User talk:Bronchalinox

Hello, I'm MrOllie. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. MrOllie (talk) 00:32, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Darius (talk) 14:03, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

My edit was not disruptive nor provocative. Both the mop and lollipop are Spanish inventions https://mobi.parador.es/en/blog/spains-most-famous-inventions

The remark left by Quirkle (profile misteriously inactive) was sarcastic. My edit said that women “mopped” the floor on their knees before the invention of the cloth+ stick as can be shown in any epoch film or even Roman times. It was a task given to women and the invention liberated them from it.

Quirkle‘s sarcastic comment is just that, sarcasm based on the fact he has seen my IP in Spain.

I’m a father of 3 beautiful daughters and one son and a proven record in helping human rights associations. I’m not going to go that path.

If the problem was the word “women” , let’s change it for “People”.

Bronchalinox (talk) 19:16, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Thilio were:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:

• Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
• Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
• Essay-like writing
• Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
• Close paraphrasing
  

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tecnolettra and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 12:36, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

I asked Dr Alcina to review the draft and she provided some information. I also added references to her seminal publications

Tecnolettrs is part of the Spanish AI academia ecosystem Bronchalinox (talk) 23:38, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

I have completely reviewed and enhanced the page. Can I re-submit? Bronchalinox (talk) 22:19, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm SomeoneDreaming. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the main body of Draft:TransMedia Catalonia. Generally, any relevant external links should be listed in an "External links" section at the end of the article and meet the external links guidelines. Links within the body of an article should be internal wikilinks. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SomeoneDreaming (talk) 02:10, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Noted with thanks! Bronchalinox (talk) 17:02, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pangeanic, a link pointing to the disambiguation page FBK was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject AI Cleanup/Noticeboard regarding an AI cleanup investigation which may be related to you. The thread is User:Bronchalinox and Pangeanic. The discussion is about the topic Pangeanic. Musashi1600 (talk) 11:56, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Please read WP:NEWLLM (a guideline) and WP:LLM (an essay) Kowal2701 (talk, contribs) 12:55, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Pangeanic, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to Draft:Pangeanic where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Athanelar (talk) 01:53, 14 March 2026 (UTC)