User talk:Afus199620

I'm reviewing List of countries by number of births. I can't quite figure out how you arrive at the numbers you use. For example, https://population.un.org gives 10.6 births per 1,000 population for the Netherlands for 2015-2020. How do you get to 905? Do you assume a population of approximately 17 million an annual birth rate per 1000 of 10.6 over 5 years? Vexations (talk) 02:38, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

The Netherlands had 905,000 births in 2015-2020. Go to ^[1] and click on "interactive data" and then on "Number of births, both sexes combined (thousands)". Here you can find all the data.--Afus199620 (talk) 06:56, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for creating List of administrative divisions of Myanmar by Human Development Index, Afus199620!

Wikipedia editor Vexations just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

The "Medium" and "Low" headings don't work in a sortable table.

To reply, leave a comment on Vexations's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Vexations (talk) 12:07, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Like all the work you did on the age chart....others may revert....but don't take it personally. Just wanted you to read over WP: sandwich....last thing we want is you being reverted only because you happened to sandwich text between two images. Just make sure there is room in the section before adding.--Moxy (talk) 20:50, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I'm Dan Koehl. Afus199620, thanks for creating List of countries by age structure!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please categorize

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Dan Koehl (talk) 17:54, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I'm Dan Koehl. Afus199620, thanks for creating List of countries by dependency ratio!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please categorize

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Dan Koehl (talk) 17:54, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Please update List of Indian states and territories by Human Development Index with this source as you did for other HDI sub national articles. Remove old list.--203.163.232.22 (talk) 06:41, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Please help update the list.--203.163.242.38 (talk) 18:08, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

But i have already updated it.

No No brother you haven't updated it in the India HDI List as you did in German HDI List or UK HDI List. India HDI List need to updated. So Please check.--116.72.130.154 (talk) 04:25, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Draft:Human Capital Index requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/30498/33252.pdf?sequ. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick(Talk) 13:24, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Draft:Human Capital Index, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:02, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi Afus199620, and thanks for your contributions to Alphabet Inc. I noticed, though, that the numbers provided go back to 2005, while the company has only existed since 2015. Are you sure the source is reliable? If so, where do these numbers come from? Regards. Lordtobi (✉) 19:44, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Numbers before 2015 are for Google.--Afus199620 (talk) 19:46, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

You can't use Pepsi data for an unrelated company. Also CMHK is not a listed company but a subsidiary, their data are only partially announced in the annual report of the parent company , which is a listed company. Matthew hk (talk) 13:19, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Please use reliable source such as Bloomberg and Reuters and may be primary source such as company annual report. Please don't insert stats. table but write a lengthy year-to-yearly paragraph.

Only if those paragraphs existed, a table may be inserted as supplement. Also, it is not quite encyclopedic for share price, P/E or P/B in wikipedia, an general purpose encyclopedia (wikipedia is not an investment guide). Matthew hk (talk) 07:02, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Regarding Microsoft, please cite the actual annual report with page number, not a single web link that direct people to download 10 years of annual reports and look in the whole report to find the data. Matthew hk (talk) 07:55, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Could you please stop destroying all my work!!! I added the right source and all the data is correct!--Afus199620 (talk) 07:57, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Please read WP:NOSTATS, WP:NOTAGUIDE and WP:V. Please properly cite the figures (actual link of annual report with page number, or news article from WP:reliable source) and please don't just add stats. table. Matthew hk (talk) 08:05, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

No one ever complained about my contributions except for you. Could you please show some good will before you destroy two weeks of my work and give me time to ad better sources. And tables are just the best for this kind of stats. Best wishes.--Afus199620 (talk) 08:17, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

WP:NOSTATS:

Excessive listings of unexplained statistics. Statistics that lack context or explanation can reduce readability and may be confusing; accordingly, statistics should be placed in tables to enhance readability, and articles with statistics should include explanatory text providing context.

Matthew hk (talk) 08:19, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

The statistics are in context, make sense and are not confusing. No one complained about them. And why do you think that you are the person making the rules???--Afus199620 (talk) 08:21, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Also the same MoS WP:NOSTATS (my emphasis in bold):

To provide , data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent sources. As explained in § Encyclopedic content above, merely being true, or even verifiable, does not automatically make something suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.

Matthew hk (talk) 08:29, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

The sources are clearly independent and correct.--Afus199620 (talk) 08:44, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

WP:Primary source is not independent actually. Despite I suggested you to cite the actual annual report , not a single web links for 10 years of annual reports. However, the ideal citation should be reliable secondary source. Those US listed company are well reported by WSJ, NYTimes, Reuters and Bloomberg, you just did not dig out those news article for your content. Matthew hk (talk) 08:50, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Then give me some time for that please. And annual reports by corporations are reliable sources and are used in these articles many times.--Afus199620 (talk) 08:53, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Again, just DON'T use https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/Investor/annual-reports.aspx (an index page for multi-year reports)

Use https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/annualreports/ar2018/downloadcenter (for 2018), and {{cite book}} and |page=/|pages=, or use{{rp}}

Ideally use secondary source such as with primary source as supplement

Write paragraph for the context of those data, table is a supplement . Matthew hk (talk) 09:00, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

What do you mean with paragraph? Could you please give me an example how you want it to look like.--Afus199620 (talk) 09:02, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

You can look at Economy of Russia#Economic history for some insight, you can paraphrase those news article (and cite those article) on what contributed to the revenues increase/decrease of that year of that company (Windows 7 may be for some year? May be the sales of iPhone?) Just need to paraphrase and did not need your own analysis (WP:NOORIGINALRESEARCH) A plain paragraph just to describe the data increase/decrease is a plain WP:routine/WP:trivial content. Matthew hk (talk) 09:21, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

The problem is that my English is not good enough to write long articles. Could I please do it in form of a table. There are many such articles with tables like in The Walt Disney Company and a 10-year oversight over important stats like in revenue and earnings surely has an encyclopedic value.--Afus199620 (talk) 09:36, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

The Walt Disney Company is a classic example of WP:NOSTATS. That page may actually updated by staff which is very very not suitable due to WP:paid, or something that should be removed but no one challenged yet (classic WP:OTHERSTUFFEXIST). It may be less trivial for all Disney chairmen in the list in that page are blue-link, but such listing in other companies are usually removed due to excessive red link.

For a paragraph for those financial data, missing one or two years of details is fine. Also those table can be trimmed to just 5 years or 10 years, which reduce the amount to paraphrase from news report of the annual earning. Matthew hk (talk) 09:49, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Visa Inc., without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Matthew hk (talk) 08:08, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Amazon (company). This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. It should have at least 13 links of individual annual report with page number for 13 annual data (or 13 news articles published in 13 different years), not 3 links for people to download the reports and read the report page by page. Matthew hk (talk) 08:33, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

I did not add unsourced content. I want to complain about this.--Afus199620 (talk) 08:45, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi! For US currency, you can use USD or US$ but never USD$. The D and the $ both stand for 'dollar', so USD$ becomes United States dollars dollars. Also, the template {{USD}} may be useful to you. Cheers.  Stepho  talk  14:09, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

And the ordinal number for 1 is 1st, not 1th! (It goes 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th.)----Ehrenkater (talk) 20:01, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi, could you please add or update the HDI data for the Baltic regions as shown in List of Baltic regions by Human Development Index? Thanks JACKINTHEBOX • ^TALK 09:34, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Hello, you mean add the the HDI data in the articles of the Baltic regions?--Afus199620 (talk) 09:38, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Yes, or update them (in the case of some). Thanks JACKINTHEBOX • ^TALK 09:41, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

No problem, I can do that. Could you please help me to add HDI data for Regions of Italy, NUTS statistical regions of the United Kingdom, States of Germany and U.S. states. I just don't get how to add the HDI values in these Articles.--Afus199620 (talk) 10:01, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Afus199620,

Welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for creating List of countries by gross national savings! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you:-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 11:42, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello Afus199620, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Happy editing, JACKINTHEBOX • TALK 07:33, 27 December 2018 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

I was on holiday in Singapore since December 18th until yesterday, and did not have a chance to send you a message earlier! JACKINTHEBOX • ^TALK 07:33, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Human Capital Index, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Binod Basnet (talk) 14:27, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

 :) JACKINTHEBOX • ^TALK 03:15, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to List of Nigerian states by GDP. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Please cite the exact page where you got your information from the document. Jamie Tubers (talk) 15:53, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Why did you reverted my third version? I gave you the correct source with pages.

Thanks for creating List of countries by past and future population density.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for your new article "List of countries by past and future population density". I recommend linking this article with the previously-existing List of countries and dependencies by population density, and describing why this new and separate article is necessary as a topic in its own right.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 16:24, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at General Motors, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Magnolia677 (talk) 19:00, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

I did not want to vandalize anything. Sorry if i gave a incorrect source.--Afus199620 (talk) 19:55, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! JACKINTHEBOX • ^TALK 08:38, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of countries by tariff rate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Capital (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Afus199620. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of the largest trading partners of France".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Phospheros (talk) 19:04, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Afus199620. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of regions of New Zealand by GDP".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 05:18, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Swiss companies by revenue, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Emmen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:26, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Afus199620. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Human Capital Index".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Interstellarity T 🌟 15:00, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for creating List of countries by airline passengers.

User:Whoisjohngalt while reviewing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thanks for adding this list, it will be useful yo many people,

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Whoisjohngalt}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whoisjohngalt (talk) 17:35, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

The article List of East Asian people by net worth has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnecessary content forking, we already have separates lists for these countries

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jklamo (talk) 12:51, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of largest Danish companies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Service (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi, Have reviewed your new page. A couple of things:

• 'The figures below are given in billions of US dollars'. I think they are in millions - needs changing.
• 'All 18 companies from Ireland are listed.' not sure what that last sentence is. Might need removing?

Regards, Willbb234 (talk) 10:58, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for creating List of largest companies in South Africa.

User:Lefcentreright while reviewing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Well-written and nicely structured. As a South African myself, it was quite interesting and surprising to see which companies are so big.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Lefcentreright}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Lefcentreright (talk) 16:31, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

On 2 August 2019 you edited the page Brookfield Asset Management replacing the 2017 income figures with those for 2018; however, you did not update the citation to reflect where you got the 2018 figures. The remaining citation shows the verification for the 2017 figures which you removed. When you edit a Wikipedia article you need to provide sources. You cannot just update figures and ignore existing sources. See Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Citing sources. Let me know if you have any questions. --Bejnar (talk) 22:21, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Hello Afus199620, I noticed you added the finance section to the Honeywell article. I am updating the sentence with the most current financial information. This sentence now lives in the 2002–present: Acquisitions and further expansion section. Can you take a look at the updated version of my request?

For the fiscal year 2018, Honeywell reported net income of US$6.765 billion, with an annual revenue of US$41.802 billion, an increase of 3.13% over the previous fiscal cycle. Honeywell's shares traded at over $169 per share, and its market capitalization was valued at over US$120.26 billion in September 2019.^{[1][2][3][4][5]}-Chefmikesf (talk) 22:24, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Very Good. Thank you.--Afus199620 (talk) 13:39, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Afus199620 Due to my COI, I cannot update the sentence. Can you update the information on the Honeywell article?--Chefmikesf (talk) 17:19, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Afus199620Thanks so much! Sorry, I should have been more clear up front. To keep the section succinct, can you remove the sentence with the 2017 data? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chefmikesf (talk • contribs) 17:41, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Hey Afus199620, Do you have interest to make more updates to the Honeywell Wikipedia article? I have some updates in the lead paragraph needing attention on the Talk:Honeywell. They are pretty straight forward, factual updates with sources.--Chefmikesf (talk) 23:53, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

2020 Honeywell Updates

Hello Afus199620, I see there are a few updates to the tables on the Honeywell article. Do you mind helping with these small updates? Thanks in advance!--Chefmikesf (talk) 19:38, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

1.

Minor Updates

Corporate governance

Remove inactive board member Jaime Chico Pardo^[6]

Remove inactive board member Bradley T. Sheares^[7]

Add new board member Deborah Flint^[8]

Add new board member Raymond T. Odierno^[9]

Acquisitions

Add Tru-Trak Flight Systems to the acquisition table^[10]

2.

One Sentence Addition

Hi Afus199620, Thank you for the updates to the Honeywell article. I noticed one more important sentence missing. Would you mind adding this sentence as the last sentence of the 2015–present section?

In September 2020, Honeywell and their predecessor AlliedSignal, celebrated their 100 year anniversary on the NYSE.^[11][12]

--Chefmikesf (talk) 02:03, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello @Afus199620:, Thanks for your help with the Honeywell finance section. Would you be open to helping with the Acquisition table? I made some simple clean up and reference suggestions below. Thanks in advance! All the edits below are drafted up in my sandbox, here.--Chefmikesf (talk) 23:23, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

@Chefmikesf:. Done now.--Afus199620 (talk) 16:45, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Hey @Afus199620:, Thank you so much!--Chefmikesf (talk) 22:20, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Merry Christmas, Afus199620! Or Season's Greetings or Happy Winter Solstice! As the year winds to a close, I would like to take a moment to recognize your hard work and offer heartfelt gratitude for all you do for Wikipedia. May this Holiday Season bring you nothing but joy, health and prosperity. Onel5969 TT me 11:12, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Thank you, Greetings and Merry Christmas.--Afus199620 (talk) 20:37, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Hello A: I noticed you added large sections to numerous stock index articles that refer to the website http://www.1stock1.com. That site certainly does not appear to be a reliable source. Can you provide any background or explanation for the additions? Thanks in advance, UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:28, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello, You're right. I changed the articles to a different/additional source now.--Afus199620 (talk) 14:12, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello- Below are a few editing suggestions to make it easier for you and others to collaborate on the encyclopedia. Please preview, consolidate, and summarize your edits:

• Try to consolidate your edits, at least at the section level, to avoid cluttering the page's edit history; this makes it easier for your fellow editors to understand your intentions, and makes it easier for those monitoring activity on the article.
  • The show preview button (beside the "publish changes" button) is helpful for this; use it to view your changes incrementally before finally saving the page once you're satisfied with your edits.
• Please remember to explain each edit with an edit summary (box above the "publish changes" button).

Thanks in advance for considering these suggestions. Eric ^talk 22:07, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

Hello again. Please do ask for help if you have trouble grasping any of the above concepts. Eric ^talk 20:11, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi Afus199620, a while back you created the "Finances" section at Verizon Communications. Could you take a look at my Verizon Communications Talk page request to add recently reported financials? As I work for Verizon and have a conflict of interest, I ask others to look at my request and make edits on my behalf. I'm posting a note here in case you did not see my ping at Talk:Verizon Communications. Thank you, VZEric (talk) 17:50, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of largest companies in the United States by revenue, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page West Chester, Ohio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Hey Afus199620, How are you? I noticed some inaccuracies and omissions in the Infobox and Corporate governance sections of the Johnson & Johnson Article. Here are the suggested improvements to each part of the article. Do you have any interest in collaborating on this project? Let me know if there are any questions!--Chefmikesf (talk) 18:37, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of regions of Thailand by Human Development Index is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of regions of Thailand by Human Development Index until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Paul_012 (talk) 09:09, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Lex Fridman, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 21:40, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello Afus199620,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Tony Xu for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 21:14, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Please explain your contributions using a descriptive edit summary. Changing information on Wikipedia (such as numbers and dates) without explanation may be confused with vandalism. Are you having trouble with the concept of leaving an edit summary? Help is available. Eric ^talk 03:07, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

An article you recently created, New Mansoura, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 17:53, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello Afus199620! I want to let you know that I added some good citations and moved around some of the narrative on Xu's page to conform to bio formatting and better flow. I also defended Xu's notability on his talk page. Thank you for creating the article as I believe he is an important figure in America business. LassoLaneFolks (talk) 23:46, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ark Invest is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ark Invest until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

FalconK (talk) 06:12, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

The article List of cities in Kagawa Prefecture by population has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The population statistics are on the prefecture's page Kagawa, Japan with better sources. Seems redundant to have this page?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fredlesaltique (talk) 02:54, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Comparison between Indian states and countries by GDP (PPP), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison between Chinese provinces and sovereign states by GDP PPP until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:05, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beam Therapeutics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beam Therapeutics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DGG ( talk ) 22:17, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Well done here. A very needed article. Keep up the good work! Cheers--Chanaka L (talk) 06:38, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Past and future population density by country a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 22:03, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect List of countries by past and future population density). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 26#List of countries by past and future population density) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 22:26, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Defence Therapeutics, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Polyamorph (talk) 21:02, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of cities by total wealth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of cities by total wealth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

JBchrch talk 04:09, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on List of cryptocurrencies by market capitalization requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. David Gerard (talk) 18:15, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of cryptocurrencies by market capitalization is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of cryptocurrencies by market capitalization until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

David Gerard (talk) 12:49, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Afus199620. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Beam Therapeutics, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:13, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Konfio, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 14:48, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Beam Therapeutics requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beam Therapeutics. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:56, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Just so your aware before others revert your chart additions to main country articles...Wikipedia:WikiProject Countries#Charts. Pls also review WP:SANDWICH.Moxy- 22:01, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

These should not be overly detailed charts.--Afus199620 (talk) 22:03, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Some will see it has historical data not covered in the prose text of the section ...thus considered historical over data best covered on main articles on the topics that covers historical information. Also if the data is not covered in the prose text it many not be the best choice of image as outlined st MOS:IMAGERELEVANCE. Also these images are an accessibility problem for those with disabilities as we should avoid using images in place of tables or charts for data as seen at WP:ACCESSIBILITY.Moxy- 22:18, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of countries by electricity price is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of countries by electricity price until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fram (talk) 15:22, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

• https://list.fandom.com/wiki/Main_Page is a good place for this, if you want to save your work just copy it over. I think having a column listing year by year would be more useful. I found it interesting to see how much the electricity of my country compared to the rest. Dream Focus 18:57, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Afus199620. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Defence Therapeutics, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:00, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Please don't add wrong information in article list of cities in Maharashtra by adding wrong district name in result. Thenexttalk (talk) 06:06, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Afus199620. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Defence Therapeutics".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:17, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Asians by net worth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Asians by net worth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 22:53, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Global Firepower Index is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Firepower Index until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Loafiewa (talk) 01:36, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Germany Trade and Invest, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 17:40, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Afus199620,

Thank you for creating Inner German relations.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

There are various unsourced statements, which require inline citations per WP:BURDEN.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Meena}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

– Meena • 21:09, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi, Afus199620. Thanks for creating List of counties of Kenya by GDP. I've removed the last column, "Equivalent country", from the two tables in this article. This column contained a synthesis of data from multiple sources that doesn't exist in any one source; this amounts to prohibited original research. In particular, the column you added makes an assertion about the similarity in GDP between a given Kenyan county, and the GDP of another country in the world. However, no source actually contains an assertion about this comparison or equivalency; the assertion comes only from you in the research you did in multiple sources to find these equivalencies. Please be sure that all information you add to Wikipedia articles is verifiable, and can be backed up with a citation to a reliable source. The equivalence column does not meet this criterion, and thus had to be removed. For more information, see Wikipedia:No original research#Synthesis of published material. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 17:16, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

I also removed the "Equivalent country" column from the tables at List of Swedish counties by GDP for the same reason. I found another dozen articles which also have the same problem, which will also need to have the same change applied to the tables in them (I didn't check to see if you are a contributor in those articles). There are too many of them for me to fix them all, so any help you could offer would be appreciated. For the list of articles and a more general discussion about this, please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Countries#Assistance requested with SYNTH issue in country demographic articles. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 19:21, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for trying to hold the line over the last few months against several editors (possibly just one, under various IP addresses) trying to reinsert WP:SYNTH data in the form of a comparable country column in List of Iranian provinces by Human Development Index. I've rolled this further back to before the editors became active at the article. Happy editing! Mathglot (talk) 22:29, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

I undid two of your recent changes to demographic articles, where you added 7kb of numeric data to Demographics of Ghana in this edit, and 5kb to Demographics of Cameroon in this edit. You provided a citation to https://population.un.org/wpp/ in both cases, but in neither case does that web page support the changes you made. Wikipedia's policy of WP:Verifiability is a core policy requirement; you may not add massive amounts of data of this type to an article without an "inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution." The term directly supports means that a given piece of material "is present explicitly in the source". I removed your edits in those two cases, because the source you gave "does not support the claim".

I fear that this may be but the tip of a very large iceberg, because in going over some edits of yours recently, it seems that you have used this same source to support addition of numeric data in dozens, or perhaps hundreds, of demographic articles, and it may be that this source does not support any of them. I hope that is not the case. For starters, please stop making any further unsupported changes to numeric data in demographic articles and be sure that all the figures you add or change are directly traceable to a reliable source. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 00:31, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello @Mathglot:, you can verify all changes when you download the second Excel file from the World Population Prospects. First click on "Download Data Files", then you can click on the second file called "Complete (estimates and all projection scenarios) (XLSX, 93.06 MB)". See here: https://population.un.org/wpp/Download/Standard/MostUsed/ There you can view and verify demographic data for all countries and territories. Unfortunately, this database is not easy to navigate for beginners. You can also use the Data Portal at the same Website or find the same data here: https://ourworldindata.org/world-population-update-2022#:~:text=The%20world%20population%20will%20pass%208%20billion%20at%20the%20end%20of%202022&text=It%20passed%20its%20last%20milestone,growth%20rate%20continues%20to%20fall.

The World Population Prospects are the most used source for demographic statistics on Wikipedia, and in most cases I just updated existing data with the new 2022 update.--Afus199620 (talk) 08:10, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Whatever happened on the article before you got there is on someone else; but when you made a change and included a citation, then you took ownership of verifiability for the assertions you added. The link you added clearly does not support the content you added. The fact that you can point to other links here on your Talk page is nice, but it is not relevant to the policy of WP:Verifiability. I see that you have reverted the two articles, restoring citations that do not verify the assertions you added. Please add a citation to the article that verifies your assertions that is "present explicitly in the source". The article in its current state does not conform to WP:Verifiability policy. Consider this a formal WP:CHALLENGE. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 10:17, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

The indicated source does confirm the WP:Verifiability. You just haven't called up the data that's in the given source. I don't know any other way to link to the data. Do you know how to link from Wikipedia directly to an Excel file? --Afus199620 (talk) 11:50, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

No, it does not, I checked it. Only the linked files do, and the page you cited could be changed and no longer link to them tomorrow. It would be like linking to "bbc.com" instead of an article linked from bbc's home page; it's fine for today, but tomorrow it may no longer be there; you have to link to the specific BBC article that has the actual text that verifies the information you've placed in the Wikipedia article. Otherwise, it's not verifiable.

If you can access the pop. data on the internet, whether it be a web page, image, Excel file, or whatever, that's because it has a Uniform Resource Locator. Your browser always exposes the URL to you in the browser address bar. Since you know how to get to the Excel file, all you have to do to get its URL is to copy it out of the address bar. Since it is a web resource, linking to it is no different than linking to any external link in a reference, such as linking the title of a book to a Google books url for that title. Or, were you asking that once you have the resource, you're not sure how to cite it, whether in plain text, or using one of the templates? Mathglot (talk) 08:11, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

I can't find where the URL is in the Excel file. I don't know where to find the address bar in the Excel file. Therefore, I can't link it.--Afus199620 (talk) 10:02, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

When you click it, it's there. But give me a Wikipedia article name, the citation number or link to it, and the name (anchor, label, linktext) of the Excel file as it appears on that page, and I will explain how to get the link to it. (please mention me on reply; thanks!) Mathglot (talk) 09:48, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

@Mathglot: I want to change reference No. 7 in Demographics of Nepal. It should directly link to the Excel file called Complete (estimates and all projection scenarios) (XLSX, 93.17 MB). You can find it here: https://population.un.org/wpp/Download/Standard/MostUsed/ (second file in the second column). How can I link it now?--Afus199620 (talk) 08:19, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

That's doable; this is becoming targeted now to a solution for this specific footnoting question, and deserves its own section; see below. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 18:37, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Municipalities of Estonia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elva.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Afus199620. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Konfio, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Note: Just to be clear: this is *your* talk page, so you get to handle it pretty much the way you want, within reason. I rolled up this discussion because I thought you would prefer it, but the discussion is not "closed", you can reply, you can keep the box but default to "show" (i.e., "expanded") by setting |collapsed=no, or you can undo it so it was the way it was before; it's your call. Mathglot (talk) 05:44, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi Afus199620. I've been away from demographics for a little bit (working on French history), and just got back, and saw that you've made great progress, congrats! Normally, almost all the articles that use the UN WPP, are using data from the 'Estimates' worksheet (the first, i.e., left-most one) and when they do, you don't have to do anything special, because the 'Estimates' sheet is what the template cites by default, if you don't tell it otherwise. I have noticed one or two articles that cited other sheets, like the 'Medium variants' sheet. Not sure if you had a chance to check out the template doc, but it has a way to pick the right worksheet, if it isn't the 'Estimates' sheet; for example, you can add |sheet=Medium variants (or any of the others) to specify the correct one. Maybe you already knew this; I only had a chance to look at a few of the ones you updated. Anyway, thanks, and keep up the good work! I'll try and do a few myself, if only to get a better sense of the real world situation out there, and make sure the template is adequate for the job.

Have a question for you: I'm still undecided about adding the ability to handle previous year data to the template. I've seen demographic articles citing UN WPP version as far back as 2010, but I imagine it's probably better to just update the numbers in our articles to 2022 data, than trying to cite them to 10-year old data. I've seen more articles that reference the '2019' one than the really old ones, so maybe it's worth doing that, what do you think? It wouldn't be particularly hard, and it would also 'prepare the terrain', so to speak, for updating the template so that when the 2024 one comes out it will be very easy to just slide that one in there. Anyway, since you're really familiar with the demographic end of this, it just really helps to have feedback from you about this. Thanks again for running with this; I feel like with every edit you do, we're improving verifiability in the Countries project! (please mention me on reply; thanks!) Mathglot (talk) 08:49, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi, Afus199620, I've made significant improvements to the documentation of {{Cite UN WPP}}, especially in the area of short footnotes. If you find yourself using the template more than once in the same article, that's a sign that you could benefit from using short citations. There's a new section explaining how to use the template in articles where you need to refer to the UN population report more than once, and a new "Examples" section at the bottom that clearly demonstrates it. Please let me know if there's anything there that isn't clear, or that you think needs improvement. Mathglot (talk) 07:48, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi Afus199620, I'd like your feedback regarding the removal by another editor of a large table of HDI trends data from an article. I'm not sure what (if anything) to do about it, and I'd appreciate your advice.

A brand new editor recently removed an entire HDI trends table from this HDI article. This table was originally added to the article by you, in this edit back in 2018. I challenged their large removal at Talk, and they responded by saying (without evidence) that they removed the table because the data "was incorrect", and because it contained "made up numbers". Tracking it down, I see that the table was copied from de-wiki revision 179939937 (12. Aug. 2018) of Liste der indischen Bundesstaaten nach dem Index der menschlichen Entwicklung which you created and added the table on 5 August. Knowing your attention to detail and sourcing, I don't believe a word of what this editor has to say in their comments about the data table they removed, and the removal is no doubt improper.

So here's my question for you: what is the best thing to do at this article now, if anything? I'm not sure if it's worth undoing their removal and reinstalling the trends table based on the 2018 data or not. Maybe the data is old enough that removing it doesn't matter at this point, so doing nothing in an option? I'll leave it up to you whether you think it's worth adding a comment at the Talk page discussion here, or just let it go. As for me, I've already challenged the editor once on the removal, and I don't know whether it's worth challenging them a second time based on their dubious comments about sourcing, or just let that go, too.

More generally, I'm curious what you think the important factors are in responding to editors who might remove a lot of data or even whole tables from the demographic articles. If the data is old (like, 2018, say) should I even bother commenting about such a removal, or just let it go? What do you think are the important principles here that should be observed? Thanks in advance for your thoughts, Mathglot (talk) 19:23, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello Mathglot, thanks for noticing this. The data I added were surely not "made up numbers". Just making up numbers of these kinds of statistics would be beyond my personal creativity. It's possible they got updated and changed retroactive. The source is still the same. You can find it here https://globaldatalab.org/shdi/table/shdi/IND/?levels=1+4&interpolation=0&extrapolation=0 with numbers going back to 1990. Instead of removing the content, they could have just updated it. I will take a look at the list myself.

Unfortunately, many lists and articles about Indian demographics and social statistics have a lot of chaotic editing and also some cases of blatant vandalism.--Afus199620 (talk) 21:25, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply. I pretty much guessed what you confirmed here, I just wasn't sure whether it was worth following up on, or not. I'll leave it to you to decide if, and how, you might want to address this. If you need any support from me on this (or on anything), feel free to {{ping}} me any time. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 22:00, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

I would like to invite you to a request for comment. I think you have a good and clear opinion that you should make known.2A0A:A546:4576:0:71CB:63BC:CC95:66A9 (talk) 13:12, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

The article List of largest cryptocurrency exchanges has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Based on a single questionable source, a Statista listing that does not cite its own sources; actual data appears to be skimmed from coinmarketcap, which lists often-faked volume from exchanges. There appears to be no Wikipedia-suitable sourcing for this topic; it is not possible to write an article on this topic based on RSes at this time, or indeed in the time this article has existed.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Afus199620. Thank you for creating Willi Voss. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 20:15, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

The article Germany–Saint Kitts and Nevis relations has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of any notability for this combination, no indepth independent sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 15:48, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Germany–Saint Kitts and Nevis relations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Germany–Saint Kitts and Nevis relations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 07:36, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Germany–Guyana relations, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Germany–Guyana relations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Afus199620. Thank you for your work on Germany–Haiti relations. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:01, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello. Regarding your edit Special:Diff/1120238411, the cited URL https://population.un.org/wpp/ is too vague thus impossible to locate the source because there are hundreds of pages and files under that. Please provide a precise URL and necessary information so readers can obtain and verify it (ideally in one click). I guess your source is https://population.un.org/wpp/Download/Files/1_Indicators%20(Standard)/EXCEL_FILES/1_General/WPP2022_GEN_F01_DEMOGRAPHIC_INDICATORS_COMPACT_REV1.xlsx so I've put an example here: Special:Diff/1120486988. Wotheina (talk) 08:00, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Afus199620. Thank you for your work on Bahrain–Germany relations. User:Bruxton, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for writing articles!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 22:55, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Afus199620. Thank you for your work on Bahrain–Germany relations. User:Bruxton, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article! Keep building the encyclopedia!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 22:55, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi again. I've reverted a few HDI dev. pages that didn't have the data in the given source. Also, could you please stop using the expression "as of 2023 with data for the year 2021" as that seems meaningless to me. What is it you are trying to say, here? If it's about when you made the edit (i.e., "in 2023") nobody reading the article will care, and it's preserved in the history, for any editor trying to track changes in the article, so you don't need to say it. Mathglot (talk) 02:08, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

You're right. I corrected it now.--Afus199620 (talk) 07:56, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Yes, looks good. Thanks! Mathglot (talk) 10:26, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of German cities by GDP, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Herne and Worms.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Afus199620. Thank you for your work on Personal union of Poland and Saxony. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 08:47, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited List of cities with a million or more inhabitants, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rom.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:48, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

About Senegal, do you know the recent types of information of the nation? Hence I have seen some edits on the population based on its recent census (being 2023). So I was wondering if you know any sources in regards to all of the level types of the administrative sub-division territorial units. Your thoughts? jlog3000 (talk) 18:47, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello, you can find Departments of Senegal here:

https://www.citypopulation.de/en/senegal/admin/

Greetings. Other subdivisions, I don't know, unfortunately. --Afus199620 (talk) 19:58, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Greetings. I have checked that link. However, you have no knowledge or acknowledgement yet in regards with the villages or quartiers within the 'communautes rurales' and communes within Senegal? jlog3000 (talk) 20:03, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

No, unfortunately not. I don't know if results are published yet. It will probably be published here.

https://www.ansd.sn/theme/demographie.--Afus199620 (talk) 20:08, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Understood. And I hope so eventually. But I appreciate your feedback and honesty in that regard by far. Thanks in advance. jlog3000 (talk) 20:20, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

I suggest you should change title to

"List of cities with a population of over 1 million inhabitants"

Because technically even 1,000,001 is over 1 million

No need for "million or more" 84.15.182.142 (talk) 01:39, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Sure. But cities with exactly 1,000,000 inhabitants will also be included. This is at least a theoretical possibility.--Afus199620 (talk) 11:24, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

For that matter, "a" is not a number but rather gibberish or slurred speech or slang, as the closest word to "uh", and is thus unencyclopedic. The "or more" is totally redundant anyway. "with one million inhabitants" is included in "more than one million". If there's 1,000,0001 then there's already also 1,000,000. Oh yeah I forgot. "Inhabitants" is redundant to "population". The population is nothing else but inhabitants! :) And how is this article not redundant altogether against others like lists of metropolises or whatever? What's the point of this article? The title says "cities" and most of the entries are simply not cities. This article's name is inconsistent with the format of other similar articles, even those in its own "see also" section. — Smuckola(talk) 21:21, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

I will try to explain.

This is a list of cities/municipalities (so called city proper) and not of agglomerations or metropolitan areas. This is a clear difference. Don't get confused by names of municipalities or administrative divisions in different countries. The definition is clear and always indicated.

I made this list because I found the other ones to be lacking quality. The List of largest cities uses a ranking by the UN that mixes up metropolitan areas, urban areas and city propers. The data for city propers and metropolitan areas there is not even giving the dates of the estimates. This list is very confusing.

I think the list is not redundant. It is listing specifically municipalities/city propers over a certain population size, and not just vaguely the "largest cities". I also tried to give the specific administrative boundaries for every city and the date of estimate with sources. You generally don't find that in the other lists. I tried to make an improvement. It was a lot of work and such lists will obviously never be perfectly.--Afus199620 (talk) 13:06, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Hello. You did not provide a reliable source WP:RS for any of your recent edits to Durango (city) here. We can't just make up numbers. That last source is about Ecuador, and the previous numbers have no source whatsoever (WP:RS WP:OR). We must always provide, replace, or update the access-date, of a reliable source. Please immediately fix or revert that anywhere you've done this on the encyclopedia. That's absolutely mandatory by policy. Thank you. — Smuckola(talk) 21:21, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

It was a mistake. I will correct.--Afus199620 (talk) 21:23, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Muchas gracias! We have a lot of editors who only edit statistics and they don't care about rules. ;) I mean a lot! And they're very stubborn. So thank you very much. — Smuckola(talk) 07:38, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Hi, I have seen that you had made changes to the articles relating to Indian states with a projected population. Are you sure that the source you had provided is a reliable source WP:RS. All these years, the official population of 2011 census has been used as a standard as other demographics are based on that. Has there been a discussion on this? Thanks! Magentic Manifestations (talk) 14:06, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Should be reliable. Isn't this official or semi-official website? 2011 is pretty outdated now. --Afus199620 (talk) 14:18, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

It is definitely not the official website and it doesn't quote any primary source for the projections as well. As I have pointed out, while the projections were for the previous years as well, official data was used all the while from 2011 census and the other demographics are based on that as well. If you are not sure if it is a reliable source or if there are no primary sources for the projection, it is a point that might warrant further discussion as it affects quite a lot of pages. Magentic Manifestations (talk) 14:30, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Use Indian government sources only for census data. Estimations and figures provided by sites like census2011.co.in are unreliable. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:46, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

This is sorted I hope. @Afus199620 Do you have any further comments on this? Hope you will make the changes as discussed. Thanks! Magentic Manifestations (talk) 14:52, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Yes @Magentic Manifestations. Do you think this is an acceptable source?: https://main.mohfw.gov.in/reports-0. It is clearly from the Indian government.--Afus199620 (talk) 14:57, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

I don't see a reason to use estimates even if it comes from the government institutions, unless used in a particular context, in the article body and not the infobox. If you want you can discuss it at WP:INB. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:06, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of association football clubs by average attendance is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of association football clubs by average attendance until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Idiosincrático (talk) 06:34, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dakoro, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dakoro Department.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Afus199620. Thank you for your work on Dietenhausen. Cocobb8, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

I've marked the article as reviewed. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Cocobb8}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 17:15, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Hello Afus199620!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Afus199620. Thank you for your work on Ar-Ramtha District. MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

the unstats ref doesn't show any district of this name

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:21, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to International Holding Company. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 20:02, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

The redirect Meeting the of the heads of state of German-speaking countries has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 18 § Meeting the of the heads of state of German-speaking countries until a consensus is reached. Rusalkii (talk) 21:48, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello can you create article “List of prefecture-level divisions by GDP”. You create article and I can add the data because I don’t have account and can’t create myself. There is article “Chinese provinces by GDP” but some prefectures have like 10 million inhabitants and deserve separate article. 84.15.186.166 (talk) 14:41, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

I fix myself

“List of prefecture-level divisions of China by GDP” 84.15.186.166 (talk) 14:42, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Where can I find the data? Could you create the article in your sandbox? I can move it to the article room then.--Afus199620 (talk) 18:58, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

You can create your sandbox and i can put data. Or you can create empty article and i would add data.

i would extract data from this table List of prefectures in China#List 84.15.186.166 (talk) 20:24, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

I put table into your sandbox

User:Afus199620/sandbox 84.15.186.166 (talk) 22:15, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Most of Chinese GDP data in Chinese Wikipedia.

For example prefectures in Anhui province:

https://w.wiki/9XgP

84.15.186.166 (talk) 20:28, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Please make a sandbox and I can move it. But there needs to be an official source for GDP data to link to. Not just Wiki data.--Afus199620 (talk) 22:56, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

I putted table in your sandbox User:Afus199620/sandbox and added sources 84.15.186.166 (talk) 23:44, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

This seems to be outdated data from nearly 10 years ago. Are there no newer numbers? It would also be nice to have gdp per capital numbers and exchange rates to USD to make the data more useful.--Afus199620 (talk) 00:44, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Data differs for every province. Some have only 2015, some like 2017 and some 2022. Yes there is per capita numbers but I need too add it. Seems a lot of work. Do you want to create article and I would update it everyday by a bit or you only want to publish table with all latest data? 84.15.186.166 (talk) 01:11, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

I will wait for newer data. You can continuously update it.--Afus199620 (talk) 10:10, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

I updated table can you publish it 84.15.190.137 (talk) 23:14, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks! I published it under List of prefecture-level divisions of China by GDP now. Greetings.--Afus199620 (talk) 10:48, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks 84.15.190.137 (talk) 12:49, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi, Afus; just checking in. How's everything going? Any of the templates need updating? Cheers, Mathglot (talk) 10:20, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Mathglot. Everything is going well, thanks. Not need for updates right now. Greetings.--Afus199620 (talk) 11:01, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Afus199620. Thank you for your work on Branitz Palace. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:10, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Afus199620. Thank you for your work on Essershausen. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:20, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi Afus199620. Thank you for your work on List of sports clubs by membership. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for your work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 17:40, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi Afus199620. Thank you for your work on Laimbach. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:22, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi Afus,

I was the first person to create a separate section about the recent incidences and I titled it "Criticism" which was then reverted because some policy against naming sections "Criticism". I then brought the separate section back under the title "Public image" and it has been reverted and unreverted for a while now. I reverted the revert once already lol and now it's reverted back in the big huge section. The ANTI-free speechers want to hid her deteriorating public image into a huge section so that people are less likely to see it. This is a disgrace on Wikipedia.

Alexysun (talk) 06:11, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your support. I appreciate it. It's very sad to see this. Wikipedia should be unbiased and open. The whole thing about the Katherine Maher article is very disheartening and seems to be agenda driven.--Afus199620 (talk) 14:52, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi Afus199620. Thank you for your work on BIST 100. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:32, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi Afus199620. Thank you for your work on Redcare Pharmacy. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:10, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

JakeshPradhan 106.207.92.156 (talk) 06:14, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

JakeshPradhan 106.207.92.156 (talk) 06:15, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

JakeshPradhan 106.207.92.156 (talk) 06:15, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi Afus199620. Thank you for your work on List of South African provinces by poverty rate. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for your work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 18:22, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello Afus can you update Moscow GDP data from 2021 to 2022. To edit it requires to be "extended confirmed user".

Can you change GDP from ₽24.471 trillion to ₽28.507 trillion

Per capita from ₽1,935,205 to ₽2,182,863

New source:https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/VRP_s_1998.xlsx Source title: Валовой региональный продукт по субъектам Российской Федерации в 2016-2022 гг.

also GDP Demographics title from "Federal city" to "Total" GonzalezRio (talk) 16:38, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Nigerian states by literacy rate is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Nigerian states by literacy rate until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Boleyn (talk) 15:33, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi! I have seen your tremendous work on updating List of cities in Punjab, Pakistan by population. Can you please also update List of cities in Pakistan by population. 83.137.6.178 (talk) 20:04, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Muhoza, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Muko.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

The Kenya National Bureau of Statistics refers Gross Domestic Product of Kenya Counties as Gross County Product (GCP)..Hence Official.. You Can refer that to Knbs web Ajohn77 (talk) 06:09, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

Its irrelevant how the Kenya National Bureau of Statistics calls it. It's still a list of Kenyan counties by GDP or GCP. This should be the title, like List of Nigerian states by GDP and other lists.--Afus199620 (talk) 10:01, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

In USA in gdp data Relating to States or Counties or districts they Call it MSA , Metropolitan Statistical Area, Representing e.g the Gross Domestic Product of Say, Los Angeles County..

Now that's the Same Way , Kenya National Bureau of Statistics refers it as Gross County product Ajohn77 (talk) 04:23, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

Then List of counties of Kenya by GCP should be correct. Greetings.--Afus199620 (talk) 12:17, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi Afus199620, I work for BDT & MSD Partners. I'm trying to create a Wikipedia article for co-CEO Gregg Lemkau. I see that you have contributed to the Wikipedia articles for other investment companies including Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase, so I hope you'll be interested in taking a look at the draft I've posted here. I'd be happy for any feedback or thoughts that you could share.

Thank you, Roundtable2023 (talk) 14:55, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello Roundtable2023. I took a look and I think it's a decent and well sourced article. The person seems to fit the criteria for inclusion. I moved it for you to the main space.--Afus199620 (talk) 21:11, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Thank you so much for your quick response. The page looks great! Roundtable2023 (talk) 16:09, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi Afus199620. Thank you for your work on FTSE/JSE All-Share Index. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 18:59, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Große Divergenz. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is a poor translation and it can't be in German in the English Wikipedia . I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 16:40, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of British billionaires by net worth, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dyson and Andrew Currie.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Lasertec Corporation, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Thanks. TheBritinator (talk) 18:29, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

พ่อแม่เมียง 2001:44C8:4811:758:0:0:0:1 (talk) 04:06, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

¡Un gusto saludarte! Espero que te encuentres muy bien.

Te escribo este mensaje porque uno de los pilares fundamentales de Wikipedia es mantener un punto de vista neutral, evitando ataques personales, generalizaciones y contenido sesgado. Entiendo que, conforme a estos principios, no debe incluirse información que carezca de respaldo en fuentes confiables, ni datos sobre relaciones personales o el uso de adjetivos subjetivos relacionados con personas vinculadas al tema. Es esencial centrarse únicamente en información relevante y verificable sobre la persona en cuestión, lo que asegura que el artículo cumpla con su propósito enciclopédico.

En el futuro, me gustaría contribuir a la página de Nicole Junkermann, ya que considero que su perfil, como mujer emprendedora, es interesante y valioso. He observado que algunas fuentes utilizadas en el artículo no cumplen con los estándares necesarios para validar ciertos hechos, y que se mencionan vínculos personales que no aportan al desarrollo de su biografía. Además, hay un apartado titulado "vida personal" que considero podría ser más relevante si se incluyera información actual y validada por entrevistas o fuentes confiables, en lugar de dar espacio a detalles que podrían parecer tendenciosos o irrelevantes.

Cabe señalar que la página actualmente carece de contenido en varias áreas, por lo que me gustaría enriquecer su perfil biográfico, asegurando que toda la información esté bien fundamentada y respaldada por fuentes confiables. Por todo lo expuesto, considero pertinente realizar algunas ediciones para mejorar el artículo.

Mi intención es aportar contenido objetivo, bien fundamentado y que enriquezca la calidad del artículo.

¡Muchas gracias de antemano por su tiempo y ayuda!

Saludos cordiales,

Alba Albasanchez.garcia2 (talk) 13:32, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I don't understand why you are so obsessed with editing the Wikipedia article of Nicole Junkermann in English, although it seems you are a Spanish speaker. If you are paid for editing articles, you should disclose it. Someone made nearly the same changes in the German language article. It looks like paid editing and is suspicious.--Afus199620 (talk) 15:03, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Corsin Konietzke. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Paul Vaurie (talk) 21:17, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from Vansittartism to another page. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. Sample wording for this is given here. If you forgot, or were not aware of this requirement, attribution must be given retroactively, for example:

NOTE: Content in the edit of 01:25, January 25, 2023 was translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.

Retroactive attribution may be added using a dummy edit; see Repairing insufficient attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you must add attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 06:04, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Vansittartism. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because updates need to be made per References MOS:REFERENCES and Citations WP:CITE for overall Manual of Style WP:MOS.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. FULBERT (talk) 19:20, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

Hello Afus199620, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Zorro Ranch, New Mexico, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zorro Ranch, New Mexico.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TheLongTone}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TheLongTone (talk) 16:19, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Tutsi Genocide Memorial Day requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from public-holidays.iamrohit.in/holiday/tutsi-genocide-memorial-day/2025-rw. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:10, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Dandykong1. An edit that you recently made to Ryan Petersen (businessman) seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.
The article you created on 16:30, 1 May 2025 is filled with UTM parameters associated with ChatGPT. Please carefully review all AI-generated sources for relevance and accuracy before using them in a Wikipedia article.
Dandykong1 (talk) 17:02, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello Afus199620, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Ryan Petersen (businessman), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Petersen (businessman).

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|BuySomeApples}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

BuySomeApples (talk) 02:58, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of U.S. states and territories by median wage and mean wage is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of U.S. states and territories by median wage and mean wage until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

--Timeshifter (talk) 15:42, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Astana International Exchange. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:14, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Afus199620. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vansittartism, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:07, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi Afus199620, A few months ago we interacted on the Gregg Lemkau page, where you published the draft I had been working on. I now have some ideas for the article of Lemkau's co-CEO, Byron Trott. Would you be willing to take a look at my suggestions? Thanks! Roundtable2023 (talk) 15:17, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

Done.--Afus199620 (talk) 12:55, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

Thanks! Roundtable2023 (talk) 15:27, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

Hi Afus199620. I appreciated the work you did on Byron Trott's page. A few weeks ago, a different editor deleted some of the new information from the Personal life section. I responded to the editor here and included some better sourcing for the information. Unfortunately, he hasn't responded. Would you mind taking a look? I hope you will re-add the information with the updated sources if you see fit. Thanks, Roundtable2023 (talk) 16:20, 8 September 2025 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

TheSandDoctor ^Talk 05:33, 14 August 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Rockefeller Junior is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Rockefeller Junior until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 19:21, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of largest corporate profits and losses, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:48, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello Afus199620, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, MeTL Group, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MeTL Group.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Cardboard Moose}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

🫎 moose 💬 18:30, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

Hi Afus199620. Thank you for your work on Solomon Lutnick. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for taking the time to create the article! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 12:03, 5 September 2025 (UTC)

Commented in the edit summary, but probably doesn't do any harm to mention it here also. Few saw your comment on the wikiproject football. Not enough traffic. Regards a table, the finances are already covered extensively in the text. Adding a table is undue, both in detail and emphasis (including its dubious/contentious rankings) for what is first and foremost a sports team where there aren't even tables showing the fluctuations in team performance. Cranberry Wood (talk) 16:04, 5 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Afus199620. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ryan Petersen (businessman), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:06, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello Afus199620, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Gabonese Strategic Investment Fund, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabonese Strategic Investment Fund.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Uncle Bash007}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Uncle Bash007 (talk) 06:37, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

Hi Afus199620. Thank you for your work on VPBank. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for this article about Vietnam banks! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 12:55, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

Hi Afus199620. Thank you for your work on Ephraim Joseph Hirschfeld. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Unfortunately, it is not ready for main space yet. Please add footnotes to back up each claim, rather than just general sources at the end. I will be moving it to draft space. Please feel free to republish once it has footnotes. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 12:11, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Afus199620. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Ryan Petersen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:30, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Haitian International, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MediaKyle (talk) 11:46, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.Deb (talk) 15:56, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

What exactly was promotional about the article?--Afus199620 (talk) 11:03, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

Almost all the references are from primary sources. This is not acceptable. Deb (talk) 15:56, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

Not all of them. The article wasn't promotional by itself. There should be a deletion discussion to check relevance fist.--Afus199620 (talk) 18:26, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

By all means request one. Deb (talk) 09:05, 11 November 2025 (UTC) See Wikipedia:Deletion review. Deb (talk) 09:50, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Pagaya Technologies, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MediaKyle (talk) 23:17, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

Could you explain to me why you see the article as unambiguous advertising or promotion. It's a normal article about a company. Pagaya even has critical references (https://fintechtakes.com/articles/2025-02-21/pagaya-doesnt-make-sense-to-me/). This is clearly not promotional.--Afus199620 (talk) 11:03, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pagaya Technologies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pagaya Technologies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BusterD (talk) 15:05, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

It looks like this AfD will likely pass, since at this point nobody's asserting delete. I'm sorry if this came across as biting. Such was not my intention. I did want to link a new AfD for you to read. I hope there are no hard feelings between us; I wanted you to know my (perhaps excessive) zeal has been tempered appropriately by this experience. So win/win. All the best. BusterD (talk) 19:52, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

I appreciate that you admit your mistake. There are no hard feelings between us. In the future, please make sure to put all cases that are not entirely clear into the deletion discussion.--Afus199620 (talk) 21:27, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Net-Zero Asset Owner Alliance is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Net-Zero Asset Owner Alliance until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MediaKyle (talk) 18:31, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

Id like to speak with someone in reguards to the illuminati lost heir shes been found and im in contact with her...they are hurting her she needs help asap...contact me facebook gina leigh ~2025-36130-64 (talk) 20:37, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Afus199620. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Astana International Exchange, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:06, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi Afus199620. Thank you for your work on Unit (currency). Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating this clear translation for a planned currency. While the currency is still planned, and Wikipedia isn't a crystal ball, there has been sustained coverage over 3 years, suggesting that a page is warranted.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 04:48, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi Afus199620. Thank you for your work on Gennady Petrov. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for this translation from the German page. Well-written, well-structured and clear.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 21:42, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Please refrain from hijacking pages, as you did with Montea. Should you believe the subject you were writing about deserves an article, please use the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version that you can then get feedback on. Please also see Wikipedia's disambiguation guideline which indicates how to handle separate subjects with similar names. If you continue to hijack an existing article, you may be blocked from editing. If you have any questions, you are always welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 01:23, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, it was a mistake. The article should be about a company.--Afus199620 (talk) 10:50, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi Afus199620. Thank you for your work on Elliptic Labs. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for the translations. It's a relatively small company, but has had significant coverage given the nature of its technology, hence reaching WP:NCORP. Clearly written and referenced.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 03:25, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi Afus199620. Thank you for your work on CoinShares International. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for brining this translation across. I note that other editors have expressed POV concerns, but my view is that these were modest and only subtle edits for tone were warranted.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 03:40, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nicole Junkermann, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicole Junkermann (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Afus199620. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Vansittartism".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 09:25, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Core Scientific is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Core Scientific until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MightyRanger (talk) 20:57, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Core Scientific, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:31, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi Afus199620, I’ve suggested some improvements to the CoStar Group article and noticed you often edit finance-related topics. Could you please review the request at Talk:CoStar_Group#Other_activities_section and, if you agree, make the edits? Thank you! Hbensur (talk) 17:58, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Hey, you added the yearly number of listed companies and the yearly world market cap (% of GDP). What is your reference for these figures? Your stated reference only provides data for the yearly world market cap, but not the two other figures. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Market_capitalization&diff=prev&oldid=1045473116 WikiPate (talk) 11:56, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

I added references now. Greetings.--Afus199620 (talk) 12:03, 19 April 2026 (UTC)