morgan Ciprès at 2016 Trophée de France.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0, source link does not work, please use an archived version.
• File:Andrée and Pierre Brunet 1933b.jpg - Public Domain
• Some images used in the article are missing alt-text needed for accessibility for readers who use screen reader software.
• All images are relevant to the article and have proper captioning.

@Arconning: I'm embarrassed at having forgotten the alt-text; I am usually good about those. It's been fixed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 12:16, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Pass Arconning (talk) 06:20, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

MPGuy2824

• A footnote for 1942 would be nice. WW2 was still going on then.
• All the junior titles seem to start in 2011. Maybe add a line about this.
• Support on prose (in advance since these are suggestions). -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:36, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

  I'm not sure what footnote I could add. Why and how France still held their national championships in Paris while under Nazi occupation is not explained. As for the junior-level results, 2011 is just the furthest back I've been able to track results, but that was not the debut of the junior competitions. Bgsu98 (Talk) 12:10, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• The only thing I can think to say is that if the junior events did not start in 2011, as your comment above seems to suggest, then I would suggest adding a note/comment/something to say that the junior events started at an unknown earlier date but that results have not been traced prior to 2011. Or something like that -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:32, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude: Added. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:22, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:28, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Image review

Here'll be an image review from me! Arconning (talk) 15:17, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

• File:00108 (여자)아이들 (G)I-DLE Gaon Awards (tweaked) (2).jpg - CC BY 3.0
• File:아이브 - 뮤직뱅크 출근길 직캠 IVE MusicBank Fancam 220624.jpg - CC BY 3.0
• File:"예쁨가득" 보아, 멀리서도 빛나는 물광 피부 BOA 보아 (디패짤) 02.png - CC BY 3.0
• File:Taeyeon for Elle Taiwan on 06042023 (1).png - CC BY 3.0
• File:Hyoyeon at Wendy's Youngstreet in August 2022 01.png - CC BY 3.0
• File:슬기 (SEULGI) Marie Claire Pop Quiz (derived).jpg - CC BY 3.0
• File:Wendy at Incheon Airport on September 9, 2019.jpg - CC BY 4.0, please provide an archived version of the source link.
• File:카리나(KARINA) SBS Radio (derived).jpg - CC BY 3.0
• File:Winter at SBS Radio on 21.10.13.jpg - CC BY 3.0, a YouTube CC BY 3.0 template for clarification would help.
• File:220701 Nayeon(나연) of Twice MusicBank Fancam.jpg - CC BY 3.0
• File:220804 뉴진스(NewJeans), 비주얼 파티.jpg - CC BY 3.0
  • All images have alt-text for accessibility, all are relevant to the article, and have proper captions.
    • Just one comment to address!

@Arconning, I have added an archive link to the file on Commons and also added the relevant YouTube CC BY template to the other image. Thank you for the review! -- EN-Jungwon 16:05, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

• @Arconning pinging. -- EN-Jungwon 15:10, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

  Pass Arconning (talk) 06:08, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• There are several uses of "number one single" or "number one song". When used as an adjective (as it is here) "number-one" has a hyphen
• Triple Crown sometimes has capital letters and sometimes doesn't
• Think that's all I got - great work! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:29, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

@ChrisTheDude, thanks for the review! Both comments have been addressed. -- EN-Jungwon 04:25, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

You've slightly misunderstood my first point. When used as an adjective, "number-one" has a hyphen, e.g. "Blackpink had the number-one song". When it is used as a noun, as in "Blackpink reached number one", it doesn't. I fixed that for you and am now happy to support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:34, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Olliefant

• [Tampico, Tamaulipas] is an MOS:SOB violation
• "Mexican [city of Veracruz]" -> "Mexican city of [Veracruz]"
• "central [Arkansas]" -> "[Central Arkansas]"

That's all I found, nothing to major just technical problems. (my FLC nom is missing is a source review if you would be so inclined) Olliefant (she/her) 16:29, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Y Corrections have been made. Drdpw (talk) 21:35, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Shwabb1

• The full name of and link to the National Hurricane Center is hidden in a footnote, so it's not clear what NHC stands for if the the footnotes are ignored. It's also not clear immediately who "officially" defines the start and end dates of the season without looking at the references. Therefore, adding "according to the National Hurricane Center (NHC)" somewhere in the first paragraph would be useful. With this addition, the wikilink in the first footnote can be removed.
• Add a wikilink to Grenada for "Grenadian".
• Remove the comma in "(miles, or kilometers)".
• Adding Template:Use American English and Template:Use mdy dates at the top would be useful to ensure a consistent style in future edits, though this isn't a requirement.

Will review the list itself soon. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 22:10, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

• Is there a reason why the absorptions of Tropical Depression Beryl and Subtropical Storm Debby into weather fronts are in the July 9 and August 9 sections even though the events happened "two days later" (July 11 and August 11, respectively)?
• Replace all instances of "Cabo Verde islands" with "Cape Verde Islands" (common name and consistency with Cape Verde).

That's all from me. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 16:03, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Y Modifications have been made. Drdpw (talk) 22:20, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Looks good; still missing the "Cabo Verde islands" → "Cape Verde Islands" changes though. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 22:42, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Y All now read "Cape Verde" Drdpw (talk) 23:31, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Support. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 07:37, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98 (2/28/26)

Lead

• I'm going to be honest: I don't like the first paragraph. The first sentence is very awkward. This sentence – "The season officially began on June 1, and officially ended on November 30. These dates, adopted by convention, historically describe the period in each year when most subtropical or tropical cyclogenesis occurs in the Atlantic Ocean." – could be merged. Perhaps "The season officially began on June 1 and ended on November 30. This is historically the period during which most subtropical or tropical cyclogenesis occurs over the Atlantic Ocean." or something similar? The last sentence is good.
• The second paragraph is good and succinctly summarizes the storm season.

Timeline

• "A tropical depression forms from a tropical wave about 65 mi (100 km) northeast of Veracruz, Veracruz." The redundant Veracruzes look weird.
• "...about 305 mi (490 km) southeast of Punta Palenque Lighthouse, Dominican Republic" --> as Punta Palenque Lighthouse is not a city, I would rephrase as "Punta Palenque Lighthouse, in the Dominican Republic."
• "The extratropical low formerly Beryl" --> This reads very awkwardly.
• "The extratropical low formerly Debby" --> Ditto.
• Under September 24, you don't need to wikilink Cuba.
• Under September 26, you don't need to wikilink Tampa, Florida (it has already been previously wikilinked).
• Under September 27, you should probably wikilink Leeward Islands.

@Dylan620: The timeline is very good with only the few issues I listed above. The first paragraph needs some work. Please let me know when you've had a chance to examine my comments. Bgsu98 (Talk) 07:00, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi Bgsu98, apologies for taking so long to get to these. I like your suggestion for the first paragraph and have applied it, as well as condensing the first sentence. All points regarding the timeline have been addressed. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 20:03, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Support. Bgsu98 (Talk) 21:11, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "Sveriges Radio's first single chart" => "Sveriges Radio's first singles chart"
• "was immensively popular with Sweden's youth" - I think you mean "immensely". "Immensively" is not a real word
• "where only one the jury" => "where only one jury"
• "most commercially successful artist" => "most successful act"
• "had the most number-ones " => "had the most number ones "
• "the Swedish act with the most number-ones" => "the Swedish act with the most number ones"
• "spent the longest time in the top-ten" => "spent the longest time in the top ten"
• Neither of the entries in the key should have a full stop, as they are not sentences
• Pat Boone image caption needs a full stop
• The key shows daggers for both items. Firstly, the symbols should be different, as having the same symbol for both does not help people who can't see the colours. And secondly, you have to actually use the symbols in the tables along with the colours.
• "merseybeat British invasion" is a SEAOFBLUE. Although, as "British invasion" very specifically refers to British acts "invading" the United States, I don't feel it is appropriate to use here anyway.
• "were listed as joint number-ones" => "were listed as joint number ones"
• "The voting that was to take place on 24 December 1966 was cancelled as it was Christmas Day" - 24 December is not Christmas Day. Maybe just say "as it was a holiday"
• "The Who had their only number one-song" => "The Who had their only number-one song"
• "The Bee Gees had their first number one single" => "The Bee Gees had their first number-one single"
• "Elvis Presley had his last number one-single" => "Elvis Presley had his last number-one single"
• Chris Andrews caption needs a full stop
• "George Harrison had his only number one song" => "George Harrison had his only number-one song"
• Lalla Hanson caption needs a full stop
• "The New Seekers had two number one songs" => "The New Seekers had two number-one songs"
• Michael Jackson caption needs a full stop
• "Björn Skifs managed two number-ones" => "Björn Skifs managed two number ones"
• "Harpo had a number one song " => "Harpo had a number-one song "
• That was a really interesting read. Nice to see a list of number ones here from a country other than the United States -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:49, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

  Hi, @ChrisTheDude! Revised the article based on your points. Seperated the key with daggers (†) and double-daggers (‡) and added them to their respective places in the article! VirreFriberg (talk) 13:45, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:30, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {{sronly|caption_text}} instead.
• Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Column scopes can be added by adding !scope=col to each header cell, e.g. ! Date becomes !scope=col | Date.
• Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. | 14 October becomes !scope=row | 14 October (on its own line). If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead.
• Images are missing alt-text.
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear.
• I would suggest that you use the {{Legend}} template instead of the table that you have right now.
• (please mention me on reply) -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:42, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

  Hi @MPGuy2824! I revised the article based on your suggestions, with a handful of inquires of my own.

  • Changed the tables based on these notes to the best of my abilities. However, I'm not very CSS-savvy so I might require assistance.
  • Added alt captions to the images for accessability purposes.
  • The key (legend) that is used on the article is done so to facilitate the usage of two symbols; (†) and double dagger (‡). Unsure of how they would be incorporated into {{Legend}} as the instructions provides no instructions.

  VirreFriberg (talk) 15:57, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

  • I've replaced the key table with legend templates.
  • However, I'm not very CSS-savvy This is mostly wikitable code. Don't worry, it isn't too tough.
  • You've missed adding the scope=col for the first col of the tables.
  • In the alt-texts there is no need of wikilinking things.
  • Also, I'm not a fan of "re" on its own. You can ape what Chris has done in List of Billboard Hot 100 number ones of 1959. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:21, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

    Hi again, @MPGuy2824. Thank you for adding the legend key to the article!

    • Added the missing !scope=col
    • Removed the Wiki links from the alt-image captions
    • Added the suggestion for the "re"'s.

    Thanks! VirreFriberg (talk) 13:37, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

• Support on accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:55, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

Thebiguglyalien

• A brief description of progg, even just a couple words, would help so I don't have to click on the link to understand what the lead is saying.
• The lead should probably mention Stockholm's role as a jury city.
• Do we know why Europatoppen was prioritized over Tio i Topp?
• Some of the notes are important enough that there needs to be some sort of indicator. Readers who only see the entry in the table might be misled if they don't see "often considered disqualified from the Tio i Topp canon" much lower.
• There are no annotations 1969–1974. That's fine if nothing happened, but at the very least it should describe how it ended.
• Why are the images at the end of the previous section instead of the start of the relevant section?

VirreFriberg, pretty good overall, just a few minor thoughts. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 00:56, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi @Thebiguglyalien! Revised the article based on your suggestions:

• added short description about progg (political musical)
• added mention of Stockholm as a permanent jury city until 1967
• incorporated some of the more important notes into the tables in the form of notes
• added the images to their correct positions in the article.

I have no idea as to why Europatoppen was prioritized over Tio i Topp, as the Hallberg/Henningsson book doesn't give any answers. According to the article on the Swedish Wikipedia (Europatoppen [sv]), Europatoppen was arranged by the European Broadcasting Union and was a collaboration between six countries which is probably why it took a higher priority. This is only speculation though, and without a reliable source shouldn't be added

I added no notes between 1969 and 1974 as (to my knowledge) there wasn't a single weekly broadcast cancelled during those five years.

Thanks for your time! VirreFriberg (talk) 11:23, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Support. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 16:39, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Olliefant

• Spot checks found nothing
• Dates are consistent
• Some sources say "Miami, Florida" while Ref 3 just says "Miami"
• Ref 3 also links Miami when no other locations are linked
• Why is Ref 3 broken up like that?
  • Ref 3 is generated from a template. I have just tweaked it to address the two points above this one. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 07:26, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
• Why does Ref 4 include the county but no others do
  • There are two places called Ferguson Township in Pennsylvania, hence the mention of the county for disambiguation purposes. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 07:26, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
• Why is Ref 11 not marked as a report?
  • Fixed. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 07:26, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
• Linking is mostly consistent, ref 10 should link "National Hurricane Center"
  • Addressed. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 07:26, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

That's what I found ping me when done. Olliefant (she/her) 23:20, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Many thanks, Olliefant. I think I've gotten everything. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 07:26, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Support Olliefant (she/her) 08:51, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

GiftedIceCream

• Timeline:Fabian's TCR says Fabian formed on October 4, not October 5.

  I'm not sure what you're seeing, because the timeline matches the TCR: 18:00 UTC (2:00 p.m. AST) at 24.2°N 64.5°W – A tropical depression forms... Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 19:27, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

  I meant the timeline below "Timeline of events" and above "June". GiftedIceCream 20:14, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

  D'oh! Thank you for pointing that out; taken care of. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 21:54, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

• 06:00 UTC (2:00 a.m. EDT) at 31.2°N 76.3°W" remove the link to UTC.

  It is common practice to link time zones on first use in timelines. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 19:27, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

• Image 2:The caption says "Track map of the unnumbered subtropical storm." Replace "unnumbered" with "unnamed".

  I get that "unnamed" is more common than "unnumbered", but the NHC's Preliminary Report explicitly calls this an "unnumbered" storm, and this is consistent with the main season article. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 19:27, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

• Can you find an image of Grace instead of the parent cyclone?

  Unfortunately, that's the best image I could find on Commons. There is File:Tropical Storm Grace (1997).JPG, but it is very low resolution, and I do not think it would suffice for featured content. I thought about replacing it with a track map, but this would disrupt the presently even balance between satellite images and track maps (right now there are five each). Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 19:27, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

• "There were no tropical cyclones in November." Unsourced

  I have fixed this by adding a citation to the MWR seasonal summary. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 19:27, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

• The rest of the images pass.
• All of the coordinates are right.

Everything else is good, ping when done.GiftedIceCream 15:30, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Much appreciated, GiftedIceCream; replies inline. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 19:27, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Support GiftedIceCream 23:55, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Hurricanehink

• Quick comment, there are probably 2 too many images. I suggest removing a few, probably the track maps. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:54, 21 February 2026 (UTC)
  • Apologies for the late response, HH. I've removed the track maps of Erika and Danny, since I feel that both of those tracks are covered in sufficient detail (breakpoints, in-between events, etc.) in the timeline itself. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 14:27, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

source review

• prose is clear and concise
• link bye to Bye (sports)
• verifiable sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 10, 14, 16, 17, 18
• 4 can include author name
• sources 11, 12 and 13 won't load
• Mohammed Issa not found in 15, otherwise it is good
• 19, 21 are dead
• 20 doesn't verify "first match", presumably this was covered in 19? 20's author is missing

Sahib-e-Qiran, He Who is Otherwise Known as ‪EasternShah‬ 21:20, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

@EasternShah:

• Refs 11, 12 and 13 seems to be working now.
• Added archives for 19 &21.

All else done. Vestrian24Bio 12:47, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

issa is a player in this tournament right? can you find a ref to include him I think that this may be fine Sahib-e-Qiran, He Who is Otherwise Known as ‪EasternShah‬ 13:31, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

@EasternShah: done now. Vestrian24Bio 13:21, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

Source review pass Sahib-e-Qiran, He Who is Otherwise Known as ‪EasternShah‬ 16:04, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

Olliefant

• The tables are missing row and column scopes (see MOS:DTAB
• The table under "Teams and qualification" doesn't sort the dates correctly
• Under "Squads" the abbreviations are not explained
• "ESPNcricinfo" is italicized under "Points table" but not "Squads"
• "ESPNcricinfo" appears in small text under "Points table" but not "Squads", also it's placement compared to the table is inconsistent
• Most of the "ESPNcricinfo" sources have MOS:DASH violations
• Under "Fixtures", why are both team names bolded? usually only the winning team is in bold
• Why are external links used in "Fixtures" and not citations?

That's what I found ping me when done. Olliefant (she/her) 11:18, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

@Olliefant:

• The abbreviations in the squads table are linked to respective pages.
• Teams in the fixtures are bolded by default in the {{Single-innings cricket match}} template.
• Scorecards are generally given as external links across cricket articles and other sports as well.

All else done. Vestrian24Bio 13:12, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Support Olliefant (she/her) 06:04, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98 (3/7/26)

Lead

• You have a self-link in the first paragraph (regional final).
• Recommend wikilinks wicket.

Teams and qualification

• "The top two sides of each sub-regional qualifier advanced to the regional final, where they joined Namibia and Zimbabwe, who received byes due to their participation..."
• The table is unnecessarily wide... Is the width set?

Squads

• There needs to be a key above the tables identifying abbreviations you use, like C and WK.
• Recommend setting the table to right-justification to match the others, as opposed to being centered as it is right now.

Points table

• You will also need a key here to explain these abbreviations in the table header.

Fixtures

• None of this is sourced.

User:Vestrian24Bio: Please let me know when you've had a chance to examine my comments. Bgsu98 (Talk) 17:58, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

• regional final isn't linked, it's bolded intentionally to identify the topic of this page.
• No width is set for the qualification table.
• c and wk are linked to their respective articles.
• The squads table uses margin:auto which aligns center by default.
• Points table headers use the {{abbr.}} function, it provides a tooltip for abbreviation.

@Bgsu98: all else done. Vestrian24Bio 03:19, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

• Support. I apologize; I somehow missed out on following up on this review. Bgsu98 (Talk) 23:47, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Vestrian24Bio: Wikipedia says your sources no. 8 and 20 are duplicates, so you will want to check on that. Bgsu98 (Talk) 23:49, 15 March 2026 (UTC)