Talk:Feel Her Love

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

More information Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks: ...
Close

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 13:02, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Tati Gabrielle
Tati Gabrielle
  • Source: HBO:50:53
Converted from a redirect by Rhain (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 94 past nominations.

Rhain (he/him) 22:59, 12 May 2025 (UTC).

  • Article is written very well. QPQ good. Image is clear and freely usable. No copyvio detected. Each hook is interesting, cited inline, and properly sourced. Well done! Nihil obstat. ~Darth StabroTalk  Contribs 00:45, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

Seraphites?

The article should explain what they are, or, if that is explained in another article, refer the reader to it. 78.154.15.163 (talk) 05:45, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Feel Her Love/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Rhain (talk · contribs) 01:00, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Reviewer: Nil NZ (talk · contribs) 02:15, 15 June 2026 (UTC)


Happy to review this! Need a break from reviewing AfC, so this shall be a nice change – I'll review it over the next day or so, but from an initial read through I don't think there's going to be any issues. In solidarity, nil nz 02:15, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Initial comments

  • Article is stable and broad in its coverage.
  • Article is well illustrated;
  • Infobox image has appropriate non-free use rationale, and all other images are appropriately licensed.
  • Images are all captioned and (although not a requirement) also have alt text which is always a big plus.
  • Earwig's highest score is 14.5%, and looking through the top results, the matches are either from proper nouns, or appropriately cited quotes from reviewers; will still double check for CLOP when it comes time for source analysis, but have no immediate copyvios concerns.

Looking into the prose now. Many of these are nit-picky and not strictly required by GAC, so feel free to pushback or disregard as you see fit:

Plot

  • No issues with plot length or WP:FICTENSE
  • Ellie's quest for revenge is mentioned, along with interrogate [Nora] for Abby's whereabouts and Nora apologizes for the brutality of Joel's death, but it would be worth connecting these pieces together for unaware readers by explicitly stating what Ellie's revenge quest is / why she's looking for Abbey / why Nora is apologising for Joel's death.

Conception and writing

  • I'm wondering if the sentence beginning Mazin liked that the red lighting made Ellie's eyes black[...] would be more appropriate in the Filming section, where the red lighting is also mentioned? While the point is to highlight the similarity with the game, it feels more like a comment on the cinematography than conception/writing.
  • Mazin considered several alternatives to Pearl Jam's "Future Days"[...] – this may need added context of its release date being why Mazin considered alternatives, despite it's use in game.
    • This is definitely true for episodes 1 and 6, but Mazin wasn't really explicit with his reasoning for considering alternatives in this specific episode. All he said was "there were a lot of different options here, and I was sort of going down a different path of what Ellie would play".

Casting and characters

  • Williams, cautious about stunt work, halted filming for the day despite Gabrielle's insistence, as his "heart can't take it anymore" – the tense switch is slightly jarring. Would replacing can't[couldn't] still work?

Sources

All numbered refs below are accurate as of revision Special:Diff/1359419434.

  • There are a few sources flagged as no-consensus or gen-unr by cite unseen.
  • 1 & 10: these two Youtube refs are the official podcast and the making of, both released by HBO, so no reliability concerns with those two
  • 5: CBR is a Valnet source that's considered situational per consensus. Ref is for a critic's review, and not used for any controversial claims. No issues.
  • 24: Daily Hive no consensus on reliability, but is not being used for anything controversial. No issues.
  • 43, 44, 47 & 48: Various sources all flagged as no consensus. As with 5, these are all sources are used as references to their own critics' reviews, so no concerns for reliability.

Spot checks

A RNG gave me 4, 8, 12, 14, 18, 21, 39, 43, 47, 52 to look at.

  • No copyvios issues found
  • spot checks of 4, 12, 14, 18, 21, 39, 43, 47 & 52 all passed.
  • I do question what 8 is being referenced for. Presently, it's used to support two statements:
a: Joel's killing of the Fireflies was depicted in "Look for the Light". → it doesn't explicitly state the episode, but it does confirm the killings. (n.b. Not as concerned about this one)
b & c: Several reviewers praised the flirty chemistry between Ellie and Dina[...] → the source is a recap rather than a review, and doesn't appear to praise their chemistry. Checking the other two refs show they support this statement (39 & 40), so probably easiest just to remove this one?
Thanks for the review! Based on my original notes, it looks like I was referencing this specific sentence from the source: The teen-love cuteness of these two is really quite adorable, guys. Rhain he
him
03:45, 16 June 2026 (UTC)
*sigh* I read through multiple times but still missed that line... Yup you're correct, it does support the statement. Great job on this and the rest of the series, it's always a pleasure to delve into TLOU :) In solidarity, nil nz 04:03, 16 June 2026 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI