Wikipedia:Featured list candidates

Drive-by comments

• I think the location column should sort on state, then city.
• A lot of the refs are missing archive links. Run iabot.
• Expect a prose review later. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:53, 23 August 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for the initial comments. I've split the state and city columns and run the archive bot. Sadly I don't think some of the refs are (or can be) archived. – Epicgenius (talk) 04:24, 23 August 2026 (UTC)

If you prefer to not split the location column, you can use the {{sort}} template.

archives not present: you can try to force the issue: https://web.archive.org/save. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:16, 23 August 2026 (UTC)

I have split the location column.

For the archives, it's that some websites) have robots.txt that prohibit archive.org crawlers from running (e.g. newer NY Times pages. Or, if they do run, send readers to a paywall (e.g. newer newspapers.com pages or this paywall landing page) or don't display properly (e.g. Google Books - trying to fetch an archive of this book sends readers to a page with details of book overviews). And books hosted on archive.org (as well as offline sources that have only ISBNs or ProQuest IDs) do not get archived. I've archived the remaining sources where feasible. – Epicgenius (talk) 13:59, 23 August 2026 (UTC)

Quick comment

Headings should be descriptions of the table, not notes (should not begin with "in the following table...). Suggest moving "In the following table, the buffer zone is an area surrounding a listed site that provides additional protection but is not part of the site itself" to a note for that respective column. Mattximus (talk) 00:25, 24 August 2026 (UTC)

I have done this. I don't necessarily agree that notes shouldn't go before the table, but I see your point that it is better as a footnote in the header of that column. – Epicgenius (talk) 01:50, 24 August 2026 (UTC)

Shwabb1

Will review this. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 06:23, 24 August 2026 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {{sronly|caption_text}} instead.
• Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Column scopes can be added by adding !scope=col to each header cell, e.g. ! Year becomes !scope=col | Year. If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroup instead.
• Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. | 1987 becomes !scope=row | 1987 (on its own line). If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead.
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear.
• All images should have alt-text.
• Color/bolding should not be used as the sole visual means of conveying information; use a symbol in addition. (You have a symbol in the key, but haven't used it appropriately.
• You'll need to use the upright param for the images instead of a pixel size (MOS:UPRIGHT).
• I suggest that the tables be simplified and background colors only be used when strictly necessary. e.g. if background color is needed for a row then only add it to the pharoah's name and not the rest of the row.
• (please mention me on reply) -MPGuy2824 (talk) 13:46, 23 August 2026 (UTC)

• In addition, many of the tables (for example, the one under First Dynasty) have mid-table headers, which is plainly against MOS:DTAB. Bgsu98 (Talk) 17:03, 23 August 2026 (UTC)

  • For PharaohCrab's benefit I'll mention that this is an MOS:COLHEAD issue which needs to be fixed. For "The position and identity of the following pharaohs is unknown:" I would suggest that you remove this and add a footnote to the "*" in the first cell of every such row.
  • Another point that I just saw is that the information in "Modern" table in the Second dynasty isn't really a table (the columns have nothing to do with every row). To indicate that it isn't a "data" table but a "presentation" table see MOS:LTAB. You add role=presentation to the table, drop the caption, change all '!' to '|' and it should be ok. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:40, 24 August 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98 (8/23/26)

• Support. I found only one missing comma, which I fixed myself. Bgsu98 (Talk) 17:09, 23 August 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "Canada had a 11–4–4 record" - this probably needs explanation
  • Expanded out.
• "during matches where De Rosario scored" => "during matches in which De Rosario scored"
  • Fixed.
• "He continued to hold the goal scoring record" => "He continued to hold the goalscoring record"
  • Fixed.
• ""Score" and "Result" list the Canada's goal tally first" - there's a spare "the" in there
  • Fixed.
• That's what I got -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:40, 22 August 2026 (UTC)
  • @ChrisTheDude: Thank you for the review. All comments have been addressed. SounderBruce 22:14, 22 August 2026 (UTC)
• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:08, 23 August 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• Lead image could be made bigger using the "upright" parameter
• "Chawla established herself as leading actresses" => "Chawla established herself as a leading actress"
• Any role which has a surname should sort based on that name
• She seems to have played a doctor several times, but "Dr" and "Dr." are used inconsistently
• "Filmed in 4 languages (Nattukku Oru Nallavan)" - I don't understand what this means
• "Punjabi film" - is there any need to write that when it already has "punjabi" in the column immediately to the left?
• Co-producers should also sort by surname
• That's what I got -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:49, 21 August 2026 (UTC)

  Hello @ChrisTheDude thanks. I have addressed all of them. Kept "Dr", changed to "The film was shot simultaneously in four languages with title Nattukku Oru Nallavan", removed "Punjabi film", added sortname toCo-producers.-25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ^🍁 16:59, 23 August 2026 (UTC)

  • One thing I just noticed (apologies if this was the case before and I just missed it) - the films from (presumably) 1993 just have a blank cell in the year column..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:10, 24 August 2026 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {{sronly|caption_text}} instead.
• Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. | 1987 becomes !scope=row | 1987 (on its own line).
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear.
• The lead image needs alt-text.
• Since you aren't using any functionality of {{sort under}}, you can remove that line.
• (please mention me on reply) -MPGuy2824 (talk) 14:27, 23 August 2026 (UTC)

  Hello @MPGuy2824 I've corrected all of the mentioned points. However, regarding ! scope="row" | 1987, I'm getting an error when a single year applies to multiple films in the same row. Could you please make the change for one of them, say 1988, as an example? I'll make the corresponding changes to the rest.Thanks.-25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ^🍁 17:04, 23 August 2026 (UTC)

  It looks like I forgot to change the example in my statements here. The year isn't the main cell of the row, the movie/series name is. You'll need to move the "!scope=row" parts to the cell containing the movie or tv series title. I've fixed the first table, please fix the rest. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:29, 24 August 2026 (UTC)

Comments by Birdienest81

• Italicize all titles of films and television programs even in the titles of references and articles per MOS:CAPS.
• Ref 48: Replace the hyphen with en dash (–).

That is all I have for now. Could you review 98th Academy Awards for featured list promotion?

--Birdienest81talk 01:17, 24 August 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "and the series Gossip Girl (2007–2010) and Kings (2009)" - maybe specifically state that these were TV series, as you were just talking about films and film series do exist.....
• "he financially struggled during this period" - this wording is a bit confusing, as you just referred to 2008 and 2010 roles but say that during this period (2008-2010?) he survived on residuals from another 2010 film, which doesn't seem to make chronological sense
• Possibly pedantic, but you say that in 2011 he was cast in Captain America: The First Avenger, but that film came out in the summer of 2011. Is it likely that he was cast less than six months before the film came out? Maybe change to some variation on "he made his first appearance as.....".....?
• In the tables, film/TV show titles starting with "A" or "The" should sort based on the next word
• Roles should sort based on surname not forename (where a surname exists)
• That's what I got -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:31, 24 August 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• The 2010 World Figure Skating Championships took place after the Olympics, so the qualification was probably the 2009 one.
• A few header cells in the Entries table span multiple rows and so their scope should be "rowgroup".
• The medal table needs a caption even if it is {{sronly}}.
• That's all I got. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 13:40, 23 August 2026 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Column scopes can be added by adding !scope=col to each header cell, e.g. ! Year becomes !scope=col | Year.
• Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. | 1987 becomes !scope=row | 1987 (on its own line).
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear.
• The attendance column should be right aligned since it has a varying number of digits.
• The infobox image should have alt-text.
• Per MOS:COLOR, color/bolding should not be used as the sole visual means of conveying information; use a symbol in addition. In the main table some of the venues only have a color. In the ranking table, there is bolding and italic without the additional use of symbols.
• (please mention me on reply) -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:53, 18 August 2026 (UTC)

  • Points 1 and 2 aren't done yet. This was for the second table. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 12:58, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "disagreements between the FECF and the UECF" - no explanation is given as to who/what these are/were
• "in 2023, the RFEF retrospectively announced that they recognized the 1937 Copa de la España Libre as an official tournament won by Levante FC,[2][3] distinct from the Copa del Rey" - was this at one time recognised as a Copa Del Rey? If not it's unclear why this even needs mentioning at all
• If the above is kept in, RFEF needs expanding/explaining
• "On 18 occasions, the winning team also won La Liga" - needs to be linked (and also a brief explanation given of what it actually is)
• "The competition was not held in 1938 due to the impact of the Spanish Civil War." - last competition to be mentioned was the Champions' League so this wording is unclear
• "Barcelona hold the record for the most wins and most finals appearances, with 32 from 43 total appearances" => "Barcelona hold the record for the most wins and most final appearances, with 32 wins from 43 total appearances"
• "(finding the net on each occasion between 1942 and 1945" - closing bracket is missing
• "Updated with official data provided by the RFEF, as of 6 April 2024" - yet the table includes finals after that date.....?
• "Official winners list provided by the RFEF, as of 2 April 2025" - same here
• The winners column does not have the symbols shown in the key
• Bold and italic cannot be used as the only way to convey information per MOS:ACCESSIBILITY (because screen readers used by visually impaired people do not read out that the text is bold or italic)
• Notes a, c, e, g, q, u, v and the last sentence of b are unsourced
• Notes f, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o, p, r and s are not sentences so should not have full stops
• That's what I got -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:27, 18 August 2026 (UTC)

  @Crowsus, I’ve done most of the work. Complete the rest. Wikipediæ philosophia (talk) 12:27, 18 August 2026 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude and @MPGuy2824, should've done addressed them all. Wikipediæ philosophia (talk) 08:52, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

• I now see a UK/US English disagreement, as both "organized" and "recognised" are used - pick one variant of English and use it consistently
• "the qualified Rojiblancos, having gone" - use of a nickname is potentially confusing to the casual reader. Just say "Athletic, having gone...."
• "between Basque clubs Ahtletic Bilbao and Real Sociedad" - Athletic is spelt incorrectly
• Bold and italics are still being used in the "performances" table in violation of MOS:ACCESSIBILITY -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:58, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude I've promptly done it all. Wikipediæ philosophia (talk) 09:13, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

• Support - nice work :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:19, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "held in Sri Lanka, which was organised by the Sri Lanka Cricket (SLC)." - Sri Lanka was not organised by the SLC. Removing the words "which was" would fix this
• "Each team was allowed to sign two overseas and two domestic players: one Icon player and one Star player; with" => "Each team was allowed to sign two Icon players and two Star players, one of each being a domestic player and the other an overseas player, with"
• How can a "salary cap" have a range (and a pretty big one at that) - a cap is a limit so surely by definition it is a single figure.....?
• "† denotes a partial replacement for the first few matches of the season." - I can't see that symbol used anywhere in the table
• That's what I got -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:28, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude:

  • Players in Icon and Star categories were allowed to have different salaries but within the specific range

  All else done.. Vestrian24Bio 10:15, 21 August 2026 (UTC)

  OK, in that case that's not a cap, it's a salary range -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:22, 21 August 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• All images should have alt-text.
• The tables look good from an accessibility perspective.
• Try to add archive links to the refs when the internet archive is working. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 14:29, 15 August 2026 (UTC)

  @MPGuy2824 I think every image has alt texts? I retroactively put them in before making this nom so it meets all of the requirements. And about the Archive links, i'll do it now. Monathephantom (talk) 14:49, 15 August 2026 (UTC)

  Check the maps. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 15:16, 15 August 2026 (UTC)

  @MPGuy2824 Done. Every image now has a alt text. Monathephantom (talk) 17:28, 15 August 2026 (UTC)

• Support on accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:35, 16 August 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "an single-concert event" => "a single-concert event"
• "The tour scheduled to begin on August 23, 2026 in San Jose, California, and is scheduled to end in Glasgow on February 28, 2027" => "The tour is scheduled to begin on August 23, 2026 in San Jose, California, and end in Glasgow on February 28, 2027"
• "single-concert tours" makes no sense as a heading, as a tour by definition cannot consist of just one concert
• "Lambert Jackson Productions added a second 3 PM matinee performance for the same date" => "Lambert Jackson Productions added a matinee performance for the same date"
• The date columns in the first three tables of the "tours" section do not sort correctly
• Cities appearing multiple times in tables should be linked each time
• "featuring music from the 2015 indie role-playing video game Undertale, composed by Toby Fox" - why do you make the first mention of the game/date/composer in the second section rather than the first?
• "the tour commenced its first performance on March 9, 2024" => "the tour commenced on March 9, 2024"
• "It was organized to celebrate the tenth anniversary of the 2015 role-playing video game Undertale" - you don't need to restate the date and name. You could just say "the game"
• "celebrating the 10th anniversary of the 2015 role-playing video game Undertale" - same here
• "The Undertale 10th Anniversary Concert was an concert tour" => "The Undertale 10th Anniversary Concert was a concert tour"
• "who previously performed the game's 5th anniversary concert " => "which previously performed the game's fifth anniversary concert "
• "The tour features live orchestral arrangements of music, by British orchestrator Adam Hoskins, from the Undertale soundtrack" => "The tour features live orchestral arrangements by British orchestrator Adam Hoskins of music from the Undertale soundtrack"
• "This concert has two showings" => "This concert has two performances"
• Notes a to d are not sentences so they should not have full stops
• That's what I got -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:16, 16 August 2026 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude Done. For the 10th Anniversary mentions, i kept them shortened and for the Determination Symphony, I removed them entirely as it's not celebrating the 10th anniversary of Undertale, unlike the Japanese concerts. For the Single-concert tours suggestion, i changed it to just "Single-concerts" as they arent really tours.Monathephantom (talk) 11:10, 16 August 2026 (UTC)

  "Single concerts" should not have a hyphen -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:22, 17 August 2026 (UTC)

  Fixed. Monathephantom (talk) 09:46, 17 August 2026 (UTC)

  The date column on the first three sortable tables still does not sort correctly. It sorts the months into alphabetical order instead of chronological order -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:52, 17 August 2026 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude My bad. It has since been fixed now, it should sort it by dates instead of alphabetical order Monathephantom (talk) 10:00, 17 August 2026 (UTC)

Comments from KevinTheCat

I saw you nominated this for FL and I thought I would give you some more suggestions.

• Specify the language in [nb 1]
• You don't need to link every single instance of something; i.e., linking "Tokyo" in every single cell it appears in a table is largely unnecessary. You should just link the first one (as you did for Japan in the "initial run" table).
• Some countries are linked (Japan, UK, etc.) and some are not (Canada, Netherlands, etc.).
• England and Scotland should probably not be listed as "countries", especially since you used "United Kingdom" in other cells.
• for reference [3] (and any others this appears in), Quotes inside of quotes are styled as "This is a 'quote' " instead of "This is a "quote" ".
• In The Determination Symphony section, both sentences use the same sources, so you could consolidate them into one by just leaving both at the end (you could do this with any citation, i noticed [15] does this as well) — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZKevinTheCat (talk • contribs)

  @ZKevinTheCat All changes done! Monathephantom (talk) 12:55, 16 August 2026 (UTC)

I think you misunderstood my last suggestion, I didn't mean that both citations had the same information, I meant that instead of citing both sentences individually with both citations you could instead cite both sentences with the citations at the both just at the end. I have fixed this myself so now you can see what I mean. Going over it again the only things I noted were some inconsistent links (which I have also fixed myself), and some merging issues. As you did in the last two tables, events that take place in the same city, venue, or country should have those cells merged to get rid of clutter.

I haven't noticed anything else wrong with the article (sources look fine, prose is well-written, it's visually appealing), so once the merging issue is fixed I can go ahead and give my Support. ZKevinTheCat (talk) 13:44, 16 August 2026 (UTC)

@ZKevinTheCat All merging issues has been complete! Monathephantom (talk) 16:01, 16 August 2026 (UTC)

• @ZKevinTheCat: For tables which are sortable, it is recommended that wikilinks be added for every row since the table could be sorted on any column. That said, MOS:OL also comes in to the picture here which says that "major examples" of settlements need not be linked. Tokyo being a megacity would fit that definition. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:19, 17 August 2026 (UTC)

  @MPGuy2824 Is it a requirement for everything to be linked in order to meet FL requirements? Monathephantom (talk) 19:00, 17 August 2026 (UTC)

  A frequent thing pointed out in FL reviews is "Link the first usage of XYZ in the list". For sortable lists, since quite a few of the columns can be used for the sorting, any of the rows may appear at the top. We always suggest that if a word is going to be wikilinked, then it should be wikilinked in every row of such a table. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:22, 18 August 2026 (UTC)

Vacant0

I have never reviewed a FLC nomination before, but I'll go ahead and review this one as the PR was closed before I was able to leave comments. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 16:53, 18 August 2026 (UTC)

The only concern I have is that the tables lack references. I'd propose creating another column that would include the references for each show. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 16:04, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

I removed the references column as it was just the same reference being repeated over and over again, and the sources listed in each section already verifies the location for each concert event. But, I could bring it back, but it's pretty unnecessary. Monathephantom (talk) 16:08, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

At least to me, it is unclear which reference(s) back up the tables. If others agree with me, we can then bring back the column. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 16:12, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

@MPGuy2824, @ZKevinTheCat @ChrisTheDude what do you three think? Monathephantom (talk) 16:20, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

If there's a single reference that sources an entire table, I would suggest putting it against the column header(s) just so it doesn't look like the table is unsourced -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:28, 21 August 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• The Steve Miller image caption needs the year that the photo was taken. The rest are within a decade of 1974, so they are ok in my opinion.
• "It was the only solo number one he achieved in the United States prior to his murder in 1980." Consider adding posthumous chart toppers as a footnote.
• The tables look good from an accessibility perspective.
• (please mention me on reply) -MPGuy2824 (talk) 14:39, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
  • @MPGuy2824: - done (hope what I did re: the second point is OK) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:44, 15 August 2026 (UTC)
    • It isn't ambiguous now. -MPGuy2824 (talk)
• Support on prose and accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:34, 16 August 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98 (8/16/26)

• Support. I went through the entire text and found nothing to critique; not even a misused or missing comma. 😃 Bgsu98 (Talk) 23:54, 16 August 2026 (UTC)

Easy image source review

• Question: did all of these images appear in previous lists in this series? - Dank (push to talk) 22:57, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

  @Dank: All of the rodent images did; some of the map images are new but only because I've been creating them one by one for the past few months, so they all have the correct tags (ex.: File:Pipanacoctomys_distribution.png). --PresN 00:50, 14 August 2026 (UTC)

  Image source review passed, but I haven't looked at the maps. I asked because I think this is one of those "trust but verify" situations ... I checked the licenses on the first 36 images for this list and found no problems. If you believe the rest (except the maps) have passed reviews in previous lists, that's fine. - Dank (push to talk) 01:24, 14 August 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• The only thing I found is that the notes for "Stung Right" and the next two songs as well as "Nearer My Job to Thee" and the next three are not sentences so should not have full stops -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:30, 12 August 2026 (UTC)
  • @ChrisTheDude: Good catch - fixed. Thank you very much! Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 07:55, 12 August 2026 (UTC)
    • Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:08, 12 August 2026 (UTC)

• Support on prose and accessibility. I couldn't find a thing for you to fix. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:03, 12 August 2026 (UTC)

• Pass on image review. Not much to say here, it's one image of a book cover that's well within the public domain, and has alt text. RandomEditsForWhenIRemember (talk) 19:39, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Column scopes can be added by adding !scope=col to each header cell, e.g. ! Year becomes !scope=col | Year.
• Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. | 1987 becomes !scope=row | 1987 (on its own line).
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear.

(please mention me on reply) -MPGuy2824 (talk) 13:46, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

Hi, MPGuy2824. Thanks for the quick feedback. Hopefully I have fixed this now, but let me know if I need to do more to resolve it. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 15:34, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

All good. Support on accessibility. Ping me when you fix the issues pointed out by Chris so that I can add a prose support. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:06, 12 August 2026 (UTC)

Hi MPGuy2824 = pinging as requested. Do let me know if anything else is needed. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 01:04, 14 August 2026 (UTC)

All looks good. Support on prose and accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:20, 14 August 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• As far as I can see, everything in the image captions is sourced in the prose so I don't think you need refs in the captions too
• "For the only time since the rankings were established in 1976, Dennis Taylor was not among the top 16;" - surely that should be "for the first time", unless he continues to be in the top 16 to this day
• In both points tariff tables, the top cell of the final column does not line up with the rest, not sure why.......?
• The footnotes need full stops -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:48, 12 August 2026 (UTC)

  In both points tariff tables, the top cell of the final column does not line up with the rest, not sure why.......? Took me some time to figure out, but those rows were missing styles that the rest of the rows were using. Fixed now. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:00, 12 August 2026 (UTC)

  @MPGuy2824: - still looks the same for me.......? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:20, 12 August 2026 (UTC)

  Not sure what happened there. Maybe I forgot to click publish last time. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:35, 12 August 2026 (UTC)

  Many thanks, ChrisTheDude. Hopefully I've adressed your points, but let me know if there is anything else. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 22:38, 12 August 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:55, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

Image check pass

All looks good in this regard. Three images that make sense, all have good justifications on their page and are in public-use, and have alt captions. RandomEditsForWhenIRemember (talk) 20:57, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "project later debuted on chart listings in 2026 internationally" - I think "project later debuted on chart listings internationally in 2026" would read more naturally

Changed.

• The singles table is sourced to chart data from the relevant countries. Therefore any release that did not chart anywhere is unsourced. You will need to add additional sources for these releases to confirm that they exist

Added sources to those releases.

• Think that's all I got! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:25, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
• Support on prose and tables. I haven't looked at the sources but I am sure someone will do a full source review -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:42, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• Please do this fix for all the tables where it is applicable.
• No problems that I could see with the prose.
• (please mention me on reply) -MPGuy2824 (talk) 13:12, 23 August 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98 (8/5/26)

• There are unsourced statements, particularly this one: While the Criterion Collection began releasing films originally on LaserDisc and VHS, they switched to DVD in 1998. Their DVD releases are considered the main canon of films in the collection, with the first DVD release being designated the first spine number. Thus, films previously released by the Criterion Collection on formats other than DVD are not included on this list.
• Colored background cannot be the only means of conveying information, as is the case on the table to differentiate between laserdisc and DVD releases. Additionally, there is no need for every cell to have a colored background.

Bgsu98 (Talk) 19:19, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Noted! I will gladly amend. As for the second point, how may I best differentiate LaserDisc, DVD, and LaserDisc/DVD releases without falling into WP:NOTCATALOG? BakedintheHole (talk) 13:00, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

Well, being released on DVD appears to be the default. So, you could notate laserdisc releases with (LD) and laserdisc/DVD releases with (LD/DVD). You could even use {{small|'''(LD)'''}} and {{small|'''(LD/DVD)'''}} to make them as unobtrusive as possible. They would render as (LD) and (LD/DVD). And then you include those in the color field of the key. Bgsu98 (Talk) 19:27, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

Great idea! Thank you, I'll add it! BakedintheHole (talk) 20:57, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

Ok! Fixed! BakedintheHole (talk) 00:30, 17 August 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• In addition to the above.....
• "the Criterion Channel launched, a streaming service" - there seems to be at least one word missing here (or if not, then the comma is not needed)
• In the tables, titles starting with "A" or "The" should sort based on the next word in the title
• Directors' names should sort based on surname, not forename
• As it's a sortable table, directors' names should be linked on each usage, not just the first
• Notes column is unsourced (eg without a source how do we know that film 8 is the first from Hong Kong and that none of 5, 6, and 7 were from that territory?)
• In the second and subsequent tables, bolding cannot be the only means of conveying information, because screen readers used by visually impaired people do not read out the fact that the words are in bold
• Note a refers to "both films being released as number 151", but there actually seem to be three films with number 151 in the table
• That's what I got -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:07, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

  Noted. For point #6, I am unsure of how to add colored columns in tables such as the ones I have created. Hence the bold. I would be glad to remove the bold, would you be able to show me how to add colors to those rows, please?

  For point #7, both films were released as #151 on Laserdisc. See the note and the legend. Is there a way I may make it clearer? BakedintheHole (talk) 12:55, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

  Bolding and background colors are both visual, so just adding a background color will not help. You'll need to add some sort of symbol as well. I suggest that you replace the bolding, with a background color and add a symbol too. Look at a current FL nom, (e.g. List of World Heritage Sites in France) to see how to do that. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 13:11, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

  Perfect example! Thank you!! BakedintheHole (talk) 17:46, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

  Re #151, the point I was making was that Traffic, Akira, and Letter from an Unknown Woman all seem to be #151. So that's three films released with that number, not just two........? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:07, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

  I think the issue is that two films were released as #151 on LaserDisc and only one was released as #151 on DVD. In concurrence to a recommendation offered by Bgsu98 above, I think I know a way to make this clearer and will try tonight! BakedintheHole (talk) 21:00, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

  Hello! I have gone through and organized every director by surname, as well as sorting films starting with "a" based on the next word in the title. However, for titles starting with the word "the", there are literally hundreds of films. I have been doing this all myself so far - do you know any tags I can put on the page or anywhere I could share it to please get some help? BakedintheHole (talk) 19:39, 12 August 2026 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {{sronly|caption_text}} instead.
• Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Column scopes can be added by adding !scope=col to each header cell, e.g. ! Year becomes !scope=col | Year. If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroup instead.
• Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. | 1987 becomes !scope=row | 1987 (on its own line). If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead.
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear.
• The image should have alt-text.
• Reviewers before me have already told you about the color/bolding issue.

(please mention me on reply) -MPGuy2824 (talk) 13:43, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

I just wanted to thank you for how helpful this guide was. I have updated the page with these specifications and I think it looks much better! BakedintheHole (talk) 19:40, 12 August 2026 (UTC)

Comments by Mattximus

• The sentence "This list uses the spine numbers of DVD releases unless otherwise noted for all films" should be in notes (linked form the heading of the table) and not in the lead.
• Same with "Film titles in bold text indicate the film was previously released on LaserDisc." Leads for tables should summarize table.
• Similarly, the two tables should have a short paragraph describing the list. For example. "there are x movies released by criterion from x to 2026". Something like this.
• The notes column is mostly blank, and not overly useful. Can this information be moved to a paragraph lead? For example, "The Grand illusion is the first French film in the collection, which now contains x French films".
• You mention countries a lot, would it not be worth adding this column? As of now I only know the first French film, not any others. Or language?

• Maybe a better suggestion than the previous two would be to replace the notes column with the country column, as the notes is almost exclusively country anyway, but would fix the problem of the nearly empty column with arbitrary info in it.

• You have dvd, and laserdisc, but not blu ray? This seems like an important omission.
• Image missing alt-text
• Movie "i live in fear" missing date
• Some notes have spine capitalized, some not. Is there a better way of putting these notes for spine number into the table itself, it's a bit silly to have hundred notes saying the same thing.

Quite a few important changes needed before it reaches featured list status. Mattximus (talk) 17:18, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

Fixed! I used most of these suggestions, but I believe point #3 may make the article fall into WP:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:NOTSALE,so I did respectfully avoid adding it. I revised the intro paragraphs in a different way that may fit it better. BakedintheHole (talk) 00:32, 17 August 2026 (UTC)

I don't see some of critical changes that need to be made, which need to be made to reach featured list. Please note which are complete and I'll take a look. Mattximus (talk) 02:12, 17 August 2026 (UTC)

Point 2, 7, and 8 have been addressed. Point 3 and point 6 have respectfully been decided against, as this would get me into the weeds of specific product type I fear would invoke WP:NOTSALE. Point 4 has been avoided for brevity and consistency between tables. BakedintheHole (talk) 12:56, 17 August 2026 (UTC)

I would say at the very least, point 6 needs to be addressed. If you write about the blu-ray in the lead, but not mention it in the table, it must be there. Also why mention DVD and Laserdisc but not blu-ray. I would have to oppose based on this critical missing component alone. Point 1 is also not addressed? I also proposed above an alternative to point 4 and 5 to see if you like that suggestion better. I'm open to different ideas, but that column needs to be fixed somehow. Mattximus (talk) 16:19, 17 August 2026 (UTC)

Films released on DVD/Blu-Ray are always listed under the same spine number. LaserDisc releases include films not eventually released on DVD. Thus, when applicable, I have listed them as either films released solely on LaserDisc or films released on LaserDisc later released to DVD. This would be moot for Blu-Ray. BakedintheHole (talk) 17:49, 17 August 2026 (UTC)

So to clarify, some are released on LaserDisc but not DVD, however all DVDs are also released as Blu Rays and have the same spine number? If then you can simply add that in the legend. If not, that would need distinction. It just seems so odd to have LaserDisc as a category but not Blu Ray. Any reader would be confused, as it's mentioned in the lead. Mattximus (talk) 20:00, 17 August 2026 (UTC)

A good point! Added! BakedintheHole (talk) 14:28, 21 August 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "Cole's musical career officially began" - not sure the word "officially" is needed here, unless she somehow had some sort of prior unofficial career
• "and was later certified a platinum" => "and was later certified platinum"
• "by the RIAA" - write this out in full with the initialism in brackets
• "produced the massive hit" - "massive hit" is a bit unencyclopedic. You quantify its massiveness almost immediately, so I would just lose those two words
• "has been certified platinum—while further singles" => "has been certified platinum, while further singles"
• "Her third album, A Different Me (2008), became the peak week " - this doesn't make sense, as an album can't "become a week"
• "The album produced three singles, such as" - as you go on to list all three in the same sentence, "such as" isn't appropriate. I would replace it with a colon (and remove "alongside" later in the sentence).
• "which became one of her releases to top the Top R&B/Hip-Hop Albums chart." => "which became another of her releases to top the Top R&B/Hip-Hop Albums chart."
• In the tables, any releaes that didn't chart anywhere will need separate sourcing, as they aren't sourced by the refs in the column headers
• That's all I got - nice work! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:06, 14 August 2026 (UTC)

  Thank you so much for the feedback! I am almost finished completing your suggestions, here are my replies!

  • I think it's best to keep "officially began" because it seems that Cole did have a prior unofficial career through 1998-2003 since that's when she was featuring on other musical projects and was apart of a short-lived trio called Grip before going solo and later signing to A&M/Interscope. (check "Guest appearances" and the Early life and Career beginnings section of her main article.)
  • I changed "Her third album, A Different Me (2008), became the peak week" to "Her third album, A Different Me (2008), became the pinnacle of her commercial success up to that point" instead. I hope that works!
  • I've finished the rest of the suggestions so far except for the tables.

  Cheers! Indigault (talk) 16:52, 14 August 2026 (UTC)

  I'm not seeing any sourcing for non-charting releases like "Next Time (Won't Give My Heart Away)"..........? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:51, 14 August 2026 (UTC)

  Yes. I'm still working on adding those as aforementioned in my previous reply. Indigault (talk) 20:47, 14 August 2026 (UTC)

  Hello! My apologies for the delay. I have now added sourcing for all of the non-charting releases in the tables. Cheers! Indigault (talk) 01:40, 16 August 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:02, 16 August 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• Please do this fix for all the tables where it is applicable.
• No problems that I could see with the prose.
• (please mention me on reply) -MPGuy2824 (talk) 13:08, 23 August 2026 (UTC)

  @MPGuy2824 Fixed. Thank you! Indigault (talk) 17:46, 23 August 2026 (UTC)

• Support on prose and accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:07, 24 August 2026 (UTC)

Drive-by comment

• The awards should all be in one table with the name of the awarding body as a column. The "lots of little tables" format has been deprecated for a long time. See List of awards and nominations received by SZA for an example -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:28, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  Fixed. –SassafrassAlabass (talk · contribs · finished projects) 09:13, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• The infobox image needs alt-text. Besides this and the sorting issue that Chris pointed out below, accessibility looks good. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 13:10, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  Added. –SassafrassAlabass (talk · contribs · finished projects) 10:22, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "Brandon Flowers has received numerous accolades" - "numerous" seems a little generous here given the number of awards in the table
• "First rising to prominence as the frontman of rock group the Killers, Flowers has released seven studio albums with the band since 2002." - all unsourced
• "Flowers launched a successful solo career with the release of his debut single "Crossfire" in 2010" - unsourced
• "which sold more than 400,000 copies " - unsourced
• " The Desired Effect (2015), sold over 100,000 copies" - unsourced
• "earned Flowers' an AML Award for Lyrics in 2015" - no reason for apostrophe on his name
• In the table, "Crossfire" should sort under C, The Desired Effect should sort under D, and Flowers' name should sort under F
• His name should be linked on each use in the table
• Some of the refs have formatting issues. Refs 4, 11 and 12 show no publisher. Many have no retrieved date. Date formatting is inconsistent. The author of ref 10 is not NME because NME is not a person.
• That's what I got -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:59, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  Fixed. –SassafrassAlabass (talk · contribs · finished projects) 08:37, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:16, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Dylan620

Source + prose review forthcoming. I've got jury duty today, but they told us we could bring our phones and some reading material...! Dylan620 in public/on mobile (he/him • talk) 13:46, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Disclosing for transparency's sake that I did already make a minor fix on the article itself. Dylan620 in public/on mobile (he/him • talk) 13:51, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Carrying out this review made me listen to the phenomenal Pressure Machine for the first time in a while, so thank you for that! The writing in the lede is clear, fluid, succinct, and professional—I have no concerns with the prose. I *do* have minor concerns from the source review, though most of it is down to ref formatting.

• Ref 1: Given that albumlinernotes is owned by AllMusic/Rovi, and in light of the RS/P entry for that umbrella, I am not comfortable with it being used as a source for information on a living person, even for an uncontroversial claim such as stating that Flowers became famous as the Killers' frontman.
• Publications (websites, magazines, news agencies) are wikilinked inconsistently. Some are linked, while others are not. The following three schemes...
  • All linked
  • All unlinked
  • Linked on first mention, unlinked after
• ...are all acceptable, but one must be chosen and applied throughout.
• All ref titles should follow the same casing structure, too, whether that means they are in Sentence case. or Title Case, regardless of how they originally appeared in the source. For instance, ShockWaves appears in three different ways (SHOCKWAVES, ShockWaves, Shockwaves) across three consecutive refs. All ref titles should be standardized to appear one way or the other.
• Onto the positives: the same date format is used for all refs, and the sources generally are awards organizations or reputable magazines.

Excellent work overall, and I look forward to supporting after the above issues are addressed. Dylan620 in public/on mobile (he/him • talk) 14:31, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Fixed. –SassafrassAlabass (talk · contribs · finished projects) 03:28, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Apologies for the late response, SassafrassAlabass. We're getting there, but we aren't there yet, as there's still inconsistent capitalization across many of the ref titles. For example, ref 2's title is capitalized in sentence case (Post your questions for the Killers), while the ShockWaves refs are capitalized in title case (ShockWaves NME Awards 2006: The Shortlist). One approach or the other needs to be consistently applied across all of the titles, regardless of how they appear in the source. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 05:22, 14 August 2026 (UTC)

Fixed. –SassafrassAlabass (talk · contribs · finished projects) 00:11, 22 August 2026 (UTC)

MPGuy2824

• Did a few copy edits.
• Improve the alt-texts for the maps. Currently it is "List of World Heritage Sites in France is located in France".
• 400 000. I'm not sure if you've purposely left out the comma or not.
• "especially in view of combining the architecture and sculptural decorations. " This needs something, but I can't think of a copy edit that doesn't use the word harmonious that is mentioned in the source.
• cave lion - disambiguate, if possible.
• Ha, menhirs remind me of Obelix.
• Will continue with the Tentative list later. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 14:33, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

  First round, done. Yes, Obelix :) This is where he is from ;) As for cave lion, there are two European species but one lived way before the cave paintings, so the choice which one to link is clear. Looking forward for the next iteration, thanks! Tone 16:55, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

• Continuing ... did a few more copy-edits.
• "Saint-Ouen Abbey in the background on the right" I think it is the one in the center but I can't be sure
• "The fortified towns of the Netherlands in northwestern Europe" Add some information about how many are in France, maybe with a couple of examples that have wikilinks.
• "numerous elements of intangible cultural heritage" I'm guessing that there is a limited number of those associated with this region. Add that number.
• A few of the images are missing alt-texts.
• That's all that I got. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 13:05, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

  Got it! I rewrote the pasture one, while for the fortified towns, there is actually nothing useful in the source, no actual place names or numbers. This is a frequent issue with those older nominations... Thanks for edits! Tone 14:58, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

• Support on prose and accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 15:46, 21 August 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98

Lead

• Is there not an appropriate target link for the Beaches of the D-Day Landings?
  • Not a dedicated one, so I am leaving it as it is for the time being. Normandy landings is a broader topic so I only link it in the text. I may put something together at a later time.

World Heritage Sites

• Chartres Cathedral – one of the most amazing places I've ever seen! Just sayin'.
• "The Arch is an important example of a provincial triumphal arches and it is decorated with low reliefs commemorating the establishment of the Pax Romana." --> Just a suggestion.
• "The city was a regional political and religious capital in the late antiquity." --> According to the page Late antiquity, "late" does not need to be capitalized.
• "Monuments from the previous eras were incorporated into a medieval city."
• "Communities practice sedentary pastoralism, as well as silvo-pastoralism and transhumance, in particular of local breeds of sheep." --> This sentences reads awkwardly, particularly the section I italicized. Recommend slightly rephrasing it.
• "Today, it is closed to the general public, but scientists are allowed to access it."
• "When it ultimately became a part of France in 1860 and was connected to the rail network, tourists from different countries started arriving."
• "Polynesians first arrived in the Marquesas around the 10th century..."

Tentative list

• "The cathedral was constructed in the 12th century on the site of churches from the previous periods, under Abbot Suger." --> Recommend shuffling some of the clauses: "The cathedral was constructed in the 12th century under Abbot Suger on the site of churches from the previous periods"
• "In the history of architecture, the church is important in pioneering the concepts of Gothic architecture."
• "The cathedral with three spires pictured on the right and Saint-Ouen Abbey in the background in the centre." --> This sentence is missing a verb.
• "However, Fouquet soon fell out of favour with the King and was arrested."
• "...which was founded in 1877 by the French military engineer Charles Renard in order to develop airships for military use."

User:Tone: Please let me know when you've had a chance to examine my comments. Bgsu98 (Talk) 01:40, 16 August 2026 (UTC)

@Bgsu98: Fixed all, thanks! One comment above. --Tone 15:28, 21 August 2026 (UTC)

• Support. Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:47, 21 August 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "The Blue Swords Cup was held every year from 1961 to 1996, after which point, it was incorporated into the new ISU Junior Grand Prix of Figure Skating series." => "The Blue Swords Cup was held every year from 1961 to 1996, after which point it was incorporated into the new ISU Junior Grand Prix of Figure Skating series."

•  Done

• It might be a silly question, but if the Blue Swords Cup has been held "numerous times" since 1996, why are those results not listed? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:45, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

• Those results are listed at ISU Junior Grand Prix in Germany. I have added an extra row to each table directing readers there. Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:58, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

• I would maybe change the note to "For results from 1997 onwards, see ISU Junior Grand Prix in Germany". But support nonetheless -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:55, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

  I amended it to For results after 1996, see ISU Junior Grand Prix in Germany. Bgsu98 (Talk) 12:08, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

• Support on prose and accessibility. I liked the anecdote about the fall of the Berin Wall. I read through the whole linked reference. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:04, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {{sronly|caption_text}} instead.
• Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. | 1987 becomes !scope=row | 1987 (on its own line). If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead.
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear.
• The infobox image should have alt-text.
• If the award already has an article, then wikilink it. If it isn't notable enough for an article, then remove that section completely.
• I'd suggest that you merge all the award sections together into one table.
• (please mention me on reply) -MPGuy2824 (talk) 16:17, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

  @MPGuy2824: Done. All captions and row scopes have been added. I also added alt-text to the infobox image and made sure all the awards were wikilinked. NP (talk) 19:44, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

  • You actually have to add table captions and not just leave it as "caption_text", Also put that line above the header cells. That's where reviewers expect it.
  • I also see tables where the row scope wasn't done.
  • I tried to look for a recent award FL for a person, but could only find one for movies. Anyway, I believe you should make one large table like in List of accolades received by United 93 (film). It would make comparison easier and wouldn't create an unnecessarily long Table of Contents.
  • Another point still remains with awards like "Music & Media Year-End Awards". Since they aren't notable enough for an article, you should remove them completely. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 14:49, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

    I'll work on adding caption text soon. Which tables are lacking row scopes? I can't find them.

    I'll work on making the list one large table, plus I removed awards lacking a separate article; let me know if I missed any. NP (talk) 20:00, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

    @MPGuy2824: Just finished adding captions and merging everything into one table. NP (talk) 02:25, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

    Which tables are lacking row scopes Well, now the single merged table is lacking row scopes. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:54, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Oppose in current form. Literally dozens of the awards/nominations are unsourced -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:29, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude: Just finished adding sources to all the nominations. Let me know if I missed any. NP (talk) 18:28, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Oppose. I agree with User:ChrisTheDude. You can't have that much unsourced content and expect this to be promoted. Either add the appropriate sources, or withdraw this nomination. Bgsu98 (Talk) 11:43, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

  @Bgsu98: Just finished adding all the necessary sources. Let me know if I missed any. NP (talk) 18:28, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Okay, I will take a look at this in a little while. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:07, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "He was well known for his eclectic work across multiple genres, flamboyant and androgynous persona, and wide vocal range which included a far-reaching falsetto and high-pitched screams." - unsourced
• "Prince began his professional music career in 1975" - unsourced
• In the table, any entry that starts with "A" or "The" should sort based on the next word
• Any entry which starts with a " should sort based on the first actual word (unless that first word is "A" or "The", in which case it should sort based on the next word)
• Linking/lack of it is very random in the table. Within the first three rows, Purple Rain is linked but 1999 is not. Everything should be linked, basically
• Some song titles are not shown in quote marks (eg ASCAP Awards)
• "Death of the Prince" - why the Prince? Also, what does this even mean - he won an award for dying?
• I haven't looked at the sources but I am sure someone will do a full source review in due course -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:21, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude: Thank you for the review! Added sources, links, quotations, etc. to everything. I think "Death of the Prince" was just a poorly translated posthumous award, so I changed it to "Prince". NP (talk) 23:37, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

  Sorting of titles starting with " or The is still not fixed -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:23, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  Also, on that 2016 award....."Best International Průser" - what does that mean? "Průser" is not a word in English -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:24, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  Which awards start with "The"? I can't find any. Also, "Best International Průser" translated to "Best International Screw-up", which makes no sense. I can just remove it. NP (talk) 15:01, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  Why was that even on there? Did you not verify these entries? Bgsu98 (Talk) 19:15, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  I verified all the English awards, but I don't know Czech so I assumed it was just poorly translated. The rest are in English and are verifiable. NP (talk) 19:29, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  "The Beautiful Ones" starts with The, as do "The Gold Experience" and "The Hits/The B-Sides" -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:31, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

  Oh I see what you mean, I wasn't thinking about song names. I'll work on that right now. NP (talk) 14:20, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude: Everything should be sorted now. Thanks for all the feedback. NP (talk) 15:34, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Note on table

I suggest using a sortable table for the entries.

• @Simongraham: Done. Min968 (talk) 11:06, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Image review – pass

There are four images included:

• The images all have appropriate captions and ALT tags.
• Ming Shenzong.jpg has an appropriate PD license.
• 孝端显皇后王氏（明神宗）.jpg lacks a US PD license.
• 孝靖显皇后王氏（明神宗）.jpg has an appropriate PD license.
• 明光宗皇帝.jpg has an appropriate PD license.
• While those that are included so far likely are the most relevant, consider including more images of his consorts and children if they are available, especially if the article is expanded through this review.

@Min968: This looks like it will be an interesting and useful FL once it has passed through this process. Please take a look at my comments above. simongraham (talk) 22:13, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

@Simongraham I think a bullet list is more practical and easier to navigate for Chinese emperors, who often had large numbers of consorts and children. Min968 (talk) 02:53, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "had 18 children by eight women, eight sons and ten daughters" - this reads a little confusingly, as at first glance it looks like he had 18 children by a combination of the women, his sons, and his daughters. I suggest "had 18 children, eight sons and ten daughters, by eight women. Of these, five sons...."
• "Empresses Dowager Li and Chen," => "Empress Dowagers Li and Chen,"
• "Lady Zheng was suspected of being involved in the "man with a stick" incident" - this really needs more explanation. What was this incident?
• That's what I got -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:56, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude All done. Min968 (talk) 16:39, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:24, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Drive-by comment

• Some of the "yes" cells are centred and others are not, and the two shades of green appear (at least to my ageing eyes) to be very slightly different. Any reason for this?
• Full review to come...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:05, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude: Thanks for pointing that out. Had to go and manually fixed the alignment. Also changed the colors to help denote what is uncredited. RobertFord II (talk) 20:19, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

  I see that you now have a key showing that yellow colour and a hash symbol denote something that is uncredited, but you haven't actually added the hash symbol to the relevant cells....... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:19, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude: Thanks for the comment. Believe I've made the right change here. RobertFord II (talk) 21:46, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Drive-by comment

You have yellow cells and green cells, both of which contain Yes as the only content. Cell color cannot be the sole means of conveying information. If you intend yellow to indicate that the actor's appearance was uncredited, I recommend changing Yes to Uncredited appearance. Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:02, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

@Bgsu98 - Thanks! Fixed those. RobertFord II (talk) 17:19, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {{sronly|caption_text}} instead.
• Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Column scopes can be added by adding !scope=col to each header cell, e.g. | Party becomes !scope=col | Party. If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroup instead.
• Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. | 1 becomes !scope=row | 1. If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead.
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. This is not a full review, and does not result in a support vote. --PresN 14:53, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

   Done

  RobertFord II (talk) 18:16, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "For his work on the screenplays for Ehrlich, as well as for Howard Hawks' critically acclaimed 1941 biopic Sergeant York" => "For his work on the screenplays for Ehrlich and Howard Hawks' critically acclaimed 1941 biopic Sergeant York"
• "Bogart would solidify his status" => "Bogart solidified his status"
• "The second film adaptation of the Dashiell Hammett’s 1930 novel," - should be either "The second film adaptation of the Dashiell Hammett 1930 novel," or "The second film adaptation of Dashiell Hammett’s 1930 novel,", but not what you have here
• "The final production by Hecht-Hill-Lancaster (HHL); Written by Ben Maddow and David Wolff; based on Alan Le May's 1957 novel of the same name" => "The final production by Hecht-Hill-Lancaster (HHL); written by Ben Maddow and David Wolff based on Alan Le May's 1957 novel of the same name"
• " Co-director with Ken Hughes, Joseph McGrath, Robert Parrish, and Val Guest; screenplay by Wolf Mankowitz, John Law, and Michael Sayers; Loosely based" => " Co-director with Ken Hughes, Joseph McGrath, Robert Parrish, and Val Guest; screenplay by Wolf Mankowitz, John Law, and Michael Sayers; loosely based"
• "loosely based on the life of American saloon-keeper and Justice of the Peace in Val Verde County, Texas Roy Bean; " - to avoid a confusing sea of blue (I thought at first glance that Texas was part of the guy's name) I suggest "loosely based on the life of Roy Bean, an American saloon-keeper and Justice of the Peace in Val Verde County, Texas "
• "A longtime passion project for Huston, development originally began in the late-1950s" - this is a complete sentence so it needs a full stop
• " Co directed with Frank Capra, John Huston, Anthony Veiller, Hugh Stewart and Roy Boulting; Due to much of the original combat footage from Operation Torch having been lost, " => " Co directed with Frank Capra, John Huston, Anthony Veiller, Hugh Stewart and Roy Boulting; due to much of the original combat footage from Operation Torch having been lost, "
• "Also writer, narrator, and editor (uncredited); The film was" => "Also writer, narrator, and editor (uncredited); the film was" (either that or make the latter part a new sentence. This probably also applies to the other instances where you have a capital letter after a semi-colon.
• "when it aired as part of a PBS special.;" - don't need both a full stop and a semi-colon
• Why does the final table suddenly use small text?
• That's all I got - fabulous work overall! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:45, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude - I've made all the proper changes. Thank you for the review! RobertFord II (talk) 20:10, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:21, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

Drive-by comment

• The photos down the left-hand side continue long after the table has ended, leaving a giant white space before the references. Bgsu98 (Talk) 23:36, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

  The whitespace is now gone when I view this article on my desktop, but I wonder how it will view on other devices? Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:24, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "first presented at the 5th Golden Globes held in 1948 — alongside the New Star of the Year – Actor category — and awarded" - the dashes around the "alongside" bit, combined with the dash in the award title look a bit confusing. I would just just lose the former.
• "New Star of the Year – Actress was presented in every ceremony — excluding the 34th Golden Globes — until" - same here, although her I might be tempted to replace them with commas rather than losing them completely
• "The New Star of the Year – Actress award was presented 34 times, to 58 actresses and one actor" - huh?
• "In 1951 and 1982, the award was merged with its male counterpart to create a unisex New Star of the Year category" - oh I see. Well that's not the same award then, so it isn't really accurate to say that the "Actress" award was presented 34 times or once given to a guy
• "producer of Butterfly producer" => "the producer of Butterfly"
• "It was presumed that Riklis had bought the award for Zadora, and following these events, the New Star of the Year Award was discontinued by the Golden Globes." - might be worth saying "after the following year's ceremony" rather than "following these events", as the latter suggests that the award was discontinued immediately after the Zadora fiasco when it actually wasn't
• I concur with BGsu98 about the images. The huge white space after the table ends looks a bit silly
• That's what I got -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:25, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

@ChrisTheDude: Thank you for the comments! I made all the necessary changes. Regarding the images and space, I removed a few of them, as I wanted to include only ones that were very high quality and large. Let me know if the page looks good now, or if I should remove a few more.--PanagiotisZois (talk) 08:55, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:31, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {{sronly|caption_text}} instead.
• Not clear why you have the tables split by decade; you're allowed to, of course, it just means that the sortability is forced to only sort by decade instead of over the whole of the awards.
  • I followed other awards that are featured list like the Oscar for Best Actress on this. I did consider having it all be one thing, but separating it by decade also made editing slightly faster. Plus, given the nature of this award, it's not as if any actresses have been nominated twice.--PanagiotisZois (talk) 09:00, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. This is not a full review, and does not result in a support vote. --PresN 14:52, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

MPGuy2824

• Pat Crowley and Carroll Baker are the only actresses to have received the award for two separate performances I also see that Bella Darvi in that same boat.
  • Rectified.
• Also, Caroll Baker is mentioned for 2 performances in 1957, but they were in 1956. Make it consistent with the other sentences of this paragraph.
  • I decided to remove the references to years, as to avoid making that section too bloated.
• Carol Lynley was the only actress to be nominated twice in two separate ceremonies Why was this?
  • I wasn't able to find a source discussing this? Perhaps she was still viewed as a "new star" and thus eligible?
• the ref column in all the tables should be made unsortable. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:15, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
  • Done.

Hey @MPGuy2824:! Thank you for reviewing this. Apologies for not answering earlier. It seems I completely missed your comments, or that this FLC had received additional comments.--PanagiotisZois (talk) 22:55, 19 August 2026 (UTC)

• Where a header cell spans multiple columns its scope should be "rowgroup". e.g. 1949 and 1950
• All the images need alt-text. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:59, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

Aoba47

• I have a comment about the following sentence: Pia Zadora's 1982 win for Butterfly was viewed as "controversial", with the Golden Globes facing scrutiny over their decision. I am not sure that the word controversial needs the quotation marks, as this win has attracted enough attention that in my opinion, it could be safely described as controversial without these quotation marks. The citations already support this information. This is admittedly quite nitpick-y.
  • I guess that's true. Personally, I don't have an issue with removing the quotation marks. I just included them because one of the sources actually used that descriptor, and I know that for us as Wikipedia users, to describe something as controversial can be a bit, well, controversial. But again, no problem removing them!--PanagiotisZois (talk) 22:56, 22 August 2026 (UTC)
    • Thank you for the response. That is fair enough. I would not have an issue with the quotation marks being kept, as I understand that this kind of clearer quotation would normally be recommended. I just think that in this case, it is generally seen as controversial enough to not need a quotation, but I will leave that up to your judgement. This would not hold up my review either way. Aoba47 (talk) 01:00, 23 August 2026 (UTC)
• I have a comment about the following sentence: At the Riviera, the HFPA members were also shown a private screening of Butterfly and saw Zadora herself perform live. I would clarify what is meant by "perform" in this context. I would say something like "saw Zadora sing and dance live". Perform could mean multiple things, and since this list is about acting, there could be some confusion with that. I think that further clarification could be helpful, particularly for people who are unfamiliar with Zadora and may not know she had a music career.
  • @Aoba47: I thought it best to use contemporary sources and looked through newspapers. Luckily for us, I was able to find two that provided additional information regarding Zadora being employed at the Riviera, and what type of performance she did for the HFPA members. Having said that, during my research, I did run into a source that disputed some of the narrative. However, as far as I'm aware, the LA Times article is the only one to state that Riklis wasn't the one to invite the members over to Vegas, and that they saw a different performance than Zadora. In my view, given that this article was written nearly 20 years after the event, I'm not entirely sure how accurate it is. Especially when most other articles confirm the traditional narrative. Regardless, I decided to add it as a note in the lede.--PanagiotisZois (talk) 21:42, 23 August 2026 (UTC)
    • Thank you for looking into this. I appreciate the time that you put into doing the research, and I think that you have done the best approach. It is best to try and be as clear and transparent as possible to avoid potentially spreading misinformation. I think that the list now presents enough information for readers to have a clearer picture, and they can look at the sources if they want to read more about it. This looks good to me. Aoba47 (talk) 22:54, 23 August 2026 (UTC)
• Sharon Waxman should be linked in the citation.
  • Done.

That should be everything from me. Once my comments (and the comments from MPGuy2824) are resolved, I would be more than happy to support this FLC for promotion. This list is quite interesting, as Zadora controversy has a lot of similarities with the Emily in Paris controversy. Some things just never change lol. I hope that these comments are helpful and best of luck with the FLC! Aoba47 (talk) 00:18, 22 August 2026 (UTC)

I remember a few years ago that Emily in Paris being nominated caused controversy, with even one of the show's writers/producers arguing that I May Destroy You was more deserving of a nomination/win. Did anything else happen with the Golden Globes? PanagiotisZois (talk) 21:43, 23 August 2026 (UTC)

There was major backlash against the Hollywood Foreign Press Association to the point that the 79th Golden Globes were not televised. I believe the HFPA underwent some major reforms in response to this, but I would double-check to make sure. I would not be surprised if this somehow affected the HFPA changing to the Golden Globe Foundation. And there has been scrutiny and skepticism around Globes wins outside of Zadora. To be fair to the Globes though, I would not be surprised if a lot of awards ceremonies have their fair share of controversies and criticisms.

But, anyway, thank you for addressing everything so far. I will wait to support the FLC until both of MPGuy2824's points have been addressed. Thank you again for all of your work on this list. Aoba47 (talk) 22:54, 23 August 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "One Battle After Another won a leading six awards" - "leading" reads a little awkwardly here to me. Maybe "One Battle After Another won the most awards, with six"......?
• "Sinners led with a record-breaking sixteen nominations, the most in Oscar history" - I would suggest this warrants a mention in the lead
• "At the age of 30, Timothée Chalamet became the youngest actor to earn three acting nominations since Marlon Brando" - maybe say when this was
• "Best Cinematography winner Autumn Durald Arkapaw became first female and black winner in the category" => "Best Cinematography winner Autumn Durald Arkapaw became the first female and black winner in the category"
• "Jeff Ross and Mike Sweeney, long-time collaborators of O'Brien, would also return as producers for a second time; Sweeney would also serve as a writer." => "Jeff Ross and Mike Sweeney, long-time collaborators of O'Brien, also returned as producers for a second time; Sweeney also served as a writer."
• "Each of the shortlisted films would have its respective casting director would then showcase their in bake-off via written notes on the process" - I can't understand this at all.........?
• "Voters must now watching each" => "Voters must now watch each"
• "stating that the member watch the film" => "stating that the member watched the film"
• "In accordance to recommendations" => "In accordance with recommendations"
• "In the Best Picture category, films released from the first six months of the year" => "In the Best Picture category, films released in the first six months of the year"
• "voting privileges all Academy members were invited to participate in the nominations round" - again, I don't understand this
• "Robert Lloyd of Los Angeles Times wrote" => "Robert Lloyd of the Los Angeles Times wrote"
• "The show also had 8.4% of households watching the ceremony based on Nielsen estimates" => "The show had 8.4% of households watching the ceremony based on Nielsen estimates"
• That's what I got :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:35, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

• @ChrisTheDude: Done – I have read your comments and made the proper adjustments and corrections based on your feedback. Thanks for the help.

--Birdienest81talk 00:18, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• I'm still seeing "Each of the shortlisted films would have its respective casting director showcase their in bake-off via written notes" - I literally have no comprehension of what this means. What's an "in bake-off"? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:18, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

• @ChrisTheDude: Done I've had added the word "work" as in "respective casting director showcase their work in a boke-off via written notes. I also added the word "highlighting" in case you were unsure what i meant was containing in the written notes.

--Birdienest81talk 06:44, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

I guess what I mostly mean (but maybe didn't express brilliantly) is that I just don't understand what a "bake-off" is in this context. My only understanding of that term is a competition to see who can produce the best cake. If it means something specific in the context of the Oscars, is there an appropriate link......? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:00, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

• @ChrisTheDude: I changed the phrase "bake-off" into a "shortlist presentation" since this phase of nomination voting involves submission of handwritten notes, a video on the casting process, and a Q&A with the casting branch which combined together functions as a presentations of the shortlisted (preliminary narrowed down list of potential nominees) nominees.

--Birdienest81talk 09:52, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:37, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. | 1987 becomes !scope=row | 1987 (on its own line). If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead. This is for the tables after the main Awards section.
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear.
• (please mention me on reply) -MPGuy2824 (talk) 17:18, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

• @MPGuy2824: Done – I added ! scope=row on the primary columns for each table.

--Birdienest81talk 07:39, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

• Fixed two issues and now I can support for accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:21, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Medxvo

• "eight of the ten films nominated for Best Picture had earned a combined gross of nearly $750 million at the American and Canadian box offices at the time" - The eight figures listed in the article add up to approximately $661.7 million, rather than $750 million. This source reports a combined gross of $662 million and may be useful
• "segments were dedicated particularly to Rob Reiner, Diane Keaton, Catherine O'Hara, and Robert Redford, with special presentations by Billy Crystal, Rachel McAdams, and Barbra Streisand, respectively" - I don't think that four people can be mapped respectively to three presenters. Could this be reworded?
• "including Best Picture and Best Casting, becoming the inaugural recipient for the latter category" - I would suggest "including Best Picture and the inaugural award for Best Casting"
• "Ruth E. Carter became the most-nominated Black woman, across any category, with her fifth nomination for Best Costume Design" - I would suggest "With her fifth Best Costume Design nomination, Ruth E. Carter became the most-nominated Black woman in Oscar history across all categories"
• How are the press releases included in the "Ceremony information" section relevant or encyclopedic? They seem unnecessary to me, and I think they should be removed per WP:NOTPUBLICITY
• Source review
  • Sources appear reliable and consistently formatted
  • Spot-checked refs 5, 6, 9, 11, 13, 18, 33, 38, 42, 48, 50, 52, 53 - no issues
  • Ref 31 does not appear to support that Alana Billingsley and Misty Buckley designed a new stage for the show
  • Ref 35 does not appear to support Ashley Nicole Black's appearance
  • Refs 2, 7, 41 are missing a publication date
  • Ref 28 links to an archived version of a different Variety article rather than the cited Entertainment Weekly article

That's all from me! Medxvo (talk) 16:57, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

• @Medxvo: Done - I have read your comments and have made corrections based off of most of them. However, the press releases under the Ceremony information section are used to give a justification as to why the Academy leaders chose the producers for the ceremony and what was the reaction from the selected producers. Press releases and statements have been used in these types of ceremony lists such as the 74th Primetime Emmy Awards (Following the announcement, Thompson called the opportunity 'ridiculously exciting', even with the relatively short window before the ceremony, adding that he 'just want[ed] to celebrate creative people in this business'."). It has been established in previous Oscar and Emmy ceremony articles and lists that this is the best way to convey the reasons and justifications behind the decisions of the people producing and running the show. Even if I decided to paraphrase their statements, the sources using the press releases would still be necessary as evidence for their reasoning. We can't just make assumptions out of thin air.

--Birdienest81talk 08:50, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for the clarification. Happy to support the FLC and pass the source review. Medxvo (talk) 21:57, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Drive-by comment

• "Thomas H. McIntosh" should sort under M, not H. The H is not part of his surname -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:16, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

  Ah that's a good spot @ChrisTheDude:, I've gone and fixed that. NapHit (talk) 13:29, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

More comments

• Wenger image caption is a complete sentence so it needs a full stop
• "The FA Cup is an association football competition contested between English clubs since 1872" - it started in 1871, not 1872
• "and is the oldest football competition in the world" => "which is the oldest football competition in the world"
• "Winning the competition was seen as an equal achievement" => "Winning the competition was previously seen as an equal achievement"
• "The role of the manager is to select the squad during the league season" - mentioning the league specifically could be taken to mean the role doesn't extend to the FA Cup
• "Due to the prestige of winning the FA Cup, the pressures on managers to succeed can be great" - does the source actually say this specifically (I can't access it for some reason)? I would imagine that pressure to win the FA Cup is one of the smallest pressures placed on a top-flight manager, yet this implies that managers are under massive pressure to win it..........

I've removed the reference to this. NapHit (talk) 07:34, 9 July 2026 (UTC)

• "while Ruud Gullit was player-manager when Chelsea won the 1997 final" => "and Ruud Gullit was player-manager when Chelsea won the 1997 final"
• Might be worth a note clarifying why so many early winning teams had no manager
• The Newcastle selection committee in 1924 is listed as Scottish. It seems highly unlikely to me that the entire committee was Scottish
• Under "see also", there's no reason to remove the word "the" from the link to History of the FA Cup -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:19, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for the comments @ChrisTheDude:, I've addressed them all. NapHit (talk) 07:34, 9 July 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:36, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

MPGuy2824

• For the main table, I would switch the header cell to be the year instead of the manager. That would be the unique element in the row.
  • Do you mean the row scopes? So, they switch from the manager to the year cell? NapHit (talk) 13:43, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
    • Yes, the row scopes as well as the "!". -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:37, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
      • No problem, I'll get to this over the weekend. NapHit (talk) 08:04, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

        Ok, I've done this now, @MPGuy2824:. NapHit (talk) 15:20, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• For the FA Cup-winning managers by individual table, I think you can remove teh rank column.
  • Not so sure on this one. I think it's useful to have it, as it gives the reader a quick indication of where the managers rank in the list. NapHit (talk) 13:43, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
    • Ok, then to maintain consistency within this page, you'll have to add that column to the "By nationality" table. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:37, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
      • That's done now. NapHit (talk) 08:04, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• Please find someway to mention that this is a knockout competition.
  • added this to the lead NapHit (talk) 13:43, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
    • Sadly, this is now causing a MOS:SEAOFBLUE issue. If you can't find a good place to put "knockout" without causing this issue, then leave it out. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:37, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
      • Can I chime in to suggest "The FA Cup is an association football competition contested between English clubs since 1871. Organised on a knockout basis, it is the oldest football competition in the world". Mind you, you might also need to address the fact (I didn't think of this earlier - apologies!) that a small number of Welsh clubs take part (and historically some Scottish and Irish clubs took part as well)...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:44, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
• The lead sentence is still a bit unweildy. See if "The FA Cup is an association football competition contested between English clubs since 1871. It is the oldest football competition in the world, and winning the competition was previously seen as an equal achievement to winning ..." works better.
  • Problem with this change is that the second sentence then becomes unwieldly. I've shortened the first sentence. Another option is to have this: 'It is the oldest football competition in the world' as it's own sentence, which could work. NapHit (talk) 13:43, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
    • See if "The FA Cup, the oldest association football competition in the world, is a knockout tournament contested between English clubs since 1871." Separation of the phrase into its own sentence, as you suggested, works too. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:37, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
      • Changed it to your suggestion here, with a slight change from 'English clubs' to 'teams in domestic English football', which goes some way to alleviating @ChrisTheDude:'s point about Scottish and Welsh clubs. Though I'm not sure if we should make that more explicit. NapHit (talk) 08:04, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
        • I think that works, as the only Welsh and Scottish clubs that have been eligible to enter in the last 140 years or so have been eligible on the grounds that they play(ed) in the English football league system -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:22, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• (please mention me on reply) -MPGuy2824 (talk) 14:27, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the comments, @MPGuy2824:, I've responded to all the points above. NapHit (talk) 13:43, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

    I should have addressed all the comments now, @MPGuy2824:. NapHit (talk) 15:21, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

    Support on prose and accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:06, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "an electoral system which relies on single-member constituencies that uses first-past-the-post voting" => "an electoral system which relies on single-member constituencies and uses first-past-the-post voting"
  • Fixed
• "The table below excludes European Advisory Council elections as members were elected by European residents, not citizens of the Protectorate themselves.[14][15] During these elections, Bechuanaland citizens also did not get to participate in the British Administration.[14]" - would be good to explain exactly when this happened, as these sentences are a bit context-free as it stands
  • Made clearer
    • I can see that you've added "during the colonial administration" but I still don't think this will be very clear to people who don't have a good knowledge of African/colonial history.... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 06:52, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
      • @ChrisTheDude: I've removed the segment entirely, since they aren't general elections. The EAC held no legislative power, could not pass laws, and could not form a government. I'm working on a separate List of European Advisory Council elections in Botswana, which will be in a see also hatnote at the top of the list. splains (💬/📝) 01:44, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
      • ChrisTheDude -- I'm not sure the ping went through. Please read above. Cheers splains (💬/📝) 02:06, 17 August 2026 (UTC)
• Any particular reason why the caption of the 2024 map differs from all the others?
  • Fixed
• Think that's all I got -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:28, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
  • ChrisTheDude, I believe I have addressed your concerns. --splains (💬/📝) 23:37, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

History6042's Review

Image review

There are relevant 14 listed images, plus one in a infobox template:

• Coat of Arms of Boswana.svg. The image has the following tag:This is not a valid license as such, being a "public domain" statement for the coat of arms definition only. It must be completed with the copyright tag associated to the picture creation.
  • The license seems fine to me...?
• Parliament of Botswana.svg claims that "this (election) apportionment diagram is ineligible for copyright and therefore in the public domain, because it contains no original authorship". It has a CC0 license.
• The other images are maps that have valid CC SA 4.0 licenses.
• The maps lack ALT tags for accessibility.
  • Added
• Suggest also adding an ALT tag to the template:Politics of Botswana.
  • Done
• Consider adding an image showing the change in voting intentions, as in the FA-rated article List of Liechtenstein general elections.[Liechtenstein elections graph.png]
  • Done

@Splains: Excellent work, and congratulations on your perseverance. Please do take a look at my comments. simongraham (talk) 22:10, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

• • @Simongraham: All done! splains (💬/📝) 04:54, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
  • Hi @Simongraham: just a quick follow-up on this! I've addressed all of your previous feedback and the updates are ready for your review. Please let me know if anything else is needed. splains (💬/📝) 09:54, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
  • simongraham -- Final followup. Cheers splains (💬/📝) 19:31, 17 August 2026 (UTC)

Source review: BennyOnTheLoose

Happy to discuss any of these points. Don't take them all as absolute requirements. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 23:25, 12 August 2026 (UTC)

• What is the source for the information on all of the maps under Electoral maps of Botswana general elections?
  • Removed images since they are not present at List of Liechtenstein general elections
• WP:BRITANNICA: "There is no consensus regarding the reliability of the Encyclopædia Britannica (including its online edition, Encyclopædia Britannica Online)." Can a different source be used?
  • Removed
• I didn't find a clear consensus about whether the The World Factbook (CIA) is reliable; it has been discussed at WP:RSN a few times. Given that the source is from over five years ago (9 January 2021), I'd suggest using a different source.
  • Listed as reliable at WP:NPPSG
• Embassy of the Republic of Botswana in Washington, D.C. is obviously not an independent source but is fine as used here.
• Looking at his email address and the citation for a paper of his on JSTOR, I think it should be "Molomo, Mpho G" rather than "G Molomo, Mpho"
  • Fixed
• Some sources are wiki-linked but others aren't. This should be consistent.
  • Fixed
• "EISA Botswana: Late British colonialism (1945-1966)" - I think that "EISA Botswana" should be the publisher, not part of the title. (similarly for other EISA onees)
  • Done
• What makes African Elections Database a reliable source?
  • It is supported by the EISA, the IFES, the UNDP, the ACE Project, and other organizations.
• I believe that sources should be in sentence case. (WP:CITESTYLE, e.g. "BOTSWANA" (PDF). Inter-Parliamentary Union. 1984."; " "IPU PARLINE database: BOTSWANA (National Assembly), Elections in 2004". Let me know if you disagree.
  • Fixed
• archive.ipu.org - I think this citation should show the publisher rather than this url.
  • Yep
• "Election Results". IEC Botswana. Retrieved 8 June 2024" - the archive service used is deprecated on Wikipedia.
  • Removed
• "2014 General Elections Report" - missing the publisher
  • Added

General comments

• I think the caption "Current composition of the Parliament of Botswana." shoud be amended per MOS:DATED
  • Done

I'll take another look after you have replied to these, hopefully there is nothing too bothersome there. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 23:29, 12 August 2026 (UTC)

• BennyOnTheLoose -- I believe I have addressed your concerns. Please check again. Cheers splains (💬/📝) 02:06, 17 August 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• I'll take a look at this one. Nudge me if I haven't done so by the end of the weekend..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:21, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
  • Support - I couldn't find anything to pick up on....... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:03, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

• Support on prose and accessibility. I too couldn't find anything to fix. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 13:54, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Vestrian24Bio

Placeholder. Will review. Vestrian24Bio 16:34, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

Hi Vestrian24Bio, did you happen to have a chance to look at the list yet? No worries if not. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 07:40, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "An interesting feature [singular] are [plural] the mountains" - maybe the easiest way to avoid this would be to merge it with a later sentence to give "The area features mountains of blue marble which are an important stop for migratory birds crossing the Sahara"
• "It was located on important trade route" => "It was located on an important trade route"
• "Lougou was place of worship" => "Lougou was a place of worship"
• "but have almost completely disappeared from the region by the 1950s" => "but had almost completely disappeared from the region by the 1950s"
• "It is home the endangered addax," => "It is home to the endangered addax,"
• "however, not all parts are navigable at all times" => "however not all parts are navigable at all times"
• That's what I got -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:06, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
  • Thanks! Fixed all. --Tone 06:30, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:40, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

Image review - support

All images are appropriate and have relevant licenses:

• Niger location map.svg has an appropriate CC SA license.
• Montagnes Bleus1.jpg has an appropriate CC SA license.
• Elephants bath park w Niger 2006.jpg has an appropriate CC SA license.
• 1997 277-9A Agadez mosque cropped.jpg has an appropriate CC SA license via Flicr.
• Zinder DSC 4487 (6328130381).jpg has an appropriate CC SA license via Flicr.
• La ville de Dosso 05.jpg has an appropriate CC SA license.
• Niger, Salewa (2), mosque.jpg has an appropriate GNU and CC SA license.
• Oasis-Bilma.jpg has an appropriate CC SA and GNU license.
• Djado-nah.jpg has an appropriate German CC SA license.
• Bastón de mando de piedra. Cultura Bura. Níger. Cronología sin determinar.jpg has an appropriate CC SA license.
• Giraffe koure niger 2006.jpg has an appropriate Flicr CC SA license.
• Termit1.jpg has an appropriate CC Attribution Unported license
• Réserve biosphère de Gadabedji 16.jpg has an appropriate CC SA license.
• Mare d'Ounsolo ou N'Solo de Téra (detilt).jpg has an appropriate CC SA license.
• Lake Chad (MODIS 2018-06-07).jpg has an appropriate US PD license.
• Niger2.jpg has an appropriate GNU and CC SA license.
• 1997 278-10 Sahara glyph.jpg has an appropriate Flicr CC SA license.
• Museum of Natural History Sarcosuchus.jpg has an appropriate CC Attribution Generic license.
• Le lac de Madarounfa 03.jpg has an appropriate CC SA license.
• Waving fisherman on Lake Chad (detilt).jpg has an appropriate CC SA license.

All the images have ALT tags for accessibility.

That all seems good to me. simongraham (talk) 15:55, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

Drive-by comment

I have a booklet published by UNESCO detailing all of their sites in the Czech Republic. I think I got it last year when the ISU was promoting Prague as the host of the 2026 World Figure Skating Championships. If you want it, I'll be happy to send it to you. Just e-mail me your address. Bgsu98 (Talk) 03:18, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

MPGuy2824

• The row about Agadez doesn't have a header cell.
• "Niger comprises about a fifth of the Niger river catchment basin" to "Niger (the country) comprises about a fifth of the Niger river catchment basin", assuming that's what was meant.
• "Terminalia leiocarpa- The" I think you wanted to end the sentence after leiocarpa.
• That's all that I got. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:52, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

  Fixed, thanks! Tone 18:42, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Support on prose and accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 13:56, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• A couple of drive-by comments (in no way a full review):
  • The article should not start "A list of notable paintings" per MOS:THISISALIST
  • While (as far as I know) not prohibited it looks really weird to have the reference column as the very first column. If refs are in their own column, the norm is to have them at the end -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:48, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

  Okay, thank you for this feedback; I will make adjustments now! ReelCosmix (talk) 15:49, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98 (6/25/26)

• There is no reason for the Reference column to be sortable. Removing that will narrow the column. Also, replace Ref. with {{Abbr|Ref.|References}}.

Lead

• "the first U.S. president" --> "the first president of the United States".
• "one of the many Founding Fathers of the United States." --> "one of the country's many Founding Fathers."
• No reason for "Patriot" to be capitalized.
• "Washington presided over the Philadelphia Convention in 1787, which drafted the Constitution of the United States, and served as president of the United States from 1789 to 1797." --> As written, this implies that the Philadelphia Convention of 1787 served as president of the United States from 1789 to 1797, which we know is not correct.
• No reason for "Vice President" to be capitalized.
• "he was entombed at Mount Vernon estate in Fairfax County, Virginia, alongside his wife Martha Washington." --> Did Martha Washington die before him? Because I thought he died first.
• "Washington was painted many times throughout his life due to his high importance in the United States." --> This is a very banal sentence.
• "Because he was also the first president of the United States, people wanted official portraits for government buildings, statehouses, and public institutions." --> Source no. 12 says nothing about any of this.
• "There were also no cameras during his lifetime, as they were invented about 50 years after he died, meaning paintings were the main way to preserve his likeness." --> Sources no. 13 and 14 say nothing about cameras.
• However, sources 12, 13, and 14 do discuss the questionable validity as to how accurate these portraits of George Washington actually were, which your lead does not discuss.
• "One of the most widely recognized paintings of Washington is the Athenaeum Portrait." --> Source no. 15 does not confirm this statement. The citation is also improperly formatted.
• All of the citations need to be cleaned up and archived.
• Note a: "This painting was never complete, although, many complete copies exist" --> Get rid of that second comma, and end the sentence with a period.

User:Realcosmixyt: To be honest, the quality of the prose is beneath what I would expect from a Featured Article/List. It needs to be cleaned up and strengthened to make it more engaging. It reads more like an essay a student might write for a high school history class. Oppose for now until major improvements are made. Bgsu98 (Talk) 20:39, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

Hello! I am really thankful for this feedback as I didn't realize pretty much all of the mistakes you pointed out. I have since fixed a couple of them, and I am planning to fix more. ReelCosmix (talk) 21:05, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

I think this is a very interesting topic, and I will certainly be happy to change my vote if the prose is strengthened up. I haven’t looked at the formatting of the table yet, but the contents of the table look good. Bgsu98 (Talk) 21:06, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

Another drive-by comment

• What's the ordering of the entries within the tables based on? As far as I can see it isn't chronological by date or alphabetical by either the title or the name of the artist. It just seems to be completely random........ -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:16, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

  Hey! Thanks for pointing that out! I've ordered them by date now. Oldest to newest. ReelCosmix (talk) 17:46, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Dylan620 (image review)

I've just finished looking over the images, and unfortunately there are some issues. Getting the positives out of the way: all images add encyclopedic value to the list, and are appropriately licensed for either Creative Commons or the public domain. Sourcing also verifies for most images, though I went over to Commons to fix some broken links (see my edits there), and I don't consider Christie's to be an adequate source for File:Thomas Sully, Portrait of General George Washington, 1842.jpg. The biggest issue is the complete absence of alt text. Quoting from WP:MOSALT: In situations where the image is not available to the reader, perhaps because they have turned off images in their web browser or are using a screen reader due to a visual impairment, the alternative text ensures that no information or functionality is lost. Alt text needs to be added to every image before this list can pass FLC; until then, this list falls short on accessibility. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 15:17, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

Hey! Thank you for pointing this out! I have added some alt text to a few of the paintings, and I'll finish the rest later when I have the time. Thank you again for pointing this out! I probably should have requested a peer review before blindly nominating this list for FLC. ReelCosmix (talk) 16:01, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

👍 please ping me when you're done, Realcosmixyt. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 17:42, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

Hey @Dylan620 I've finished adding all alt text, so hopefully that fixes that issue. ReelCosmix (talk) 17:49, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Also, I think Christie's is the WP:RS for this painting; I couldn't find any other sources. ReelCosmix (talk) 17:55, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

And so it is! My apologies—the Commons upload didn't link to the website, which I've now fixed, and the word "Christie's" on its own sounded very vague. And fantastic work on the alt texts. I'm happy to support on images. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 21:45, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Thank you so much! ReelCosmix (talk) 21:46, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {{sronly|caption_text}} instead.
• Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. | 1 becomes !scope=row | 1. If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead. The row header doesn't have to be the first cell, so for this one it should probably be the title, not the image.
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. This is not a full review, and does not result in a support vote. --PresN 14:45, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Image license review

Not checking the maps or alt text (since there's a lot to do). This image review only goes through Hellwald's spiny rat, about halfway down. FWIW, if an image with a broken source link has passed a previous review where source links were generally being checked, that works for me.

• The following may or may not have images at https://collections.nmnh.si.edu/search/mammals/; I looked at the given source links and couldn't quickly determine the answer:
• File:Apomys musculus.jpg
• File:Apomys sacobianus.jpg
• File:Apomys insignis.jpg
• File:Apomys microdon.jpg
• File:Batomys dentatus.jpg

• These done. The NMNH has the worst website for this, but for future reference- if you search for the species name, even though it looks like a gallery of results it's actually just examples, if you click on an image it pulls up a box with all of the images from that collection sample, including these. Links fixed.
  • Thanks, making a note of that. - Dank (push to talk) 00:20, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

• Continuing:
• File:Batomys granti.jpg: Broken source link: very few species images found at that site
• File:Batomys salomonseni.jpg: broken source link: site no longer exists
• File:Bunomys chrysoccomus.jpg: No source link. Also, a search for that species at Naturalis Bioportal (https://bioportal.naturalis.nl/en) comes up empty.
• File:Carpomys melanurus.jpg: source link broken
• File:Carpomys phaeurus.jpg: ditto
• File:Chrotomys silaceus.jpg: ditto
• File:Chrotomys whiteheadi.jpg: ditto
• File:Chrotomys mindorensis drawing.jpg: Opinions welcome on the quality of the image.
• File:Hapalotis albipipes Gould.jpg: Source link goes to a 301-page book. I didn't check every page.

• Worse, it goes to volume 1, but the image was from volume 3. Fixed.

• File:Crateromys australis drawing.jpg: Opinions welcome on the quality of the image.
• File:Crateromys schadenbergi AB Meyer.jpg: source link missing
• File:Crateromys paulus drawing.jpg: Opinions welcome on the quality of the image.
• File:Crunomys fallax.jpg: broken source link
• - Dank (push to talk) 11:59, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
• Let me know if you want help with any of this. - Dank (push to talk) 02:20, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

• Responded inline for the ones I could correct; removed all others. --PresN 21:51, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
  • Thanks much. I'll keep going ... I'll cover about half of the image list, since this is a long one. - Dank (push to talk) 00:38, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

The following two have no source link, and it's the same search as one of the failed searches above.

• File:Echiothrix leucura.png:
• File:Lenomys meyeri.png:

• Removed both

• Continuing:
• File:Echiothrix centrosa.jpg: fixed the source link
• File:Komodomys rintjanus.jpg: source link found and added
• File:Lenothrix cana.jpg: [The file name is wrong, you correctly have Lenothrix canus]: Searched on lenothrix at the Smithsonian, followed the various links, couldn't find this image.

• Found and fixed

• File:Leporillus apicalis - Gould.jpg: page not found, and nothing found at https://museumsvictoria.com.au in a search

• Found in the book from the first section and fixed

• File:Limnomys sibuanus Mearns, 1905 - USNM 125228.jpg: fixed the source link
• Okay, that covers down through Hellwald's spiny rat, which should be about halfway. Hopefully some kind soul will finish up! - Dank (push to talk) 03:08, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

• Thank you! --PresN 14:20, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
  • De nada. Looks good. - Dank (push to talk) 17:55, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

Continuing . - Dank (push to talk) 02:55, 11 July 2026 (UTC)

• File:Maxomys-whiteheadi-1.jpeg: no source link

• Removed, arkive is a long-dead site and very hard to search in archive.org

• File:Mesembriomys macrurus.jpg: It's on p. 333, I added the page number at Commons
• File:Micromysminutus1.jpg: The page says the uploader was User:Hecke, but that account doesn't seem to exist on the English or German Wikipedias. There's a User:Hecke at Commons, don't know if it's the same (last comment was 18 years ago).

• That one looks like a personal photo so I believe it

• File:Paramelomys platyops.jpg: The source link goes to a page that links to another page with 22K images.

• That's the entire mammal dataset... can't find it by searching, dropped.

• File:Rattus leucopus 3170.jpg: I don't see an image at the linked page

• Can't find, dropped

• File:Celænomys silaceus and Rhynchomys soricoides.jpg: broken source link

• Removed

• File:Archboldomys kalinga 2008 stamp of the Philippines.jpg: I don't see an image at the linked page

• It's there, details only show up if you log in

• File:Giant White-tailed Rat.jpg: Your call. Source link goes to a page that says all the images are copyrighted; last line of that page has a link to terms of use, which say "You are free to use any of my photos for personal and educational purposes provided ..."

• I don't think that's good enough for CC, replaced with a verified iNaturalist photo.

• That's all of them.
• - Dank (push to talk) 03:50, 11 July 2026 (UTC)

• @Dank: Done, thank you so much! --PresN 14:20, 11 July 2026 (UTC)

• Passed image license check. No problem, my pleasure (when I can find the time). - Dank (push to talk) 17:58, 11 July 2026 (UTC)

MPGuy2824

• "grasslands, and savannas, and deserts, though some species can be found in deserts ..." Remove deserts from one part of the sentence.
• In Cheesman's vlei rat, "Taylor" goes to an article about a football manager. There are a few other places too where this article is wikilinked.
• Bush rat has 4 subspecies according to its article and the range map.
• File:Distribution Archboldomys.svg can be used unless you see a problem with it.
• In Vandeleuria, "Diet: Fruit, buds, and shoorts": I guess you meant "shoots".
• That's all that I got. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 13:19, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

  @MPGuy2824: All fixed; I couldn't use the image because it didn't cite where it got the distribution info from, but I went and manually verified that it matched the IUCN and updated the image page so now I can. Thanks for reviewing! --PresN 14:07, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

• Support on prose and accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 14:25, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98 (8/11/26)

I apologize for not reviewing this earlier, but holy cow! that is a long list of mice.

• Camiguin forest mouse – The range says the Philippines, but the image shows a small circle. Is that a particular island in the Philippines?
• Large Mindoro forest mouse & Luzon montane forest mouse – The range says the Philippines, but you have a map of the world, when plenty of other mice have maps of the Philippines, even without specific ranges shaded.
• Actually, all of these Filipino mice could probably have better range descriptions than just "Philippines", considering they're islands and probably isolated.
• I'm going to say the same thing about Indonesia. For example, starting with Andrew's hill rat, I don't even know what island that is on the map. Like, if it didn't say Indonesia, I wouldn't even recognize it as Indonesia.
• Small pencil-tailed tree mouse – "Island of Borneo" really should just be "Borneo".

• Fixed

• Montane shaggy rat – I feel like the DRC has already been wikilinked.

• Fixed

• Genus Echiothrix – Another unrecognizable map; recommend at least identifying the island.
• Rakali – "southeastern Asia" doesn't seem like an apt description here. Southeast Asia implies mainland Asia (Vietname, Laos, etc.). This looks like New Guinea.

• It's not just New Guinea, it's a bunch of islands around it, so I'm being more general

• Beginning with Ernst Mayr's water rat – three identical maps in a row, yet the first says New Guinea, while the last two say Papua New Guinea.

• Removed the map, it's pretty far off what the IUCN has and has some species split apart that the list doesn't, so it's just confusing

• House mouse – Range says Western and central Africa; the map shows the whole damn planet covered. 😂

• Fixed

• Coxing's white-bellied rat – I feel like this is the first mention of Taiwan.

• Nope, Taiwan field mouse way up above

• Sloggett's vlei rat – I feel like this is the first mention of Lesotho.

• Linked

• Giant white-tailed rat – "Northern Australia and New Guinea and nearby islands" --> Recommend putting a comma after "Australia".

• Fixed

User:PresN: Let me know when you have had a chance to examine my comments. Bgsu98 (Talk) 21:48, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

@Bgsu98: Got as much of the "Indonesia" and "Philippines" ones to have specific islands if available. Replied inline for the rest. --PresN 01:12, 12 August 2026 (UTC)

• Support. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:35, 12 August 2026 (UTC)

Dylan620

• I feel like the lede should be expanded. At the risk of comparing apples to oranges (theater performers to musicians), the two most recently promoted live performance FLs—Coldplay and Justin Timberlake—both have longer ledes, substantially so in the case of Coldplay.
• Following his 2017 television debut, which was...? This is related to the above – I don't think the lede in its current state has enough detail, though what's already here is well-written.
• I do like the lede image – it portrays him well, the sourcing and licensing both verify, and props for including alt text.

That's it for now. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 19:07, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

Hi @Dylan620, sorry it took me awhile. I’ve expand the lede a bit. Would you mind to take a look. Thank you in advance. Preferwiki (talk) 06:37, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for expanding the lede, but we have new issues:

• What is a joint concert? Did Kim perform with other musicians? If so, then who?
• television debut as supporting role – this currently reads like a placeholder. I would either replace supporting role with the role in question, or as with in a.
• He has also headlined solo tours across Asia. I assume this is referring to solo concert tours? I don't see anything in the body of the list about solo concerts. If the recent Coldplay FL is anything to go from, then each concert should be listed somehow. You know better than I whether this would enter dynamic list territory, but as it currently stands, I'm seeing that my earlier concerns with a lack of comprehensiveness were justified. I note that a cursory Google search for 'kim-seon ho concerts' yielded mentions of a Love Factory Tour – each show from that tour, and any others, should be added to the list.

I'm sorry, Preferwiki, but I must oppose for now per my above concerns, especially the last. I don't think this is comprehensive enough to be featured at this time. I do believe there is a lot of potential here, and I will reconsider my oppose if Kim's solo tours/concerts are added to the list. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 21:06, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Hi @Dylan620. I have added the tour as per your suggestion and also made some updates incorporating your three points above. Please have a look. Thank you. Preferwiki (talk) 00:52, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Much appreciated Preferwiki. I'll take a closer look later today or tonight, but I've struck my oppose as you've addressed the main reason for it. Both new images pass the image review, too (alt text, check; appropriate licensing, check; encyclopedic value, check; sourcing, check). Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 07:58, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

@Preferwiki: I'm happy with the changes made, and close to supporting. I have one more concern with the prose: what is meant by digital fan single? Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 19:37, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

@Dylan620 He wrote the digital single for his fans. Should I rephrase that to clarify? Preferwiki (talk) 20:58, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

@Preferwiki: I would say so, because the current wording on its own could imply that it was a fanmade single. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 21:19, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

@Dylan620, I rephrase into this: On April 30, 2024, Kim released the digital single "Miracle" across major music platforms. Written for his fans, the song was co-written by Kim and lyricist Kim Ji-hyang. Preferwiki (talk) 21:31, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

That works for me and I'm pleased to support. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 21:56, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your help @Dylan620 Preferwiki (talk) 22:02, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Of course! Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 22:39, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Column scopes can be added by adding !scope=col to each header cell, e.g. | Party becomes !scope=col | Party. If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroup instead. You have scopes for most of your columns, but not the sub-column headers.
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. This is not a full review, and does not result in a support vote. --PresN 14:44, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

  Hi @PresN, I have tried to incorporate ur feedbacks. Would you mind to take a look? Sorry it took me a while. Thanks in advance. Preferwiki (talk) 06:38, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

  Looks good! --PresN 01:03, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  Thanks for ur feedback @PresN Preferwiki (talk) 06:23, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

MPGuy2824

• Symbols like ₮, §, ฿ and ₩ are hard to pick out and differentiate at small font sizes. Can you use clearer ones please?
• I think you can remove the "Individual Triple Crown race winners" section completely. Essentially, they are horses that came close, but didn't win the triple crown for that year. If you decide to have pages for these individual triple crowns, then maybe that particular table would be more relevant there.
• Support on accessibility.
• Expect a prose review soon. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:28, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for taking a look MP! I get what you mean about the individual winners, I've been mulling that for a while. I'll look to port that over to its own page ala List of winners of Triple Crown of Motorsport races today or tomorrow.

For the symbols, I've changed these all to block symbols (●▲■★); are these any better? Happy to change these again if not - other pages I looked at weren't consistent in their picks. RandomEditsForWhenIRemember (talk) 11:43, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Update: I've spun off the individual winners to List of winners of Japanese Thoroughbred Triple Crown races RandomEditsForWhenIRemember (talk) 11:40, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

These symbols are better than the previous ones, yes. But, if another reviewer gives you a better suggestion, use that. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:55, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

Prose review

• Spring and Autumn Triple Crowns respectively. Unbold the "and".
• "The original races' forms were different" to "The forms of the original races were different"
• "oversee regional level racing instead of the JRA's national focus." Try "oversee regional level racing as compared to the JRA's national focus."
• "aiming to encourage the best Japanese to focus" - I couldn't find this supported by the refs, but it could be a translation issue on my end.
• "2026; but like his father, he lost" to "2026; but he also lost"
• "As of June 2026, no horse has won the Spring Triple Crown since its establishment." Add a ref for this.
• A few refs are missing their archive links. See if iabot has any luck. -MPGuy2824 (talk)

All done! IABot missed quite a few refs out for some reason... The Spring sentence you pointed out got a bit mangled at some point - that part about promoting horses to race in Spring should have been about the Osaka Hai's promotion, not the Triple Crown. I've rewritten that and put a more explicit reference in. RandomEditsForWhenIRemember (talk) 18:27, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

• Support on prose (in addition to accessibility which was mentioned above.-MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:35, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• Three of the four captions for the lead image have full stops, but none of them are sentences, so they should not have full stops
• "each a series of three races ran within a single year" => "each a series of three races run within a single year"
• "The Classic Triple Crown title is bestowed to any horse" => "The Classic Triple Crown title is bestowed on any horse"
• "and ran at Yokohama Racecourse over 1,850 meters" => "and run at Yokohama Racecourse over 1,850 meters"
• "and with the exception of Saint Lite, won their year's Best Three-Year-Old Colt award.[" => "and, with the exception of Saint Lite, won their year's Best Three-Year-Old Colt award.["
• "but was discontinued and re-organised into the Queen Elizabeth II Cup in 1976" => "but it was discontinued and re-organised into the Queen Elizabeth II Cup in 1976"
• " the Tiara's shorter distances has led to more frequent winners of the Tiara" => " the Tiara's shorter distances have led to more frequent winners of the Tiara"
• Notes b and c are not sentences so should not have full stops
• That's what I got :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:55, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  Thanks Chris! The full stops for the captions/notes always gets me... I've taken care of all of these now; only one I haven't is the Yokohama as I think ran is correct there (the Satsuki Shō isn't ran on that course anymore). RandomEditsForWhenIRemember (talk) 22:48, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Support - I think the wording in the Yokohama sentence is ambiguous but I concede that the current wording is probably OK -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:52, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Thanks both, greatly appreciated! RandomEditsForWhenIRemember (talk) 17:06, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Dylan620

Marking myself down for a prose review – should be able to start looking at this later today. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 08:19, 14 August 2026 (UTC)

As promised:

• Saint Lite is the only horse to achieve the Classic Triple Crown before the Satsuki Shō's relocation to Nakayama Racecourse – I feel like 'was' would make more sense than 'is' here.
• matching the Japan Dirt Classic – acronym should be used here
• Since the title's inception, no horse has yet won the Crown – 'since' and 'yet' are kinda redundant to each other, IMO. Maybe rephrase as No horse has won the Crown since the title's inception? The same issue appears in the Spring Triple Crown section.
• The example given following cannot by achieved by winning the three legs over several years only spans two years, whereas 'several' means 'more than two'. I suggest replacing 'several' with 'multiple' for this reason.
• I'm admittedly going nitpick mode here: won the Crown's first two legs in 2026; but he lost in the year's Takarazuka Kinen – this would, IMO, flow more efficiently if you either replaced the semicolon with a comma or removed the word 'but'.
• As of June 2026, no horse has won the Dirt Triple Crown since its establishment. – I suggest removing either 'As of June 2026' or 'since its establisment', then doing the same for the Spring Triple Crown [lack of] Winners.

That's about it. Great work, RandomEditsForWhenIRemember. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 15:32, 14 August 2026 (UTC)

Thank you Dylan for the comprehensive review! No issues with any of your ideas, so I have made all suggested changes in this edit. RandomEditsForWhenIRemember (talk) 22:26, 14 August 2026 (UTC)

Of course! Happy to support on prose. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 06:18, 15 August 2026 (UTC)

Shwabb1

Will do the image review in a few days. Hopefully I have the time to do a source review as well (I've never done one before but I've seen enough to get the gist of it). Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 16:26, 16 August 2026 (UTC)

File:Symboli Rudolf 20060920.jpg does not have a source and author indicated but, based on the uploader's history, it is reasonable to assume that the file is own work (though a clarification would be nice). Assuming this is not a large issue, passing image review. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 07:22, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

Thanks Swabb! I've updated the description to more concretely attribute this to ROG, but there are other pictures of SR around if anyone else raises an objection. RandomEditsForWhenIRemember (talk) 20:33, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

This table lists 10 random passages from throughout the article (19.2% of 52 total passages). These passages contain 16 inline citations (18.0% of 89 in the article). Reference numbers refer to this revision. Generated with the Veracity user script. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 04:52, 21 August 2026 (UTC)

If needed for the Meiba book ref as part of ref check 38/39, the relevant text is: [following a long discussion on which of the Classic races/Crown and Tiara legs is easiest due to race lengths] そう考えると、社馬に比べて牝馬のほ うが、やや難易度はドがるかもしれない もちろん、牝馬三冠も偉業であることは 間違いないが。(When you look at it that way, the difficulty level may actually be a little lower for fillies than for colts. Of course, winning the Triple Tiara is still unquestionably a remarkable achievement in its own right.) RandomEditsForWhenIRemember (talk) 14:35, 22 August 2026 (UTC)

More information Reference #, Letter ...

Reference #	Letter	Source	Archive	Status	Notes
The three races are part of Japan's Classic Races, meaning only three-year horses can enter each leg. Thus, every horse only has one chance at winning the Triple Crown.
2		japanracing.jp	web.archive.org
Despite the races' names, all horses entered were chronologically three years old; until 2001, Japanese horseracing used the kazoedoshi counting system where horses are considered one at birth and become one year older each New Year.
7		news.sp.netkeiba.com	web.archive.org
The Fillies Triple Crown, commonly referred to as the Triple Tiara, is the fillies' equivalent of the Classic Triple Crown, consisting of the Oka Shō, Yūshun Himba and Shūka Shō.
32	a	en.netkeiba.com	web.archive.org
33		japanracing.jp	web.archive.org
Unlike the Classic Triple Crown, the Triple Tiara's legs do not increase in length with each race, and the Yūshun Himba's 2,400m falls far short of the Kikuka-shō's 3,000m. While no less prestigious than the Classic Triple Crown, the Tiara's shorter distances have led to more frequent winners of the Tiara, with three occurring between 2018 and 2023, and assertions that the Tiara is easier to achieve.
38		sportsbull.jp	web.archive.org
39		Meiba Collection 2022, pp. 4, Why is a Triple Crown winner so extraordinary?.
However, as the NAR wished to create more opportunities for dirt specalists, the three races were re-organised to encourage wider participation. The Haneda Hai and the Tokyo Derby were promoted to Group 1 status and opened to all horses in the country, matching the JDC. The JDC itself was renamed from the Japan Dirt Derby and moved from July to October. All three races had their prize money substantially increased.
54	b	keiba.go.jp	web.archive.org
58		asianracingreport.com	web.archive.org
In 2000, the JRA established a bonus prize for any horse that won the Tennō Shō (Autumn), Japan Cup and Arima Kinen in the same year.
70	a	number.bunshun.jp	web.archive.org
Since 2025, the reward for winning the Crown has been ¥300,000,000 for Japanese horses and ¥150,000,000 for foreign horses, and an additional incentive where any horse that wins any three of the six races in the Spring and Autumn Triple Crowns will receive an additional ¥200,000,000 or ¥100,000,000, depending on their nationality.
78	a	en.netkeiba.com	web.archive.org
79	a	news.netkeiba.com	web.archive.org
The Spring Crown shares the same reward for achieving it as the Autumn Crown; ¥300,000,000 for Japanese horses and ¥150,000,000 for foreign horses.
78	b	en.netkeiba.com	web.archive.org
79	b	news.netkeiba.com	web.archive.org
His son, Croix du Nord, won the Crown's first two legs in 2026, but he lost in the year's Takarazuka Kinen, though he came closer than his father did, placing 2nd by a neck.
92		nikkansports.com	web.archive.org
93		news.netkeiba.com	web.archive.org
2007,
95		racingpost.com	web.archive.org

Close

Pass spot-check source review: all the above sources support the relevant statements. I didn't notice any other issues either, so this list should be good to go. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 05:21, 24 August 2026 (UTC)

Thanks Shwabb1, much appreciated! :) RandomEditsForWhenIRemember (talk) 07:44, 24 August 2026 (UTC)