User talk:Applaused

May I know what exactly was the reason you reverted my recent edits on the page List of Indian states and union territories by GDP ? I had corrected and updated the latest data as published by Government of India's Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (MOSPI) on their official website on 31 July 2020. I also updated the link to the official MOSPI source that reflects this latest data. Why you reverted these edits is beyond reason. I have been contributing to Wikipedia for more than 5 years now and I'm reasonably experienced in editing India related list articles including the one I'm concerned with here. You added old 2018-19 figures of Himachal Pradesh in place of correct and latest 2019-20 figures in the aforementioned list article and mentioned the year as 2019-20. You also incorrectly changed the year of 2018-19 figures of Jammu and Kashmir to 2019-20. GSDP figures of 2019-20 for Jammu and Kashmir have not even been published by MOSPI yet. The same have been released for Himachal Pradesh and they were being appropriately mentioned in the article until you disruptively added one year older figures.

I noticed from the edit history of the page that you had made similar edits before also. Earlier, the MOSPI source in the article was not updated. You might have seen the older reference so I can understand your confusion. But now that I have updated the MOSPI source reflecting the latest data and made appropriate changes according to it in the concerned list article, your mindlessly reverting my edits is totally unwarranted. All the changes I've made in the above article are strictly as per the latest official data published by MOSPI for which the official government source has also been defined in the article. Please refrain from undoing productive contributions to Wikipedia like you just did. Kindly check and verify the figures you're incorrectly manipulating in the article from the updated MOSPI source first. I'm giving link to the updated source here: ^[1]

Vibhss (talk) 23:24, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to List of Indian states and union territories by GDP. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Kindly read my previous message properly. In your latest edits on the page (that I reverted) you incorrectly added the 2018-19 figures as 2019-20 figures for many states while citing the same MOSPI source that I cited for my own edits, albeit more specifically. Kindly go through the statewise GDP figures mentioned in the MOSPI source thoroughly first. You will get to know what exactly is wrong with your edits. 2019-20 figures are not available for many states and UTs yet. For Andaman and Nicobar Islands, even 2018-19 GDP figures haven't been released by MOSPI yet. From where did you come up with 2019-20 figures? The current list which I've updated reflects the latest official data available for each and every state/ UT. Vibhss (talk) 11:39, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

You have added page protection templates to List of cities with most skyscrapers but page protection can only be done by admins WP:PP. What is your reason for reverting my removal and why two templates? Robynthehode (talk) 15:36, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Southeast Asia, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Karo and Demak.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Your edit has been undone. You removed reliably cited data with a random number. Fundamental_metric_tensor (talk) 19:43, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

After undoing your edit at List of Indonesian provinces by Human Development Index because it was unsourced, I see you doubled down, and inserted it again, without explanation. I realize you have made many edits to this article before, perhaps all of them unsourced, and have not been called to account for it. No matter; Wikipedia's WP:Verifiability policy *requires* you to provide a citation to a reliable source when challenged, and this applies to this edit of yours, and all of your edits at this article, and at every article at Wikipedia. I will be reverting your unsourced edit at List of Indonesian provinces by Human Development Index again right after this. If you revert again, I'll take you to the Edit warring noticeboard, and that may result in having your editing privileges at Wikipedia suspended, or removed. You are welcome to reinsert your edit again, as long as it is accompanied by a citation to a reliable source; otherwise, you may not. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 09:44, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

can you read this page again? https://www.bps.go.id/indicator/26/413/1/-metode-baru-indeks-pembangunan-manusia.html. while yes you read jakarta 81.65, but round to because i following UNDP style 0.xxx . For numbers greater than 5, I round it up. on the contrary for the lower of 5 I round it down. and also a writing style of 70.00 to 0.700 according to the UNDP style. or should i erase my contribution since start on this page? which include cities and regencies (from beginings), by UNDP report, Trends by Statistics Indonesia, Trends by UNDP. because all following those principle Applaused (talk) 10:00, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

also where u get Yogyakarta 0.933? Applaused (talk) 10:03, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

I'm waiting for u answer, if not i will reversed your undo on my edit. Thanks Applaused (talk) 10:11, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into List of the largest trading partners of the ASEAN. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 00:52, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Applaused. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List India City by GDP, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

Hello there @Applaused the source you provided regarding the gdp of mumbai does not even mention the gdp it mentions nsdp and nsdp per capita, its highly unlikely that mumbai would have a gdp of 113 billion considering it contributes 6.2 % of the indian gdp India's gdp is around 3.5 trillion so a simple mathematical calculation would be 3.5 tn * 6.2;/100 which comes to more than 220 billion. Joy goel (talk) 20:03, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Mumbai case is the same with Delhi case. Delhi GDP from national Government is about 100+ billion link = https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/PublicationsView.aspx?id=20679. Because they using city proper GDP Nominal. Not 270+ billion according to visual capitalist, because they using GDP Nominal for Metropolitan Area. Here from visual capitalist https://www.visualcapitalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Global-Wealth-Distribution.html they highlight it in "METROPOLITAN AREAS". Can u give link where Mumbai "CITY PROPER" contributes 6.2 % of the indian gdp, i'll satisfied if u share that data from government NOT from media. thx Applaused (talk) 20:11, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

I'll wait, if ur source seems not accurate. Then sorry, i'll undo your edit Applaused (talk) 20:13, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

anyway, the only source i find with Mumbai 6.2% india's GDP is https://www.indiachem.in/why-mumbai.php. That is not from official government data Applaused (talk) 20:15, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

@Applaused have a look at this its from a highly reliable leading newspaper in India https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/adi-bytes/mumbai-a-tale-of-repeated-ignorance/?source=app&frmapp=yes i can provide you with many other link that say that mumbai contributes 6.16% of the indian gdp Joy goel (talk) 20:30, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

The source from https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/adi-bytes/mumbai-a-tale-of-repeated-ignorance/?source=app&frmapp=yes having same story with my source https://www.indiachem.in/why-mumbai.php "10% of factory employment, 25% of industrial output, 33% of income tax collections, 60% of customs duty collections". Media report usually not fully accurate and tried immitate each other. It's different when we using source from official government. Also the source from timesofindia could'nt define Mumbai metropolitan or city proper, where government official can. so i will trust official government data rather than eading newspaper media source. If u confuse, Mumbai metropolitan include mumbai thane navi etc, same also with delhi metropolitan which include delhi noida gurugram etc. Applaused (talk) 06:33, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

@Applaused I have gone through your source thoroughly and nowhere can I find the gdp of mumbai to be 113 billion your source mainly shows the NSDP and NSDP per capita district vise, the article we are concerned with is Greater Mumbai not only Mumbai city Proper, Mumbai city proper information would be more appropriate for Mumbai City district in this article we are dealing with the entire city of mumbai not only mumbai city district or the city proper, and according to your source its not clear that mumbai's nominal gdp is just $113 billion i can provide you multiple sources that say that mumbai's contributes 6.2 % of the indian gdp this is mentioned multiple times through the article as well with multiple sources.

Therefore to avoid conflict i'm removing the nominal gdp and per capita information as its not verifiable through your source and again this article is about the Whole of mumbai not only mumbai city proper please dont revert this edit. Joy goel (talk) 08:04, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Applaused. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List India City by GDP".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:04, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick(Talk) 12:39, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Kcic2.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:30, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

The author writes the source listed in the picture Applaused (talk) 11:50, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Depo tegalluar.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:30, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

The author writes the source listed in the picture Applaused (talk) 11:51, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Kereta Cepat Indonesia.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:31, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

The author writes the source listed in the picture Applaused (talk) 11:50, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Please add license tags if you want to use images on Wikipedia.

It has come to attention that large amount of images you uploaded lack clear copyright status and do not have proper license tags. This is a crucial issue, as Wikipedia places a strong emphasis on maintaining content that complies with copyright laws and respects the rights of content creators. To ensure the quality and legality of images on Wikipedia, it is essential that all uploaded images have a clear and appropriate copyright status.

Here's why it's important to provide clear copyright information and proper license tags for images:

1. Legal Compliance: Wikipedia strives to comply with copyright laws worldwide. Without proper copyright information and licensing, we risk violating copyright and intellectual property rights.
2. Transparency: Properly licensed images provide transparency about their usage rights. This helps other Wikipedia editors and users understand how they can use, share, and attribute the images in accordance with the license terms.
3. Avoiding Deletion: Images without clear copyright status may be flagged for deletion.

If you don't understand copyright policies of Wikipedia, please read:

Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright

Wikipedia:WikiProject Fair use/Fair use rationale

Wikipedia:File copyright tags/Free licenses Benjamin Ceci (talk) 06:05, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for uploading File:Kcic2.png. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Benjamin Ceci (talk) 06:12, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

The author writes the source listed in the picture Applaused (talk) 12:12, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for uploading File:Depo tegalluar.jpeg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Benjamin Ceci (talk) 06:18, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

The author writes the source listed in the picture Applaused (talk) 12:13, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Depo tegalluar.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Benjamin Ceci (talk) 11:35, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

The author writes the source listed in the picture Applaused (talk) 12:13, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on File:Kcic2.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Benjamin Ceci (talk) 11:39, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

The author writes the source listed in the picture Applaused (talk) 12:17, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on File:Kereta Cepat Indonesia.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Benjamin Ceci (talk) 11:41, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

The author writes the source listed in the picture Applaused (talk) 12:17, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Yes, you placed a source, but a source have nothing to do with copyright status.

Please read:

Wikipedia:Copyrights

Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not

Benjamin Ceci (talk) 13:13, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Speed 386.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 12:00, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

The author got a picture from a friend while trying to hunt for pictures of high-speed trains Applaused (talk) 12:05, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on File:KCIC 400.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=606635454911844&set=pb.100066961852680.-2207520000&type=3. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 12:06, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

The author got the picture from the official website. On some Wikipedia pages, the author sees many similar things, but does not get corpyright. Can you explain why only on this page? If you can't, the author will take a picture with a license from YouTube as Benyamin Ceci wrote on this page Applaused (talk) 12:10, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

I will write using as simple English as possible. Copyright is important. Images have copyrights. There are different copyright licenses. We must have proof of license. Without proof, we delete. --Hammersoft (talk) 13:19, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Hello Applaused! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 12:08, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

The author got the picture from the official website. On some Wikipedia pages, the author sees many similar things, but does not get corpyright. Can you explain why only on this page? If you can't, the author will take a picture with a license from YouTube as Benyamin Ceci wrote on this page Applaused (talk) 12:11, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

You are claiming this is your own work. It clearly is not your own work. You cannot copy images from the internet and claim these as your own work, nor can you just apply Creative Commons licenses to images which are not released under under such a license. If you do not understand somethin about copyright for images, you can ask questions at Media Copyright Questions. What you cannot do is to continue uploading images you have copied from the Internet that do not have a free license. You have also claimed that File:Halim.png is also your won work. Is it really your own work, or have you copied it from the internet like the other images? -- Whpq (talk) 12:22, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Then again, author get image from friend. The other photo you saw, the author get from OFFICIAL WEBSITE with SOURCE. then why getting delete? for soft opening, it's harder to get to photo from the site. IF this HSR get commercial, then author will floding this page with my OWN photo. thx. Applaused (talk) 12:27, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Please read Wikipedia policies:

Wikipedia:Copyrights

Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not

Benjamin Ceci (talk) Benjamin Ceci (talk) 13:01, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

If you continue to upload copyright violating images here on en.wikipedia, or upload them on Commons and use them here, you will be blocked from further editing until you gain an understanding and appreciation of the importance of copyright. You have had many images deleted for violating copyright, yet still insist what you are doing is acceptable. IT IS NOT. Either you stop this behavior, or you will be blocked. I hope I have been clear. If I have not been clear, then ask clarifying questions. The appropriate response to this is not to continue to upload and/or use copyright violating images while insisting what you are doing is ok. This ends. Now. --Hammersoft (talk) 13:43, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

i'll upload my photo, then how to proved that is my own photo? i will try to next page that i already been, and capture those image photo there Applaused (talk) 13:51, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Hello Applaused. It has come to my attention that you have uploaded several files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Wikipedia:Copyrights for the copyright policy on English Wikipedia. This is your last warning. Continuing to upload copyright violations will result in your account being blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions.

Additionally, please stop uploading copyright violating files to Wiki Commons. Benjamin Ceci (talk) 13:45, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

i'll upload my photo, then how to proved that is my own photo? i will try to next page that i already been, and capture those image photo there Applaused (talk) 13:51, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

You can NOT take an image you find somewhere on the Internet and upload it here claiming it is your image. IT IS NOT. --Hammersoft (talk) 13:59, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Lol, I upload dozens my very OWN IMAGE. Then look what happen at "License tagging for File:Taman Anggrek.jpeg" Applaused (talk) 15:33, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Because you didn't properly tag the image. Fine, it's your image. What's the copyright status? We can't assume. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:35, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

All on "Own work, Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0" Applaused (talk) 15:37, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Then tag the images. You've done so elsewhere, such as at File:Coffe Plantation.jpeg. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:40, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

In general: when a photo has no specific free licence, always assume that it is copyright protected. The fact that you have it does not make it free. The Banner talk 16:24, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Taman Anggrek.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:30, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

This is MY OWN IMAGE Applaused (talk) 15:32, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

So, in order for us to actually host that, we need you to release the image under a suitable free license. Adding {{Cc-by-4.0}}, or some other licensing tag to the page, would resolve this issue. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 22:34, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Bakaheuni.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:30, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

This is MY OWN IMAGE Applaused (talk) 15:33, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

I noticed that in your edit, Metro Manila is replaced with Greater Manila Area. For WP:Consistency purposes, which of the definitions should be used? Metro Manila or Greater Manila? As far as WP is concerned, Metro Manila is "one of the officially recognized metropolitan areas by the National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA)" (see List of metropolitan areas in the Philippines), while Greater Manila is more of a larger planning area.

For Bangkok Metropolitan Region, how was the figure 15,931,300 derived? According to Thailand's 2020 census,

• Bangkok: 5,588,222
• Nonthaburi: 1,276,745
• Nakhon Phanom: 717,201
• Pathum Thani: 1,176,412
• Samut Prakan: 1,351,479
• Samut Sakhon: 586,199

Total is only 10,696,258.

Also is there a need to add a column for area, when urban areas and cities are usually ranked by population as per standard practice?

hundenvonPG (talk) 02:17, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Hi Applaused! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of High-speed rail in Indonesia several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:High-speed rail in Indonesia, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Jjpachano (talk) 10:49, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for your attention. As already explained, I have sources from various print and video media (but video ones are not listed) on this page. But the Anon's account insists that his source is correct when it comes to Indonesian sources, he misinterprets it. I was fair at first, but lately he's been removing my edits from various sources. In the end I did what he did. Applaused (talk) 11:52, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of countries by number of billionaires, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Could you please stop adding {{Flag|Türkiye}} to articles? It should read {{Flag|Turkey}}, to reflect the WP:COMMONNAME of that country that is standard usage on Wikipedia. — The Anome (talk) 18:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

@Applaused the reference you added is not opening up please provide the link here so i can verify. Joy goel (talk) 15:21, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

@Applaused reviewing your actions, you've been enganging in disruptive & manipulative editing. Please stop, not gonna work @Joy goel please help to supervise

may i send u email? Applaused (talk) 15:21, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

http://mls.org.in/PDF2023/BUDGET/ESM_2022_23_Eng_Book.pdf Applaused (talk) 15:22, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

@ApplausedI read the link and its nominal gross district domestic product, its GDDP not GDP please add this the Mumbai city district Joy goel (talk) 15:30, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

If u add up all the data, Maharashtra GDP is 3108022 crore, or US$420 bilion. very accurate data. Mumbai #Includes Mumbai city & Mumbai Suburban. Applaused (talk) 15:39, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

@Applaused just tell me one thing Mumabai is the financial capital of india it contributes almoist 7 % to the gdp of india, then how can it be 80 billion, that is the gdp of mumbai city district not the city of mumbai. the city district has a population of 3 million the whole of the mega city of mumbai has a population of 12 million. please, its gddp not gdp stop reverting. Joy goel (talk) 15:44, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

it's came from media right? not from local statistics. pls refer to government statistics Applaused (talk) 15:46, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

@Applaused add that to Mumabai city district its Gddp not gdp how many times do i have to tell you. Joy goel (talk) 15:50, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

pls dont be denial about your government data Applaused (talk) 15:40, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

@Applaused Please stop reverting , you are continuously adding district domestic to the city page. Joy goel (talk) 16:42, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

you are the one. pls using official data statistics. https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/AnnualPublications.aspx?head=Handbook%20of%20Statistics%20on%20Indian%20States https://rbidocs.rbi.org.in/rdocs/Publications/PDFs/27T_15112023E301A02422494F73BFAFD6CDD84EEEAE.PDF http://mls.org.in/PDF2023/BUDGET/ESM_2022_23_Eng_Book.pdf Applaused (talk) 16:44, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

that is disrtrict domestic product not for the whole city of mumbai Joy goel (talk) 16:46, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

district domestic product just naming, is same for gross domestic regional product. pls using official data statistics. https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/AnnualPublications.aspx?head=Handbook%20of%20Statistics%20on%20Indian%20States https://rbidocs.rbi.org.in/rdocs/Publications/PDFs/27T_15112023E301A02422494F73BFAFD6CDD84EEEAE.PDF http://mls.org.in/PDF2023/BUDGET/ESM_2022_23_Eng_Book.pdf Applaused (talk) 16:48, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

@Applaused and rbi does not provide data for mumbai Joy goel (talk) 16:47, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

why cerry picking? pls learn critical thinking. or at least higher education Applaused (talk) 16:49, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

@Applausedi cant see mumbai anywhere in the rbi sources Joy goel (talk) 16:50, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

@Applaused you are adding district domestic product again and again Joy goel (talk) 16:57, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

@ApplausedPlease stop adding district domestic product to mumbai city page Joy goel (talk) 17:15, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

that is district domestic product mumbais gdp cannot be 80 billion Joy goel (talk) 17:21, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Mumbai #Includes Mumbai city & Mumbai Suburban http://mls.org.in/PDF2023/BUDGET/ESM_2022_23_Eng_Book.pdf Applaused (talk) 17:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Please read the heading its DISTRICT do you understand DISTRICT means mumbai city distruict Joy goel (talk) 17:27, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

GROSS DISTRICT DOMESTIC PRODUCT and GROSS STATE DOMESTIC PRODUCT are both GDP. Mumbai #Includes Mumbai city & Mumbai Suburban http://mls.org.in/PDF2023/BUDGET/ESM_2022_23_Eng_Book.pdf Applaused (talk) 17:30, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

why u trust state GDP but not district GDP? Because Mumbai so low? Applaused (talk) 17:31, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

thats what im saying its impossible for the whole of mumbai to be 80 billion, its indias financial capital. Joy goel (talk) 17:38, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

not impossible. GROSS DISTRICT DOMESTIC PRODUCT for district and GROSS STATE DOMESTIC PRODUCT for state. both are GDP Applaused (talk) 17:39, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

DISTRICT DOMESTIC PRODUCT IS FOR MUMBAI CITY DISTRICT NOT WHOLE MUMBAI Joy goel (talk) 17:41, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Mumbai #Includes Mumbai city & Mumbai Suburban Applaused (talk) 17:42, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

please i request you please stop this its very late at night here and i cannot fight you all night long, just let there be no gdp figures lets agree to that please Joy goel (talk) 17:46, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

if you can provide more accurate and better statistics, i rest my case. if not again pls don't reverted Applaused (talk) 17:47, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

you cannot add district product to mumbai page Joy goel (talk) 17:48, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Mumbai #Includes Mumbai city & Mumbai Suburban Applaused (talk) 17:50, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

district domestic product is only for city district Joy goel (talk) 18:01, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

GROSS DISTRICT DOMESTIC PRODUCT for district and GROSS STATE DOMESTIC PRODUCT for state. both are GDP. Mumbai #Includes Mumbai city & Mumbai Suburban http://mls.org.in/PDF2023/BUDGET/ESM_2022_23_Eng_Book.pdf Applaused (talk) 18:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi Applaused. Thank you for your work on Makassar metropolitan area. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:05, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Surabaya metropolitan area, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Batu.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:57, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of ASEAN countries and subdivisions by minimum wage is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of ASEAN countries and subdivisions by minimum wage until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:42, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Similar with page List of countries by minimum wage and List of first-level administrative divisions by GRDP, they also contain original research. if this page was delete, kindly to delete those page too. Warm Regards. Applaused (talk) 11:18, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Also this page will continue to expand to provinces, states, etc for the future. Already have the source. Applaused (talk) 11:19, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello Applaused, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Rankings of Southeast Asia Startups, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rankings of Southeast Asia Startups.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Conyo14}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Conyo14 (talk) 22:37, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 23:29, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of ASEAN countries by IQ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of ASEAN countries by IQ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 23:51, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

The article Top reviewed places in ASEAN has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:LISTN, no evidence that being a "top reviewed place" on Google Maps in the ASEAN region is a notable grouping of characteristics.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 16:30, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

This page was created and inspire by this page List of most-viewed YouTube videos but ASEAN version. Then do not delete it, as author will improve the page Applaused (talk) 08:21, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Improved done. Will add more content in time to time. Applaused (talk) 08:49, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited New Guinea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Morobe.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

done Applaused (talk) 08:39, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

The article List most reviewed places in ASEAN has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:LISTN, no evidence that being a "top reviewed place" on Google Maps in the ASEAN region is a notable grouping of characteristics.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List most reviewed places in ASEAN is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List most reviewed places in ASEAN until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 18:39, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

I must have read the wrong set of data. Apologies for that. hundenvonPG (talk) 12:54, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

understood Applaused (talk) 12:57, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Minangkabau Express, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page INKA.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Applaused

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username MPGuy2824, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, List of ASEAN countries by medal count at International Science Olympiad, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:39, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi Applaused. Thank you for your work on Surakarta metropolitan area. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia! May you and your family have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:09, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi Applaused. Thank you for your work on IE305 series. Another editor, Noleander, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Excellent article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Noleander}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Noleander (talk) 14:03, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Rendang shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Audit2020 (talk • contribs) 11:34, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

Ok then let's join Applaused (talk) 14:31, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Audit2020 (talk) 15:47, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

Why malaysian one are bias. who using their source but not acknowledge third persons/country views Applaused (talk) 17:00, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

Need Independent auditor, will reject auditor from malay/bias one. Thank you Applaused (talk) 17:00, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Edit warring and refusal to engage in talk page discussion – Applaused on Rendang article. Thank you.--Native99girl (talk) 17:07, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Per a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. EdJohnston (talk) 21:55, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Applaused

Thanks for your contributions to the iE305 series article. I noticed that your edits seems to have been translated directly from Indonesian (likely using Google Translate or DeepL). While machine translation is a helpful tool, it doesn’t always handle technical terms correctly. For example, it left the abbreviation KRL (Kereta Rel Listrik) untranslated, whereas in English it should be EMU (Electric Multiple Unit).

I’ll go ahead and fix the edit this time, but for future contributions it would be great if you could double-check machine-translated text, especially technical terms and abbreviations, before publishing. This will help keep the article accurate and easier to read.

Thanks again for your work! Hayase Desta｜chat here 15:32, 21 August 2025 (UTC)