User talk:Realcosmixyt

Hello, I'm Randomdude121. I noticed that you recently removed content from Draft:WildGDamian without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not remove that line. randomdude121    14:34, 13 September 2025 (UTC)

I've restored that line and kindly ask that you please consider writing the page on Minitubia instead. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 02:13, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm OpalYosutebito. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on MrBeast, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:41, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Joe Bartolozzi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. EatingCarBatteries _{(contributions, talk)} 00:00, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Jmancurly requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jmancurly. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Signed, Guessitsavis (she/they) ^Talk 00:07, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Realcosmixyt, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

• Article development
• Standard layout
• Lead section
• The perfect article
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:51, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Dale O'hanlon. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it consists of machine-generated text and it relies entirely on primary and self-published sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Aesurias (talk) 07:43, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Muterhaert requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Somebodyidkfkdt (talk) 07:51, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Ohnoitsjamie. I noticed that one or more of your recent contribution attempts to Jeffy (SML) have been disallowed by an edit filter as they did not appear constructive. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. If you believe the edit filter disallowance was a false positive, please report it. Feel free to ask for assistance at the Teahouse whenever you like. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:49, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Realcosmixyt. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:WildGDamian, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:09, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Realcosmixyt. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "WildGDamian".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 04:25, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Eddie Sherlock.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:38, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

I appreciate you adding a tag to Beyond Sandbox asking for more sources (as the sources are insufficient at the moment), however you did not use the correct format. (See the current format of the multiple issues tag as I've replaced part of it) - also, bit odd that it was set to "collapse" by default, which would hide any of the issues anybody else adds. There might be valid reasons to collapse the multiple issues tag, but I wouldn't recommend doing so with your own articles. ASUKITE 18:51, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your message. I will do better in the future as I continue to polish this article as much as I can

-ReelCosmix Realcosmixyt (talk) 19:03, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beyond Sandbox is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beyond Sandbox until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Garsh (talk) 19:51, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of recognized countries is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of recognized countries until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Swordfish121,641 (talk) 21:23, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

The article List of VR games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet the criteria for [[ Wikipedia:stand-alone lists|]].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time.

msk 15:50, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Eddie Sherlock. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. msk 15:57, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi, could you explain the sections that need more sources? Realcosmixyt (talk) 16:04, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Please familiarize yourself with the general notability guideline and the notability criteria for musicians. Sources 5-8 and 10 are primary, and the remaining sources are mainly about the band, not the person. The sources do not demonstrate notability. msk 16:10, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Will do, thank you for your help! Realcosmixyt (talk) 16:11, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

I recommend you avoid creating new articles until you are familiar with the general notability guideline, otherwise you may create more work for volunteers, and have your articles deleted. Instead, you can improve existing articles, help patrol recent changes, or something else. msk 16:15, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Yeah, sorry about this. I am pretty new to Wikipedia; I probably should've given the guidelines a read. Realcosmixyt (talk) 16:17, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello. In a recent edit to the page Chanel College, Dublin, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the first author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 16:42, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Okay, thank you for your advice! Realcosmixyt (talk) 13:55, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Chanel College, Dublin

added links pointing to French, German, Spanish, Dublin City and Gaelic

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Please dont steal photos from the Washington Post's photographers again Trade (talk) 01:54, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

I apologize for this, as I did not realize this was stealing. ReelCosmix (talk) 01:55, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2026 White House security incident is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2026 White House security incident until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 04:30, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Murder of Ailish Walsh, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dublin City was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:07, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hullo (social media influencer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hullo (social media influencer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 21:23, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

Template:Charlie Kirk series has been listed for discussion, which may result in the template being merged or deleted by consensus. You are invited to comment on the proposed action at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Pbritti (talk) 00:21, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Just from noticing your enthusiasm. Instead of trying to use each source one time in that article, where you added more - see how they are used once only? Dig into them. This is what I am doing right now: Earthquake_light#References. See how many are used multiple times for different things? Most editors (shockingly an ultra majority) seem to just use a brilliant source once and then just... leave it there. Would you walk past a $20 bill on a desolate road you're walking down? — Very Polite Person (talk/contribs) 00:56, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Category:Murder of Ailish Walsh has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. MIDI (talk) 10:21, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ally Lotti is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ally Lotti until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

orangesclub 🍊 09:07, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved content from Charlie Kirk into The Charlie Kirk Show. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content (here or elsewhere), Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s).

When copying within Wikipedia, at a minimum, give attribution in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination.

Please add attribution if no one has done so yet. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:37, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

Oh my apologies, I thought that's how it worked. It won't happen again. ReelCosmix (talk) 13:49, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert W. Kirk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert W. Kirk until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

CountryANDWestern (talk) 17:51, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Murder of Ailish Walsh, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. ^SMason_Garrison 20:17, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

Good article nominations | June 2026 Backlog Drive
June 2026 Backlog Drive: Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process? On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles reviewed. Mentors are available, and new reviewers (<6 reviews) get bonus points! Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talk page.
You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:59, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article United States two hundred fifty dollar bill is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be merged into United States two-hundred-fifty dollar bill.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States two hundred fifty dollar bill until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

JTtheOG (talk) 22:53, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2026 Hawaii killings is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be merged into 2026 Hawaii County killings.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2026 Hawaii killings until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

JTtheOG (talk) 04:16, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2026 New Glenn rocket explosion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be merged into New Glenn.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2026 New Glenn rocket explosion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Ilov3gam3z (talk) 13:58, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

I moved your article on the Jefferson portrait back to draft as the sourcing leaves a lot to be desired. Only a single source of the ten actually mentions the portrait. Significant improvement is needed or it won’t be able to survive in the main space. CountryANDWestern (talk) 00:27, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

Sorry bout that; I was planning to add more sources on the painting itself but I straight up forgot to. ReelCosmix (talk) 00:28, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2026 Hawaii killings, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2026 Hawaii killings until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fortnite: Chapter 2 Season 2 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be merged into Fortnite seasonal events.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fortnite: Chapter 2 Season 2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

MidnightMayhem (talk) 01:10, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Mighty Cuphead Adventure.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:XXXTENTACION.webp. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:06, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi Realcosmixyt. Thank you for your work on The Agency (Fortnite location). Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

not mentioned in target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 14:11, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

The redirect Aye aye ayee has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 June 10 § Aye aye ayee until a consensus is reached. CountryANDWestern (talk) 14:27, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

The redirect Ich Bin Ein Heidelberger has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 June 10 § Ich Bin Ein Heidelberger until a consensus is reached. CountryANDWestern (talk) 15:21, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

The article John Seed (character) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I am not seeing any indication that this character has been subject to significant coverage outside of passing mentions in video game reviews. Developmental coverage is rather thin. The entirety of the contents should be redirected or merged into Far Cry 5.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Haleth (talk) 15:48, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

The redirect It's Radical. has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 June 10 § It's Radical. until a consensus is reached. CountryANDWestern (talk) 19:01, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mighty Cuphead Adventure is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be merged into Cuphead.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mighty Cuphead Adventure until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

CountryANDWestern (talk) 19:12, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

Redirects you have created have been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 June 11 § SAY YES until a consensus is reached. CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:21, 11 June 2026 (UTC)

The redirect White House security incident has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 June 11 § White House security incident until a consensus is reached. CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:51, 11 June 2026 (UTC)

Redirects you have created have been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 June 11 § UNITED STATES UFO FILES until a consensus is reached. CountryANDWestern (talk) 13:39, 11 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Mighty Cuphead Adventure logo.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 11 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:John Seed (Far Cry 5).webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:John Seed (character).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for uploading File:2026 Rio de Janeiro mid-air collision.jpg. It looks like you used an LLM to generate the summary of the file; LLMS are prohibited on Wikipedia. I advise you rewrite the summary section. Thanks, Fortek67 (talk) 20:02, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on File:2026 Rio de Janeiro mid-air collision.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file from a commercial source (e.g. Associated Press, Getty Images), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary. If you can explain why the file can be used under the non-free content guidelines, please add the appropriate non-free use tag and rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 20:17, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Yes, it is redundant to have individual writing credits listed when the text above the track listing template says all tracks were solely written by Oliver Tree. Otherwise there is no point in having the text above the template. Skyversay (talk) 21:26, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

I did not add that notice I just added the track listing ReelCosmix (talk) 21:28, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

I didn't say anything about a notice. I was replying to your revert of my edit. Skyversay (talk) 21:30, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

If you are talking about the credits on the track listing, why did you remove the entire template? ReelCosmix (talk) 21:33, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Hurricane Wisdom, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire, why did you decline my draft? (talk) (contribs)🔥 00:22, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

Wrong person. Sorry.

there should be info on creeps leaking her pics on twitter tho. DannyCutterAnderson (talk) 00:14, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

Since there are no real sources reporting on it, there's no point in mentioning it, plus, it seems random to add. ReelCosmix (talk) 00:15, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

The article Death of Maria Eduarda Rodrigues has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article fails WP:NOTNEWS. Immediate, short-term coverage of a bizarre death does not indicate notability. For this to not be WP:1E, something more than just the incident would have to follow. There is no indication already has a lasting impact, nor an indication that her tragic death will lead to any such impact in the future.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Pbritti (talk) 13:31, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Jar of Nutella.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Death of Maria Eduarda Rodrigues is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death of Maria Eduarda Rodrigues until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

AndyTheGrump (talk) 00:00, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lucas Frota is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be merged into 2026 Rio de Janeiro mid-air collision.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucas Frota until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 08:49, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

I note that since my advice to you about creating in draft space instead of directly in main space on June 11, you have made 7 new articles (I may have miscounted as there were also dozens of redirects in your page creations). Only one came through the draft process. Two others are presently at AFD discussions. I just redirected another, too. The article on the B-52 crash is one that may not meet notability standards as well for its own article.

It is clear that you are not fully grasping the notability guidelines particularly when it comes to news events. Please heed the advice to focus on article drafts first. CountryANDWestern (talk) 20:49, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

I actually completely forgot about your advice! My apologies on that one, but also, when it's a current event and I'm sure there are no other articles already on it, I feel like it's right to create an article directly. Also, I was notified about a month ago that I am trusted with making articles directly. Not sure if that means anything, though. ReelCosmix (talk) 20:53, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

Being a 'current event' is no indication that an article is justified. What is required is evidence of long-term notability, which most 'current events' don't have. Wikipedia is not a newspaper. AndyTheGrump (talk) 21:18, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Lucas Frota.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:59, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

Redirects you have created have been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 June 18 § Every painting of George Washington until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 23:59, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

Redirects you have created have been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 June 19 § List of George Washington art until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 00:01, 19 June 2026 (UTC)